Difference between revisions of "Moshe's Epitaph – Signs and Wonders/2"
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<approaches> | <approaches> | ||
<category name="">Quantity and Quality | <category name="">Quantity and Quality | ||
− | <p>Moshe's feats | + | <p>Moshe's feats surpassed those of all other prophets because they impacted greater numbers of people in more fundamental ways.  This approach subdivides regarding which aspect is emphasized:</p> |
<opinion name="">Abundance | <opinion name="">Abundance | ||
<p>Moshe's miracles were unparalleled due to their sheer numbers, duration,<fn>For example, the manna and pillars of cloud and fire all endured for a full forty years.</fn> and area which they affected.<fn>Ramban, Shadal, and the Hoil Moshe emphasize the vast number of Moshe's miracles. Ramban highlights also their long duration, while Ralbag points to both their enduring quality and the large expanse which they affected.</fn></p> | <p>Moshe's miracles were unparalleled due to their sheer numbers, duration,<fn>For example, the manna and pillars of cloud and fire all endured for a full forty years.</fn> and area which they affected.<fn>Ramban, Shadal, and the Hoil Moshe emphasize the vast number of Moshe's miracles. Ramban highlights also their long duration, while Ralbag points to both their enduring quality and the large expanse which they affected.</fn></p> | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<point><b>Comparison to Eliyahu and Elisha</b> – Eliyahu and Elisha's wonders were indeed more numerous<fn>Almost every story involving Elisha relates to some miracle he wrought for the good of an individual or the nation.</fn> and of longer duration<fn>Eliyahu brings drought for three years, but this is quite short of forty years worth of manna.</fn> when compared to those of Yehoshua, but they still do not rival those of Moshe.</point> | <point><b>Comparison to Eliyahu and Elisha</b> – Eliyahu and Elisha's wonders were indeed more numerous<fn>Almost every story involving Elisha relates to some miracle he wrought for the good of an individual or the nation.</fn> and of longer duration<fn>Eliyahu brings drought for three years, but this is quite short of forty years worth of manna.</fn> when compared to those of Yehoshua, but they still do not rival those of Moshe.</point> | ||
<point><b>Moshe vs. Mashiach – "וְלֹא קָם נָבִיא עוֹד בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל כְּמֹשֶׁה"</b> – Ralbag asserts that the Mashiach will be on a higher prophetic level than Moshe and do greater wonders, most notably resurrecting the dead. He maintains that the verse claims only that for Israel alone there will be none like Moshe. The Mashiach, however, who will serve as prophet for both Israel and the nations, might surpass Moshe in his greatness.<fn>Ramban, in his commentary to Yeshayahu 52 (פרשת הנה ישכיל עבדי) also claims that the Mashiach will be more exalted and knowledgeable than Moshe, but he does not compare the miracles of the two.</fn></point> | <point><b>Moshe vs. Mashiach – "וְלֹא קָם נָבִיא עוֹד בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל כְּמֹשֶׁה"</b> – Ralbag asserts that the Mashiach will be on a higher prophetic level than Moshe and do greater wonders, most notably resurrecting the dead. He maintains that the verse claims only that for Israel alone there will be none like Moshe. The Mashiach, however, who will serve as prophet for both Israel and the nations, might surpass Moshe in his greatness.<fn>Ramban, in his commentary to Yeshayahu 52 (פרשת הנה ישכיל עבדי) also claims that the Mashiach will be more exalted and knowledgeable than Moshe, but he does not compare the miracles of the two.</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Relationship of verses 10 and 11-12</b><ul> | + | <point><b>Syntactic Relationship of verses 10 and 11-12</b><ul> |
<li>Ralbag reads the opening clause "וְלֹא קָם נָבִיא עוֹד בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל כְּמֹשֶׁה" as a proposition which is then supported by the various types of evidence which follow in each of the remainder of v. 10 as well as vss. 11-12. Thus, Moshe's uniqueness was rooted both in his "face to face" encounter with Hashem as well as in the signs and wonders he performed.</li> | <li>Ralbag reads the opening clause "וְלֹא קָם נָבִיא עוֹד בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל כְּמֹשֶׁה" as a proposition which is then supported by the various types of evidence which follow in each of the remainder of v. 10 as well as vss. 11-12. Thus, Moshe's uniqueness was rooted both in his "face to face" encounter with Hashem as well as in the signs and wonders he performed.</li> | ||
