Realia:Stones of the Choshen/0

Stones of the Choshen

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Overview

The twelve stones of the choshen are named in Shemot 28:17-20. However, since the verses provide no other descriptive information, the identity of almost every stone is heavily debated. In trying to determine which gems are referred to, scholars look for descriptions in other verses in which the stones are mentioned, explore cognate languages for linguistic clues as to the stones' identity, and turn to identifications made by both the Aramaic and Greek translations of Torah. The various translations, however, are not in total agreement, and the identity of many of the Aramaic and Greek names are disputed.¹ Bemidbar Rabbah provides further clues, as it lists the color of many of the stones, but as this is a relatively late source, it is less reliable. Given the many unknowns, it is not surprising that multiple possible identifications have been raised for almost every stone.

אֹדֶם

• Biblical verses – The stone is mentioned only in the context of the Choshen (Shemot 28:17 and Shemot 39:10) and the stones of Gan Eden (Yechezkel 28:13).
• Etymology – The word "אֹדֶם" relates to the color "אדום", meaning red.
• Translations – All the Aramaic translations render "אֹדֶם" fairly literally, as "סמקן" or "סמוקתא", meaning reddish. The Septuagint translates it as sardius,² generally identified as the orange-red gemstone, carnelian.  Based on the archaeological evidence, this stone was very popular in ancient times.³  Others suggest that sardius might instead refer to red jasper.⁴
• Possible Identifications – A reddish stone, likely carnelian, but perhaps red jasper.⁵

פִּטְדָה

• Biblical verses – The stone is mentioned in the context of the Choshen (Shemot 28:17 and Shemot 39:10) and the stones of Gan Eden in Yechezkel 28:13, and also in Iyyov 28:19 where it is referred to as "פִּטְדַת כּוּשׁ", suggesting that it originated in or was imported from Egypt (Ethiopia).
• Etymology – The word פִּטְדָה might be a loan word from Sanskrit where pita means yellow, or it could be related to the Assyrian hipindu, which means "flashing" stone.⁶
• Translations – The Aramaic Targumim render "פִּטְדָה" as "ירקן" or "ירקתא", pointing to a green gem,⁷ while the Septuagint identifies it as topazius.⁸ Based on descriptions by Pliny the Elder,⁹ many scholars assume that this refers to olivine (also known as peridot), a stone with a yellow-green color.¹⁰ The ancient source of peridot was the Island of Zabargad (modern St. John's Island) in the Red Sea, under the control of Egypt,¹¹ matching Iyyov's reference to "פִּטְדַת כּוּשׁ". Others, however, raise the possibility that the Greek topazius refers to the modern gem known as topaz,¹² and point to yellow variety of the stone.
• Possible Identifications – A greenish-yellow stone, likely olivine (peridot), or perhaps yellow topaz.

בָרֶקֶת

• Biblical verses – The stone is mentioned only in the context of the Choshen (Shemot 28:17 and Shemot 39:10) and the stones of Gan Eden in Yechezkel 28:13.
• Etymology – The word "בָרֶקֶת" might relate to "ברק", lightning, referring to something that shines.  In Assyrian the word baraqu similarly means to flash, while burruqu means flushed or red-faced and red-haired.¹³ Taken together, these might suggest a brilliant red stone.
• Translations – Aramaic translations render "בָרֶקֶת" fairly literally,¹⁴ echoing that the rock sparkled or was particularly shiny. This fits a carbuncle such as the red garnet which has an unusually high refractive index, making it exceptionally bright.¹⁵ The Septuagint,¹⁶ in contrast, translates the word as smaragdos, often understood to be an emerald or other green stone. As the hardness of emeralds makes them difficult to engrave, a better identification might be malachite, an opaque, green banded gem, or perhaps turqoise, a greenish-blue stone.¹⁷
• Additional data – Bemidbar Rabbah2:7About Bemidbar Rabbah describes the gem as having black, white, and red bands, suggesting that it is some sort of agate or onyx.
• Possible identifications – Carbuncle (perhaps a red garnet), a green stone such as emerald or malakhite, or a banded stone such as agate or onyx.

