Difference between revisions of "Selection of the Priests and Levites/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 11: Line 11:
 
<mekorot><multilink><a href="Jubilees30-17-29" data-aht="source">Jubilees</a><a href="Jubilees30-17-29" data-aht="source">30:17-29</a><a href="Jubilees31-13-27" data-aht="source">31:13-27</a><a href="Jubilees32-1-15" data-aht="source">32:1-15</a><a href="Jubilees" data-aht="parshan">About Jubilees</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="TestamentsofLevi9-1-4" data-aht="source">Testaments of Levi</a><a href="TestamentsofLevi9-1-4" data-aht="source">Testaments of Levi 9:1-4</a></multilink>,<fn>This source only speaks of the choosing of the priesthood.</fn> <multilink><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit32-25" data-aht="source">Targum Pseudo-Jonathan</a><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit32-25" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:25</a><a href="Targum Pseudo-Jonathan" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Pseudo-Jonathan</a></multilink>,<fn>Targum Pseudo-Jonathan speaks of the choosing of the Tribe of Levi in general terms and does not specify if this refers to their meriting both the priesthood and Levite service or just one or the other.</fn>&#160;<multilink><a href="TanchumaKorach12" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaKorach12" data-aht="source">Korach 12</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>,<fn>Tanchuma also speaks of the choosing of the Tribe of Levi in general terms and does not specify if this refers to their meriting both the priesthood and Levite service or just one or the other.</fn> <multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah3-17" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah3-17" data-aht="source">3:17</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="RadakShemuelI2-27" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Kimchi</a><a href="RadakShemuelI2-27" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 2:27</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink>,</mekorot>
 
<mekorot><multilink><a href="Jubilees30-17-29" data-aht="source">Jubilees</a><a href="Jubilees30-17-29" data-aht="source">30:17-29</a><a href="Jubilees31-13-27" data-aht="source">31:13-27</a><a href="Jubilees32-1-15" data-aht="source">32:1-15</a><a href="Jubilees" data-aht="parshan">About Jubilees</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="TestamentsofLevi9-1-4" data-aht="source">Testaments of Levi</a><a href="TestamentsofLevi9-1-4" data-aht="source">Testaments of Levi 9:1-4</a></multilink>,<fn>This source only speaks of the choosing of the priesthood.</fn> <multilink><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit32-25" data-aht="source">Targum Pseudo-Jonathan</a><a href="TargumPseudo-JonathanBereshit32-25" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:25</a><a href="Targum Pseudo-Jonathan" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Pseudo-Jonathan</a></multilink>,<fn>Targum Pseudo-Jonathan speaks of the choosing of the Tribe of Levi in general terms and does not specify if this refers to their meriting both the priesthood and Levite service or just one or the other.</fn>&#160;<multilink><a href="TanchumaKorach12" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaKorach12" data-aht="source">Korach 12</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>,<fn>Tanchuma also speaks of the choosing of the Tribe of Levi in general terms and does not specify if this refers to their meriting both the priesthood and Levite service or just one or the other.</fn> <multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah3-17" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah3-17" data-aht="source">3:17</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="RadakShemuelI2-27" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Kimchi</a><a href="RadakShemuelI2-27" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 2:27</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Kimchi</a></multilink>,</mekorot>
 
