Difference between revisions of "Purpose of the Service of Vayikra 16/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<div class="overview">
 
<div class="overview">
 
<h2>Overview</h2>
 
<h2>Overview</h2>
<p>The commentators have varying opinions on what the purpose of the Yom HaKippurim service is. R. Saadia&#160;Gaon views the Kohen Gadol's service as exclusively an atonement for Israel's sins. On the other extreme, some consider the service as a purification ceremony for the Mikdash. Most commentators, though, take a middle position claiming that the service was not exclusively atonement for the people or purification of the Mikdash, but rather a combination of the two.</p></div>
+
<p>Commentators debate the main goal of the Yom HaKippurim service is. While R. Saadia&#160;Gaon puts the people at the center, suggesting that all aspects of the rite aim to achieve atonement for Israel's sins, the Hoil Moshe views the rite as aimed at the Mikdash itself, understanding it to be a purification ceremony meant to cleanse the Mikdash of impurities. J. Milgrom takes a middle position, suggesting that the ritual had a dual focus, to both purge the Mikdash of impurity and to expiate the sins of the nation.</p></div>
 
 
 
<approaches>
 
<approaches>
  
 
<category>Atonement for the People
 
<category>Atonement for the People
<p>The central focus of the service was to achieve Atonement for all of Israel, and any part of the service that has to do with purification of the Mikdash is just a means to the ends of Atonement</p>
+
<p>The central goal of the service described in Vayikra 17 is to achieve atonement for the nation's sins.</p>
<mekorot><multilink><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryVayikra16" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryVayikra16" data-aht="source">Commentary Vayikra 16</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink>,</mekorot>
+
<mekorot><multilink><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryVayikra16" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryVayikra16" data-aht="source">Commentary Vayikra 16</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-16" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-1" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:1</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:2</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-3" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:3</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-6" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:6</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-8" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:8</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-16" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:16</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-32" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:32</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="RambanVayikra16-21" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanVayikra16-1" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:1</a><a href="RambanVayikra16-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:2</a><a href="RambanVayikra16-4" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:4</a><a href="RambanVayikra16-18" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:18</a><a href="RambanVayikra16-21" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:21</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="RalbagVayikra16" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagVayikra16" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="ShadalVayikra16-16" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalVayikra16-1" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:1</a><a href="ShadalVayikra16-8" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:8</a><a href="ShadalVayikra16-16" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:16</a><a href="ShadalVayikra16-30" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:30</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink></mekorot>
<point><b>Why start with Nadav and Avihu?</b> To achieve atonement for the people, it is required for Aharon to go into the Holy of Hollies. Since according to&#160;<a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryVayikra16" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><sup class="fnRef mceNonEditable"><a class="ahtNonEditable" href="#fn1">1</a></sup><span class="aht-chrome-space"> explains that Nadav and Avihu were killed for going into the Holy of Hollies, Hashem used them as an example for what could happen if you go into the Holy of Hollies without the accompanying service. </span></point>
+
<point><b>Focus of the ceremony: "לְכַפֵּר עַל בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל מִכׇּל חַטֹּאתָם"</b> – This approach looks to this description of the goal of the day as evidence that the rite was aimed at achieving penance and that the ceremony was focused on the people rather than the Mikdash.<fn>The summary statement of verse 30, too, (כִּי בַיּוֹם הַזֶּה יְכַפֵּר עֲלֵיכֶם לְטַהֵר אֶתְכֶם מִכֹּל חַטֹּאתֵיכֶם לִפְנֵי י"י תִּטְהָרוּ) focuses on purification of the nation rather than a purging of the Temple.&#160; Moreover, the verse emphasizes that this is a purification is from sin.</fn></point>
 +
<point><b>Relationship to the Sin of the Golden Calf</b> – It is possible that the institution of Yom HaKippurim was a direct result of the Sin of the Golden Calf:<br/>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>Tanchuma asserts that the day that Hashem forgave the people for the sin was the tenth of Tishrei<fn>The Midrash assumes that there were three sets of "forty days".&#160; During the first set, Moshe received the initial tablets.</fn> and, in commemoration, Hashem set it to be a day of forgiveness for all future generations as well. </li>
 +
<li>The sin might have further demonstrated the nation's general need for vehicles of repentance and atonement, leading to both the construction of the Tabernacle (a means to atone for transgressions throughout the year) and a national, annual Day of Atonement. In fact, the very first Yom HaKippurim might have even been meant to atone mainly for the sin itself.</li>
 +
</ul></point>
 +
<point><b>"וְכִפֶּר עַל הַקֹּדֶשׁ מִטֻּמְאֹת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל"</b> – This verse implies</point>
 +
<point><b>Why start with Nadav and Avihu?</b> This position might suggest one of two explanations:<br/>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>Commanded then&#160;– It is possible that these laws were commanded right after the deaths of Nadav and Avihu. This day marked the completion of the Tabernacles's construction, the first vehicle for the nation's atonement.&#160; On that very day, Hashem introduced teh second vehicle, Yom HaKippuriim.</li>
 +
<li>Warning – To achieve atonement for the people, it is required for Aharon to go into the Holy of Hollies. Since according to&#160;<a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryVayikra16" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><sup class="fnRef mceNonEditable"><a class="ahtNonEditable" href="#fn1">1</a></sup><span class="aht-chrome-space"> Nadav and Avihu were killed for going into the Holy of Hollies, Hashem used them as an example for what could happen if you go into the Holy of Hollies without the accompanying service. </span></li>
 +
</ul></point>
 +
<point><b>Choice of animals</b></point>
 +
<point><b>White, linen clothing</b></point>
 +
<point><b>When and how often was the ritual enacted?</b></point>
 
