Difference between revisions of "Reward and Punishment/1"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
<h2>Collective or Individual</h2>
 
<h2>Collective or Individual</h2>
<p>At whom are Torah's blessings targeted&#160;– the individual or the collective?&#160; Some verses are formulated in the singular,<fn>See, for instance, <a href="Shemot15-26" data-aht="source">Shemot 15:26</a>, <a href="Shemot20-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:11</a>, <a href="Vayikra20-1-5" data-aht="source">Vayikra 20:1-5</a>, <a href="Devarim4-40" data-aht="source">Devarim 4:40</a>, <a href="Devarim7-11-16" data-aht="source">Devarim 7:11</a>, <a href="Devarim12-28" data-aht="source">Devarim 12:28</a>, or <a href="Devarim28-1-13" data-aht="source">Devarim 28</a>.</fn> perhaps suggesting the former, but many others are addressed in the plural.<fn>See <a href="Vayikra26-3-12" data-aht="source">Vayikra 26</a>, <a href="Devarim5-25" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:25</a>, <a href="Devarim5-29" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:29</a>, <a href="Devarim11-8-9" data-aht="source">Devarim 11:8-9</a>,&#160;<a href="Devarim11-13-21" data-aht="source">Devarim 11:13-25</a> and <a href="Devarim32-46-47" data-aht="source">Devarim 32:46-47</a>.</fn>· A few passages, such as&#160;<a href="Vayikra20-1-5" data-aht="source">Vayikra 20:1-5</a> or <a href="Devarim29-17-20" data-aht="source">Devarim 29:17-20</a>, explicitly target the individual for retribution.&#160; Should these be considered the exception or the norm?&#160;&#160; On the other hand, many other verses speak of recompense such as rain, famine or war, &#160; which would seem to naturally affect the collective.&#160; Are the verses suggesting that these phenomena will behave as they normally do, and thus, by definition, it is the nation rather than the individual who will suffer or be blessed? Or, might rewards and punishments be miraculous, so that a righteous individual might benefit from peace and rain, while his wicked neighbors do not?&#160;</p>
+
<p>At whom are Torah's blessings targeted&#160;– the individual or the collective?&#160; Some verses are formulated in the singular,<fn>See, for instance, <a href="Shemot15-26" data-aht="source">Shemot 15:26</a>, <a href="Shemot20-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:11</a>, <a href="Vayikra20-1-5" data-aht="source">Vayikra 20:1-5</a>, <a href="Devarim4-40" data-aht="source">Devarim 4:40</a>, <a href="Devarim7-11-16" data-aht="source">Devarim 7:11</a>, <a href="Devarim12-28" data-aht="source">Devarim 12:28</a>, or <a href="Devarim28-1-13" data-aht="source">Devarim 28</a>.</fn> perhaps suggesting the former, but many others are addressed in the plural.<fn>See <a href="Vayikra26-3-12" data-aht="source">Vayikra 26</a>, <a href="Devarim5-25" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:25</a>, <a href="Devarim5-29" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:29</a>, <a href="Devarim11-8-9" data-aht="source">Devarim 11:8-9</a>,&#160;<a href="Devarim11-13-21" data-aht="source">Devarim 11:13-25</a> and <a href="Devarim32-46-47" data-aht="source">Devarim 32:46-47</a>.</fn>· A few passages, such as&#160;<a href="Vayikra20-1-5" data-aht="source">Vayikra 20:1-5</a> or <a href="Devarim29-17-20" data-aht="source">Devarim 29:17-20</a>, explicitly target the individual for retribution.&#160; Does the fact that these are singled out mean that they are exceptional or are they proof that individual retribution is the norm? Many other verses speak of recompense such as rain, famine or war, which would seem to naturally affect the collective.&#160; Are the verses suggesting that these phenomena will behave as they normally do, and thus, by definition, it is the nation rather than the individual who will suffer or be blessed? Or, might rewards and punishments be miraculous, so that a righteous individual might benefit from peace and rain, while his wicked neighbors do not?&#160;</p>
  
