Difference between revisions of "Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Bemidbar/0/en"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 9: Line 9:
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li>See&#160;<multilink><a href="Jubilees30-17-29" data-aht="source">Jubilees</a><a href="Jubilees30-17-29" data-aht="source">30:17-29</a><a href="Jubilees" data-aht="parshan">About Jubilees</a></multilink> who claims that they were rewarded for Levi's avenging of Dinah's honor in Shekhem,&#160;<multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah3-17" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah3-17" data-aht="source">3:17</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink> who implies that it was the special character of Moshe's family which elevated the tribe, and&#160;<multilink><a href="RashiDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">Devarim 10:8</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> who points to the Levite's non-participation in the Sin of the Golden Calf.&#160; Which of these approaches do you find most compelling?&#160; Which do you find problematic?&#160; According to Rashi, why should Aharon have merited the priesthood?</li>
 
<li>See&#160;<multilink><a href="Jubilees30-17-29" data-aht="source">Jubilees</a><a href="Jubilees30-17-29" data-aht="source">30:17-29</a><a href="Jubilees" data-aht="parshan">About Jubilees</a></multilink> who claims that they were rewarded for Levi's avenging of Dinah's honor in Shekhem,&#160;<multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah3-17" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah3-17" data-aht="source">3:17</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink> who implies that it was the special character of Moshe's family which elevated the tribe, and&#160;<multilink><a href="RashiDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">Devarim 10:8</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> who points to the Levite's non-participation in the Sin of the Golden Calf.&#160; Which of these approaches do you find most compelling?&#160; Which do you find problematic?&#160; According to Rashi, why should Aharon have merited the priesthood?</li>
<li>R"Y Behor Shor suggests that the choice was practical in nature.&#160; Though originally the firstborns had been selected for the position, Hashem decided that it was better that the service to be confined to a family line and consolidated into one tribe.<fn>He further points out that the the fact that firstborns were given a double portion of the land would hinder them from devoting themselves entirely to service of Hashem.</fn> What are the advantages and disadvantages of selecting just one tribe rather than one individual from each family?&#160; For elaboration, see <a href="Selection of the Priests and Levites" data-aht="page">Selection of the Priests and Levites</a>.</li>
+
<li><multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">R"Y Behor Shor </a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">Devarim 10:8</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>suggests that the choice was practical in nature.&#160; Though originally the firstborns had been selected for the position, Hashem decided that it was better that the service to be confined to a family line and consolidated into one tribe.<fn>He further points out that the the fact that firstborns were given a double portion of the land would hinder them from devoting themselves entirely to service of Hashem.</fn> What are the advantages and disadvantages of selecting just one tribe rather than one individual from each family?&#160; For elaboration, see <a href="Selection of the Priests and Levites" data-aht="page">Selection of the Priests and Levites</a>.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
<category>Tanakh and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
 
<category>Tanakh and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
<p>Sefer Bemidbar opens with a census of the nation</p>
+
<p>Sefer Bemidbar opens with a census of the nation, taken a mere few months after the census of Shemot 30, when the nation had been counted via their half shekel donations to the Mishkan.&#160; Why was it necessary to count the people twice in such a short period?&#160; Moreover, the tallies of the two censuses were identical.&#160; How is this possible?&#160; Were there no deaths or births in the intervening months?&#160; </p>
<p>&#160;</p>
+
<ul>
 +
<li>U. Cassuto uses knowledge of Ancient Near Eastern censuses to suggest that the two events were were both part of a single extended process which started with the building of the Tabernacle.&#160; Can you think of other instances where knowledge of ancient near eastern norms might shed light on a Biblical narrative or law?&#160; For some examples, see <a href="The Mabbul and Mesopotamian Myths" data-aht="page">The Mabbul and Mesopotamian Myths</a>, <a href="The Torah and Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes" data-aht="page">The Torah and Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes</a>, <a href="ANE:Treaties" data-aht="page">R</a>. D"Z Hoffmann's understanding of <a href="Yitro's Visit – Purpose and Significance" data-aht="page">Yitro's Visit</a>, and <a href="Rachel's Stealing of the Terafim" data-aht="page">Rachel's Stealing of the Terafim</a>.</li>
 +
<li>How else might you explain both the identical tallies and the need for two censuses? See <a href="Censuses in the Wilderness" data-aht="page">Censuses in the Wilderness</a>.</li>
 +
</ul>
 
</category>
 
</category>
  
 
</page>
 
</page>
 
</aht-xml>
 
</aht-xml>

Version as of 01:37, 25 May 2017

Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Bemidbar

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Choseness

When and why was the tribe of Levi chosen to be the priests and Levites?  Was the selection merit-based?  If so, for what actions?

  • See Jubilees30:17-29About Jubilees who claims that they were rewarded for Levi's avenging of Dinah's honor in Shekhem, Shemot Rabbah3:17About Shemot Rabbah who implies that it was the special character of Moshe's family which elevated the tribe, and RashiDevarim 10:8About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki who points to the Levite's non-participation in the Sin of the Golden Calf.  Which of these approaches do you find most compelling?  Which do you find problematic?  According to Rashi, why should Aharon have merited the priesthood?
  • R"Y Behor Shor Devarim 10:8About R. Yosef Bekhor Shorsuggests that the choice was practical in nature.  Though originally the firstborns had been selected for the position, Hashem decided that it was better that the service to be confined to a family line and consolidated into one tribe.1 What are the advantages and disadvantages of selecting just one tribe rather than one individual from each family?  For elaboration, see Selection of the Priests and Levites.

Tanakh and Ancient Near Eastern Studies

Sefer Bemidbar opens with a census of the nation, taken a mere few months after the census of Shemot 30, when the nation had been counted via their half shekel donations to the Mishkan.  Why was it necessary to count the people twice in such a short period?  Moreover, the tallies of the two censuses were identical.  How is this possible?  Were there no deaths or births in the intervening months?