Difference between revisions of "Reward and Punishment/1"
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<li>Many verses speak of recompense such as rain, famine or war, which would seem to naturally affect the collective.  Are the verses suggesting that these phenomena will behave as they normally do, and thus, by definition, it is the nation rather than the individual who will suffer or be blessed? Or, might rewards and punishments be miraculous, so that a righteous individual might benefit from peace and rain, while his wicked neighbors do not? </li> | <li>Many verses speak of recompense such as rain, famine or war, which would seem to naturally affect the collective.  Are the verses suggesting that these phenomena will behave as they normally do, and thus, by definition, it is the nation rather than the individual who will suffer or be blessed? Or, might rewards and punishments be miraculous, so that a righteous individual might benefit from peace and rain, while his wicked neighbors do not? </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<h2>Other Questions</h2> | <h2>Other Questions</h2> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
+ | <li><b>"שֶׁלֹּא עַל מְנָת לְקַבֵּל פְּרָס" </b>– In <multilink><a href="MishnaAvot1-3" data-aht="source">Avot 1:3</a><a href="MishnaAvot1-3" data-aht="source">Avot 1:3</a><a href="Mishna" data-aht="parshan">About the Mishna</a></multilink>, Antigonus makes the well known statement, "אַל תִּהְיוּ כַעֲבָדִים הַמְשַׁמְּשִׁין אֶת הָרַב עַל מְנָת לְקַבֵּל פְּרָס", asserting that one should not serve Hashem out of hopes of reward.<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="SifreDevarim11-22" data-aht="source">Sifre Devarim</a><a href="SifreDevarim11-22" data-aht="source">11:22</a><a href="Sifre Devarim" data-aht="parshan">About Sifre Devarim</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="BavliNedarim62a" data-aht="source">Bavli Nedarim</a><a href="BavliNedarim62a" data-aht="source">Nedarim 62a</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink> which similarly suggest that one should not learn Torah for glory or other reward.  In contrast, though, see <multilink><a href="BavliPesachim8a-b" data-aht="source">Bavli Pesachim</a><a href="BavliPesachim8a-b" data-aht="source">Pesachim 8a-b</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink> which states that someone who gives charity so that his son will live or he will be rewarded in the Next World is considered a "צדיק גמור".</fn>  How, though, does this jive with the dozens of verses which promise exactly that? If the ideal is that one observe commandments regardless of retribution, why does Hashem devote so much press space to delineating blessings and curses? <b><br/></b></li> | ||
<li><b>Physical or spiritual </b>–  Almost all the rewards and blessings of the Torah are physical in nature.<fn>There might be several exceptions.</fn>  Why does Hashem not also promise spiritual rewards? Moreover, if the World to Come is considered the ultimate reward, why is it never explicitly mentioned in Torah?</li> | <li><b>Physical or spiritual </b>–  Almost all the rewards and blessings of the Torah are physical in nature.<fn>There might be several exceptions.</fn>  Why does Hashem not also promise spiritual rewards? Moreover, if the World to Come is considered the ultimate reward, why is it never explicitly mentioned in Torah?</li> | ||
<li><b>"עַל הָאֲדָמָה אֲשֶׁר י״י אֱלֹהֶיךָ נֹתֵן לָךְ"</b> – Many of the blessings in Torah mention that they will be fulfilled "on the land that Hashem will give you".  Does this mean that the retribution spoken of in Torah is limited to an era in which the nation is living in the Land of Israel?</li> | <li><b>"עַל הָאֲדָמָה אֲשֶׁר י״י אֱלֹהֶיךָ נֹתֵן לָךְ"</b> – Many of the blessings in Torah mention that they will be fulfilled "on the land that Hashem will give you".  Does this mean that the retribution spoken of in Torah is limited to an era in which the nation is living in the Land of Israel?</li> |
Version as of 05:00, 6 January 2021
Reward and Punishment
Introduction
A Plethora of Blessings and Curses
Torah is replete with promises of both rewards for obedience and punishment for transgression. These are perhaps most evident in Vayikra 26 and Devarim 28 which each contain a full list of blessings and curses, but many other individual verses,1 too, similarly promise recompense, including health/disease, rain/drought, peace/war and more. In the vast majority of cases, retribution is promised in the context of general observance,2 but in other instances, specific mitzvot are singled out as meriting reward or punishment.3
"?היכן טובתו של זה"
Despite the plethora of promises, however, experience suggests that not all who observe Hashem's commands reap the benefits described. The problem is raised in Yerushalmi Chagiga 2:14 through the mouth of Elisha b. Avuyah. He witnesses an individual fulfilling the directive to send away the mother bird, a commandment whose stated reward is longevity, and yet finds that the man dies upon descent:
פעם אחת היה יושב ושונה בבקעת גינוסר וראה אדם אחד עלה לראש הדקל ונטל אם על הבנים וירד משם בשלום למחר ראה אדם אחר שעלה לראש הדקל ונטל את הבנים ושילח את האם וירד משם והכישו נחש ומת אמר כתיב {דברים כב} שלח תשלח את האם ואת הבנים תקח לך למען ייטב לך והארכת ימים איכן היא טובתו של זה איכן היא אריכות ימיו של זה?
