Difference between revisions of "Reward and Punishment/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Individuals Rewarded in this World
 
Individuals Rewarded in this World
 
<p>Individuals are compensated for their actions already in this world, and not only in the next world.</p>
 
<p>Individuals are compensated for their actions already in this world, and not only in the next world.</p>
<mekorot>one opinion in&#160;<multilink><a href="BavliKiddushin39b" data-aht="source">Bavli Kiddushin</a><a href="BavliKiddushin39b" data-aht="source">Kiddushin 39b</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot5-1" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryBereshit6-7" data-aht="source">Commentary Bereshit 6:7</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot5-1" data-aht="source">HaEmunot VeHaDeiot 5:1</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot6-5" data-aht="source">HaEmunot VeHaDeiot 6:5</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot8-2" data-aht="source">HaEmunot VeHaDeiot 8:2</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot9-1" data-aht="source">HaEmunot VeHaDeiot 9:1</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot9-2" data-aht="source">HaEmunot VeHaDeiot 9:2</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink>, perhaps <multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary23-25" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary20-11" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 20:11</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary23-25" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 23:25</a><a href="IbnEzraDevarim5-15" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:15</a><a href="IbnEzraDevarim32-39" data-aht="source">Devarim 32:39</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit17-1" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit17-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 17:1</a><a href="RambanBereshit18-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 18:19</a><a href="RambanShemot13-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 13:16</a><a href="RambanVayikra26-11" data-aht="source">Vayikra 26:11</a><a href="RambanVayikra26-12" data-aht="source">Vayikra 26:12</a><a href="RambanDevarim6-24-25" data-aht="source">Devarim 6:24-25</a><a href="RambanDevarim11-13" data-aht="source">Devarim 11:13</a><a href="RambanDevarim11-13_2" data-aht="source">Devarim 11:13</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>&#160; <multilink><a href="NetzivDevarim22-7" data-aht="source">Netziv</a><a href="NetzivVayikra26-3" data-aht="source">Vayikra 26:3</a><a href="NetzivDevarim5-29" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:29</a><a href="NetzivDevarim6-24" data-aht="source">Devarim 6:24</a><a href="NetzivDevarim22-7" data-aht="source">Devarim 22:7</a><a href="R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin (Netziv)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannShemot20-11" data-aht="source">R. David Zvi Hoffmann</a><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannShemot20-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:11</a><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannDevarim6-25" data-aht="source">Devarim 6:25</a><a href="R. David Zvi Hoffmann" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Zvi Hoffmann</a></multilink></mekorot>
+
<mekorot>one opinion in&#160;<multilink><a href="BavliKiddushin39b" data-aht="source">Bavli Kiddushin</a><a href="BavliKiddushin39b" data-aht="source">Kiddushin 39b</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot5-1" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryBereshit6-7" data-aht="source">Commentary Bereshit 6:7</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot5-1" data-aht="source">HaEmunot VeHaDeiot 5:1</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot6-5" data-aht="source">HaEmunot VeHaDeiot 6:5</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot8-2" data-aht="source">HaEmunot VeHaDeiot 8:2</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot9-1" data-aht="source">HaEmunot VeHaDeiot 9:1</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot9-2" data-aht="source">HaEmunot VeHaDeiot 9:2</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink>, perhaps <multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary23-25" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary20-11" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 20:11</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary23-25" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 23:25</a><a href="IbnEzraDevarim5-15" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:15</a><a href="IbnEzraDevarim32-39" data-aht="source">Devarim 32:39</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RambanBereshit17-1" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit17-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 17:1</a><a href="RambanBereshit18-19" data-aht="source">Bereshit 18:19</a><a href="RambanShemot13-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 13:16</a><a href="RambanVayikra26-11" data-aht="source">Vayikra 26:11</a><a href="RambanVayikra26-12" data-aht="source">Vayikra 26:12</a><a href="RambanDevarim6-24-25" data-aht="source">Devarim 6:24-25</a><a href="RambanDevarim11-13" data-aht="source">Devarim 11:13</a><a href="RambanDevarim11-13_2" data-aht="source">Devarim 11:13</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="ShadalShemot20-11" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalShemot20-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:11</a><a href="ShadalDevarim6-24" data-aht="source">Devarim 6:24</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="NetzivDevarim22-7" data-aht="source">Netziv</a><a href="NetzivVayikra26-3" data-aht="source">Vayikra 26:3</a><a href="NetzivDevarim5-29" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:29</a><a href="NetzivDevarim6-24" data-aht="source">Devarim 6:24</a><a href="NetzivDevarim22-7" data-aht="source">Devarim 22:7</a><a href="R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin (Netziv)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannShemot20-11" data-aht="source">R. David Zvi Hoffmann</a><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannShemot20-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:11</a><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannDevarim6-25" data-aht="source">Devarim 6:25</a><a href="R. David Zvi Hoffmann" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Zvi Hoffmann</a></multilink></mekorot>
 