<li>Shadal and the Hoil Moshe, in contrast, suggest that the phrase "...לְכָל הָאֹתֹת וְהַמּוֹפְתִים" should be read as the direct continuation of the words "וְלֹא קָם נָבִיא עוֹד בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל כְּמֹשֶׁה", with the intervening clause "אֲשֶׁר יְדָעוֹ ה' פָּנִים אֶל פָּנִים" being only parenthetical.<fn>Hoil Moshe maintains that the "ל" of "לְכָל הָאֹתֹת" is comparable to that in the verse, "וַיִּגְדַּל הַמֶּלֶךְ שְׁלֹמֹה מִכֹּל מַלְכֵי הָאָרֶץ לְעֹשֶׁר וּלְחָכְמָה". Moshe surpassed other prophets in his signs and wonders, just as Shelomo surpassed other kings in his wisdom and wealth.</fn> Thus, the verses are saying that it is specifically with regard to the wonders he performed that no other prophet will compare to Moshe.<fn>Shadal and the Hoil Moshe, thus, opt to deemphasize the uniqueness of Moshe's prophetic capabilities, despite the fact that these seem to be what Bemidbar 12:6-8 highlights as Moshe's singularity.  For other places where Shadal downplays the role of the intellect, displaying his anti-Maimonidean philosophy, see <a href="R._Shemuel_David_Luzzatto_(Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About Shadal</a>.</fn></li> | <li>Shadal and the Hoil Moshe, in contrast, suggest that the phrase "...לְכָל הָאֹתֹת וְהַמּוֹפְתִים" should be read as the direct continuation of the words "וְלֹא קָם נָבִיא עוֹד בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל כְּמֹשֶׁה", with the intervening clause "אֲשֶׁר יְדָעוֹ ה' פָּנִים אֶל פָּנִים" being only parenthetical.<fn>Hoil Moshe maintains that the "ל" of "לְכָל הָאֹתֹת" is comparable to that in the verse, "וַיִּגְדַּל הַמֶּלֶךְ שְׁלֹמֹה מִכֹּל מַלְכֵי הָאָרֶץ לְעֹשֶׁר וּלְחָכְמָה". Moshe surpassed other prophets in his signs and wonders, just as Shelomo surpassed other kings in his wisdom and wealth.</fn> Thus, the verses are saying that it is specifically with regard to the wonders he performed that no other prophet will compare to Moshe.<fn>Shadal and the Hoil Moshe, thus, opt to deemphasize the uniqueness of Moshe's prophetic capabilities, despite the fact that these seem to be what Bemidbar 12:6-8 highlights as Moshe's singularity.  For other places where Shadal downplays the role of the intellect, displaying his anti-Maimonidean philosophy, see <a href="R._Shemuel_David_Luzzatto_(Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About Shadal</a>.</fn></li> | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<point><b>"לְכָל"</b> – Shadal points to this word as evidence that the multiplicity of signs is what made Moshe unique.<fn>The word repeats five times in just two verses, suggesting that Moshe's uniqueness relates to the abundance and scope of his actions.</fn> Ralbag similarly notes that the phrase, "וּלְכָל אַרְצוֹ" is meant to emphasize the extent of the area affected by the miracles.</point> | <point><b>"לְכָל"</b> – Shadal points to this word as evidence that the multiplicity of signs is what made Moshe unique.<fn>The word repeats five times in just two verses, suggesting that Moshe's uniqueness relates to the abundance and scope of his actions.</fn> Ralbag similarly notes that the phrase, "וּלְכָל אַרְצוֹ" is meant to emphasize the extent of the area affected by the miracles.</point> | ||
<point><b>"הָאֹתֹת וְהַמּוֹפְתִים"</b> – According to both Ramban and Ralbag, a "מופת" is a miracle which involves a change in the natural order,<fn>This could include the turning of the staff into a snake and many of the other plagues in Egypt.</fn> and is distinct from an "אות". They differ, though, in their interpretations of an "אות", with Ramban asserting that it is a miracle which a prophet announces in advance,<fn>Thus, Moshe's announcing that frogs or ערוב were to arrive constituted an אות. Ramban explains the etymology of the word "אות" as follows: "על כל הדבר שיקדים הנביא לאמר כן יבוא <b>ויאתה</b> לעתיד".</fn> and Ralbag maintaining that is a wonder intended to persuade the nation to believe in something.<fn>Thus, Moshe's transformation of the waters of the Nile into blood was a sign for the nation to believe in Moshe.</fn></point> | <point><b>"הָאֹתֹת וְהַמּוֹפְתִים"</b> – According to both Ramban and Ralbag, a "מופת" is a miracle which involves a change in the natural order,<fn>This could include the turning of the staff into a snake and many of the other plagues in Egypt.