Elisha b. Avuyah asks, "Where is the good promised to this one? Where is his longevity?" We, too, wonder, why does it seem that Hashem promises but does not fulfill? The Gemara responds that the verses refer to rewards in the World to Come, but is that the simple sense of the text? If the Torah's blessings all refer to the spiritual world, why are the vast majority physical in nature?5 If, though, they refer to rewards in this world, why are these not always evident?
Collective or Individual
The Torah's discussion of retribution leaves one important question open to debate: at whom are Torah's blessings targeted – the individual or the collective? Several factors might influence one's position:
- While many verses are formulated in the singular,6 others are addressed in the plural.7 Is this difference significant, suggesting that some blessings are for the individual and others for nation as a whole? Or, is the formulation irrelevant as one can address both a collective and an individual in either the singular or the plural?8
- A few passages, such as Vayikra 20:1-5 or Devarim 29:17-20, explicitly target the individual ("בָּאִישׁ הַהוּא") for retribution. Others speak of individual observance of specific mitzvot,9 also implying that the stated reward is for the individual. Should these cases be viewed as exceptional or as proof that individual retribution is the norm?
- Many verses speak of recompense such as rain, famine or war, which would seem to naturally affect the collective. Are the verses suggesting that these phenomena will behave as they normally do, and thus, by definition, it is the nation rather than the individual who will suffer or be blessed? Or, might rewards and punishments be miraculous, so that a righteous individual might benefit from peace and rain, while his wicked neighbors do not?
Other Questions
- "שֶׁלֹּא עַל מְנָת לְקַבֵּל פְּרָס" – In Avot 1:3, Antigonus makes the well known statement, "אַל תִּהְיוּ כַעֲבָדִים הַמְשַׁמְּשִׁין אֶת הָרַב עַל מְנָת לְקַבֵּל פְּרָס", asserting that one should not serve Hashem out of hopes of reward.10 How, though, does this jive with the dozens of verses which promise exactly that? If the ideal is that one observe commandments regardless of retribution, why does Hashem devote so much press space to delineating blessings and curses?
- Physical or spiritual – Almost all the rewards and blessings of the Torah are physical in nature.11 Why does Hashem not also promise spiritual rewards? Moreover, if the World to Come is considered the ultimate reward, why is it never explicitly mentioned in Torah?
- "עַל הָאֲדָמָה אֲשֶׁר י״י אֱלֹהֶיךָ נֹתֵן לָךְ" – Many of the blessings in Torah mention that they will be fulfilled "on the land that Hashem will give you". Does this mean that the retribution spoken of in Torah is limited to an era in which the nation is living in the Land of Israel?
- The Biblical record – Throughout Tanakh, Hashem's retribution is very obvious, with many sinners being punished almost instantaneously, and almost every national disaster being explained by prophets in terms of sin and punishment, making the correlation between deed and consequence abundantly clear. Is this same correlation true today, less obvious only due to the fact that prophets no longer exist to point it out, or have Hashem's modes of providence changed over time? If the later, what has led to the change?