Difference between revisions of "Purpose of the Shulchan and Lechem HaPanim/2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
m |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<p>The Tabernacle was built to resemble a human palace, and thus the Shulchan and Lechem HaPanim represent the dining hall of Hashem's abode.</p> | <p>The Tabernacle was built to resemble a human palace, and thus the Shulchan and Lechem HaPanim represent the dining hall of Hashem's abode.</p> | ||
<mekorot><multilink><a href="MidrashAggadahBuberShemot27-11" data-aht="source">Midrash Aggadah (Buber)</a><a href="MidrashAggadahBuberShemot27-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 27:1, #1</a><a href="Midrash Aggadah (Buber)" data-aht="parshan">About Midrash Aggadah (Buber)</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot25-23-30" data-aht="source">Shemot 25:23-30</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:1</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="AbarbanelShemot25-23" data-aht="source">Abarbanel #2</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot25-23" data-aht="source">Shemot 25:23</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink>,<fn>Abarbanel combines this approach with the idea below that the table represented material blessings.</fn> <multilink><a href="SefornoShemot25-23" data-aht="source">Seforno #1</a><a href="SefornoShemot25-23" data-aht="source">Shemot 25:23-29</a><a href="R. Ovadyah Seforno" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah Seforno</a></multilink>, Cassuto</mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="MidrashAggadahBuberShemot27-11" data-aht="source">Midrash Aggadah (Buber)</a><a href="MidrashAggadahBuberShemot27-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 27:1, #1</a><a href="Midrash Aggadah (Buber)" data-aht="parshan">About Midrash Aggadah (Buber)</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot25-23-30" data-aht="source">Shemot 25:23-30</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:1</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="AbarbanelShemot25-23" data-aht="source">Abarbanel #2</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot25-23" data-aht="source">Shemot 25:23</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink>,<fn>Abarbanel combines this approach with the idea below that the table represented material blessings.</fn> <multilink><a href="SefornoShemot25-23" data-aht="source">Seforno #1</a><a href="SefornoShemot25-23" data-aht="source">Shemot 25:23-29</a><a href="R. Ovadyah Seforno" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah Seforno</a></multilink>, Cassuto</mekorot> | ||
− | <point><b>Relationship to other vessels in the Mishkan</b> – R"Y Bekhor Shor and Abarbanel suggest that each section of the Mishkan and its accompanying vessels was equivalent to a different room in a king's palace.  The Bronze Altar represented the the kitchen, outside and far from the king's actual throne.  The | + | <point><b>Relationship to other vessels in the Mishkan</b> – R"Y Bekhor Shor and Abarbanel suggest that each section of the Mishkan and its accompanying vessels was equivalent to a different room in a king's palace.  The Bronze Altar represented the the kitchen, outside and far from the king's actual throne.  The Outer Sanctum (הקדש) with the Table, Menorah and Incense was like a living room, providing food, light, and spices as servants entered.  Finally, the Inner Sanctum (קדש הקדשים) and the Ark symbolize the king's private abode and throne, to which he alone had access.</point> |
− | <point><b>Does Hashem need a house?</b> Midrash Aggadah asserts that Hashem had no need for such a structure and that in fact, the request to build a house stemmed not from Him but from the people.  Since the nation only knew how to relate to Hashem via human models of relationship, they thought to honor God in the way that subjects glorify a king, by building him a palace.</point> | + | <point><b>Does Hashem need a house?</b> Midrash Aggadah asserts that Hashem had no need for such a structure and that, in fact, the request to build a house stemmed not from Him but from the people.  Since the nation only knew how to relate to Hashem via human models of relationship, they thought to honor God in the way that subjects glorify a king, by building him a palace.</point> |
− | <point><b>Secondary vessels - "קְּעָרֹתָיו וְכַפֹּתָיו וּקְשׂוֹתָיו וּמְנַקִּיֹּתָיו "</b><ul> | + | <point><b>Secondary vessels - "קְּעָרֹתָיו וְכַפֹּתָיו וּקְשׂוֹתָיו וּמְנַקִּיֹּתָיו "</b> – Most of these sources<fn>Abarbanel does not offer his own opinion, but brings the explanation of Rashi, following Menachot, that the "קשות" and "מנקיות"were part of the Tables' structure, serving as racks to hold the bread.</fn> maintain that these vessels were placed on top of the Shulchan,<fn>See <a href="Shemot37-10-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 37:16</a></fn> much like any king's table might be adorned with golden ware.<br/> |