</fn> and is distinct from an "אות". They differ, though, in their interpretations of an "אות", with Ramban asserting that it is a miracle which a prophet announces in advance,<fn>Thus, Moshe's announcing that frogs or ערוב were to arrive constituted an אות. Ramban explains the etymology of the word "אות" as follows: "על כל הדבר שיקדים הנביא לאמר כן יבוא <b>ויאתה</b> לעתיד".</fn> and Ralbag maintaining that is a wonder intended to persuade the nation to believe in something.<fn>Thus, Moshe's transformation of the waters of the Nile into blood was a sign for the nation to believe in Moshe.</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה... הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל"</b> – Ramban maintains that, in contrast to the earlier terms, these do not refer to the plagues of Egypt.<fn>Since those were already mentioned in the previous verse, these terms must be distinct and refer to other miracles.</fn> Instead, "הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה" refers to the miracle of the splitting of the sea where the verse says, "וַיַּרְא יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶת הַיָּד הַגְּדֹלָה"‎,<fn>See Shemot 14:31. Ralbag offers a broader interpretation, including not only the splitting of the Sea but also the miracle of the manna.</fn> while "הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל" refers to the revelation at Sinai whose purpose was to instill fear of Hashem in the nation: "בַעֲבוּר תִּהְיֶה יִרְאָתוֹ עַל פְּנֵיכֶם‎".<fn>See Shemot 20:18. Ralbag explains similarly that the phrase refers to any feat performed to lead the nation to fear God, but he does not mention Matan Torah explicitly. Ramban's choice to highlight Matan Torah together with miracles of the Exodus is logical given that he views both as the twin fundamental events in the formation of the nation and the people's belief in Hashem. One might even suggest that it is the | + | <point><b>"הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה... הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל"</b> – Ramban maintains that, in contrast to the earlier terms, these do not refer to the plagues of Egypt.<fn>Since those were already mentioned in the previous verse, these terms must be distinct and refer to other miracles.</fn> Instead, "הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה" refers to the miracle of the splitting of the sea where the verse says, "וַיַּרְא יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶת הַיָּד הַגְּדֹלָה"‎,<fn>See Shemot 14:31. Ralbag offers a broader interpretation, including not only the splitting of the Sea but also the miracle of the manna.</fn> while "הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל" refers to the revelation at Sinai whose purpose was to instill fear of Hashem in the nation: "בַעֲבוּר תִּהְיֶה יִרְאָתוֹ עַל פְּנֵיכֶם‎".<fn>See Shemot 20:18. Ralbag explains similarly that the phrase refers to any feat performed to lead the nation to fear God, but he does not mention Matan Torah explicitly. Ramban's choice to highlight Matan Torah together with miracles of the Exodus is logical given that he views both as the twin fundamental events in the formation of the nation and the people's belief in Hashem (see Ramban Shemot 13:16 and Devarim 4:9-10). One might even suggest that it is the singular historical impact of these wonders which places Moshe's legacy in a different league than that of all other prophets.</fn></point> |
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
<opinion name="">Audience | <opinion name="">Audience | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<point><b>Comparison to Eliyahu and Elisha</b> – Rambam points to the king of Israel's request that Geichazi tell him of Elisha's miracles<fn>See <a href="MelakhimII8-4" data-aht="source">Melakhim II 8:4</a>.</fn> as proof that most of them were not known to the nation at large and affected only several individuals. Ramban and Abarbanel question this assumption as well, pointing to the drought brought by Eliyahu which affected the entire nation and was known also to neighboring nations.<fn>See Ovadiah's words in <a href="MelakhimI18-10" data-aht="source">Melakhim I 18:10</a> which suggest that Eliyahu's actions were known to surrounding peoples as well. Ramban and Abarbanel further question Rambam from the contest on Mt. Carmel which, they claim, was witnessed by both masses of Israelites and Baal worshipers. Rambam, in contrast, maintains that there were just a handful of people present. Though the verses set the number of Baal prophets at 450, they do not give an exact count of the Israelites, so it is not clear whose reading is correct. Eliyahu, though, does tell Achav to "gather all of Israel", and the chapter several times mentions "all of the nation" acting or speaking. Nonetheless, the word "all" might simply refer to all those who were present.