<point><b>What sins are being atoned for?</b> The atonement from the service is for all of the sins of Israel.</point>
 
<point><b>What sins are being atoned for?</b> The atonement from the service is for all of the sins of Israel.</point>
 +
<point><b>Role of blood</b></point>
 
<point><b>Is the purification for the people or the place?</b> The purification is for the people exclusively. Any reference to purifying the Kodesh or any part of the Mikdash is not to be understood as purifying the place or objects themselves; instead these objects are facilitating the atonement through the service of the day.</point>
 
<point><b>Is the purification for the people or the place?</b> The purification is for the people exclusively. Any reference to purifying the Kodesh or any part of the Mikdash is not to be understood as purifying the place or objects themselves; instead these objects are facilitating the atonement through the service of the day.</point>
 
<point><b>What is the function of various rituals of the service?</b> All the&#160;rituals&#160;are for the atonement of&#160;the people, and even the text says that specific actions, for example:<multilang style="overflow: auto;">
 
<point><b>What is the function of various rituals of the service?</b> All the&#160;rituals&#160;are for the atonement of&#160;the people, and even the text says that specific actions, for example:<multilang style="overflow: auto;">
Line 22: Line 36:
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
<category>Purification of the Temple
 
<category>Purification of the Temple
<p>The main focus of the&#160;service is to purify the Mikdash from impurity. All issues that deal with atonement are just a byproduct of rectifying the&#160;impurity in the Mikdash.</p>
+
<p>The various rituals were instituted as a means of purifying the Mikdash from impurity.</p>
<mekorot><multilink><a href="RashiVayikra16-16" data-aht="source">Hoil Moshe</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-1" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:1</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:2</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-3" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:3</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-11" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:11</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-16" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:16</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-23" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:23</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-32" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:32</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-34" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:34</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink>,&#160;<a href="http://lib.cet.ac.il/pages/item.asp?item=11737">Milgram&#160;</a></mekorot>
+
<mekorot><multilink><a href="RashiVayikra16-16" data-aht="source">Hoil Moshe</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-1" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:1</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:2</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-3" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:3</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-11" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:11</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-16" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:16</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-23" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:23</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-32" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:32</a><a href="RashiVayikra16-34" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:34</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink></mekorot>
 
