Difference between revisions of "Rachel's Stealing of the Terafim/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 10: Line 10:
 
<p>Rachel stole the terafim so that her father could not use them to divine where the family had fled.</p>
 
<p>Rachel stole the terafim so that her father could not use them to divine where the family had fled.</p>
 
<mekorot><multilink><a href="TanchumaVayetze12" data-aht="source">Tanchuma #1</a><a href="TanchumaVayetze12" data-aht="source">Vayetze 12</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, Tosafists, <multilink><a href="RadakBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="RadakBereshit31-30" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:30</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>, Ralbag #2,</mekorot>
 
<mekorot><multilink><a href="TanchumaVayetze12" data-aht="source">Tanchuma #1</a><a href="TanchumaVayetze12" data-aht="source">Vayetze 12</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, Tosafists, <multilink><a href="RadakBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="RadakBereshit31-30" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:30</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit31-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 31:19</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>, Ralbag #2,</mekorot>
<point><b>What are terafim?</b> According to these commentators the terafim were objects used for divination.<fn>The commentators differ regarding how they think the terafim were created and worked. Tanchuma describes an elaborate process including a dead person, spices, names of impure spirits and candles.&#160; Ibn Ezra and Ralbag, in contrast, point to the story of <a href="ShemuelI19-11-17" data-aht="source">Michal's saving of David</a>, to prove that they took the form of men, but do not think that they were an actual person.</fn>&#160; As evidence, Rashbam points to <a href="Zekharyah10-2" data-aht="source">Zekharyah 10:2</a> which mentions "terafim speaking" and to <a href="Hoshea3-4" data-aht="source">Hoshea 3:4</a>, which pairs them with the "אֵפוֹד", another item associated with divination.<fn>Ramban further points to the story of "פסל מיכה" in&#160;<a href="Shofetim18-11-26" data-aht="source">Shofetim 18</a> in which they are also mentioned together with the "אֵפוֹד", and the people of Dan explicitly talk of divining whether they will succeed on their way.</fn> Tanchuma asserts that they are called "תְּרָפִים" because they are a "מַעֲשֵׂה תֹרֶף", an object of impurity.&#160; Ramban, in contrast, suggests that the term comes from the fact that their words are like a weak prophecy (נבואה רפה) and not very reliable.</point>
+
<point><b>What are terafim?</b> According to these commentators the terafim were objects used for divination.<fn>The commentators differ regarding how they think the terafim worked. Tanchuma describes an elaborate process including a dead person, spices, names of impure spirits and candles.&#160; Ibn Ezra and Ralbag, looking to the story of <a href="ShemuelI19-11-17" data-aht="source">Michal's saving of David</a>, suggest instead that they took the form of men, but do not think that they were an actual person.</fn>&#160; As evidence, Rashbam points to <a href="Zekharyah10-2" data-aht="source">Zekharyah 10:2</a> which mentions "terafim speaking" and to <a href="Hoshea3-4" data-aht="source">Hoshea 3:4</a>, which pairs them with the "אֵפוֹד", another item associated with divination.<fn>Ramban further points to the story of "פסל מיכה" in&#160;<a href="Shofetim18-11-26" data-aht="source">Shofetim 18</a> in which they are also mentioned together with the "אֵפוֹד", and the people of Dan explicitly talk of divining whether they will succeed on their way.</fn> Tanchuma asserts that they are called "תְּרָפִים" because they are a "מַעֲשֵׂה תֹרֶף", an object of impurity.&#160; Ramban, in contrast, suggests that the term comes from the fact that their words are like a weak prophecy (נבואה רפה) and not very reliable.</point>
<point><b>לָמָּה גָנַבְתָּ אֶת אֱלֹהָי</b> – Ramban asserts that many people would turn their terafim into gods, acting upon their word and believing in them, much the way the Israelites strayed after the "אֵפוֹד" set up by Gideon.<fn>See <a href="Shofetim8-24-27" data-aht="source">Shofetim 8:24-27</a>.</fn>&#160; Thus, too, Lavan might have considered and referred to the terafim as gods, even if they were not originally intended as such.</point>
+
<point><b>"לָמָּה גָנַבְתָּ אֶת אֱלֹהָי"</b> – Ramban asserts that many people would turn their terafim into gods, acting upon their word and believing in them, much the way the Israelites strayed after the "אֵפוֹד" set up by Gideon.<fn>See <a href="Shofetim8-24-27" data-aht="source">Shofetim 8:24-27</a>.</fn>&#160; Thus, too, Lavan might have considered and referred to the terafim as gods, even if they were not originally intended as such.<fn>Yaakov similarly refers to them as gods, "עִם אֲשֶׁר תִּמְצָא אֶת אֱלֹהֶיךָ לֹא יִחְיֶה" probably because Lavan had done so.</fn> Radak similarly suggests that Lavan referred to them as gods because he trusted in them as one would in the word of God.</point>
<point><b>Belief in magic and divination</b> – According to most of these sources the terafim really did have the ability to speak or share the future, albeit often incorrectly.&#160; Ralbag, in contrast, asserts that the magician using the terafim merely imagined it talking,<fn>He objects to the possibility that anything not given a mouth by God could actually talk.</fn> while Ibn Ezra assumes that Lavan's divination was related to his astronomical abilities.<fn>He does not explain the exact connection between the use of the terafim and reading the stars.</fn></point>
+
<point><b>Belief in magic and divination</b> – According to most of these sources the terafim really did have the ability to speak or tell the future, albeit often incorrectly.&#160; Ralbag, in contrast, asserts that the magician using the terafim merely imagined it talking,<fn>He objects to the possibility that anything not given a mouth by God could actually talk.</fn> while Ibn Ezra assumes that Lavan's divination was related to his astronomical abilities.<fn>He does not explain the exact connection between the use of the terafim and reading the stars.</fn></point>
<point><b>Sitting on the terafim</b> – According to Tosafot, Rachel sat upon the terafim with force to prevent their crying out and telling Lavan where they were.</point>
+
<point><b>Sitting on the terafim</b> – According to Tosafot, Rachel sat upon the terafim with force to prevent their crying out and telling Lavan where they were.&#160; Ralbag and Ibn Ezra would more simply suggest that this was just a good way of hiding them from her father.</point>
<point><b>Evaluation of Rachel's actions</b></point>
+
<point><b>Evaluation of Rachel's actions</b> – This approach might view Rachel's intentions as meritorious as she was attempting to protect her family.&#160; Radak, though, suggests that she shoudl nonetheless not have stolen</point>
 