</fn> Here, too, Rambam belittles the prophets' miracles suggesting that the boys who they "brought back to life" had never really died, but were merely extremely sick and in need of resuscitation but not of resurrection.<fn>Rambam asserts that just as the word "חי" can mean both alive and cured, so too the word "מת" can mean not only dead but also extremely sick.</fn></point> | <point><b>Comparison to Eliyahu and Elisha</b> – Rambam points to the king of Israel's request that Geichazi tell him of Elisha's miracles<fn>See <a href="MelakhimII8-4" data-aht="source">Melakhim II 8:4</a>.</fn> as proof that most of them were not known to the nation at large and affected only several individuals. Ramban and Abarbanel question this assumption as well, pointing to the drought brought by Eliyahu which affected the entire nation and was known also to neighboring nations.<fn>See Ovadiah's words in <a href="MelakhimI18-10" data-aht="source">Melakhim I 18:10</a> which suggest that Eliyahu's actions were known to surrounding peoples as well. Ramban and Abarbanel further question Rambam from the contest on Mt. Carmel which, they claim, was witnessed by both masses of Israelites and Baal worshipers. Rambam, in contrast, maintains that there were just a handful of people present. Though the verses set the number of Baal prophets at 450, they do not give an exact count of the Israelites, so it is not clear whose reading is correct. Eliyahu, though, does tell Achav to "gather all of Israel", and the chapter several times mentions "all of the nation" acting or speaking. Nonetheless, the word "all" might simply refer to all those who were present.</fn> Here, too, Rambam belittles the prophets' miracles suggesting that the boys who they "brought back to life" had never really died, but were merely extremely sick and in need of resuscitation but not of resurrection.<fn>Rambam asserts that just as the word "חי" can mean both alive and cured, so too the word "מת" can mean not only dead but also extremely sick.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Moshe vs. Mashiach</b> – Rambam asserts that the Mashiach will approach but not surpass Moshe's abilities. This is compatible with Rambam's understanding that the era of Mashiach will be a natural one and that the Mashiach need not perform miracles or revive the dead.</point> | <point><b>Moshe vs. Mashiach</b> – Rambam asserts that the Mashiach will approach but not surpass Moshe's abilities. This is compatible with Rambam's understanding that the era of Mashiach will be a natural one and that the Mashiach need not perform miracles or revive the dead.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Relationship of verses 10 and 11-12</b> – Rambam reads the introductory phrase "וְלֹא קָם נָבִיא עוֹד בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל כְּמֹשֶׁה" as a general statement which is then supported by the other clauses in the rest of v. 10 and vss. 11-12. Thus, Moshe surpassed others in both his prophetic abilities and his performance of signs and wonders.</point> | + | <point><b>Syntactic Relationship of verses 10 and 11-12</b> – Rambam reads the introductory phrase "וְלֹא קָם נָבִיא עוֹד בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל כְּמֹשֶׁה" as a general statement which is then supported by the other clauses in the rest of v. 10 and vss. 11-12. Thus, Moshe surpassed others in both his prophetic abilities and his performance of signs and wonders.</point> |
<point><b>"לְעֵינֵי כָּל יִשְׂרָאֵל"</b> – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor and Rambam look to the verse's mentioning that Moshe acted "before the eyes of all of Israel" as evidence that this is what distinguished him from others.<fn>Rambam also highlights the fact that the verses speak of two separate audiences – both the enemy Paroh and the nation themselves. The fact that both friend and foe alike were spectators to Moshe's miracles is another factor which made Moshe unique.</fn></point> | <point><b>"לְעֵינֵי כָּל יִשְׂרָאֵל"</b> – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor and Rambam look to the verse's mentioning that Moshe acted "before the eyes of all of Israel" as evidence that this is what distinguished him from others.