<point><b>Why start with Nadav and Avihu?</b> Since the death of Nadav and Avihu caused the Midash and certain utensils to be impure, there is a need to purify them through this service.</point>
 
<point><b>Why start with Nadav and Avihu?</b> Since the death of Nadav and Avihu caused the Midash and certain utensils to be impure, there is a need to purify them through this service.</point>
 
<point><b>What sins are being atoned for?</b> It depends on whether the impurity is a Halakhic or Metaphoric one:&#160;<br/>
 
<point><b>What sins are being atoned for?</b> It depends on whether the impurity is a Halakhic or Metaphoric one:&#160;<br/>
Line 32: Line 46:
 
<point><b>Is the purification for the people or the place?</b> The purification is for the Mikdash that has become impure. Any reference to the atonement of Israel's sins is a means to purify the temple.</point>
 
<point><b>Is the purification for the people or the place?</b> The purification is for the Mikdash that has become impure. Any reference to the atonement of Israel's sins is a means to purify the temple.</point>
 
<point><b>Is there a greater atonement?</b> The biggest issue&#160;with claiming the service on Yom Kippur is solely about purification&#160;of the temple is a later verse of the chapter (16:30):<br/>
 
<point><b>Is there a greater atonement?</b> The biggest issue&#160;with claiming the service on Yom Kippur is solely about purification&#160;of the temple is a later verse of the chapter (16:30):<br/>
<q lang="he" dir="rtl">
+
<q dir="rtl" lang="he">
 
<p>כִּי בַיּוֹם הַזֶּה יְכַפֵּר עֲלֵיכֶם לְטַהֵר אֶתְכֶם מִכֹּל חַטֹּאתֵיכֶם לִפְנֵי י"י תִּטְהָרוּ.</p>
 
<p>כִּי בַיּוֹם הַזֶּה יְכַפֵּר עֲלֵיכֶם לְטַהֵר אֶתְכֶם מִכֹּל חַטֹּאתֵיכֶם לִפְנֵי י"י תִּטְהָרוּ.</p>
 
</q>
 
</q>
Line 39: Line 53:
 
</q>
 
</q>
 
&#160;The verse seems to say that there is a universal atonement that happens on this day which is connected to the service of the day. One way of solving this issue is to say that there is a separate aspect of atonement on Yom HaKippur that has nothing to do with the service done by the Kohen Gadol.<fn>Support for this understanding can be seen in the verses as the mention of the service has to be done on Yom Kippur comes after the service itself. The Meshekh Chokhmah points this out and posets from the Gra that the service was able to be done on other days besides Yom Kippur to purify the temple.1 <br/> Another proof to this is the Mishna Yoma where R. Akiva lauds Israel for being purified by Hashem. Rav Soloveitchik2 understood this as R. Akiva telling the people, in a post-second temple world Israel still gets atonement from Hashem without the service of Yom Kippur. Seemingly, in this understanding, the day of Yom Kippur itself atones for the sins of Israel and the above verse is a declaration of that and not connected to the purification of the Mikdash.</fn>&#160;<sup class="fnRef mceNonEditable"><br/></sup></point>
 
