Difference between revisions of "Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Bemidbar/0/en"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
<category>Chosenness and Levi
 
<category>Chosenness and Levi
<p>When and why was the tribe of Levi chosen to be the priests and Levites?&#160; Was the selection merit-based?&#160; If so, for what actions?&#160; Why were the firstborns replaced?</p>
+
<p>When and why was the tribe of Levi chosen to be the priests and Levites?&#160; Was the selection merit-based?&#160; If so, for what actions?&#160; Why were the firstborns replaced?</p><ul>
<ul>
 
 
<li><multilink><a href="Jubilees30-17-29" data-aht="source">Jubilees</a><a href="Jubilees30-17-29" data-aht="source">30:17-29</a><a href="Jubilees" data-aht="parshan">About Jubilees</a></multilink> claims that the tribe was chosen already in the time of the Patriarchs, as a reward for Levi's avenging of Dinah's honor in Shekhem.&#160; In contrast, <multilink><a href="RashiDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">Devarim 10:8</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> points to the Levites' loyalty to Hashem during the Sin of the Golden Calf.&#160; Which approach do you find more compelling?&#160; How would Rashi explain why Aharon merited the priesthood despite being involved in making the Calf?</li>
 
<li><multilink><a href="Jubilees30-17-29" data-aht="source">Jubilees</a><a href="Jubilees30-17-29" data-aht="source">30:17-29</a><a href="Jubilees" data-aht="parshan">About Jubilees</a></multilink> claims that the tribe was chosen already in the time of the Patriarchs, as a reward for Levi's avenging of Dinah's honor in Shekhem.&#160; In contrast, <multilink><a href="RashiDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">Devarim 10:8</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> points to the Levites' loyalty to Hashem during the Sin of the Golden Calf.&#160; Which approach do you find more compelling?&#160; How would Rashi explain why Aharon merited the priesthood despite being involved in making the Calf?</li>
 
<li>In contrast to the above commentators, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">R"Y Bekhor Shor </a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">Devarim 10:8</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>suggests that the choice was practical in nature.&#160; Though originally all firstborns had been designated to serve, Hashem decided that it was better that the sacrificial service be confined to a single family line.<fn>He further points out that the the fact that firstborn were given a double portion of the land would hinder them from devoting themselves entirely to service of Hashem.</fn> What are the advantages and disadvantages of each model (one tribe versus one individual from each family)?&#160; For elaboration, see <a href="Selection of the Priests and Levites" data-aht="page">Selection of the Priests and Levites</a>.</li>
 
<li>In contrast to the above commentators, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">R"Y Bekhor Shor </a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorDevarim10-8" data-aht="source">Devarim 10:8</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>suggests that the choice was practical in nature.&#160; Though originally all firstborns had been designated to serve, Hashem decided that it was better that the sacrificial service be confined to a single family line.<fn>He further points out that the the fact that firstborn were given a double portion of the land would hinder them from devoting themselves entirely to service of Hashem.</fn> What are the advantages and disadvantages of each model (one tribe versus one individual from each family)?&#160; For elaboration, see <a href="Selection of the Priests and Levites" data-aht="page">Selection of the Priests and Levites</a>.</li>
Line 13: Line 12:
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
<category>Tanakh and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
 
<category>Tanakh and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
<p>Sefer Bemidbar opens with a census of the nation, taken a mere few months after an earlier census described in Shemot 30 and 38, when the nation had been counted via their half shekel donations to the Mishkan.&#160; Why was it necessary to count the people twice in such a short period?&#160; In addition, surprisingly, the tallies of the two censuses were identical.&#160; How is this possible?&#160; Were there no deaths or births in the intervening months?&#160;</p>
+
<p>Sefer Bemidbar opens with a census of the nation, taken a mere few months after an earlier census described in <a href="Shemot38-25-26" data-aht="source">Shemot 38</a>, when the nation had been counted via their half shekel donations to the Mishkan.&#160; But why was it necessary to count the people twice in such a short period?&#160; In addition, surprisingly, the tallies of the two censuses are identical.&#160; How is this possible?&#160; Were there no deaths or births in the intervening months?&#160;</p>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>U. Cassuto uses knowledge of Ancient Near Eastern censuses to suggest that the two events were were both part of a single extended process which started with the building of the Tabernacle.&#160; Can you think of other instances where knowledge of Ancient Near Eastern norms might shed light on a Biblical narrative or law?&#160; For some examples, see <a href="The Mabbul and Mesopotamian Myths" data-aht="page">The Mabbul and Mesopotamian Myths</a>, <a href="The Torah and Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes" data-aht="page">The Torah and Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes</a>, <a href="ANE:Treaties" data-aht="page">R</a>. D"Z Hoffmann's understanding of <a href="Yitro's Visit – Purpose and Significance" data-aht="page">Yitro's Visit</a>, and <a href="Rachel's Stealing of the Terafim" data-aht="page">Rachel's Stealing of the Terafim</a>.</li>
+
<li>U. Cassuto uses knowledge of Ancient Near Eastern censuses to suggest that the two events were were both part of a single extended process which started with the building of the Tabernacle.&#160; Can you think of other instances where knowledge of Ancient Near Eastern norms might shed light on a Biblical narrative or law?&#160; For a few examples, see <a href="The Mabbul and Mesopotamian Myths" data-aht="page">The Mabbul and Mesopotamian Myths</a>, <a href="The Torah and Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes" data-aht="page">The Torah and Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes</a>, <a href="Rachel's Stealing of the Terafim" data-aht="page">Rachel's Stealing of the Terafim</a>, and R. D"Z Hoffmann's understanding of <a href="Yitro's Visit – Purpose and Significance" data-aht="page">Yitro's Visit</a></li>
<li>How else might you explain both the identical tallies and the need for two censuses? See <a href="Censuses in the Wilderness" data-aht="page">Censuses in the Wilderness</a>.</li>
+
<li>How else can both the identical tallies and the need for two censuses be explained?&#160; See <a href="Censuses in the Wilderness" data-aht="page">Censuses in the Wilderness</a>.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
<category>Is the Torah Chronological?
 