<point><b>Total or partial compensation?</b></point>
 
<point><b>Total or partial compensation?</b></point>
 
<point><b>Why not reward the individual only in this world?</b></point>
 
<point><b>Why not reward the individual only in this world?</b></point>
Line 35: Line 35:
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
 
<point><b>Hashem's providence</b> – This reading of reward and punishment is further influenced by these sources' understanding of Divine providence. According to many of these thinkers,<fn>See Rambam, Ralbag, Ran, R"Y Albo, and Abarbanel.</fn> though there is individual Divine providence, not all merit it to the same degree.<fn>The more righteous one is (or the more in line with the Active Intellect), the more providence one will receive. Ralbag notes that, as a result, it is possible that some people might not merit any individual providence at all.&#160; Even a basically good person, who at times benefits from Divine providence, might not merit enough providence to cause Hashem to overturn nature on&#160; his behalf.</fn> Moreover, the world is generally run via natural law<fn>These sources do not use the language of natural order but instead refer to "מערכת הכוכבים".</fn> rather than such providence.<fn>The Ran points to Rava's statement in <a href="BavliMoedKatan28a" data-aht="source">Bavli Moed Katan 28a</a>&#160; that length of life and livelihood are dependent on the constellations rather than one's merits, as proven by the very different fates of Rabbah and R. Chisda despite their both being Torah giants.</fn>&#160; In such a world, judged as it by the deeds of the majority, it is difficult to reward an individual for his personal deeds, as doing so will often necessitate intervening in nature<fn>For example, if one deserves rain, but his neighbors do not, to make the individual's crops grow while the neighbors' suffer drought requires a miracle.</fn> (which many might not deserve).</point>
 
<point><b>Hashem's providence</b> – This reading of reward and punishment is further influenced by these sources' understanding of Divine providence. According to many of these thinkers,<fn>See Rambam, Ralbag, Ran, R"Y Albo, and Abarbanel.</fn> though there is individual Divine providence, not all merit it to the same degree.<fn>The more righteous one is (or the more in line with the Active Intellect), the more providence one will receive. Ralbag notes that, as a result, it is possible that some people might not merit any individual providence at all.&#160; Even a basically good person, who at times benefits from Divine providence, might not merit enough providence to cause Hashem to overturn nature on&#160; his behalf.</fn> Moreover, the world is generally run via natural law<fn>These sources do not use the language of natural order but instead refer to "מערכת הכוכבים".</fn> rather than such providence.<fn>The Ran points to Rava's statement in <a href="BavliMoedKatan28a" data-aht="source">Bavli Moed Katan 28a</a>&#160; that length of life and livelihood are dependent on the constellations rather than one's merits, as proven by the very different fates of Rabbah and R. Chisda despite their both being Torah giants.</fn>&#160; In such a world, judged as it by the deeds of the majority, it is difficult to reward an individual for his personal deeds, as doing so will often necessitate intervening in nature<fn>For example, if one deserves rain, but his neighbors do not, to make the individual's crops grow while the neighbors' suffer drought requires a miracle.</fn> (which many might not deserve).</point>
<point><b>Reality that appears to contradict the Torah</b> – These sources might also be motivated by their perceptions of reality, in which often individuals do not appear to receive the rewards promised by Torah despite mitzvah observance.<fn>R. Yaakov's position that "שְׂכַר מִצְוָה בְּהַאי עָלְמָא לֵיכָּא"&#160; is presented in the gemara as an answer to Elisha b. Avuyah's questioning of a real life scenario, where a son who both honors his father and observes the commandment of sending away the mother bird, gets not long life as promised by the Torah, but early death!</fn>&#160; Positing that the Torah does not actually promise individual retribution in this world resolves the seeming contradiction.<fn>This issue, though, might still be somewhat difficult for the Rambam who suggests that people who perform mitzvot should receive the benefits listed in Torah, even if they are not considered rewards.</fn>&#160; [By adding that the individual instead gets his just compensation in the next world, they also address the associated and more general problem of theodicy.<fn>See <a href="Philosophy:Theodicy – צדיק ורע לו" data-aht="page">Theodicy – צדיק ורע לו</a> for a full discussion.</fn>]</point>
+
<point><b>Reality that appears to contradict the Torah</b> – These sources might also be motivated by their perceptions of reality, in which individuals often do not appear to receive the rewards promised by Torah despite mitzvah observance.<fn>R. Yaakov's position that "שְׂכַר מִצְוָה בְּהַאי עָלְמָא לֵיכָּא"&#160; is presented in the gemara as an answer to Elisha b. Avuyah's questioning of a real life scenario, where a son who both honors his father and observes the commandment of sending away the mother bird, gets not long life as promised by the Torah, but early death!</fn>&#160; Positing that the Torah does not actually promise individual retribution in this world resolves the seeming contradiction.<fn>This issue, though, might still be somewhat difficult for the Rambam who suggests that people who perform mitzvot should receive the benefits listed in Torah, even if they are not considered rewards.</fn>&#160; [By adding that the individual instead gets his just compensation in the next world, they also address the associated and more general problem of theodicy.<fn>See <a href="Philosophy:Theodicy – צדיק ורע לו" data-aht="page">Theodicy – צדיק ורע לו</a> for a full discussion.</fn>]</point>
 