&#160;The verse seems to say that there is a universal atonement that happens on this day which is connected to the service of the day. One way of solving this issue is to say that there is a separate aspect of atonement on Yom HaKippur that has nothing to do with the service done by the Kohen Gadol.<fn>Support for this understanding can be seen in the verses as the mention of the service has to be done on Yom Kippur comes after the service itself. The Meshekh Chokhmah points this out and posets from the Gra that the service was able to be done on other days besides Yom Kippur to purify the temple.1 <br/> Another proof to this is the Mishna Yoma where R. Akiva lauds Israel for being purified by Hashem. Rav Soloveitchik2 understood this as R. Akiva telling the people, in a post-second temple world Israel still gets atonement from Hashem without the service of Yom Kippur. Seemingly, in this understanding, the day of Yom Kippur itself atones for the sins of Israel and the above verse is a declaration of that and not connected to the purification of the Mikdash.</fn>&#160;<sup class="fnRef mceNonEditable"><br/></sup></point>
<point><b>What is the function of various rituals of the service?</b> The function of the various rituals of the service depends on whether the purification of impurity was on a metaphoric or Halakhic level. According to the&#160;<a href="HoilMosheVayikra16" data-aht="source">Hoil Moshe</a>&#160;all of the sacrifices, including the Azazel, were to get rid of Halakhic Tumah and did not atone for any sins.&#160;<a href="http://lib.cet.ac.il/pages/item.asp?item=11737">Milgram</a>, on the other hand, says that there was atonement in specific offerings like the Azazel that would facilitate purification of the Mikdash from the metaphoric impurity&#160;</point>
+
<point><b>What is the function of various rituals of the service?</b> The function of the various rituals of the service depends on whether the purification of impurity was on a metaphoric or Halakhic level. According to the&#160;<a href="HoilMosheVayikra16" data-aht="source">Hoil Moshe</a>&#160;all of the sacrifices, including the Azazel, were to get rid of Halakhic Tumah and did not atone for any sins.&#160;<a href="http://lib.cet.ac.il/pages/item.asp?item=11737">Milgram</a>, on the other hand, says that there was atonement in specific offerings like the Azazel that would facilitate purification of the Mikdash from the metaphoric impurity</point>
 
</category>
 
</category>
<category>A Hybrid: For the People and the Temple
+
<category>Purity and Atonement
<p>Both purifications of the Mikdash and Atonement for the people are done in the Yom HaKippurim service</p>
+
<p>The service was dual focused, meant both to purge the Temple from impurity and to attain atonement for the nation.</p>
<mekorot><multilink><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-16" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-1" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:1</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:2</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-3" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:3</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-6" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:6</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-8" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:8</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-16" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:16</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra16-32" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:32</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="RambanVayikra16-21" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanVayikra16-1" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:1</a><a href="RambanVayikra16-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:2</a><a href="RambanVayikra16-4" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:4</a><a href="RambanVayikra16-18" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:18</a><a href="RambanVayikra16-21" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:21</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="RalbagVayikra16" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagVayikra16" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="ShadalVayikra16-16" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalVayikra16-1" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:1</a><a href="ShadalVayikra16-8" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:8</a><a href="ShadalVayikra16-16" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:16</a><a href="ShadalVayikra16-30" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:30</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink></mekorot>
+
<mekorot>J. Milgrom<fn>See J. Milgrom, The Anchor Bible, Leviticus 1-17 (New York, 1991): 1009-1079.</fn></mekorot>
<point><b>Why start with Nadav and Avihu?</b> It is less straightforward what the connection between the Yom HaKippurim service is and the deaths of Nadav and Avihu, compared to the previous approaches, because their deaths do not have to fit into one way of understanding the service. Therefore, there are different ways to understand the connection, such as:<br/>
+
<point><b>"וְכִפֶּר עַל הַקֹּדֶשׁ מִטֻּמְאֹת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל"</b></point>
<ul>
+
<point><b>"<b>וְהִתְוַדָּה עָלָיו אֶת כׇּל עֲוֺנֹת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל </b>"</b></point>
<li>Nadav and Avihu were killed because they entered the Holy of Hollies with incense. Therefore, since the service requires entry into the Holy of Hollies with incense, recalling the death of Nadav and Avihu stands as a warning for him.<sup class="fnRef mceNonEditable"><sup class="fnRef mceNonEditable"><a class="ahtNonEditable" href="#fn3">3</a></sup></sup></li>
+
<point><b>Connection to Nadav and Avihu?</b></point>
<li>The text mentions the deaths of Aharon's sons because&#160;the command of the Yom HaKippurim service happened on the day of their deaths even though there are many commandments between Nadav and Avihu's demise and the Yom HaKippurim service.<sup class="fnRef mceNonEditable"><a class="ahtNonEditable" href="#fn4">4</a></sup></li>
+
<point><b>When and how often was the ritual enacted?</b></point>
<li>Nadav and Avihu were not killed because they went into the Holy of Holies, but rather because they were disrespectful to honor of the Mikdash.<sup class="fnRef mceNonEditable"><a class="ahtNonEditable" href="#fn5">5</a></sup> Therefore,&#160;the text recalls their deaths before discussing the critical Yom HaKippurim service that is important for honoring the Mikdash and the services are done in it.</li>
+
<point><b>Meaning of "כפרה"</b></point>
</ul></point>
+
<point><b>Choice of animals</b></point>
 +
<point><b>Goat to Azazel</b></point>
 