<fn>Rambam also highlights the fact that the verses speak of two separate audiences – both the enemy Paroh and the nation themselves. The fact that both friend and foe alike were spectators to Moshe's miracles is another factor which made Moshe unique.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>"הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה... הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל"</b> – Neither of these commentators define what specific miracles are referred to by these terms. It is possible that they would suggest that they refer to the miracles of the Exodus, like the preceding verse, and the Torah is merely adding that these miracles were viewed by all, friend and enemy alike.</point> | <point><b>"הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה... הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל"</b> – Neither of these commentators define what specific miracles are referred to by these terms. It is possible that they would suggest that they refer to the miracles of the Exodus, like the preceding verse, and the Torah is merely adding that these miracles were viewed by all, friend and enemy alike.</point> | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
<point><b>Moshe vs. Mashiach</b> – Abarbanel asserts that the Mashiach will surpass Moshe only with regards to the extent of his redemption of the people, but not in his prophetic status. He does not explicitly compare their relative capabilities as miracle workers.<fn>It is unclear if Abarbanel assumes that redemption will come via natural or supernatural means.</fn></point> | <point><b>Moshe vs. Mashiach</b> – Abarbanel asserts that the Mashiach will surpass Moshe only with regards to the extent of his redemption of the people, but not in his prophetic status. He does not explicitly compare their relative capabilities as miracle workers.<fn>It is unclear if Abarbanel assumes that redemption will come via natural or supernatural means.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Does a prophet need to make miracles?</b> Abarbanel asserts that a prophet should not be judged by the miracles he performs since these are brought out of necessity and have nothing to do with the stature of the prophet.<fn>A prophet living in a time of greater need will perform more wonders, while one living in a time of lesser need will bring about less.  However, this has nothing to do with the stature of the prophet.</fn> Abarbanel, nonetheless, attempts to prove how Moshe's wonders were greater than others, but does so by linking them to his prophetic abilities.</point> | <point><b>Does a prophet need to make miracles?</b> Abarbanel asserts that a prophet should not be judged by the miracles he performs since these are brought out of necessity and have nothing to do with the stature of the prophet.<fn>A prophet living in a time of greater need will perform more wonders, while one living in a time of lesser need will bring about less.  However, this has nothing to do with the stature of the prophet.</fn> Abarbanel, nonetheless, attempts to prove how Moshe's wonders were greater than others, but does so by linking them to his prophetic abilities.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Relationship of verses 10 and 11-12</b> – Ramban and Abarbanel suggest that the phrase "אֲשֶׁר יְדָעוֹ ה' פָּנִים אֶל פָּנִים" is coming not merely to praise Moshe's prophetic abilities, but also to explain his manner of bringing miracles. Moshe's direct connection with Hashem is what enabled the wonders to be performed instantaneously.</point> | + | <point><b>Syntactic Relationship of verses 10 and 11-12</b> – Ramban and Abarbanel suggest that the phrase "אֲשֶׁר יְדָעוֹ ה' פָּנִים אֶל פָּנִים" is coming not merely to praise Moshe's prophetic abilities, but also to explain his manner of bringing miracles. Moshe's direct connection with Hashem is what enabled the wonders to be performed instantaneously.</point> |
