Difference between revisions of "Mordechai's Religious Identity/2"
m |
|||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<point><b>"וְרָצוּי לְרֹב אֶחָיו"</b><ul> | <point><b>"וְרָצוּי לְרֹב אֶחָיו"</b><ul> | ||
<li><b>Critique of Mordechai</b> – Bavli Megillah 16b<fn>Followed by Rashi.</fn> explains that Mordechai was acceptable only to "most of his brethren" because some of the Sanhedrin withdrew their support from him once he became second to the king and spent less time studying Torah.  R"Y Kara alternatively suggests that some people blamed Mordechai for his refusal to bow and its consequences.<fn>See <a href="Mordechai's Refusal to Bow" data-aht="page">Mordechai's Refusal to Bow</a> for a discussion of whether Mordechai's decision was justified, according to R. Yosef' Kara's understanding of his motives.</fn></li> | <li><b>Critique of Mordechai</b> – Bavli Megillah 16b<fn>Followed by Rashi.</fn> explains that Mordechai was acceptable only to "most of his brethren" because some of the Sanhedrin withdrew their support from him once he became second to the king and spent less time studying Torah.  R"Y Kara alternatively suggests that some people blamed Mordechai for his refusal to bow and its consequences.<fn>See <a href="Mordechai's Refusal to Bow" data-aht="page">Mordechai's Refusal to Bow</a> for a discussion of whether Mordechai's decision was justified, according to R. Yosef' Kara's understanding of his motives.</fn></li> | ||
− | <li><b>Neutral | + | <li><b>Neutral statement </b>– Rashbam suggests that the verse simply means that he was liked by everyone, while Ibn Ezra suggests that it is impossible for anyone to please everyone.</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
<category>Assimilated Persian | <category>Assimilated Persian | ||
<p>Mordechai was a secular Jew who was completely assimilated into Persian society and initially cared little about his nation.</p> | <p>Mordechai was a secular Jew who was completely assimilated into Persian society and initially cared little about his nation.</p> | ||
− | <mekorot>R. Yaacov Medan<fn>See his article, "‏ומרדכי לא יכרע ולא ישתחוה | + | <mekorot>One option developed by R. Yaacov Medan<fn>See his article, "‏ומרדכי לא יכרע ולא ישתחוה' – מדוע?‏'", in הדסה היא אסתר, (Jerusalem, 5757): 151-171.  This is one of several options raised in the article.</fn></mekorot> |
<point><b>Keeping Mitzvot</b> – R. Medan suggests that Mordechai might have been disconnected from his Judaism and a full part of Persian society.  Though he had the opportunity to return to Israel with the proclamation of Cyrus, he decided against doing so.</point> | <point><b>Keeping Mitzvot</b> – R. Medan suggests that Mordechai might have been disconnected from his Judaism and a full part of Persian society.  Though he had the opportunity to return to Israel with the proclamation of Cyrus, he decided against doing so.</point> | ||
<point><b>"אִישׁ יְהוּדִי"</b> – This approach might suggest that this title has nothing to do with Mordechai's connection to his Judaism, but rather points to his having been exiled from the province of Judea.</point> | <point><b>"אִישׁ יְהוּדִי"</b> – This approach might suggest that this title has nothing to do with Mordechai's connection to his Judaism, but rather points to his having been exiled from the province of Judea.</point> | ||
<point><b>"וּמׇרְדֳּכַי יֹשֵׁב בְּשַׁעַר הַמֶּלֶךְ"</b> – Mordechai had fully acculturated, involving himself in Persian politics and working his way up to a position of prominence in the king's court. The ensuing difficulties in observance did not deter him as he was not attempting to maintain a Jewish lifestyle.</point> | <point><b>"וּמׇרְדֳּכַי יֹשֵׁב בְּשַׁעַר הַמֶּלֶךְ"</b> – Mordechai had fully acculturated, involving himself in Persian politics and working his way up to a position of prominence in the king's court. The ensuing difficulties in observance did not deter him as he was not attempting to maintain a Jewish lifestyle.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Mordechai's name</b> – Mordechai's name, recalling that of the Babylonian god, Marduk, might be evidence of his total assimilation.  Unlike Esther, | + | <point><b>Mordechai's name</b> – Mordechai's name, recalling that of the Babylonian god, Marduk, might be evidence of his total assimilation.  Unlike by Esther, there is not even a record that he had an alternative Hebrew name.</point> |
− | <point><b>Why conceal Esther's religious identity?</b> R. Medan suggests that Mordechai was embarrassed by | + | <point><b>Why conceal Esther's religious identity?</b> R. Medan suggests that Mordechai was embarrassed by their Jewish roots and therefore counseled Esther to hide her origins.  It is possible that Mordechai attempted to hide his own Jewish identity as well, but at some point was forced to reveal it.<fn>It is possible that it is first during the clash with Haman that his own Judaism became known, and beforehand, as he was rising in power, everyone was unaware of it.</fn></point> |
− | <point><b>Mordechai's refusal to bow</b> – This was prompted not by any religious motives but by a personal rivalry with Haman. After having just saved the king's life, Mordechai did not | + | <point><b>Mordechai's refusal to bow</b> – This act of disobedience was prompted not by any religious motives but by a personal rivalry with Haman. After having just saved the king's life, Mordechai did not view himself as inferior to Haman and thus refused to be subservient to him.  He did not give a second thought as to how this might affect his nation.</point> |