<point><b>What sins are being atoned for?</b> The sins being atoned for are sins of impurity of the Mikdash and the rest of the sins of Israel.</point>
 
<point><b>What sins are being atoned for?</b> The sins being atoned for are sins of impurity of the Mikdash and the rest of the sins of Israel.</point>
<point><b>Is there a purification of the people or the place?</b> The purification is for the Mikdash and the utensils and for the people of Israel&#160;</point>
+
<point><b>Is there a purification of the people or the place?</b> The purification is for the Mikdash and the utensils and for the people of Israel</point>
<point><b>What is the function of the various rituals?</b> Most commentators are of the same opinion for what the&#160;function of the different sacrifices and libations are during the service. These include:<br/>
+
<point><b>ANE parallels</b></point>
<ul>
 
<li>Aharon's Bull - Was an atonement for Aharon, his family, and the rest of the Kohanim. Then its blood was supposed to be used in purifying the Mikdash</li>
 
<li>The Goat for Hashem - Used for a purifying the Mikdash&#160;</li>
 
<li>The Azazel - was an atonement for all of Israel for all their sins.</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
</approaches>
 
</approaches>
 
</page>
 
</page>
 
</aht-xml>
 
</aht-xml>

Version as of 03:14, 24 December 2019

The Service of Acharei Mot

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Overview

Commentators debate the main goal of the Yom HaKippurim service is. While R. Saadia Gaon puts the people at the center, suggesting that all aspects of the rite aim to achieve atonement for Israel's sins, the Hoil Moshe views the rite as aimed at the Mikdash itself, understanding it to be a purification ceremony meant to cleanse the Mikdash of impurities. J. Milgrom takes a middle position, suggesting that the ritual had a dual focus, to both purge the Mikdash of impurity and to expiate the sins of the nation.

Atonement for the People

The central goal of the service described in Vayikra 17 is to achieve atonement for the nation's sins.

Focus of the ceremony: "לְכַפֵּר עַל בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל מִכׇּל חַטֹּאתָם" – This approach looks to this description of the goal of the day as evidence that the rite was aimed at achieving penance and that the ceremony was focused on the people rather than the Mikdash.1
Relationship to the Sin of the Golden Calf – It is possible that the institution of Yom HaKippurim was a direct result of the Sin of the Golden Calf:
  • Tanchuma asserts that the day that Hashem forgave the people for the sin was the tenth of Tishrei2 and, in commemoration, Hashem set it to be a day of forgiveness for all future generations as well.
  • The sin might have further demonstrated the nation's general need for vehicles of repentance and atonement, leading to both the construction of the Tabernacle (a means to atone for transgressions throughout the year) and a national, annual Day of Atonement. In fact, the very first Yom HaKippurim might have even been meant to atone mainly for the sin itself.
"וְכִפֶּר עַל הַקֹּדֶשׁ מִטֻּמְאֹת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" – This verse implies
Why start with Nadav and Avihu? This position might suggest one of two explanations:
  • Commanded then – It is possible that these laws were commanded right after the deaths of Nadav and Avihu. This day marked the completion of the Tabernacles's construction, the first vehicle for the nation's atonement.  On that very day, Hashem introduced teh second vehicle, Yom HaKippuriim.
  • Warning – To achieve atonement for the people, it is required for Aharon to go into the Holy of Hollies. Since according to R. Saadia Gaon1 Nadav and Avihu were killed for going into the Holy of Hollies, Hashem used them as an example for what could happen if you go into the Holy of Hollies without the accompanying service.
Choice of animals
White, linen clothing
When and how often was the ritual enacted?
What sins are being atoned for? The atonement from the service is for all of the sins of Israel.
Role of blood
Is the purification for the people or the place? The purification is for the people exclusively. Any reference to purifying the Kodesh or any part of the Mikdash is not to be understood as purifying the place or objects themselves; instead these objects are facilitating the atonement through the service of the day.
What is the function of various rituals of the service? All the rituals are for the atonement of the people, and even the text says that specific actions, for example:
EN/HEע/E