<point><b>"הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה... הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל"</b> – Abarbanel distinguishes between the "signs and wonders" which refer to the miracles wrought in Egypt and "the strong hand and great fear" which allude to the events of the wilderness and specifically Moshe's biggest wonder, inviting the Divine Providence to dwell amongst Israel. Moshe's power ("הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה") convinced Hashem not to send an angel but to accompany the nation Himself, thereby bringing fear of God ("הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל") upon the people.<fn>Abarbanel also brings an alternative possibility that the "strong hand" refers to the revelation at Sinai, when all of the people were able to prophesy, "כי הנבואה תקרא יד ‏ה'‏".</fn> Abarbanel asserts that this wonder is the greatest type a human can bring.</point> | <point><b>"הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה... הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל"</b> – Abarbanel distinguishes between the "signs and wonders" which refer to the miracles wrought in Egypt and "the strong hand and great fear" which allude to the events of the wilderness and specifically Moshe's biggest wonder, inviting the Divine Providence to dwell amongst Israel. Moshe's power ("הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה") convinced Hashem not to send an angel but to accompany the nation Himself, thereby bringing fear of God ("הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל") upon the people.<fn>Abarbanel also brings an alternative possibility that the "strong hand" refers to the revelation at Sinai, when all of the people were able to prophesy, "כי הנבואה תקרא יד ‏ה'‏".</fn> Abarbanel asserts that this wonder is the greatest type a human can bring.</point> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
<mekorot><multilink><a href="SefornoDevarim34-11-12" data-aht="source">Seforno</a><a href="SefornoShemot3-2" data-aht="source">Shemot 3:2</a><a href="SefornoDevarim34-11-12" data-aht="source">Devarim 34:11-12</a><a href="Seforno" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah Seforno</a></multilink></mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="SefornoDevarim34-11-12" data-aht="source">Seforno</a><a href="SefornoShemot3-2" data-aht="source">Shemot 3:2</a><a href="SefornoDevarim34-11-12" data-aht="source">Devarim 34:11-12</a><a href="Seforno" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah Seforno</a></multilink></mekorot> | ||
<point><b>Comparison to Others</b> – According to this position, there is no reason why other prophets could not outperform Moshe in their wonders. Moshe's higher stature was related to his prophetic abilities,<fn>Moshe's level of prophecy is, in fact, what Bemidbar 12:6-8 highlights as making him unique.</fn> not to his miracles.<fn>This position could explain, like Abarbanel above, that a prophet performs miracles only when needed by the nation and thus, these says nothing about his overall capabilities.</fn></point> | <point><b>Comparison to Others</b> – According to this position, there is no reason why other prophets could not outperform Moshe in their wonders. Moshe's higher stature was related to his prophetic abilities,<fn>Moshe's level of prophecy is, in fact, what Bemidbar 12:6-8 highlights as making him unique.</fn> not to his miracles.<fn>This position could explain, like Abarbanel above, that a prophet performs miracles only when needed by the nation and thus, these says nothing about his overall capabilities.</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Relationship of verses 10 and 11-12</b> – According to Seforno, the verses are not listing the various ways in which Moshe was exceptional, but mentioning just one – his achieving a face to face connection with Hashem. Thus, verses 11-12 are merely a parenthetical explanation of how and when this happened, telling the reader that this process began after Moshe was sent to perform signs and wonders in Egypt and culminated at Mt. Sinai.<fn>Seforno points to the encounter by the burning bush where Moshe feared to look at Hashem as evidence that at this point he had not yet attained the status of face to face contact.</fn> Seforno could interpret the "ל" of "לְכָל הָאֹתֹת" to mean "for the purpose of".</point> | + | <point><b>Syntactic Relationship of verses 10 and 11-12</b> – According to Seforno, the verses are not listing the various ways in which Moshe was exceptional, but mentioning just one – his achieving a face to face connection with Hashem. Thus, verses 11-12 are merely a parenthetical explanation of how and when this happened, telling the reader that this process began after Moshe was sent to perform signs and wonders in Egypt and culminated at Mt. Sinai.<fn>Seforno points to the encounter by the burning bush where Moshe feared to look at Hashem as evidence that at this point he had not yet attained the status of face to face contact.</fn> Seforno could interpret the "ל" of "לְכָל הָאֹתֹת" to mean "for the purpose of".</point> |
