Sefer Yehoshua – Evolving Plans/0/en
Sefer Yehoshua – Evolving Plans
Introduction
Often, readers of Tanakh come to the text with knowledge of the end of the story. This frequently means that we forget that the written outcome was not necessarily the only possible one, and that the Biblical characters were not privy to it. Below are several examples drawn from throughout Sefer Yehoshua where it is possible that there was a change in plan. In each case, such a hypothesis explains otherwise difficult aspects of the narrative.
Crossing of the Yarden
Chapters 3-4 describe the miraculous splitting of the Yarden. It is possible, however, that the initial plan was to cross the Yarden naturally, at the river's fords, and that Yehoshua was only told of the miracle immediately beforehand. This would explain several difficulties and inconsistencies in the text:
- Food – In Yehoshua 1:11, Yehoshua commands the people to prepare food for the crossing, a seemingly unnecessary preparation if the river was to split and the nation to cross in a matter of hours.1 If, however, Yehoshua was thinking about millions crossing the river naturally, an event that would take days, it is clear why provisions were needed.
- Day of crossing – There is a discrepancy between the date set for the crossing in Chapters 1 and 3. In the former, Yehoshua tells the nation that "in another three days you will cross the Jordan" yet in Chapter 3 the verses state that "after three days" Yehoshua told the people to sanctify themselves to cross "the next day". It is possible that after Yehoshua was told of the miracle, he needed to postpone the crossing so that everyone could prepare for Hashem's revelation and merit Divine intervention.2
- Following the ark – It is possible that the directives of the leaders in Chapter 6:1-43 are also according to the original plan. If so, their command that the nation follow the ark and keep a distance of 2000 cubits might have later been overridden. During the actual crossing, the people don't follow the ark, which stays put in the river, but instead pass it and there is no mention of staying far.
