Difference between revisions of "Sale of the Birthright – A Fair Deal/2/en"
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Evaluation of Yaakov's actions</b> – This position maintains that Yaakov pursued the birthright, not for material gain, but for a lofty, spiritual, ideal. As Esav's character and/or beliefs proved him an unworthy successor to Avraham, Yaakov viewed himself as proactively ensuring that the blessing went to the proper individual.<fn>Abarbanel even proposes that since Esav was undeserving, Yaakov feared that perhaps the blessing would switch to the line of Yishmael, and neither brother would receive it.</fn> In addition, since Esav was not literally about to die and did not value the birthright, the sale was neither unfair nor exploitative.</point> | <point><b>Evaluation of Yaakov's actions</b> – This position maintains that Yaakov pursued the birthright, not for material gain, but for a lofty, spiritual, ideal. As Esav's character and/or beliefs proved him an unworthy successor to Avraham, Yaakov viewed himself as proactively ensuring that the blessing went to the proper individual.<fn>Abarbanel even proposes that since Esav was undeserving, Yaakov feared that perhaps the blessing would switch to the line of Yishmael, and neither brother would receive it.</fn> In addition, since Esav was not literally about to die and did not value the birthright, the sale was neither unfair nor exploitative.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Does Yaakov receive the birthright?</b> All agree that Yaakov's descendants, rather than Esav's, became the chosen nation, and the inheritors of Avraham's legacy.<fn> | + | <point><b>Does Yaakov receive the birthright?</b> All agree that Yaakov's descendants, rather than Esav's, became the chosen nation, and the inheritors of Avraham's legacy.<fn>R. Yitzchak Arama proves that Yaakov's orchestrations to purchase the birthright were ultimately vindicated from the fact that Yitzchak did give the blessing of Avraham to Yaakov (<a href="Bereshit28-4" data-aht="source">Bereshit 28:4</a>) and from Hashem's usage of the phrase "בְּנִי בְכֹרִי יִשְׂרָאֵל" (<a href="Shemot4-22" data-aht="source">Shemot 4:22</a>). Both Yitzchak and God, thus, confirmed Yaakov and his descendants as the true inheritors of the Covenant.</fn> R. D"Z Hoffmann, though, suggests that this inheritance had nothing to do with the sale,<fn>He points out that Yaakov never gets any special privileges as a direct result of the sale, nor does his father ever point to it to validate his rights to Avraham's blessing.</fn> which was more like child's play with no legal standing. Lekach Tov and Shadal, in contrast, point out how Esav acted upon the oath taken during the sale, and, after his father's death, moved to Seir, staking no claim on the Land of Israel.</point> |
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Version as of 10:56, 21 May 2019
Sale of the Birthright – A Fair Deal?
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
Commentators attempt to justify Yaakov's actions in a variety of ways, presenting a spectrum of opinions regarding both the essence of the birthright and how to evaluate Yaakov and Esav's actions. Rashbam and Ibn Ezra view the birthright as a material inheritance and defend Yaakov's purchase by suggesting that he paid its full worth. According to them, both Yaakov and Esav are neutral figures. On the other hand, various midrashim and later commentators understand the birthright to be a spiritual commodity, either the religious responsibility of serving God or the status of the chosen nation, and explain that Esav was simply unworthy of these tasks. Finally, R"Y Bekhor Shor assumes that the birthright granted the eldest son the rights to the father's entire estate, claiming that under such circumstances Yaakov had the right to put his own interests ahead of his brothers. He equates Yaakov and Esav in their desire to look out for themselves, seeing in this a necessary quality in their struggle for survival.
Gave Fair Value
Yaakov did not cheat Esav since he paid for the full worth of the birthright. This position subdivides regarding whether Yaakov paid more for the birthright than is generally assumed, or whether the birthright was worth less than often thought.
Paid Full Price
The birthright constituted a double portion of inheritance, and Yaakov paid its full price in money.
Worthless to Esav
The birthright was either a double estate portion or merely honored status,8 but either way, was not worth much to Esav.
- Ibn Ezra explains that Esav belittled the birthright because it really was almost worthless due to Yitzchak's poverty.12 He thus does not view the verse as passing moral judgment on Esav.13
- Ramban maintains that Esav's attitude stemmed from his impetuousness and need for immediate gratification. According to Ramban, Esav, like all fools, lived in the moment and never thought about the future.14 Ramban clearly portrays Esav in a negative light.15
Esav Unworthy
The birthright was a spiritual (rather than financial) commodity which Esav was both unworthy of and uninterested in receiving. This position divides regarding what rights and obligations this religious position granted:
Priestly Status
The birthright was a priestly status, and Yaakov secured the patriarch's responsibilities to serve God.
- Esav vilified – Most of the commentators who take this position vilify Esav,22 portraying him as an evil person who cared nothing for the service of Hashem.23 Esav did not feel cheated, but happily sold the birthright both because it had no value to him and because he thought that it might lead to his premature death. Moreover, according to Midrash Aggadah (Buber), it was Esav who was the trickster, gloating among fellow villains that he outsmarted his brother who paid for a commodity that he could not legitimately acquire.
- Esav unsuited – Seforno's portrait of Esav is much more neutral, portraying a figure who really was on the verge of death and who was simply not cut out for the demands of the priestly position.24 This combination of factors led to his willingness to sell the birthright.
Avraham's Legacy
Yaakov acquired the rights to the Blessing and Covenant of Avraham. This included the privileges of inheriting the land of Israel and becoming the father of the chosen nation.
- Chizkuni, Abarbanel, and Shadal suggest that Esav is declaring that he is likely to die before obtaining the inheritance. Abarbanel and Shadal31 think that Esav is referring to the perils inherent in his hunting profession. Chizkuni, in contrast, proposes that Esav was thinking that the inheritance of the land of Israel was still centuries away,32 by which point he would be long dead and incapable of benefiting.33
- R. D"Z Hoffmann maintains that Esav feels as if he is literally on the verge of death due to his insatiable desire for the stew,34 and it is this craving that makes him agree to the deal.35
- Agnostic – Lekach Tov and Abarbanel paint an Esav unworthy of fulfilling the legacy of Avraham. Esav was evil and lacking in faith. He did not even believe that Hashem was going to fulfill His promise and give the Land of Israel to Avraham.36
- Slave to his desires – Chizkuni and R. D"Z Hoffmann portray not an evil Esav, but one who lives in the moment, a slave to his physical desires.37 Esav was willing to sell the birthright so as indulge in his immediate craving, neither thinking of the future nor appreciating the value of spiritual blessings.38
Yaakov's Self Interest
The birthright included Yitzchak's full inheritance, and only one son was to receive the entire estate. Yaakov's purchase was justified since, under such circumstances, he had the right to look out for his own self interest.