− | <li>According to Cassuto the "קערות" and "כפות" were plates or bowls of varying size, while the "קשות"and "מנקיות"  were vessels to hold libations.  He asserts that similar vessels were found on tables in pagan temples, where they would be filled with food | + | <ul> |
− | <li>R"Y Bekhor Shor, in contrast, suggest | + | <li>According to Cassuto the "קערות" and "כפות" were plates or bowls of varying size, while the "קשות"and "מנקיות"  were vessels to hold libations.  He asserts that similar vessels were found on tables in pagan temples, where they would be filled with food and thought  to be necessary sustenance for the gods.  Here, in contrast, the vessels were intentionally left empty to show that Hashem has no need for food.</li> |
+ | <li>R"Y Bekhor Shor, in contrast, suggest that the various vessels were used during the process of making the Lechem HaPanim.  The קשות held water for kneading the dough<fn>He understands the phrase "אֲשֶׁר יֻסַּךְ בָּהֵן" to refer back to the "קשות" rather than the "מנקיות",leading to his suggestion that they played a role related to the pouring of a liquid.  This is supported by the parallel verse in <a href="Shemot37-10-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 37:16</a> in which the term ""אֲשֶׁר יֻסַּךְ בָּהֵן" is juxtaposed to the word "קשות"and by the phrase "קְשׂוֹת הַנָּסֶךְ" in <a href="Bemidbar4-7" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 4:7</a>.</fn> which took place in the קערות, while the "קשות" held the frankinsence<fn>See <a href="Vayikra24-5-9" data-aht="source">Vayikra 24:5-9</a> that this was poured over the breads.</fn> and the מנקיות were used to clean the Table.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Priestly eating of the bread</b> – Cassuto explains that the</point> | <point><b>Priestly eating of the bread</b> – Cassuto explains that the</point> |
Version as of 10:24, 10 February 2016
Purpose of the Shulchan and Lechem HaPanim
Exegetical Approaches
Regalia of Hashem's Earthly Palace
The Tabernacle was built to resemble a human palace, and thus the Shulchan and Lechem HaPanim represent the dining hall of Hashem's abode.
Relationship to other vessels in the Mishkan – R"Y Bekhor Shor and Abarbanel suggest that each section of the Mishkan and its accompanying vessels was equivalent to a different room in a king's palace. The Bronze Altar represented the the kitchen, outside and far from the king's actual throne. The Outer Sanctum (הקדש) with the Table, Menorah and Incense was like a living room, providing food, light, and spices as servants entered. Finally, the Inner Sanctum (קדש הקדשים) and the Ark symbolize the king's private abode and throne, to which he alone had access.
Does Hashem need a house? Midrash Aggadah asserts that Hashem had no need for such a structure and that, in fact, the request to build a house stemmed not from Him but from the people. Since the nation only knew how to relate to Hashem via human models of relationship, they thought to honor God in the way that subjects glorify a king, by building him a palace.
Secondary vessels - "קְּעָרֹתָיו וְכַפֹּתָיו וּקְשׂוֹתָיו וּמְנַקִּיֹּתָיו " – Most of these sources2 maintain that these vessels were placed on top of the Shulchan,3 much like any king's table might be adorned with golden ware.
- According to Cassuto the "קערות" and "כפות" were plates or bowls of varying size, while the "קשות"and "מנקיות" were vessels to hold libations. He asserts that similar vessels were found on tables in pagan temples, where they would be filled with food and thought to be necessary sustenance for the gods. Here, in contrast, the vessels were intentionally left empty to show that Hashem has no need for food.
- R"Y Bekhor Shor, in contrast, suggest that the various vessels were used during the process of making the Lechem HaPanim. The קשות held water for kneading the dough4 which took place in the קערות, while the "קשות" held the frankinsence5 and the מנקיות were used to clean the Table.
Priestly eating of the bread – Cassuto explains that the
אֲשֶׁר יֻסַּךְ בָּהֵן
לֶחֶם פָּנִים
תָּמִיד
בְּרִית עוֹלָם
Symbolism of twelve?
Symbol of Material Blessings
The Table and Showbread symbolize that Hashem is the source of sustenance for all of mankind.
Sign of Covenant
The Lechem HaPanim constitutes a covenant sealing meal which renews the eternal covenant between the nation and Hashem.
Sources:R. Yechieli