− | <point><b>"וַיִּזְעַק זְעָקָה גְדוֹלָה וּמָרָה"</b> – | + | <point><b>"וַיִּזְעַק זְעָקָה גְדוֹלָה וּמָרָה"</b> – This position could posit that this was the turning point in Mordechai's life. When he realized the consequences of his actions, he set out to correct them and, in so doing, returned to both his nation and Hashem.</point> |
− | <point><b>Absence of Hashem in the Megillah</b> – This position might suggest that the absence of Hashem's name in the Megillah reflects | + | <point><b>Absence of Hashem in the Megillah</b> – This position might suggest that the absence of Hashem's name in the Megillah reflects that both Mordechai's and the nation's lives were devoid of devotion to Hashem.</point> |
− | <point><b>Biblical | + | <point><b>Biblical parallels</b> – R. Medan suggests that there are similarities between Mordechai and Moshe.  During the earlier stages of their lives, each was detached from his brethren and had ties to the king's palace.  Moshe may have even been swayed by Yitro's religious beliefs.<fn>R. Medan points to the opinion brought by R. Elazar HaModai in Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael that suggests that he made a pact with Yitro that one of his sons would not be circumcised and raised as a polytheist.  For details see <a href="Mystery at the Malon" data-aht="page">Mystery at the Malon</a>.</fn> Nonetheless at the crucial moment, each one assumes the leadership mantle and dedicates the rest of his life to saving and helping his nation.</point> |
− | <point><b>Religious identity of the whole nation</b> – It is possible that many of the Jews of Shushan were similarly assimilated.  Like Mordechai they had opted to remain in exile, and were perhaps quite comfortable in Persian society.</point> | + | <point><b>Religious identity of the whole nation</b> – It is possible that many of the Jews of Shushan were similarly assimilated.  Like Mordechai, they had opted to remain in exile, and were perhaps quite comfortable in Persian society.</point> |
<point><b>Message of the Megillah</b> – According to this approach, the Megillah is as much a story about a return to Hashem and one's roots as it is about salvation from physical destruction.</point> | <point><b>Message of the Megillah</b> – According to this approach, the Megillah is as much a story about a return to Hashem and one's roots as it is about salvation from physical destruction.</point> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Version as of 23:31, 17 March 2016
Mordechai's Religious Identity
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
The vast majority of commentators assume that Mordechai was not only an observant Jew, but the spiritual leader of Persian Jewry. According to them, Mordechai maintained his piety while serving in a position of political power and also tried to ensure that Esther and the entire nation acted similarly. As such, the Megillah is the story of a righteous hero who helps to save his nation from both physical and spiritual destruction.
A small group of commentators, though, portray Mordechai in a less favorable light. R. Reggio depicts him as a layman who was not a particularly knowledgeable Jew and was willing to compromise his observance for personal gain. Accordingly, it was Esther, rather than Mordechai, who saved the nation, and Megillat Esther tells the tale of life in exile without proper leadership and of how Hashem never abandons His nation. R. Medan goes a step further in presenting Mordechai as a completely assimilated Jew who cared more for his personal honor than his nation. For him, the Megillah records the story of how Mordechai ultimately reconnected with his Jewish roots and conveys the enduring lesson that assimilation does not protect from anti-semitism.
Gadol HaDor (Spiritual Leader of the Generation)
Mordechai was a pious leader of the Jewish community of Persia, who was not only punctilious in his own religious observance but also attempted to aid his brethren in maintaining their faith.
- Rashi asserts that Mordechai thought that hiding Esther's identity would reduce her chances of becoming queen11 and help her avoid the difficulties that palace life would place on maintaining a Jewish lifestyle.
- According to Ibn Ezra, Mordechai felt that if Esther's religious affiliation was not publicly known, she would be better able to keep Hashem's commandments in the palace.12
- Critique of Mordechai – Bavli Megillah 16b19 explains that Mordechai was acceptable only to "most of his brethren" because some of the Sanhedrin withdrew their support from him once he became second to the king and spent less time studying Torah. R"Y Kara alternatively suggests that some people blamed Mordechai for his refusal to bow and its consequences.20
- Neutral statement – Rashbam suggests that the verse simply means that he was liked by everyone, while Ibn Ezra suggests that it is impossible for anyone to please everyone.
Simple Jew
Mordechai was a layman. Though he was not assimilated, he was not particularly knowledgeable in matters of Jewish law.
Assimilated Persian
Mordechai was a secular Jew who was completely assimilated into Persian society and initially cared little about his nation.