וְכִפֶּר עַל הַקֹּדֶשׁ מִטֻּמְאֹת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וּמִפִּשְׁעֵיהֶם לְכׇל חַטֹּאתָם וְכֵן יַעֲשֶׂה לְאֹהֶל מוֹעֵד הַשֹּׁכֵן אִתָּם בְּתוֹךְ טֻמְאֹתָם.

And he shall make atonement for the holy place, because of the uncleannesses of the children of Israel, and because of their transgressions, even all their sins; and so shall he do for the tent of meeting, that dwelleth with them in the midst of their uncleannesses.

The blood libations, which come to purify the sanctuary, really use the sanctuary and the utensils to purify the sins of Israel

Purification of the Temple

The various rituals were instituted as a means of purifying the Mikdash from impurity.

Why start with Nadav and Avihu? Since the death of Nadav and Avihu caused the Midash and certain utensils to be impure, there is a need to purify them through this service.
What sins are being atoned for? It depends on whether the impurity is a Halakhic or Metaphoric one: 
  • Halakhic - There is only atonement for sins directly dealing with the laws of impurity of the Mikdash. (come back) i.e., Entering the Mikdash impure, eating sacrifices in an impure state, etc.3 
  • Metaphoric - When Israel sins they are causing a  There must be atonement for all the sins of Israel that are causing the Mikdash to be 'impure'.4 
Is the purification for the people or the place? The purification is for the Mikdash that has become impure. Any reference to the atonement of Israel's sins is a means to purify the temple.
Is there a greater atonement? The biggest issue with claiming the service on Yom Kippur is solely about purification of the temple is a later verse of the chapter (16:30):

כִּי בַיּוֹם הַזֶּה יְכַפֵּר עֲלֵיכֶם לְטַהֵר אֶתְכֶם מִכֹּל חַטֹּאתֵיכֶם לִפְנֵי י"י תִּטְהָרוּ.

For on this day shall atonement be made for you, to cleanse you; from all your sins shall ye be clean before the Lord.

 The verse seems to say that there is a universal atonement that happens on this day which is connected to the service of the day. One way of solving this issue is to say that there is a separate aspect of atonement on Yom HaKippur that has nothing to do with the service done by the Kohen Gadol.5 
What is the function of various rituals of the service? The function of the various rituals of the service depends on whether the purification of impurity was on a metaphoric or Halakhic level. According to the Hoil Moshe all of the sacrifices, including the Azazel, were to get rid of Halakhic Tumah and did not atone for any sins. Milgram, on the other hand, says that there was atonement in specific offerings like the Azazel that would facilitate purification of the Mikdash from the metaphoric impurity

Purity and Atonement

The service was dual focused, meant both to purge the Temple from impurity and to attain atonement for the nation.

Sources:J. Milgrom6
"וְכִפֶּר עַל הַקֹּדֶשׁ מִטֻּמְאֹת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל"
"וְהִתְוַדָּה עָלָיו אֶת כׇּל עֲוֺנֹת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל "
Connection to Nadav and Avihu?
When and how often was the ritual enacted?
Meaning of "כפרה"
Choice of animals
Goat to Azazel
What sins are being atoned for? The sins being atoned for are sins of impurity of the Mikdash and the rest of the sins of Israel.
Is there a purification of the people or the place? The purification is for the Mikdash and the utensils and for the people of Israel
ANE parallels