 
<h2>"עַל מְנָת לְקַבֵּל פְּרָס"</h2>
 
<h2>"עַל מְנָת לְקַבֵּל פְּרָס"</h2>

Version as of 23:31, 5 January 2021

Reward and Punishment

Introduction

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

A Plethora of Blessings and Curses

Torah is replete with promises of both rewards for obedience and punishment for transgression. These are perhaps most evident in Vayikra 26 and Devarim 28 which each contain a full list of blessings and curses, but many other individual verses,1 too, similarly promise recompense, including health/disease, rain/drought, peace/war and more. In the vast majority of cases, retribution is promised in the context of general observance,2 but in other instances, specific mitzvot are singled out as meriting reward or punishment.3

"?היכן טובתו של זה"

Despite the plethora of promises, however, experience suggests that not all who observe Hashem's commands reap the benefits described.  The problem is raised in Yerushalmi Chagiga 2:1Chagigah 2:1About the Yerushalmi4 through the mouth of Elisha b. Avuyah.  He witnesses an individual fulfilling the directive to send away the mother bird, a commandment whose stated reward is longevity, and yet finds that the man dies upon descent:

 פעם אחת היה יושב ושונה בבקעת גינוסר וראה אדם אחד עלה לראש הדקל ונטל אם על הבנים וירד משם בשלום למחר ראה אדם אחר שעלה לראש הדקל ונטל את הבנים ושילח את האם וירד משם והכישו נחש ומת אמר כתיב {דברים כב} שלח תשלח את האם ואת הבנים תקח לך למען ייטב לך והארכת ימים איכן היא טובתו של זה איכן היא אריכות ימיו של זה?

Elisha b. Avuyah asks, "Where is the good promised to this one?  Where is his longevity?"  We, too, wonder, why does it seem that Hashem promises but does not fulfill? The Gemara responds that the verses refer to rewards in the World to Come, but is that the simple sense of the text?  If the Torah's blessings all refer to the spiritual world, why are the vast majority physical in nature?5 If, though, they refer to rewards in this world, why are these not always evident?

Collective or Individual

At whom are Torah's blessings targeted – the individual or the collective?  Some verses are formulated in the singular,6 perhaps suggesting the former, but many others are addressed in the plural.7· A few passages, such as Vayikra 20:1-5 or Devarim 29:17-20, explicitly target the individual for retribution.  Does the fact that these are singled out mean that they are exceptional or are they proof that individual retribution is the norm? Many other verses speak of recompense such as rain, famine or war, which would seem to naturally affect the collective.  Are the verses suggesting that these phenomena will behave as they normally do, and thus, by definition, it is the nation rather than the individual who will suffer or be blessed? Or, might rewards and punishments be miraculous, so that a righteous individual might benefit from peace and rain, while his wicked neighbors do not? 

"עַל מְנָת לְקַבֵּל פְּרָס"

In Avot 1:3Avot 1:3About the Mishna Antigonus makes the well known statement, "אַל תִּהְיוּ כַעֲבָדִים הַמְשַׁמְּשִׁין אֶת הָרַב עַל מְנָת לְקַבֵּל פְּרָס", asserting that one should not serve Hashem out of hopes of reward.8  How, though, does this jive with the dozens of verses which promise exactly that? If the ideal is that one observe commandments regardless of retribution, why does Hashem devote so much press space to delineating blessings and curses? Might the rewards listed serve a purpose other than retribution?  Or, Antigonus' words notwithstanding, might the simlpe sense of the text imply that really there is nothing wrong with hoping for one's just due?9

Other Questions

  • Physical or spiritual –  Almost all the rewards and blessings of the Torah are physical in nature.10  Why does Hashem not also promise spiritual rewards? Moreover, if the World to Come is considered the ultimate reward, why is it never explicitly mentioned in Torah?
  • "עַל הָאֲדָמָה אֲשֶׁר י״י אֱלֹהֶיךָ נֹתֵן לָךְ" – Many of the blessings in Torah mention that they will be fulfilled "on the land that Hashem will give you".  Does this mean that the retribution spoken of in Torah is limited to an era in which the nation is living in the Land of Israel?
  • The Biblical record – Throughout Tanakh, Hashem's retribution is very obvious, with many sinners being punished almost instantaneously, and almost every national disaster being explained by prophets in terms of sin and punishment, making the correlation between deed and consequence abundantly clear.  Is this same correlation true today, less obvious only due to the fact that prophets no longer exist to point it out, or have Hashem's modes of providence changed over time?  If the later, what has led to the change?