<point><b>Why was the Levite tribe chosen?</b><ul>
 
<point><b>Why was the Levite tribe chosen?</b><ul>
<li><b>Actions in Shechem</b> – According to many of these sources<fn>See Jubilees, Testament of Levi, Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, and Tanchuma.&#160; With the exception of Jubilees, however, none of the sources explain why Levi, as opposed to the other tribes, was chosen.</fn> it was Yaakov who sanctified the tribe of Levi for Hashem.&#160; Jubilees maintains that this was a reward for Levi's avenging of Dinah's honor in Shechem.<fn>For elaboration on Jubilees read of the Shechem story, see <a href="Sin and Slaughter of Shekhem" data-aht="page">Sin and Slaughter of Shekhem</a>.</fn></li>
+
<li><b>Actions in Shechem</b> – According to many of these sources<fn>See Jubilees, Testament of Levi, Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, and Tanchuma.&#160; With the exception of Jubilees, however, none of the sources explain why Levi, as opposed to the other tribes, was chosen.</fn> it was Yaakov who sanctified the tribe of Levi for Hashem.&#160; Jubilees maintains that this was a reward for Levi's avenging of Dinah's honor in Shekhem.<fn>For elaboration on Jubilees' read of the Shekhem story, see <a href="Sin and Slaughter of Shekhem" data-aht="page">Sin and Slaughter of Shekhem</a>.</fn></li>
<li><b>Moshe's Family</b> – Shemot Rabbah and R"Y Kimchi, in contrast, suggest that the appointment occurred first in Egypt, with Shemot Rabbah implying that it was the elevated character of Moshe's specific family that merited the positions.<fn>Shemot Rabbah is ambiguous and could also suggest that the tribe as a whole was picked earlier and only the specific allotment of Levite status to Moshe and preisthood to Aharon) occurred in Egypt.</fn>&#160; The midrash suggests that Moshe himself was originally destined for the priesthood, while Aharon was to be a Levite, but after Moshe's repeated refusals of Hashem's mission at the burning bush, Hashem punished him by switching the roles.</li>
+
<li><b>Moshe's Family</b> – Shemot Rabbah and R"Y Kimchi, in contrast, suggest that the appointment occurred first in Egypt, with Shemot Rabbah implying that it was the elevated character of Moshe's specific family that merited the positions.<fn>Shemot Rabbah is ambiguous and could also suggest that the tribe as a whole was picked earlier and only the specific allotment of Levite status to Moshe and preisthood to Aharon) occurred in Egypt.</fn>&#160; The Midrash suggests that Moshe himself was originally destined for the priesthood, while Aharon was to be a Levite, but after Moshe's repeated refusals of Hashem's mission at the burning bush, Hashem punished him by switching the roles.</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
<point><b>הֲנִגְלֹה נִגְלֵיתִי אֶל בֵּית אָבִיךָ...לִי לְכֹהֵן</b> – According to R. Yosef Kimchi, this verse in Shemuel supports an early appointment, since it states that already in Egypt Hashem revealed Himself to the House of Levi and chose them to serve him as priests.&#160;<multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah5-16" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah5-16" data-aht="source">5:16</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink> adds that the tribe already had special status in Egypt, not sharing in the bondage of the rest of the nation.</point>
+
<point><b>הֲנִגְלֹה נִגְלֵיתִי אֶל בֵּית אָבִיךָ...לִי לְכֹהֵן</b> – According to R. Yosef Kimchi, this verse in Shemuel supports an early appointment, since it states that already in Egypt Hashem revealed Himself to the House of Levi and chose them to serve him as priests.&#160;<multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah5-16" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah5-16" data-aht="source">5:16</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink> adds that the tribe had special status in Egypt, not sharing in the bondage of the rest of the nation.</point>
 
<point><b>"בָּעֵת הַהִוא הִבְדִּיל י"י אֶת שֵׁבֶט הַלֵּוִי"</b> – This verse seems to suggest that the tribe was first chosen after the Sin of the Golden Calf<fn>The time spoken of in the previous verses relates to the period in which Moshe received the second set of Tablets.</fn>.&#160; These sources would suggest that though Levi had been singled out much earlier, it was first with construction of the Mishkan, after the sin, that service was official, with a permanent, regulated&#160; character.</point>
 
<point><b>"בָּעֵת הַהִוא הִבְדִּיל י"י אֶת שֵׁבֶט הַלֵּוִי"</b> – This verse seems to suggest that the tribe was first chosen after the Sin of the Golden Calf<fn>The time spoken of in the previous verses relates to the period in which Moshe received the second set of Tablets.</fn>.&#160; These sources would suggest that though Levi had been singled out much earlier, it was first with construction of the Mishkan, after the sin, that service was official, with a permanent, regulated&#160; character.</point>
 
