Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Balak/0/en

Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Balak

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Does the Torah Believe in Magic?

Do words have the capacity to bless or curse?  Do powers of sorcery really exist in the world?  If so, are such acts independent of Hashem's will?  

• What does the Torah as a whole, and Parashat Balak in particular, suggest?  If Hashem did not want the Children of Israel harmed, why would it matter whether Bilam spoke positively or negatively about them? Would his curses have had any effect?
• Are magical practices and divination prohibited by the Torah because they are nonsense, or because despite (or maybe, due to) their efficacy, they are not Hashem's desired behavior?
• Debate the opinions of Ibn Ezra and Ramban in Why Worry About Bilam. How do their approaches compare to commentators' understanding of the necromancer's revival of Shemuel in Did Shemuel Come Back to Life?

Calming the Masses

Ibn Kaspi asserts that many among the nation were anxious about Bilam's curse, erroneously believing that it could harm them. Though their concern was unfounded, Hashem, nonetheless, did not want them to be nervous or frightened and so he prevented Bilam from cursing. See Why Worry About Bilam for elaboration.

• Is it possible that Hashem sometimes acts only so as to allay fears and concerns stemming from the misguided beliefs of the masses?  Does this not simply ensure that such beliefs are perpetuated?  Would it not be preferable to, instead, correct the nation's misconceptions?
• Elsewhere, commentators go even further to suggest that there are even certain commandments which were instituted only in response to erroneous beliefs.  For example, see Ibn Kaspi on Purpose of the Pesach, Shadal on the impurity of Tzara'at and the "evil eye" in Half Shekels – For Census or Tabernacle, and Rambam's understanding of the Purpose of the Sacrifices.  Do you find such approaches convincing?

To Dwell Alone: A Blessing or Curse?

Bilam blesses the nation, "הֶן עָם לְבָדָד יִשְׁכֹּן וּבַגּוֹיִם לֹא יִתְחַשָּׁב".  This is often translated as, "Lo, it is a people that shall dwell alone, and shall not be reckoned among the nations."  What, though, is the blessing in being alone?

• Netziv reads Bilam's words less as a blessing and more as a warning against assimilation.  When the nation lives alone, then "יִשְׁכֹּן", they are able to dwell [in peace and dignity]. However, when they are "בַגּוֹיִם", when they interact, then "לֹא יִתְחַשָּׁב", they are not considered important or worthy of respect.
• Do you agree?  Does assimilation cause persecution or prevent it?  In general, does the Torah promote an isolationist attitude towards surrounding cultures, or a policy of involvement with the outside world?  What is the appropriate balance between the two?
• Look up the word "בָדָד" in the concordance. What other meanings or connotations might the word have?  How might these be applied to our verse?  For elaboration, see A Nation that Dwells Alone and R"Y Bekhor Shor there.

Pinchas

What about Pinechas' deed made it so praiseworthy that it stopped a Divine plague and merited him special status and Divine favor?

• In killing Zimri, was Pinechas taking the law into his own hands or following orders? Bring support from the verses for each possibility.
• What was Zimri's sin, and how did it relate to the sin of the nation?  How might your answer bear on the two possibilities brioght above?