נֹפֶךְ

• Biblical verses – The stone is mentioned with regards to the Choshen (Shemot 28:18 and Shemot 39:11) and the stones of Gan Eden (Yechezkel 28:13), and also in Yechezkel 27:16, in the context of the merchandise of Aram.
• Etymology – R. Saadia and Rashi¹⁸ relate נֹפֶךְ to the word "פוך", a stone mentioned alongside other precious gems in Yeshayahu 54:11 and Divrei HaYamim I 29:2.¹⁹ Both Melakhim II 9:30 and Yirmeyahu 4:30 imply that it was a source of eye make-up, assumed to be bluish²⁰ in color. The word "נֹפֶךְ" might also relate to the Egyptian mfkt, referring to a greenish-blue stone such as turquoise, or perhaps malachite.²¹ These could both be a source of eye-paint and further match Bemidbar Rabbah's2:7About Bemidbar Rabbah description of the stone as being "the color of the sky".
• Translations - Targum OnkelosShemot 28:17-20About Targum Onkelos translates "נֹפֶךְ" as "אִזְמַרַגְדִּין",‎²² generally understood to refer to a green gem such as an emerald or malachite,²³ while the Septuagint refers to it as anthrax, which, like the English word carbuncle, means coal, and refers to a stone the color of burning embers,²⁴ such as a ruby²⁵or red garnet.²⁶
• Possible identifications – A blue-green stone such as turquoise, an emerald or other green stone such as a malachite, a red stone such as a ruby or red garnet.

סַפִּיר

• Biblical verses – The סַפִּיר is mentioned in many verses²⁷ but the most helpful source in terms of identifying the stone is Shemot 24:10.  In describing the vision of Hashem seen by the elders, it reads, "וְתַחַת רַגְלָיו כְּמַעֲשֵׂה לִבְנַת הַסַּפִּיר וּכְעֶצֶם הַשָּׁמַיִם לָטֹהַר"‎,²⁸ suggesting that the סַפִּיר might be either white²⁹ or the color of a pure blue sky.
• Translations – The various Aramaic and Greek translations (as well as many later sources) are fairly close to the Hebrew, rendering it as ספרינה or sapphirus‎.³⁰  Many have identified the gem with the modern sapphire,³¹ a sky-blue colored gem, but despite the similarity in name, it seems that a different stone is referred to as the modern gem was not known in the Mediterranean region until Roman times.³² Both Theophrastus and Pliny describe sapphirus‎ as an opaque blue stone³³ with golden specks, matching the gem lapis lazuli.³⁴
• Possible identifications – Likely lapis lazuli, though some have suggested sapphire.

יָהֲלֹם

• Biblical verses – The stone is mentioned only in the context of the Choshen (Shemot 28:18 and Shemot 39:11) and the stones of Gan Eden in Yechezkel 28:13.

• Linguistic analysis – "יָהֲלֹם" might relate to the root "הלם" which means to strike or hammer.  This would suggest that the stone was on the harder side and used for cutting other gems, or perhaps to start fires by striking pyrite. This might point to a quartz which ranks 7 on the MOHS scale of hardness and was commonly used to start fires in ancient times.  Alternatively, the word might be connected to the root "הלל", meaning to shine, which would point specifically to a clear variety of quartz. Others have suggested that the word might be related to the gemstone known in Akkadian as ḫulālu, whose description might match that of moonstone or another milky white gem.³⁵ [Bemidbar Rabbah's description of a white stone might match either of these last two possibilities.³⁶]
• Translations – Though the modern translation of "יָהֲלֹם" is diamond,³⁷ this is an unlikely identification as the art of cutting diamonds was unknown in Biblical times and they were not found in the region until the Roman period.³⁸ Onkelos translates "יָהֲלֹם" as "סַבְהֲלוֹם" , while Targum Neofiti and Targum Yerushalmi (Fragments) write "עין עגלה".  Neither of these names are easily identifiable. The Septuagint, in contrast, identifies the gem as iaspis,³⁹ which, from ancient descriptions, appears to refer to quartz or jasper,⁴⁰ likely of a shade of green.⁴¹
• Possible identifications – Green quartz or jasper, clear crystal quartz, moonstone

