Difference between revisions of "Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Behaalotekha/0/en"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
m |
m |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Though most identify the שליו as quail, a minority opinion asserts that it refers to fish.  What proofs can be brought for each position? How might each identification illuminate the Biblical account?  For elaboration, see <a href="Realia:שְׂלָו – Fish or Fowl" data-aht="page">שְׂלָו – Fish or Fowl</a></li> | <li>Though most identify the שליו as quail, a minority opinion asserts that it refers to fish.  What proofs can be brought for each position? How might each identification illuminate the Biblical account?  For elaboration, see <a href="Realia:שְׂלָו – Fish or Fowl" data-aht="page">שְׂלָו – Fish or Fowl</a></li> | ||
| − | <li>The nation's complaint of having only manna to eat would suggest that it was their sole source of nourishment.   However, the Hoil Moshe and others disagree, | + | <li>The nation's complaint of having only manna to eat would suggest that it was their sole source of nourishment.   However, the Hoil Moshe and others disagree, suggesting that the manna served only as a supplement and there were often other food sources.  What might be prompting this position?  What does it suggest about the nature of the Israelite's wandering in the Wilderness?  Was theirs a totally supernatural existence or a more typical nomadic lifestyle, supplemented by the occasional miracle?  See <a href="Realia:Life in the Wilderness" data-aht="page">Life in the Wilderness</a> for more.</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
| − | <category>Idle Gossip or Challenge to Authority? | + | <category>Idle Gossip or a Challenge to Authority? |
| − | <p>How is Miryam and Aharon's critique of Moshe to be understood?  Was this simply idle and misguided chatter, or did they have a fundamental disagreement with his behavior leading them question his authority as leader?</p> | + | <p>How is Miryam and Aharon's critique of Moshe to be understood?  Was this simply idle and misguided chatter, or did they have a fundamental disagreement with his behavior leading them to question his authority as leader?</p> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
| − | <li>The Sifre views Miryam and Aharon as intending no harm, and in fact trying to improve Moshe's family life by encouraging the resumption of normal relations between Moshe and Zipporah.  | + | <li>The Sifre views Miryam and Aharon as intending no harm, and in fact trying to improve Moshe's family life by encouraging the resumption of normal relations between Moshe and Zipporah.  Modern scholars, in contrast, cast Miryam and Aharon in a negative light, suggesting that they were contesting Moshe's leadership and claiming to be his equals. With whom do you agree?  What are the advantages and disadvantages of each position? </li> |
| − | + | <li>R"Y Bekhor Shor offers a different reading of the story, presenting the siblings as bothered by what they perceived as hubris in Moshe's decision to marry a non-Israelite. Was intermarriage prohibited at this point in history?  Is it a Biblical prohibition at all?  Even if not, was not marrying an Israelite the ideal, and Miryam and Aharon thus somewhat justified in their complaint? See <a href="Miryam's Critique of Moshe and his Cushite Marriage" data-aht="page">Miryam's Critique of Moshe and his Cushite Marriage</a>.</li> | |
<li>Is it always wrong to speak about another? What if your intentions are to help the other? If you truly find another's actions troubling, is it problematic to consult a third party about their behavior before approaching the person yourself?</li> | <li>Is it always wrong to speak about another? What if your intentions are to help the other? If you truly find another's actions troubling, is it problematic to consult a third party about their behavior before approaching the person yourself?</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Version as of 05:48, 5 June 2017
Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Behaalotekha
Miracles in the Wilderness: The Selav
After the nation complains about the tediousness of their diet of manna, Hashem provides them with שליו. They gluttonously devour it, and with the "meat still between their teeth" Hashem smites them.
- Though most identify the שליו as quail, a minority opinion asserts that it refers to fish. What proofs can be brought for each position? How might each identification illuminate the Biblical account? For elaboration, see שְׂלָו – Fish or Fowl
- The nation's complaint of having only manna to eat would suggest that it was their sole source of nourishment. However, the Hoil Moshe and others disagree, suggesting that the manna served only as a supplement and there were often other food sources. What might be prompting this position? What does it suggest about the nature of the Israelite's wandering in the Wilderness? Was theirs a totally supernatural existence or a more typical nomadic lifestyle, supplemented by the occasional miracle? See Life in the Wilderness for more.
Idle Gossip or a Challenge to Authority?
How is Miryam and Aharon's critique of Moshe to be understood? Was this simply idle and misguided chatter, or did they have a fundamental disagreement with his behavior leading them to question his authority as leader?
- The Sifre views Miryam and Aharon as intending no harm, and in fact trying to improve Moshe's family life by encouraging the resumption of normal relations between Moshe and Zipporah. Modern scholars, in contrast, cast Miryam and Aharon in a negative light, suggesting that they were contesting Moshe's leadership and claiming to be his equals. With whom do you agree? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each position?
- R"Y Bekhor Shor offers a different reading of the story, presenting the siblings as bothered by what they perceived as hubris in Moshe's decision to marry a non-Israelite. Was intermarriage prohibited at this point in history? Is it a Biblical prohibition at all? Even if not, was not marrying an Israelite the ideal, and Miryam and Aharon thus somewhat justified in their complaint? See Miryam's Critique of Moshe and his Cushite Marriage.
- Is it always wrong to speak about another? What if your intentions are to help the other? If you truly find another's actions troubling, is it problematic to consult a third party about their behavior before approaching the person yourself?
