Difference between revisions of "Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Acharei Mot/0/en"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<page type="Basic"> | <page type="Basic"> | ||
<h1>Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Acharei Mot</h1> | <h1>Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Acharei Mot</h1> | ||
| − | + | ||
<category>Is Yom HaKippurim Really About Repentance? | <category>Is Yom HaKippurim Really About Repentance? | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<category name="Nadav and Avihu"> | <category name="Nadav and Avihu"> | ||
The Deaths of Nadav and Avihu | The Deaths of Nadav and Avihu | ||
| − | <p>Parashat Acharei Mot opens by referencing the tragic deaths of Nadav and Avihu, who were consumed by heavenly fire after offering incense to Hashem.  What about their deed was so terrible to warrant such a severe punishment?  See <a href="Why Were Nadav and Avihu Killed" data-aht="page">Why Were Nadav and Avihu Killed?</a></p> | + | <p>Parashat Acharei Mot opens by referencing the tragic deaths of Nadav and Avihu, who were consumed by heavenly fire after offering incense to Hashem.  What about their deed was so terrible to warrant such a severe punishment?  See <a href="Why Were Nadav and Avihu Killed" data-aht="page">Why Were Nadav and Avihu Killed?</a></p><ul> |
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>Many suggest that even if the brothers had positive intentions, they were punished for violating proper protocol.  R. S"R Hirsch, thus, writes that though Nadav and Avihu desired to get close to Hashem, "in the sacrificial service there is no room for subjectivity... [closeness] will not be achieved except via listening to God".  What are the dangers of subjective worship?  Why might R. Hirsch, specifically, have been concerned about this?</li> | <li>Many suggest that even if the brothers had positive intentions, they were punished for violating proper protocol.  R. S"R Hirsch, thus, writes that though Nadav and Avihu desired to get close to Hashem, "in the sacrificial service there is no room for subjectivity... [closeness] will not be achieved except via listening to God".  What are the dangers of subjective worship?  Why might R. Hirsch, specifically, have been concerned about this?</li> | ||
<li>Rashbam<fn>This is the general direction of his comments, though he is not completely explicit.</fn> suggests that the deaths should not be viewed as a punishment, but rather as a "work accident".  According to this, Nadav and Avihu were in the wrong place at the wrong time and suffered the natural consequences. Are there "chance accidents", or must everything that occurs in the world be directly attributed to God and viewed in terms of reward and punishment?</li> | <li>Rashbam<fn>This is the general direction of his comments, though he is not completely explicit.</fn> suggests that the deaths should not be viewed as a punishment, but rather as a "work accident".  According to this, Nadav and Avihu were in the wrong place at the wrong time and suffered the natural consequences. Are there "chance accidents", or must everything that occurs in the world be directly attributed to God and viewed in terms of reward and punishment?</li> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
<category>Centralization of Worship | <category>Centralization of Worship | ||
| − | <p>Vayikra 17 warns against bringing offerings outside of the Mishkan. </p> | + | <p>Vayikra 17 warns against bringing offerings outside of the Mishkan. </p><ul> |
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>Why does Hashem find worship on private altars problematic? </li> | <li>Why does Hashem find worship on private altars problematic? </li> | ||
<li>What are the advantages and disadvantages of centralized worship?  How might your service of Hashem differ if you always needed to travel to the Mikdash to bring sacrifices, rather than offering them in your backyard?</li> | <li>What are the advantages and disadvantages of centralized worship?  How might your service of Hashem differ if you always needed to travel to the Mikdash to bring sacrifices, rather than offering them in your backyard?</li> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 29: | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
<category>Is Intermarriage Biblically Prohibited? | <category>Is Intermarriage Biblically Prohibited? | ||
| − | <p>In Vayikra 18 and 20, the Torah commands not to give of one's seed to the Molekh.  What does the violation of this prohibition entail?  Some commentators assume that the verse refers to an idolatrous rite, such as child immolation or consecration, while others connect it to sexual offenses, such as relations or marriage to a non-Jew.</p> | + | <p>In Vayikra 18 and 20, the Torah commands not to give of one's seed to the Molekh.  What does the violation of this prohibition entail?  Some commentators assume that the verse refers to an idolatrous rite, such as child immolation or consecration, while others connect it to sexual offenses, such as relations or marriage to a non-Jew.</p><ul> |
| − | <ul> | ||
<li>What textual support might be brought for each position?  See <a href="Giving One's Seed to Molekh" data-aht="page">Giving One's Seed to Molekh</a>.</li> | <li>What textual support might be brought for each position?  See <a href="Giving One's Seed to Molekh" data-aht="page">Giving One's Seed to Molekh</a>.</li> | ||
<li>Though the Torah prohibits intermarriage with the seven Canaanite nations, it nowhere, except for perhaps here, explicitly legislates against marriage to other outsiders.  How might this omission be understood, and how might it affect exegetes' reading of this passage?</li> | <li>Though the Torah prohibits intermarriage with the seven Canaanite nations, it nowhere, except for perhaps here, explicitly legislates against marriage to other outsiders.  How might this omission be understood, and how might it affect exegetes' reading of this passage?</li> | ||
Version as of 07:45, 4 May 2017
Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Acharei Mot
Is Yom HaKippurim Really About Repentance?
