Difference between revisions of "Purposes of the Egyptian Bondage/3/he"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 33: Line 33:
 
<opinion>The Egyptians were xenophobic and this prevented assimilation – Zohar, Seforno, R. Hirsch, Immanueli</opinion>
 
<opinion>The Egyptians were xenophobic and this prevented assimilation – Zohar, Seforno, R. Hirsch, Immanueli</opinion>
 
</topic>
 
</topic>
 +
 +
</disagreements>
  
 
</page>
 
</page>
 
</aht-xml>
 
</aht-xml>

Version as of 07:58, 8 January 2015

מטרות שעבוד מצרים

נקודות המחלוקת

These are some of the central points of dispute (נקודות המחלוקת) between the various exegetes:

  • Religious identity of the Israelites in Egypt
    • Completely righteous – Ran, R. Chasdai Crescas, Tzeror HaMor, Malbim
    • Needed to be taught belief in Hashem – Ralbag, Ma'asei Hashem
    • Assimilated and idolatrous – Radak, Nimmukei Yosef, Seforno, Netziv
  • Does Hashem punish children for the sins of fathers?
    • Yes – Three Amoraic opinions in Bavli Nedarim, Vayikra Rabbah, Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, Tanchuma, R. Yochanan b. Zakkai in Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer (Higger), Ramban, Mishnat Rabbi Eliezer, Opinion cited (and rejected) by Akeidat Yitzchak, Abarbanel (Approach #1)1
    • No – Akeidat Yitzchak, Abarbanel
  • Collective punishment
    • Yes – Abarbanel (Approach #1)
    • No – Akeidat Yitzchak
  • Afflictions without sin?
    • Yes – Rashi, Ran, R. Chasdai Crescas
    • No – Ramban
  • Why in Egypt?
    • Ma'aseh Avot Siman LeBanim – Ramban
    • Measure for measure – Abarbanel (Approach #1)
    • Egypt was the world's leading center of idolatry – R. Chasdai Crescas, Abarbanel (Approach #2)
    • The Egyptians were xenophobic and this prevented assimilation – Zohar, Seforno, R. Hirsch, Immanueli