Difference between revisions of "Purposes of the Egyptian Bondage/3/en"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
<disagreements>
 
<disagreements>
 
<!--
 
<topic>
 
<opinion></opinion>
 
<opinion></opinion>
 
<opinion></opinion>
 
</topic>
 
 
-->
 
  
 
<topic>Religious identity of the Israelites in Egypt
 
<topic>Religious identity of the Israelites in Egypt

Version as of 07:53, 8 January 2015

Purposes of the Egyptian Bondage

Points of Dispute

This page is a stub.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.

These are some of the central points of dispute (נקודות המחלוקת) between the various exegetes:

  • Religious identity of the Israelites in Egypt
    • Completely righteous – Ran, R. Chasdai Crescas, Tzeror HaMor, Malbim
    • Needed to be taught belief in Hashem – Ralbag, Ma'asei Hashem
    • Assimilated and idolatrous – Radak, Nimmukei Yosef, Seforno, Netziv
  • Does Hashem punish children for the sins of fathers?
    • Yes – Three Amoraic opinions in Bavli Nedarim, Vayikra Rabbah, Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, Tanchuma, R. Yochanan b. Zakkai in Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer (Higger), Ramban, Mishnat Rabbi Eliezer, Opinion cited (and rejected) by Akeidat Yitzchak, Abarbanel (Approach #1)1
    • No – Akeidat Yitzchak, Abarbanel
  • Collective punishment
    • Yes – Abarbanel (Approach #1)
    • No – Akeidat Yitzchak
  • Afflictions without sin?
    • Yes – Rashi, Ran, R. Chasdai Crescas
    • No – Ramban
  • Why in Egypt?
    • Ma'aseh Avot Siman LeBanim – Ramban
    • Measure for measure – Abarbanel (Approach #1)
    • Egypt was the world's leading center of idolatry – R. Chasdai Crescas, Abarbanel (Approach #2)
    • The Egyptians were xenophobic and this prevented assimilation – Zohar, Seforno, R. Hirsch, Immanueli