לֶשֶׁם

• Possible identifications – Amber, jacinth, turquoise
• Biblical verses – The stone is mentioned only in the context of the Choshen (Shemot 28:19 and Shemot 39:12).
• Linguistic analysis –
• Translations – Targum OnkelosShemot 28:17-20About Targum Onkelos and Yerushalmi (Yonatan)Shemot 28:17-20About Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan) translate "לֶשֶׁם" as "קנכירי" / "קנכירינון", while the Septuagint reads lyncurion or ligurios. [These might be variations of the same word with the Aramaic inserting a ק in place of the ל.] The Greek word has been understood to refer either to amber, fossilized pine resin which is yellow-orange in color,⁴² or to jacinth, a reddish-yellow zirkon.⁴³ 

שְׁבוֹ

• Possible identifications – Agate, turquoise, jet
• Biblical verses – The stone is mentioned only in the context of the Choshen (Shemot 28:19 and Shemot 39:12).
• Additional data – 

אַחְלָמָה

• Possible identifications – Sardonyx, amethyst, red jasper
• Biblical verses – The stone is mentioned only in the context of the Choshen.
• Additional data – 

שֹׁהַם

• Possible identifications – Beryl (emerald or aquamarine), clear crystal quartz, sardonyx, onyx, carnelian
• Biblical verses – The gem is mentioned with regards to the Choshen (Shemot 28:20, 39:13), the stones of Eden (Yechezkel 28) and the Efod, where it is named as the stones upon which were inscribed the names of all the tribes  (Shemot 28:9).⁴⁴ Bereshit 2:12 shares that אֶרֶץ הַחֲוִילָה contained both "שֹׁהַם" and "בְּדֹלַח" and Iyyov 28 writes that wisdom cannot be valued with either it or the סַפִּיר.
• Additional data – 

תַּרְשִׁישׁ

• Possible identifications – Yellow-gold topaz, amber, aquamarine,
• Biblical verses – 
• Additional data – 

יָשְׁפֵה

• Possible identifications – Jasper, pearl, opal
• Biblical verses – The stone is mentioned only in the context of the Choshen (Shemot 28 and 39) and the stones of Gan Eden (Yechezkel 28).
• Additional data – 

¹ Several books from the Second Temple period which discuss various gemstones can be very helpful in identifying the Greek names, as they often include descriptions of the various stones, including their color, hardness, translucence, place of origin and the like.  Among these are the work of the Greek botanist, Theophrastus, On Stones, and Pliny the Elder's Natural History (Book 37).

² This is also Josephus' translation in his Wars of the Jews, but in his Antiquities of the Jews, he identifies the stone as sardonyx.

³ See

⁴ See, for example, G. F. Kunz, The Curious Lore of Precious Stones, (New York, 1913), who suggests that in Ancient Egypt this was the more common stone.  Cf. J. Harrell, "Old Testament Gemstones : A Philological, Geological, and Archaeological Assessment of the Septuagint", Bulletin for Biblical Research 21.2 (2011):141-172, who points to descriptions of sardius by Theophrastus and Pliny the Elder which might match jasper.

⁵ See also R. Bachya and Abarbanel who identify אודם as a ruby, another red gem. However, see Kunz (ibid) and R"Y Yankelovitz, "זיהוי אבני החושן על פי תרגום השבעים והתרגומים הארמיים", in חצי גבורים-פליטת סופרים, vol. 10 (2017): 478-541, who point out that, based on the archaeological evidence, it is doubtful whether rubies were known in the Near East in the time of the Exodus.

⁶ See E. G. Hirsch, The Jewish Encyclopedia (1906), entry: Gems,  M. Malul, Olam HaTanakh Shemot (Tel Aviv, 1993): 169, and S.V. Meschel, "The Gems in the High Priest's Breastplate: A Pragmatic Review", Jewish Bible Quarterly 46:4 (2018).