<point><b>Is not deferred retribution unjust?</b> One might question the justice of deferred retribution.&#160; If a person sins or acts righteously in this world, should he not get his due in this world as well?&#160; Is it fair that one needs to wait for the next world to be compensated?&#160;<br/>
 
<point><b>Is not deferred retribution unjust?</b> One might question the justice of deferred retribution.&#160; If a person sins or acts righteously in this world, should he not get his due in this world as well?&#160; Is it fair that one needs to wait for the next world to be compensated?&#160;<br/>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
Line 42: Line 42:
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
 
<point><b>Nature of עולם הבא</b><ul>
 
<point><b>Nature of עולם הבא</b><ul>
<li>According to Rambam, "עולם הבא" refers to the eternal existence of the souls of the deserving after death (and the cutting off of the undeserving).&#160; It is a purely spiritual existence where souls exist without a body, basking in Hashem's glory, with no need for food, drink, sleep or physical drives.&#160; It is not a distinct place to be created in the future after the Messianic era and Resurrection of the Dead,<fn>The Rambam explains that the Messianic era will occur sometime in the future, in this world itself.&#160; It will not be marked by the supernatural, but rather by a just leader, world peace and conditions which will enable people to learn and observe Torah with ease. <br/>Rambam is a bit more ambiguous about the nature of the period of the Resurrection of the Dead.&#160; He claims that it is a phenomenon limited to the righteous alone and appears to believe that souls will come back to life with a body, but then die again to return to עולם הבא, where they resume their purely spiritual existence and continue to enjoy this ultimate reward.&#160; Given that Rambam believes that life in עולם הבא is the better existence, and that souls can enjoy it from the moment of death, it is not clear what he thinks is the purpose of the Resurrection.</fn> but simply how one refers to what happens to each soul immediately after death.</li>
+
<li>According to Rambam, "עולם הבא" refers to the eternal existence of the souls of the deserving after death (and the cutting off of the undeserving).&#160; It is a purely spiritual existence where souls exist without a body, basking in Hashem's glory, with no need for food, drink, or sleep.&#160; It is not a distinct place to be created in the future after the Messianic era and Resurrection of the Dead,<fn>The Rambam explains that the Messianic era will occur sometime in the future, in this world itself.&#160; It will not be marked by the supernatural, but rather by a just leader, world peace and conditions which will enable people to learn and observe Torah with ease. <br/>Rambam is a bit more ambiguous about the nature of the period of the Resurrection of the Dead.&#160; He claims that it is a phenomenon limited to the righteous alone and appears to believe that souls will come back to life with a body, but then die again to return to עולם הבא, where they resume their purely spiritual existence and continue to enjoy this ultimate reward.&#160; Given that Rambam believes that life in עולם הבא is the better existence, and that souls can enjoy it from the moment of death, it is not clear what he thinks is the purpose of the Resurrection.</fn> but simply how one refers to what happens to each soul immediately after death.</li>
 
