Difference between revisions of "Purposes of the Egyptian Bondage/3/en"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<disagreements> | <disagreements> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<topic>Religious identity of the Israelites in Egypt | <topic>Religious identity of the Israelites in Egypt |
Version as of 07:53, 8 January 2015
Purposes of the Egyptian Bondage
Points of Dispute
This page is a stub.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.
These are some of the central points of dispute (נקודות המחלוקת) between the various exegetes:
- Religious identity of the Israelites in Egypt
- Completely righteous – Ran, R. Chasdai Crescas, Tzeror HaMor, Malbim
- Needed to be taught belief in Hashem – Ralbag, Ma'asei Hashem
- Assimilated and idolatrous – Radak, Nimmukei Yosef, Seforno, Netziv
- Does Hashem punish children for the sins of fathers?
- Yes – Three Amoraic opinions in Bavli Nedarim, Vayikra Rabbah, Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, Tanchuma, R. Yochanan b. Zakkai in Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer (Higger), Ramban, Mishnat Rabbi Eliezer, Opinion cited (and rejected) by Akeidat Yitzchak, Abarbanel (Approach #1)1
- No – Akeidat Yitzchak, Abarbanel
- Collective punishment
- Yes – Abarbanel (Approach #1)
- No – Akeidat Yitzchak
- Afflictions without sin?
- Yes – Rashi, Ran, R. Chasdai Crescas
- No – Ramban
- Why in Egypt?
- Ma'aseh Avot Siman LeBanim – Ramban
- Measure for measure – Abarbanel (Approach #1)
- Egypt was the world's leading center of idolatry – R. Chasdai Crescas, Abarbanel (Approach #2)
- The Egyptians were xenophobic and this prevented assimilation – Zohar, Seforno, R. Hirsch, Immanueli