Difference between revisions of "Pinechas – Action and Reward/3"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Topic Manager created an empty topic subpage)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<aht-xml>
 +
 +
<page type="Disagreements">
 
<h1>Pinechas – Action and Reward</h1>
 
<h1>Pinechas – Action and Reward</h1>
 +
<p>These are some of the central points of dispute (נקודות המחלוקת) between the various exegetes:</p>
 +
<disagreements>
 +
 +
<topic>What was the nature of Zimri's sin?
 +
<opinion>Sexual and idolatrous (Philo, Josephus, Abarbanel)</opinion>
 +
<opinion>Sexual only (Maasei Hashem, possibly others)</opinion>
 +
</topic>
 +
<topic>Why did Pinechas take up arms?
 +
<opinion>His own initiative (Bavli Sanhedrin, Netziv)</opinion>
 +
<opinion>He was one of the judges commanded by Moshe (Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, Sifre)</opinion>
 +
<opinion>He was not a judge, but heard Moshe's command (Abarbanel)</opinion>
 +
</topic>
 +
<topic>How exactly did Pinechas's action allay Hashem's anger and halt the plague?
 +
<opinion>Led the people to repent (Seforno)</opinion>
 +
<opinion>Killed the ringleader of the sinners - since Zimri was from Shimon and the tribe of Shimon decreased in numbers (Abarbanel)</opinion>
 +
<opinion>Once Israel was punishing its own sinners, God no longer had to intervene to punish (Hoil Moshe)</opinion>
 +
<opinion>It did not; the plague continued until all sinners had died (Philo, Josephus)</opinion>
 +
</topic>
 +
<topic>What did these Divine promises add that Pinechas did not already possess by virtue of his priestly lineage?
 +
<opinion>Nothing new - just a repetition, like the blessings to the Patriarchs (Hoil Moshe)</opinion>
 +
<opinion>Reassurance that he had not lost his priestly role due to killing (Hizkuni, Abarbanel)</opinion>
 +
<opinion>High priesthood (Sifrei, Hizkuni, Abarbanel)</opinion>
 +
<opinion>Protection from retribution from the families of Zimri and Kozbi (Hizkuni, Abarbanel)</opinion>
 +
</topic>
 +
</disagreements>
 +
</page>
 +
</aht-xml>

Version as of 12:29, 24 April 2018

Pinechas – Action and Reward

Points of Dispute

These are some of the central points of dispute (נקודות המחלוקת) between the various exegetes:

  • What was the nature of Zimri's sin?
    • Sexual and idolatrous (Philo, Josephus, Abarbanel)
    • Sexual only (Maasei Hashem, possibly others)
  • Why did Pinechas take up arms?
    • His own initiative (Bavli Sanhedrin, Netziv)
    • He was one of the judges commanded by Moshe (Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, Sifre)
    • He was not a judge, but heard Moshe's command (Abarbanel)
  • How exactly did Pinechas's action allay Hashem's anger and halt the plague?
    • Led the people to repent (Seforno)
    • Killed the ringleader of the sinners - since Zimri was from Shimon and the tribe of Shimon decreased in numbers (Abarbanel)
    • Once Israel was punishing its own sinners, God no longer had to intervene to punish (Hoil Moshe)
    • It did not; the plague continued until all sinners had died (Philo, Josephus)
  • What did these Divine promises add that Pinechas did not already possess by virtue of his priestly lineage?
    • Nothing new - just a repetition, like the blessings to the Patriarchs (Hoil Moshe)
    • Reassurance that he had not lost his priestly role due to killing (Hizkuni, Abarbanel)
    • High priesthood (Sifrei, Hizkuni, Abarbanel)
    • Protection from retribution from the families of Zimri and Kozbi (Hizkuni, Abarbanel)