<li>One could have alternatively suggested, as do R. Saadia Gaon and Ramban, that Olam Haba is an actual physical place which will be created after the Messianic age and Resurrection of the Dead, in which the resurrected will live eternally. If so, the ultimate reward is for both the body and soul, and is not purely spiritual (though bodies will not need physical sustenance as they do in this world).&#160; R"Y Albo explains that since both the body and soul performed mitzvot (and neither was fully rewarded in this world) they both deserve reward in the next world.</li>
 
<li>One could have alternatively suggested, as do R. Saadia Gaon and Ramban, that Olam Haba is an actual physical place which will be created after the Messianic age and Resurrection of the Dead, in which the resurrected will live eternally. If so, the ultimate reward is for both the body and soul, and is not purely spiritual (though bodies will not need physical sustenance as they do in this world).&#160; R"Y Albo explains that since both the body and soul performed mitzvot (and neither was fully rewarded in this world) they both deserve reward in the next world.</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
Line 52: Line 52:
 
<li>The Kuzari and Ran<fn>See also Shadal in his letter to Almeda: "However, for purposes of sanction in his laws, Moses announced rewards that were earthly, natural, verifiable in this life,<br/>and such a sanction was much more effective than one that would<br/>have been drawn from heavenly rewards, supported by faith alone." (See Daniel Klein, "<a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=&amp;ved=2ahUKEwis8tmQ0NLtAhUNlhQKHVxeBdIQFjABegQIARAC&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hakirah.org%2FVol%252010%2520Klein.pdf&amp;usg=AOvVaw0PeuicUtYmPzZN2gmJOyXw">A Letter to Almeda:Shadal’s Guide for the Perplexed</a>," Hakirah 10: 225-241 for a&#160; translation of the full letter.)</fn> note that if Torah only spoke of a world to come (as is promised by other religions), there would be no way to verify Hashem's providence and one would have to rely on faith alone that retribution is really to come.<fn>The Kuzari adds that among the blessings promised for this world are also spiritual ones (for instance, Vayikra 26:12 promises" "וְהִתְהַלַּכְתִּי בְּתוֹכְכֶם וְהָיִיתִי לָכֶם לֵאלֹהִים"). When people see that even in this world one's soul can cling to the Divine and reap spiritual, they will know by a priori argument that in the spiritual world to come, their souls will surely be able to benefit similarly.</fn>&#160; The Kuzari further adds that, for many, the physical rewards of this world are a greater incentive to observance than promises of the next world.</li>
 
<li>The Kuzari and Ran<fn>See also Shadal in his letter to Almeda: "However, for purposes of sanction in his laws, Moses announced rewards that were earthly, natural, verifiable in this life,<br/>and such a sanction was much more effective than one that would<br/>have been drawn from heavenly rewards, supported by faith alone." (See Daniel Klein, "<a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=&amp;ved=2ahUKEwis8tmQ0NLtAhUNlhQKHVxeBdIQFjABegQIARAC&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hakirah.org%2FVol%252010%2520Klein.pdf&amp;usg=AOvVaw0PeuicUtYmPzZN2gmJOyXw">A Letter to Almeda:Shadal’s Guide for the Perplexed</a>," Hakirah 10: 225-241 for a&#160; translation of the full letter.)</fn> note that if Torah only spoke of a world to come (as is promised by other religions), there would be no way to verify Hashem's providence and one would have to rely on faith alone that retribution is really to come.<fn>The Kuzari adds that among the blessings promised for this world are also spiritual ones (for instance, Vayikra 26:12 promises" "וְהִתְהַלַּכְתִּי בְּתוֹכְכֶם וְהָיִיתִי לָכֶם לֵאלֹהִים"). When people see that even in this world one's soul can cling to the Divine and reap spiritual, they will know by a priori argument that in the spiritual world to come, their souls will surely be able to benefit similarly.</fn>&#160; The Kuzari further adds that, for many, the physical rewards of this world are a greater incentive to observance than promises of the next world.</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
<point><b>Is it problematic to hope for reward?</b> Commentators divide on this point. Rambam claims that one should observe mitzvot for their own sake, simply because that is God's bidding, and not for hopes of reward.<fn>See above that he explains that this is the reason that no true rewards are mentioned in Torah.</fn> Abarbanel, in contrast, asserts that there is nothing wrong with serving Hashem in hopes of reward, as proven by the many verses in which Hashem Himself says to observe "so that it will be good for you" and the like. He does assert, however, that one should not serve with only physical rewards in mind as these are fleeting and not the true compensation, regardless.</point>
+
<point><b>Is it problematic to hope for reward?</b> Commentators divide on this point. <br/>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>Rambam claims that one should observe mitzvot for their own sake, simply because that is God's bidding, and not for hopes of reward. As mentioned, it is for this reason that true rewards are not mentioned in Torah.</li>
 +
<li>Abarbanel, in contrast, asserts that there is nothing wrong with serving Hashem in hopes of reward, as proven by the many verses in which Hashem Himself says to observe "so that it will be good for you" and the like. He does assert, however, that one should not serve with only physical rewards in mind as these are fleeting and not the true compensation, regardless.</li>
 +
</ul></point>
 
