Difference between revisions of "Moshe's Birth and the Legend of Sargon/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 5: Line 5:
 
<div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div>
 
<div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div>
 
<h2>Introduction</h2>
 
<h2>Introduction</h2>
Many legends from both the ancient and classical periods share the motif of a hero being abandoned at birth, recalling the story of Moshe's infancy in Shemot 2.<fn>Elements common to many of these tales include: a baby of noble status, abandonment and explanation thereof, unusual nursing or protection of the infant, discovery and adoption, and finally, a list of exploits of the hero.&#160; For an extensive comparison of such legends, see D. B. Redford, "The Literary Motif of the Exposed Child," Numen 14 (1967): 209-228 and Brian Lewis, The Sargon Legend: a study of the Akkadian text and the tale of the hero who was exposed at birth (Massachusetts, 1980).</fn> Of these, the closest parallel is probably the Mesopotamian legend retelling the birth of Sargon, founder of Akkad.<fn>Sargon ruled over Mesopotamia in the 24th-23rd century BCE, but the earliest surviving fragments of the legend date to the much later Neo-Assyrian period (7th century BCE).&#160; This has led to the proposal that the legend may have actually first been been written by the 8th century Assyrian king, Sargon II, who took the name of and identified himself with the original monarch. [See, for example, James K. Hoffmeier, Israel in Egypt: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition (Oxford University Press, 1999): 137.]</fn>&#160; In both stories a mother places her a baby in a basket and sets it on the river.&#160; The baby is drawn from the water by another, adopted, and later grows to become a heroic figure.&#160; A comparison of the two tales serves to highlight both the unique aspects of the Biblical episode and some of the difficulties in the story.
+
Numerous legends from both the ancient and classical periods share the motif of a hero being abandoned at birth, and some of them recall the story of Moshe's infancy in Shemot 2.<fn>Elements common to many of these tales include: a baby of noble status, abandonment and explanation thereof, unusual nursing or protection of the infant, discovery and adoption, and finally, a list of exploits of the hero.&#160; For an extensive comparison of such legends, see D. B. Redford, "The Literary Motif of the Exposed Child," Numen 14 (1967): 209-228 and Brian Lewis, The Sargon Legend: a study of the Akkadian text and the tale of the hero who was exposed at birth (Massachusetts, 1980).</fn> Of these, the closest parallel is probably the Mesopotamian legend recounting the birth of Sargon, founder of Akkad.<fn>Sargon ruled over Mesopotamia in the 24th-23rd century BCE, but the earliest surviving fragments of the legend date to the much later Neo-Assyrian period (7th century BCE).&#160; This has led to the proposal that the legend may have actually first been been written by the 8th century Assyrian king, Sargon II, who took the name of and identified himself with the original monarch. [See, for example, James K. Hoffmeier, Israel in Egypt: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition (Oxford University Press, 1999): 137.]</fn>&#160; In both stories, a mother places her a baby in a basket and sets it on the river.&#160; A stranger then discovers the baby, draws him from the water and adopts him, and the child grows up to become a heroic figure.&#160; A comparison of the two tales serves to highlight both the unique aspects of the Biblical story and some of the difficulties in the narrative.
  
 
<h2>Content Parallels and Contrasts</h2>
 
<h2>Content Parallels and Contrasts</h2>

Version as of 10:37, 29 December 2015

Moshe's Birth and the Legend of Sargon

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Introduction

Numerous legends from both the ancient and classical periods share the motif of a hero being abandoned at birth, and some of them recall the story of Moshe's infancy in Shemot 2.1 Of these, the closest parallel is probably the Mesopotamian legend recounting the birth of Sargon, founder of Akkad.2  In both stories, a mother places her a baby in a basket and sets it on the river.  A stranger then discovers the baby, draws him from the water and adopts him, and the child grows up to become a heroic figure.  A comparison of the two tales serves to highlight both the unique aspects of the Biblical story and some of the difficulties in the narrative.

Content Parallels and Contrasts

Parallels Contrasts
Parents Moshe's mother is from the Levite tribe, and Sargon's mother is a priestess.3 In both stories, the father does not play an active role. While Sargon's father in unknown, Moshe's father is identified. Moreover, while Sargon loses contact with his mother, Moshe's mother continues to nurse him.
Baby Left in River Moshe and Sargon are both placed in a basket covered in bitumen and set in the river. Sargon's mother "cast" him into the "river", suggesting abandonment.  In contrast, Moshe is "placed" in the "reeds", with his sister standing guard.
Background for Abandonment Yocheved's actions are prompted by Paroh's decree to kill all male babies.  No reason is given for Sargon's mother's actions.4
Salvation  Moshe is drawn from the water and adopted by Paroh's daughter, and Sargon is adopted by Aqqi, the water drawer. Moshe is saved by a member of the nobility while Sargon is saved by a commoner. This enables Moshe, born a slave, to move up in status, while Sargon, born to a higher class, moves down.
Unknown Identity Both Sargon and Moshe's full identity are unknown to their saviors. Moshe's Israelite origins are immediately apparent to Paroh's daughter.
Naming Moshe is named by the daughter of Paroh, and his name reflects her drawing him forth from the water.  Sargon's name means "the legitimate king" which might suggest that it was an epithet he gave to himself.5
Interim Profession Before assuming leadership roles, both engage in more common professions. Moshe is a shepherd and Sargon is a gardener.
Rise to Power Both are commissioned by a deity to become leaders of their respective peoples.

Analysis

  • Degree of similarity – 
  • Distinctive phrases – 

Conclusions

Placement of basket – The contrast between Sargon's casting of her child in the water versus Yocheved's placing Moshe in the reeds makes the reader wonder about the motives of each.  N. Sarna6 suggests that Sargon's mother was likely protecting herself rather than the baby.  Being a priestess, she was expected to be chaste and thus had to rid herself of her unwanted illegitimate child.7  Yocheved, in contrast, was reacting to a decree of death, and with tender love, trying to her save her baby. This reading, though, is not totally fair to either text. The fact that Sargon's mother caulked her infant's basket suggests that she, too, might have hoped that her infant would be saved.  Moreover, Shemot leaves Yocheved's intentions unclear.  Was she hoping for Moshe to stay hidden or be found?  Was this an act of despair or hope?

Familial Involvement – A comparison of the stories highlights the continued involvement of Moshe's family in his welfare.  His sister stands guard to discover his fate, and later his mother herself is able to nurse him.  This raises the question of the extent of Moshe's continue relationship with his family even after he moves to the palace.  How much did he know of his Israelite origins?   Did he have a connection to his siblings?  The fact that Aharon comes to greet him after he has moved to Midyan suggests that they did.

Change in status – Moshe's connection to a nation of slaves and the fact that he is found by a royal princess inverts the motif found in the Sargon (and other) legends in which it is a commoner who adopts a baby of originally noble lineage.  N. Sarna points out that most such legends serve a political purpose, to legitimate a usurping king who really has no blood claim to the throne but wants to present himself as having had one.  Sargon's name, "the king is true or legitimate" would support such a claim.8  The Biblical story, obviously, does not share this goal, presenting Moshe as one who rises in status to live in the palace, but then decides to identify with his lowly nation instead.  It suggests that noble birth might not be a necessary prerequisite for leadership, but that a royal upbringing might be advantageous.9