⁷ See also Bemidbar Rabbah2:7About Bemidbar Rabbah, R. BachyaShemot 28:15About R. Bachya b. Asher and AbarbanelShemot 28:6About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel (when reviewing the opinions of others) who all also claim that the stone was green. See also R Saadia Gaon who identifies the gem as "זמרד", an Arabic word which generally refers to emeralds, but might also refer other green stones.

⁸ See also Shemot Rabbah38:8About Shemot Rabbah which writes, "שמפוזין" which might refer to topazius as well (with the "ש" replacing the "ט"). R"Y Yankelovitz (cited above) raises the possibility that the words טופז(יון) and פטדה might be related, with the "פ" and "ט" switching places and the "ז" replacing the "ד" (a common exchange).

⁹ See his Natural History 37:32:109, where he describes it as resembling the "colouring principle of the leek".

¹⁰ As the stone is translucent, this choice might also fit the description emerging from the Assyrian "hipindu", as a  "flashing" or shimmering stone.

¹¹ See J. Harrell (ibid, p.162), who points to several ancient sources from as early as the second century BCE who associate topazius with an island in the Red Sea. A legend relayed by Pliny the Elder (Natural History 37:9:24) also suggests that it originated there.

¹² See the discussion in G. F. Kunz, cited above.

¹³ See The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago vol. 2 (Chicago, 1998): 103-4, 332.

¹⁴ Targum OnkelosShemot 28:17-20About Targum Onkelos writes, "בָרְקָן", Targum NeofitiShemot 28:17-20About Targum Yerushalmi (Neofiti) has "ברקתה", and Targum Yerushlami (Yonatan)Shemot 28:17-20About Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan) has "ברקתא".

¹⁵ See R. BachyaShemot 28:15About R. Bachya b. Asher and AbarbanelShemot 28:6About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel who both agree with this identification. R. Bachya even suggests that this was the stone that Noach put in the ark to provide light due to its extreme brilliance. As  red garnets were found in both Egypt and Sinai in ancient times, these are a logical candidate for the gem.

¹⁶ See also Josephus and the Vulgate.

¹⁷ J. Harrell (ibid, p.161) claims that the descriptions of smaragdos by Theophrastus easily match turquoise, and that it was more commonly used in jewelry than was malachite.  It should be noted, though, that neither malachite nor turquoise are known for their luster, and thus, might not be the best fit for the Hebrew "ברקת".

¹⁸ See also Shadal.

¹⁹ Ibn Ezra argues against the association, pointing out that the the "נ" of "נפך" appears to be part of the root. See, though, R"Y Yankelovitz (ibid) who attempts to bring textual support for identifying the two stones.

²⁰ See, though, R. Saadia as cited by Ibn EzraShemot Second Commentary 28:9About R. Avraham ibn Ezra who suggests that it was closer to black.

²¹ See T. Lambdin, "Egyptian Loan Words in the Old Testament", Journal of the American Oriental Society 73:3 (1953): 152.

²² See also Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan) who writes "איזמורד". Targum Neofiti and Targum Yerushalmi (Fragments), in contrast, translate it as "כדכדינה". However, as Yeshayahu 54:11-12 mentions כדכד  together with פוך, it seems that they are two different stones.

²³ See R. BachyaShemot 28:15About R. Bachya b. Asher who also suggests that the stone was green.

²⁴ See also Shemot Rabbah who identifies he stone as "בְּרָדִינִין" and Targum Yerushalmi and Neofiti who write, "כדכדינה", both of which have been understood by some to refer to a red stone as well. [See Emil G. Hirsch, The Jewish Encyclopedia (1906), entry: Gems.] JosephusAntiquities of the Jews 3:7:5Wars of the Jews 5:5:7About Josephus and the Vulgate also refer to נופך as carbuncle, as does Chizkuni.

²⁵ See above, though, that it is doubtful whether rubies were found in the time of Tanakh.