<point><b>"הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה... הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל"</b> – The first of these terms refers to the supernatural miracles in the wilderness, such as the splitting of the sea and the manna, while the second refers to the revelation at Sinai. It was only here that Moshe, finally, truly attained the highest level of face to face prophecy.<fn>See Seforno's comments to Shemot 3:2 as well. According to Seforno, Moshe's achieving of this status was a process which began with his being sent to perform wonders in Egypt and climaxed at Mt. Sinai.</fn></point> | <point><b>"הַיָּד הַחֲזָקָה... הַמּוֹרָא הַגָּדוֹל"</b> – The first of these terms refers to the supernatural miracles in the wilderness, such as the splitting of the sea and the manna, while the second refers to the revelation at Sinai. It was only here that Moshe, finally, truly attained the highest level of face to face prophecy.<fn>See Seforno's comments to Shemot 3:2 as well. According to Seforno, Moshe's achieving of this status was a process which began with his being sent to perform wonders in Egypt and climaxed at Mt. Sinai.</fn></point> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Version as of 01:38, 17 October 2014
Moshe's Epitaph – Signs and Wonders
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
Commentators struggle to pinpoint the exact aspect of Moshe's miracle-making which elevated him above other prophets. The various exegetes are influenced by their interpretations of other Biblical miracles, the degree to which they connect Moshe's prophetic status and his wonders, and their understanding of the syntactical difficulties in the text.
Ramban suggests that it was the quantity and duration of Moshe's miracles, while Rambam looks to the broad audience affected by them. Abarbanel, in contrast, asserts that due to Moshe's face to face communication with and always available direct hotline to Hashem, he could work wonders without the need for preparatory prayer. Finally, Seforno maintains that the verses say nothing about the uniqueness of Moshe's miracles, and that they claim only that Moshe surpassed others in terms of his prophetic prowess.
Quantity and Quality
Moshe's feats surpassed those of all other prophets because they impacted greater numbers of people in more fundamental ways. This approach subdivides regarding which aspect is emphasized:
Abundance
Moshe's miracles were unparalleled due to their sheer numbers, duration,1 and area which they affected.2
- Although Yehoshua performed miracles such as splitting the Jordan and making the sun stand still which were on par with Moshe, he did not perform nearly as many wonders as his predecessor. In addition, none of Yehoshua's feats lasted longer than a few hours.
- Ralbag adds that Yehoshua did not really make the sun stop (which would indeed have been a greater miracle than those brought by Moshe), but that he only miraculously sped up the battle, thereby creating an illusion that time stood still. This, though, does not seem to conform to the simple sense of the verses.
- Ralbag reads the opening clause "וְלֹא קָם נָבִיא עוֹד בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל כְּמֹשֶׁה" as a proposition which is then supported by the various types of evidence which follow in each of the remainder of v. 10 as well as vss. 11-12. Thus, Moshe's uniqueness was rooted both in his "face to face" encounter with Hashem as well as in the signs and wonders he performed.
- Shadal and the Hoil Moshe, in contrast, suggest that the phrase "...לְכָל הָאֹתֹת וְהַמּוֹפְתִים" should be read as the direct continuation of the words "וְלֹא קָם נָבִיא עוֹד בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל כְּמֹשֶׁה", with the intervening clause "אֲשֶׁר יְדָעוֹ ה' פָּנִים אֶל פָּנִים" being only parenthetical.6 Thus, the verses are saying that it is specifically with regard to the wonders he performed that no other prophet will compare to Moshe.7
Audience
Moshe's wonders were unique because they were viewed by a wider audience. While most prophets performed miracles for individuals or a small portion of the nation, Moshe's were known to all of the Children of Israel as well as the surrounding nations.
Instantaneous
In contrast to other prophets, Moshe could bring miracles without needing to first pray. Moshe's face to face connection enabled a direct hotline to Hashem and instantaneous implementation.
Not Unique
Moshe's singularity was unconnected to the miracles he performed, and only related to his prophetic powers.