<point><b>Religiosity of the forefathers</b></point>
 
<point><b>Religiosity of the forefathers</b></point>
 
<point><b>Parallel case - Michal and the terafim</b> – If the terafim were impure items used for magical purposes, it is not clear why they should have been present in the ome of Michal and David.</point>
 
<point><b>Parallel case - Michal and the terafim</b> – If the terafim were impure items used for magical purposes, it is not clear why they should have been present in the ome of Michal and David.</point>

Version as of 23:21, 18 November 2015

Rachel's Stealing of the Terafim

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Survival

Rachel stole the terafim so that her father could not use them to divine where the family had fled.

What are terafim? According to these commentators the terafim were objects used for divination.1  As evidence, Rashbam points to Zekharyah 10:2 which mentions "terafim speaking" and to Hoshea 3:4, which pairs them with the "אֵפוֹד", another item associated with divination.2 Tanchuma asserts that they are called "תְּרָפִים" because they are a "מַעֲשֵׂה תֹרֶף", an object of impurity.  Ramban, in contrast, suggests that the term comes from the fact that their words are like a weak prophecy (נבואה רפה) and not very reliable.
"לָמָּה גָנַבְתָּ אֶת אֱלֹהָי" – Ramban asserts that many people would turn their terafim into gods, acting upon their word and believing in them, much the way the Israelites strayed after the "אֵפוֹד" set up by Gideon.3  Thus, too, Lavan might have considered and referred to the terafim as gods, even if they were not originally intended as such.4 Radak similarly suggests that Lavan referred to them as gods because he trusted in them as one would in the word of God.
Belief in magic and divination – According to most of these sources the terafim really did have the ability to speak or tell the future, albeit often incorrectly.  Ralbag, in contrast, asserts that the magician using the terafim merely imagined it talking,5 while Ibn Ezra assumes that Lavan's divination was related to his astronomical abilities.6
Sitting on the terafim – According to Tosafot, Rachel sat upon the terafim with force to prevent their crying out and telling Lavan where they were.  Ralbag and Ibn Ezra would more simply suggest that this was just a good way of hiding them from her father.
Evaluation of Rachel's actions – This approach might view Rachel's intentions as meritorious as she was attempting to protect her family.  Radak, though, suggests that she shoudl nonetheless not have stolen
Religiosity of the forefathers
Parallel case - Michal and the terafim – If the terafim were impure items used for magical purposes, it is not clear why they should have been present in the ome of Michal and David.

Religious Motivations

Economic Advantage

The terafim testified to Yaakov's rights to Lavan's inheritance.

Sources:Modern scholars