Difference between revisions of "Projects – Bereshit 37/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(Import script)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
<h1>Projects – Bereshit 37</h1>
 
<h1>Projects – Bereshit 37</h1>
  
<p style="text-align:center"><a class="pdfleft" rel="external" href="Media/1Bereshit/37/Trial.pdf">Click to view/print PDF version.</a></p>
+
<p style="text-align:center"><a class="pdfleft" rel="external" href="Media/1Bereshit/37/Trial.pdf">Click to view/print a PDF version of this topic.</a></p>
  
 
<category>The Brothers on Trial
 
<category>The Brothers on Trial

Version as of 15:57, 12 May 2014

Projects – Bereshit 37

Click to view/print a PDF version of this topic.

The Brothers on Trial

After students have learned the story of Yosef's sale, review together, as a class, the approaches of Rashi and Rashbam to the sale. See Who Sold Yosef for details. Then have the students stage a trial to determine if the brothers really sold Yosef or not.

  • Divide the class into two groups, those who will work for the prosecution (Rashi) and those who will work for the defense (Rashbam).
  • Provide each with "evidence" in the form of verses and commentaries that support either side. These can relate to:
    • a) The character of the brothers and their relationship to Yosef
    • b) The role of Reuven
    • c) The relationship between the Midianites, Medanites and Yishmaelites
    • d) Later statements by either Yosef or the brothers that relate back to the sale.
  • Each group will choose someone to act as lawyer, others to be witnesses, others to prepare "evidence" such as a bill of sale or the like.

The trial should include the following components:

  • An opening speech where each side presents the main facts of their case
  • Calling of witnesses - Students can choose whomever they want: Reuven, Yosef, Midianites, Yishmaelites, Bilhah, character witnesses, Yaakov, and/or whomever else you think of
  • Cross examination of the other side's witnesses
  • Presentation of evidence wherever relevant
  • A closing speech where each side summarizes and reacts to points brought up in the trial