<point><b>"וְשַׂמְתִּי אֲנִי אֶת פָּנַי בָּאִישׁ הַהוּא"</b></point>
 
<point><b>"וְשַׂמְתִּי אֲנִי אֶת פָּנַי בָּאִישׁ הַהוּא"</b></point>
 
<point><b>Purpose of rewards / punishments</b></point>
 
<point><b>Purpose of rewards / punishments</b></point>

Version as of 08:17, 16 December 2020

Reward and Punishment

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Individuals Rewarded in this World

Individuals are compensated for their actions already in this world, and not only in the next world.

Total or partial compensation?
Why not reward the individual only in this world?

Individuals Not Rewarded in this World

Individuals do not receive true retribution in this world, getting their just desserts only in the next world.

Biblical blessings – This position must explain the Torah's many promises of reward and punishment, especially considering that many of these are physical in nature,3 implying that they refer to this world.  If there is no individual retribution in this world, to what do these refer?
  • Collective recompense – R. Crescas, R"Y Albo and Abarbanel4 respond that the retribution spoken about throughout Torah refers only to the collective and speaks of national rather than individual rewards. 
    • This is supported by the collective nature of the vast majority of the Torah's blessings and curses which speak of war, rain, famine and the like.5
    • As further support for this reading, R"Y Albo further points to the plural formulation of the blessings/curses of Vayikra 26, which suggests that a group, rather than an individual, is being addressed. He notes that other verses, despite being worded in the singular, explicitly mention or reference the nation.6 
    • In addition, the collective context of specific verses implies that even surrounding verses which could theoretically be explained to refer only to the individual refer to the group as well.7
    • Some commentators8 suggest that even verses which speak of rewards for individual observance of specific mitzvot, like the promise of long life for honoring one's parents in Shemot 20:11,9 refer to collective retribution.10 RalbagVayikra 26:4-5Devarim 5:29Devarim 6:24-25Devarim 22:7Shemot Beur HaParashah 20:11Shemot Toalot 23:25Vayikra Toalot 26:3Devarim Toalot 6:24Milchamot Hashem 4:4Milchamot Hashem 4:6About R. Levi b. Gershom notes that a society in which people revere their parents is one in which people have respect for their elders, which in turn leads to general Torah observance, meriting the nation to live in Israel and not be exiled.11
  • Rewards of next world – This approach can also suggest that certain rewards12 in Torah do indeed refer to the individual, but to blessings of the next world.  Thus, R. Yaakov maintains that the promises of "לְמַעַן יִיטַב לָךְ / לְמַעַן יַאֲרִכוּן יָמֶיךָ" in Devarim 5:15 and Devarim 22:713 refer to the spiritual good and eternal life of the next world.  This, however, is difficult in this specific case, as Devarim 5 explicitly states, "עַל הָאֲדָמָה אֲשֶׁר י״י אֱלֹהֶיךָ נֹתֵן לָךְ", suggesting that the promise applies to this world. Nonetheless, the concept can be applied to other verses such as  as Devarim 5:25, Devarim 6:24, and Devarim 12:28.14
  • Enablers – In contrast to the above, Rambam15 suggests that even individuals might in fact benefit from the promises of Torah in this world, but he maintains that these do not constitute rewards but rather enablers. A life free of troubles, sickness, and war will make it easier for people to observe Hashem's commandments,16 paving the way for one to earn real reward in the next world.17  
Ultimate reward: physical or spiritual? One of the main philosophical motivations for this position is the belief in the primacy of spiritual rewards:
Hashem's providence – This reading of reward and punishment is further influenced by these sources' understanding of Divine providence. According to many of these thinkers,19 though there is individual Divine providence, not all merit it to the same degree.20 Moreover, the world is generally run via natural law21 rather than such providence.22  In such a world, judged as it by the deeds of the majority, it is difficult to reward an individual for his personal deeds, as doing so will often necessitate intervening in nature23 (which many might not deserve).