In the time of the Beit HaMikdash, one of the eagerly anticipated rites of Yom HaKippurim was the dispatching to Azazel of a goat, laden with the nation's sins. Who or what is Azazel, and why send it a goat? See Why is the Goat Sent to Azazel?
- The verses juxtapose the name Azazel with that of Hashem, suggesting that the word is a proper noun, referring to a specific supernatural being. If so, though, why offer it a goat; is it not prohibited to offer sacrifices to anyone other than Hashem? Moreover, does the Torah believe in the existence of demonic powers?
- If Azazel is, instead, the name of a location, what about this offering uniquely allows it to be brought outside the confines of the Mikdash?
- Either way, what is the purpose of the entire ceremony? How does it relate to the other offerings of the day? What role does it play in achieving atonement for sins, and how does it relate to the presumed need for the people to actually repent for their misdeeds?
The Deaths of Nadav and Avihu
Parashat Acharei Mot opens by referencing the tragic deaths of Nadav and Avihu, who were consumed by heavenly fire after offering incense to Hashem. What about their deed was so terrible to warrant such a severe punishment? See Why Were Nadav and Avihu Killed?
- Many suggest that even if the brothers had positive intentions, they were punished for violating proper protocol. R. S"R Hirsch, thus, writes that though Nadav and Avihu desired to get close to Hashem, "in the sacrificial service there is no room for subjectivity... [closeness] will not be achieved except via listening to God". What are the dangers of subjective worship? Why might R. Hirsch, specifically, have been concerned about this?
- Rashbam1 suggests that the deaths should not be viewed as a punishment, but rather as a "work accident". According to this, Nadav and Avihu were in the wrong place at the wrong time and suffered the natural consequences. Are there "chance accidents", or must everything that occurs in the world be directly attributed to God and viewed in terms of reward and punishment?
- Mention of the brothers' deaths is used to introduce the laws of the Yom HaKippurim Service. What is the connection between the two? Does the service serve to correct the misdeed of Nadav and Avihu, or, alternatively, to prevent another such incident? How so?
Centralization of Worship
Vayikra 17 warns against bringing offerings outside of the Mishkan.
- Why does Hashem find worship on private altars problematic?
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of centralized worship? How might your service of Hashem differ if you always needed to travel to the Mikdash to bring sacrifices, rather than offering them in your backyard?
- During which periods in Israelite history were sacrifices prohibited outside of the Mikdash? Devarim 12 suggests two conditions for the prohibition, inheritance of Canaan and security from enemies. What is the relationship between the two? What light does this shed on the possible understandings of the commandment? See When Were Private Altars Prohibited?
Is Intermarriage Biblically Prohibited?
In Vayikra 18 and 20, the Torah commands not to give of one's seed to the Molekh. What does the violation of this prohibition entail? Some commentators assume that the verse refers to an idolatrous rite, such as child immolation or consecration, while others connect it to sexual offenses, such as relations or marriage to a non-Jew.
- What textual support might be brought for each position? See Giving One's Seed to Molekh.
- Though the Torah prohibits intermarriage with the seven Canaanite nations, it nowhere, except for perhaps here, explicitly legislates against marriage to other outsiders. How might this omission be understood, and how might it affect exegetes' reading of this passage?
