Difference between revisions of "Rachel's Stealing of the Terafim/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 11: Line 11:
 
<mekorot><multilink><a href="TanchumaVayetze12" data-aht="source">Tanchuma #1</a><a href="TanchumaVayetze12" data-aht="source">Vayetze 12</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, Tosafists, <multilink><a href="RadakBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="RadakBereshit31-30" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:30</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>, Ralbag #2,</mekorot>
 
<mekorot><multilink><a href="TanchumaVayetze12" data-aht="source">Tanchuma #1</a><a href="TanchumaVayetze12" data-aht="source">Vayetze 12</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, Tosafists, <multilink><a href="RadakBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="RadakBereshit31-30" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:30</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>, Ralbag #2,</mekorot>
 
<point><b>What are terafim?</b> According to these commentators the terafim were objects used for divination.<fn>The commentators differ regarding how they think the terafim were created and worked. Tanchuma describes an elaborate process including a dead person, spices, names of impure spirits and candles.&#160; Ibn Ezra and Ralbag, in contrast, point to the story of <a href="ShemuelI19-11-17" data-aht="source">Michal's saving of David</a>, to prove that they took the form of men, but do not think that they were an actual person.</fn>&#160; As evidence, Rashbam points to <a href="Zekharyah10-2" data-aht="source">Zekharyah 10:2</a> which mentions "terafim speaking" and to <a href="Hoshea3-4" data-aht="source">Hoshea 3:4</a>, which pairs them with the "אֵפוֹד", another item associated with divination.<fn>Ramban further points to the story of "פסל מיכה" in&#160;<a href="Shofetim18-11-26" data-aht="source">Shofetim 18</a> in which they are also mentioned together with the "אֵפוֹד", and the people of Dan explicitly talk of divining whether they will succeed on their way.</fn> Tanchuma asserts that they are called "תְּרָפִים" because they are a "מַעֲשֵׂה תֹרֶף", an object of impurity.&#160; Ramban, in contrast, suggests that the term comes from the fact that their words are like a weak prophecy (נבואה רפה) and not very reliable.</point>
 
<point><b>What are terafim?</b> According to these commentators the terafim were objects used for divination.<fn>The commentators differ regarding how they think the terafim were created and worked. Tanchuma describes an elaborate process including a dead person, spices, names of impure spirits and candles.&#160; Ibn Ezra and Ralbag, in contrast, point to the story of <a href="ShemuelI19-11-17" data-aht="source">Michal's saving of David</a>, to prove that they took the form of men, but do not think that they were an actual person.</fn>&#160; As evidence, Rashbam points to <a href="Zekharyah10-2" data-aht="source">Zekharyah 10:2</a> which mentions "terafim speaking" and to <a href="Hoshea3-4" data-aht="source">Hoshea 3:4</a>, which pairs them with the "אֵפוֹד", another item associated with divination.<fn>Ramban further points to the story of "פסל מיכה" in&#160;<a href="Shofetim18-11-26" data-aht="source">Shofetim 18</a> in which they are also mentioned together with the "אֵפוֹד", and the people of Dan explicitly talk of divining whether they will succeed on their way.</fn> Tanchuma asserts that they are called "תְּרָפִים" because they are a "מַעֲשֵׂה תֹרֶף", an object of impurity.&#160; Ramban, in contrast, suggests that the term comes from the fact that their words are like a weak prophecy (נבואה רפה) and not very reliable.</point>
<point><b>לָמָּה גָנַבְתָּ אֶת אֱלֹהָי</b> – Ramban asserts that many people would make the terafim into gods,acting only upon their word and believing in them., much the way the Israelites strayed after the "אֵפוֹד" set up by Gideon.&#160; Thus, too, Lavan might have considered the terafim as gods, even if they were not intended as such.</point>
+
<point><b>לָמָּה גָנַבְתָּ אֶת אֱלֹהָי</b> – Ramban asserts that many people would make the terafim into gods,acting only upon their word and believing in them., much the way the Israelites strayed after the "אֵפוֹד" set up by Gideon.<fn>See <a href="Shofetim8-24-27" data-aht="source">Shofetim 8:24-27</a>.</fn>&#160; Thus, too, Lavan might have considered the terafim as gods, even if they were not intended as such.</point>
<point><b>Sitting on the terafim</b></point>
+
<point><b>Belief in magic and divination</b> – According to most of these sources the terafim really did have the ability to speak or share the future, albeit often incorrectly.&#160; Ralbag, in contrast, asserts that the magician using the terafim merely imagined it talking.</point>
<point><b>Belief in magic and divination</b></point>
+
<point><b>Sitting on the terafim</b> – According to Tosafot, Rachel sat upon the terafim with force to prevent their crying out and telling Lavan where they were.</point>
 
<point><b>Evaluation of Rachel's actions</b></point>
 
<point><b>Evaluation of Rachel's actions</b></point>
 
<point><b>Religiosity of the forefathers</b></point>
 
<point><b>Religiosity of the forefathers</b></point>

Version as of 12:36, 18 November 2015

Rachel's Stealing of the Terafim

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Survival

Rachel stole the terafim so that her father could not use them to divine where the family had fled.

What are terafim? According to these commentators the terafim were objects used for divination.1  As evidence, Rashbam points to Zekharyah 10:2 which mentions "terafim speaking" and to Hoshea 3:4, which pairs them with the "אֵפוֹד", another item associated with divination.2 Tanchuma asserts that they are called "תְּרָפִים" because they are a "מַעֲשֵׂה תֹרֶף", an object of impurity.  Ramban, in contrast, suggests that the term comes from the fact that their words are like a weak prophecy (נבואה רפה) and not very reliable.
לָמָּה גָנַבְתָּ אֶת אֱלֹהָי – Ramban asserts that many people would make the terafim into gods,acting only upon their word and believing in them., much the way the Israelites strayed after the "אֵפוֹד" set up by Gideon.3  Thus, too, Lavan might have considered the terafim as gods, even if they were not intended as such.
Belief in magic and divination – According to most of these sources the terafim really did have the ability to speak or share the future, albeit often incorrectly.  Ralbag, in contrast, asserts that the magician using the terafim merely imagined it talking.
Sitting on the terafim – According to Tosafot, Rachel sat upon the terafim with force to prevent their crying out and telling Lavan where they were.
Evaluation of Rachel's actions
Religiosity of the forefathers

Religious Motivations

Economic Advantage

The terafim testified to Yaakov's rights to Lavan's inheritance.

Sources:Modern scholars