Reality that appears to contradict the Torah – These sources might also be motivated by their perceptions of reality, in which individuals often do not appear to receive the rewards promised by Torah despite mitzvah observance.24  Positing that the Torah does not actually promise individual retribution in this world resolves the seeming contradiction.25  [By adding that the individual instead gets his just compensation in the next world, they also address the associated and more general problem of theodicy.26]
Is not deferred retribution unjust? One might question the justice of deferred retribution.  If a person sins or acts righteously in this world, should he not get his due in this world as well?  Is it fair that one needs to wait for the next world to be compensated? 
  • Rambam appears unperturbed by the question, assuming that the magnitude of the good of the next world renders all rewards of this world negligible. According to him, it is simply impossible to get full reward in this world, so there can be no question of injustice.
  • Others might suggest that since this and the next world are really one continuum,27 there is no issue in meting out recompense in one world for deeds done in the other.
Nature of עולם הבא
  • According to Rambam, "עולם הבא" refers to the eternal existence of the souls of the deserving after death (and the cutting off of the undeserving).  It is a purely spiritual existence where souls exist without a body, basking in Hashem's glory, with no need for food, drink, or sleep.  It is not a distinct place to be created in the future after the Messianic era and Resurrection of the Dead,28 but simply how one refers to what happens to each soul immediately after death.
  • One could have alternatively suggested, as do R. Saadia Gaon and Ramban, that Olam Haba is an actual physical place which will be created after the Messianic age and Resurrection of the Dead, in which the resurrected will live eternally. If so, the ultimate reward is for both the body and soul, and is not purely spiritual (though bodies will not need physical sustenance as they do in this world).  R"Y Albo explains that since both the body and soul performed mitzvot (and neither was fully rewarded in this world) they both deserve reward in the next world.
Why isn't עולם הבא mentioned in the Torah? Considering that these sources all  assume that "עולם הבא" constitutes the ultimate reward, they must explain why it is never mentioned in Torah. Many explanations have been offered;29 just a few are listed below:
  • Rambam explains that Hashem does not want people to serve Him for hopes of reward or fear of punishment, but rather for the sake of Hashem Himself.
  • Ibn EzraShemot Second Commentary 20:11Shemot Second Commentary 23:25Devarim 5:15Devarim 32:39About R. Avraham ibn Ezra suggests that since Torah is given to the masses, who would not be able to comprehend the secrets of the next world, Hashem speaks on their level, telling only of the physical rewards of this world.
  • R"Y Albo asserts that Torah's focus is the collective rather than the individual, being a covenant between Hashem and the nation. Therefore there is no room for discussion of Olam Haba which refers only to the fate of the individual.
  • The Kuzari and Ran30 note that if Torah only spoke of a world to come (as is promised by other religions), there would be no way to verify Hashem's providence and one would have to rely on faith alone that retribution is really to come.31  The Kuzari further adds that, for many, the physical rewards of this world are a greater incentive to observance than promises of the next world.
Is it problematic to hope for reward? Commentators divide on this point.
  • Rambam claims that one should observe mitzvot for their own sake, simply because that is God's bidding, and not for hopes of reward. As mentioned, it is for this reason that true rewards are not mentioned in Torah.
  • Abarbanel, in contrast, asserts that there is nothing wrong with serving Hashem in hopes of reward, as proven by the many verses in which Hashem Himself says to observe "so that it will be good for you" and the like. He does assert, however, that one should not serve with only physical rewards in mind as these are fleeting and not the true compensation, regardless.
"וְשַׂמְתִּי אֲנִי אֶת פָּנַי בָּאִישׁ הַהוּא"
Purpose of rewards / punishments

Changing Rewards

Hashem's modes of providence have changed over time.  Though immediate reward and punishment is manifest in the Biblical and First Temple periods, it disappeared thereafter as Hashem's initial overt providence gradually became covert.

"עַל הָאֲדָמָה אֲשֶׁר י״י אֱלֹהֶיךָ נֹתֵן לָךְ"