Difference between revisions of "Reward and Punishment/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 38: Line 38:
 
<point><b>Why not reward the individual in this world?</b></point>
 
<point><b>Why not reward the individual in this world?</b></point>
 
<point><b>Nature of עולם הבא</b></point>
 
<point><b>Nature of עולם הבא</b></point>
<point><b>Why isn't עולם הבא mentioned in the Torah?</b> Considering that according to this approach,&#160;&#160; the ultimate reard is Olam haba, why is it nvere mntioned in torah?</point>
+
<point><b>Why isn't עולם הבא mentioned in the Torah?</b> Considering that according to this approach,&#160;&#160; the ultimate reward is in the next world why is the concpetof nvere mntioned in torah?</point>
 
<point><b>Purpose of rewards / punishments</b></point>
 
<point><b>Purpose of rewards / punishments</b></point>
 
<point><b>Is it problematic to hope for reward?</b></point>
 
<point><b>Is it problematic to hope for reward?</b></point>

Version as of 04:33, 14 December 2020

Reward and Punishment

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Individuals Rewarded in this World

Individuals Not Rewarded in this World

Individuals do not receive true retribution in this world, getting their just desserts only in the next world.

Biblical blessings – This position must explain the Torah's many promises of reward and punishment, especially considering that many of these are physical in nature,1 suggesting that they refer to this world.  If there is no individual retribution in this world, to what do these refer?:
  • Collective recompense – R. Crescas, R"Y Albo and Abarbanel2 responds that the retribution spoken about in the verses is for the collective, and refers to national rather than individual rewards. 
    • This is supported by the collective nature of the vast majority of the Torah's blessings and curses, which speak of war, rain, famine and the like.3
    • R"Y Albo further notes the plural formulation of the blessings/curses of Vayikra 26, which suggests that a group, rather than an individual, is being addressed. He points out that others, despite being worded in the singular, explicitly mention or reference the nation.4 
    • The collective context of specific verses further implies that even surrounding verses which could theoretically be explained to refer only to the individual refer to the group as well.5
  • Enablers – Rambam,6 in contrast, suggests that even individuals might in fact benefit from the promises of Torah,7 but maintains that these do not constitute rewards but rather enablers. A life free of troubles, sickness, and war will make it easier for people to observe Hashem's commandments,8 paving the way for one to earn real reward in the next world.9  
  • Rewards of next world – R. Yaakov suggests that other promises such as "לְמַעַן יִיטַב לָךְ / לְמַעַן יַאֲרִכוּן יָמֶיךָ" in Shemot 20:11 or Devarim 22:710 refer to the next world.11  This, though, is somewhat difficult in light of the ending of the verse (and other similar ones) which explicitly add, "עַל הָאֲדָמָה אֲשֶׁר י״י אֱלֹהֶיךָ נֹתֵן לָךְ", suggesting that the promise applies to this world.12 
Ultimate reward: physical or spiritual? One of the main philosophical motivations for this position is the belief in the primacy of spiritual rewards. 
Hashem's providence – This reading of reward and punishment is further influenced by these sources' understanding of Divine providence. According to many of these thinkers,15 though there is individual Divine providence, not all merit it to the same degree,16 and in general, the world is run via natural law17 rather than such providence.  In such a world, it is difficult to reward an individual for his personal deeds, as this will often necessitate intervening in nature18 (something many might not deserve).
Reality that appears to contradict the Torah – These sources might also be motivated by their perceptions of reality, in which often individuals do not appear to receive the rewards promised by Torah despite mitzvah observance.19  Positing that the Torah does not actually promise individual retribution in this world resolves the seeming contradiction.  [By adding that the individual instead gets his just compensation in the next world, they also address the associated and more general problem of theodicy.]
Is not deferred retribution unjust? One might question the justice of deferred retribution.  If a person sins or acts righteously in this world, should he not get his due in this world as well?  Is it fair that one needs to wait for one's reward?  Rambam appears unperturbed by the question, assuming that the magnitude of the good of the next world renders all rewards of this world negligible.20 Others might suggest that since this and the next world are really one continuum21, there is no injustice in meting out recompense in one world for deeds done in the other.
"וְשַׂמְתִּי אֲנִי אֶת פָּנַי בָּאִישׁ הַהוּא"
Why not reward the individual in this world?
Nature of עולם הבא
Why isn't עולם הבא mentioned in the Torah? Considering that according to this approach,   the ultimate reward is in the next world why is the concpetof nvere mntioned in torah?
Purpose of rewards / punishments
Is it problematic to hope for reward?

Changing Rewards

Hashem's modes of providence have changed over time.  Though immediate reward and punishment is manifest in the Biblical and First Temple periods, it disappeared thereafter as Hashem's initial overt providence gradually became covert.

"עַל הָאֲדָמָה אֲשֶׁר י״י אֱלֹהֶיךָ נֹתֵן לָךְ"