²⁶ R"Y Yankelovitz notes that this is exactly the opposite of the translations given for ברקת where it was the Aramaic translators who identified the stone as a red gem such as carbuncle, and the Greek translations which identified it as emerald.  This leads him to suggest that one of the two translators simply erred and accidentally switched the order of his identifications. He assumes that the error is in the Septuagint and brings several arguments to support his hypothesis. According to his analysis, then, it is agreed among both the Aramaic and Greek translations that ברקת refers to a bright red stone and that נופך refers to a green one.

²⁷ See Yeshayahu 54:11, Yechezkel 1:26, 10:1, Iyyov 28:6,16, Shir HaShirim 5:14 and Eikhah 4:7.

²⁸ In Yechezkel's "vision of the chariot" he similarly describes Hashem's throne as "כְּמַרְאֵה אֶבֶן סַפִּיר" (Yechezkel 1:26, 10:1).

²⁹ R. Saadia identifies the stone as "מהא", understood to be a white or clear crystal and Ibn Ezra explicitly states that R. Saadia thought the stone was white because of the phrase, "לבנת הספיר".  However, it is possible that the word "לִבְנַת" refers to a brick (from לבנה) and not to whiteness.

³⁰ Targum Neofiti and Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan) identify the stone as ספרינה or ספירינון, while the Septuagint (and Josephus) has sapphirus.  Shemot Rabbah similarly writes, "סַנְפִּירִינוֹוּן", while ChizkunShemot 28:17-20About R. Chizkiyah b. Manoachi has "שפיר". Targum Onkelos reads, "שַׁבְזֵיז", which is difficult to identify.

³¹ See discussions in D.Ginzberg, "לזהות המינרלוגית של אבני-החושן," Da'at Mikra Shemot (Jerusalem, 1991): appendix, 70-71 and M. Malul, Olam HaTanakh (ibid, p.169).

³² See. E. G. Hirsch, The Jewish Encyclopedia (1906), entry: Gems.

³³ As the modern sapphire is translucent, they cannot be referring to it.

³⁴ R. Yankelovitz (ibid, p.507) suggests that Iyyov 28:6's description, "מְקוֹם סַפִּיר אֲבָנֶיהָ וְעַפְרֹת זָהָב לוֹ", might allude to this aspect of the gem. The phrase "עַפְרֹת זָהָב לוֹ"  might be referring back to the gold speckled stone (and not the place being discussed, which would have required a feminine referent "לה").

³⁵ See discussion in J. Harrel, J. Hoffmeier and K. Williams, "Hebrew Gemstones in the Old Testament: A Lexical, Geological, and Archaeological Analysis," Bulletin for Biblical Research 27:1 (2017): 21

³⁶ As it identifies the colors of the tribes' flags based on the stones, when writing that Zevulun's flag was "white" it could be assuming that the associated stone was either white or clear (as it would be impossible to color a flag "clear").

³⁷ See AbarbanelShemot 28:6About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel who identifies the stone as a diamond.

³⁸ See J. Harrel, J. Hoffmeier and K. Williams, (ibid, p 20).

³⁹ This might match the translation of Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan), "כדכודין". A variant of this word, כדכוד, appears in Yeshayahu 54:12 where the Septuagint identifies as iaspis, equivalent to the יהלום of this verse.

⁴⁰ The modern word jasper is derived from the ancient iaspis.

⁴¹ See J. Harrrell (ibid, p.156) who points to descriptions by Theophrastrus which imply that the stone was greenish and to Pliny who lists many varieties of iaspis, most of which are some shade of green (or perhaps blue).

⁴² This is based on descriptions by Theophrastrus and Pliny. See Harrell (ibid, p. 157-158) and R. Yankelovitz (ibid, p. 510-512).

⁴³ See discussion in Kunz (ibid).

⁴⁴ See also Shemot 25:7, 35:9, 27 amd Divrei HaYamim I 29:2 which all speak of gathering the stone among materials to be used for the Mishkan / Mikdash.