<point><b>The "כֹּהֲנִים" of Shemot 19</b> – This position could suggest that the word Kohanim here refers to the same people as it does in the rest of Tanakh:&#160; Aharon's sons who have already been appointed.&#160;&#160; This might be supported by the similar cast of characters that are mentioned both in this&#160;<a href="Shemot19-21-24" data-aht="source">verse</a> (Moshe, Aharon, the Kohanim and nation) and in the somewhat parallel verse of <a href="Shemot24-1-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 24:1</a>(Moshe, Aharon, Nadav and Avihu, and Elders, or the representatives of the nation).<fn>Cf. the Hoil Moshe who identifies the commands of the two verses, suggesting that Nadav and Avihu of Shemot 24:1 is equivalent the kohanim of Shemot 19:24.</fn></point>
 
<point><b>The "כֹּהֲנִים" of Shemot 19</b> – This position could suggest that the word Kohanim here refers to the same people as it does in the rest of Tanakh:&#160; Aharon's sons who have already been appointed.&#160;&#160; This might be supported by the similar cast of characters that are mentioned both in this&#160;<a href="Shemot19-21-24" data-aht="source">verse</a> (Moshe, Aharon, the Kohanim and nation) and in the somewhat parallel verse of <a href="Shemot24-1-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 24:1</a>(Moshe, Aharon, Nadav and Avihu, and Elders, or the representatives of the nation).<fn>Cf. the Hoil Moshe who identifies the commands of the two verses, suggesting that Nadav and Avihu of Shemot 24:1 is equivalent the kohanim of Shemot 19:24.</fn></point>
 
<point><b>Sacrifices before the Mishkan</b> – These sources might maintain the "נַעֲרֵי בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" who bring offerings at Sinai in Shemot 24&#160; also refer to Aharon's sons.&#160; It is not clear, however, why they would be referred to in this manner rather than by either their names or title.<fn>See <multilink><a href="RashiKetubot115b" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiKetubot115b" data-aht="source">Ketubot 115b</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> who suggests that the youth were fetched to bring the animals but they are not the subject of the pharse, "וַיַּעֲלוּ עֹלֹת".&#160; Only Aharon's sons actually sacrificed.</fn></point>
 
<point><b>Sacrifices before the Mishkan</b> – These sources might maintain the "נַעֲרֵי בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" who bring offerings at Sinai in Shemot 24&#160; also refer to Aharon's sons.&#160; It is not clear, however, why they would be referred to in this manner rather than by either their names or title.<fn>See <multilink><a href="RashiKetubot115b" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiKetubot115b" data-aht="source">Ketubot 115b</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> who suggests that the youth were fetched to bring the animals but they are not the subject of the pharse, "וַיַּעֲלוּ עֹלֹת".&#160; Only Aharon's sons actually sacrificed.</fn></point>
 
<point><b>Levites and the Golden Calf</b> – According to this position, it is possible that it was only the Levites who heeded Moshe's call and stood against the idolatry of the Calf specifically because they had already been designated to serve God.<fn>In other words the Levites were not chosen because they alone served Hashem during the episode, but rather, they alone served Hashem because they had previously been chosen.</fn></point>
 
<point><b>Levites and the Golden Calf</b> – According to this position, it is possible that it was only the Levites who heeded Moshe's call and stood against the idolatry of the Calf specifically because they had already been designated to serve God.<fn>In other words the Levites were not chosen because they alone served Hashem during the episode, but rather, they alone served Hashem because they had previously been chosen.</fn></point>
<point><b>Status of Firstborns</b> – This approach might maintain that the first-borns never held any Levite or priestly status.&#160; They were sanctified in Egypt because they had been saved from the Plague of&#160; First-borns,<fn>This was not something they individually merited, but simply a consequence of being saved; with the miraculous act they became holy to Hashem.</fn> but this was not accompanied by any cultic role.<fn>It is even possible that those sanctified were just the children born after the Plague, in which case it is obvious that tehse infants could not have been in charge of sacrificing.</fn>&#160;</point>
+
<point><b>Status of Firstborns</b> – This approach might maintain that the first-borns never held any Levite or priestly status.&#160; They were sanctified in Egypt because they had been saved from the Plague of&#160; First-borns,<fn>This was not something they individually merited, but simply a consequence of being saved; with the miraculous act they became holy to Hashem.</fn> but this was not accompanied by any cultic role.<fn>It is even possible that those sanctified were just the children born after the Plague, in which case it is obvious that tehse infants could not have been in charge of sacrificing.</fn></point>
 
<point><b>Switching of Levites and Firtsborns</b> – If the firstborns never played a cultic role, it is not clear what it means that the Levites were chosen to serve in their stead.&#160; These sources might explain that the redemption</point>
 
<point><b>Switching of Levites and Firtsborns</b> – If the firstborns never played a cultic role, it is not clear what it means that the Levites were chosen to serve in their stead.&#160; These sources might explain that the redemption</point>
 
<point><b>Korach's Rebellion</b></point>
 
<point><b>Korach's Rebellion</b></point>

Version as of 00:50, 18 February 2016

Selection of the Priests and Levites

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Before the Exodus

The tribe of Levi was singled out to be Levites and Priests already in Egypt, and were perhaps chosen even as early as the Patriarchal Period.

Why was the Levite tribe chosen?
  • Actions in Shechem – According to many of these sources4 it was Yaakov who sanctified the tribe of Levi for Hashem.  Jubilees maintains that this was a reward for Levi's avenging of Dinah's honor in Shekhem.5
  • Moshe's Family – Shemot Rabbah and R"Y Kimchi, in contrast, suggest that the appointment occurred first in Egypt, with Shemot Rabbah implying that it was the elevated character of Moshe's specific family that merited the positions.6  The Midrash suggests that Moshe himself was originally destined for the priesthood, while Aharon was to be a Levite, but after Moshe's repeated refusals of Hashem's mission at the burning bush, Hashem punished him by switching the roles.
הֲנִגְלֹה נִגְלֵיתִי אֶל בֵּית אָבִיךָ...לִי לְכֹהֵן – According to R. Yosef Kimchi, this verse in Shemuel supports an early appointment, since it states that already in Egypt Hashem revealed Himself to the House of Levi and chose them to serve him as priests. Shemot Rabbah5:16About Shemot Rabbah adds that the tribe had special status in Egypt, not sharing in the bondage of the rest of the nation.
"בָּעֵת הַהִוא הִבְדִּיל י"י אֶת שֵׁבֶט הַלֵּוִי" – This verse seems to suggest that the tribe was first chosen after the Sin of the Golden Calf7.  These sources would suggest that though Levi had been singled out much earlier, it was first with construction of the Mishkan, after the sin, that service was official, with a permanent, regulated  character.
The "כֹּהֲנִים" of Shemot 19 – This position could suggest that the word Kohanim here refers to the same people as it does in the rest of Tanakh:  Aharon's sons who have already been appointed.   This might be supported by the similar cast of characters that are mentioned both in this verse (Moshe, Aharon, the Kohanim and nation) and in the somewhat parallel verse of Shemot 24:1(Moshe, Aharon, Nadav and Avihu, and Elders, or the representatives of the nation).8
Sacrifices before the Mishkan – These sources might maintain the "נַעֲרֵי בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" who bring offerings at Sinai in Shemot 24  also refer to Aharon's sons.  It is not clear, however, why they would be referred to in this manner rather than by either their names or title.9
Levites and the Golden Calf – According to this position, it is possible that it was only the Levites who heeded Moshe's call and stood against the idolatry of the Calf specifically because they had already been designated to serve God.10
Status of Firstborns – This approach might maintain that the first-borns never held any Levite or priestly status.  They were sanctified in Egypt because they had been saved from the Plague of  First-borns,11 but this was not accompanied by any cultic role.12
Switching of Levites and Firtsborns – If the firstborns never played a cultic role, it is not clear what it means that the Levites were chosen to serve in their stead.  These sources might explain that the redemption
Korach's Rebellion

Before the Sin of the Golden Calf

The Priests were designated before the Sin of the Golden Calf, in preparation for the erection of the Mishkan.  This positions subdivides regarding when the Levites were chosen.

Together with the Priests

After the Priests

In the Aftermath of the Sin of the Golden Calf