<category>Is the Torah Chronological?
<p>When recording any story, an author must balance the competing demands of chronological and thematic order.&#160; The Torah is no exception, and thought it sets chronological order as the norm, at times it appears willing to sacrifice it for other concerns.</p>
+
<p>When recording any story, an author must balance the competing demands of chronological and thematic order.&#160; The Torah is no exception, and though chronological order appears to be its default setting, at times this is sacrificed to achieve other objectives.</p>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>In the early chapters of Sefer Bemidbar, explicit dates imply that the narrative is not told in its proper order.&#160; Why might this have been the preferred method of relaying the laws and stories of this section?&#160; Is there any other way of reading the chapters? See <a href="Chronology of Bemidbar 1 – 10" data-aht="page">Chronology of Bemidbar 1 – 10</a> for details.</li>
+
<li>In the early chapters of Sefer Bemidbar, explicit dates appear to make explicit that the narrative is not recounted in chronological order.&#160; Why might this have been the preferred method of relaying the laws and stories of this section?&#160; Is there any other way of reading the chapters? See <a href="Chronology of Bemidbar 1 – 10" data-aht="page">Chronology of Bemidbar 1 – 10</a> for details.</li>
<li>When passage are not dated, what clues might the text, nonetheless, hold that hint to achronological order?</li>
+
<li>When passages are undated, what textual clues might nonetheless exist which would provide evidence for an achronological order?</li>
<li>If a text presents certain difficulties, when is legitimate to posit achronology so as to explain these away?&#160; Can such a hypothesis ever be proven?&#160;</li>
+
<li>Regarding each of the following stories, some commentators have suggested that the text is not chronological.&#160; See <a href="Avraham's Aliyah" data-aht="page">Avraham's Aliyah</a> for a discussion of when and how many times Avraham moved to Israel,&#160; <a href="Chronology – Shemot 18" data-aht="page">Chronology – Shemot 18</a> regarding Yitro's arrival and Matan Torah, <a href="The Births and Relative Ages of Yaakov's Children" data-aht="page">The Births and Relative Ages of Yaakov's Children</a> and its implications for understanding the <a href="Sin and Slaughter of Shekhem" data-aht="page">Slaughter of Shekhem</a>, and <a href="Chronology of Shemuel I 16 – 17" data-aht="page">Chronology of Shemuel I 16 – 17</a> regarding David's killing of Golyat and rise to power in Shaul's court.&#160; Are the achronology proposals persuasive?&#160; What are the larger ramifications of these suggestions?</li>
<li>In each of the following stories some have suggested that the text is not chronological; which do you find convincing? What are the larger ramifications of the suggestions?&#160; See: <a href="Avraham's Aliyah" data-aht="page">Avraham's Aliyah</a> for a discussion of when and how many times Avraham moved to Israel,&#160; <a href="Chronology – Shemot 18" data-aht="page">Chronology – Shemot 18</a> regarding Yitro's arrival and Matan Torah, <a href="The Births and Relative Ages of Yaakov's Children" data-aht="page">The Births and Relative Ages of Yaakov's Children</a> and its implications for understanding the <a href="Sin and Slaughter of Shekhem" data-aht="page">Slaughter of Shekhem</a>, and <a href="Chronology of Shemuel I 16 – 17" data-aht="page">Chronology of Shemuel I 16 – 17</a> regarding David's killing of Golyat and rise to power in Shaul's court.</li>
 
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</category>
 
</category>

Version as of 20:52, 25 May 2017

Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Bemidbar

Chosenness and Levi

When and why was the tribe of Levi chosen to be the priests and Levites?  Was the selection merit-based?  If so, for what actions?  Why were the firstborns replaced?

  • Jubilees30:17-29About Jubilees claims that the tribe was chosen already in the time of the Patriarchs, as a reward for Levi's avenging of Dinah's honor in Shekhem.  In contrast, RashiDevarim 10:8About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki points to the Levites' loyalty to Hashem during the Sin of the Golden Calf.  Which approach do you find more compelling?  How would Rashi explain why Aharon merited the priesthood despite being involved in making the Calf?
  • In contrast to the above commentators, R"Y Bekhor Shor Devarim 10:8About R. Yosef Bekhor Shorsuggests that the choice was practical in nature.  Though originally all firstborns had been designated to serve, Hashem decided that it was better that the sacrificial service be confined to a single family line.1 What are the advantages and disadvantages of each model (one tribe versus one individual from each family)?  For elaboration, see Selection of the Priests and Levites.

Tanakh and Ancient Near Eastern Studies

Sefer Bemidbar opens with a census of the nation, taken a mere few months after an earlier census described in Shemot 38, when the nation had been counted via their half shekel donations to the Mishkan.  But why was it necessary to count the people twice in such a short period?  In addition, surprisingly, the tallies of the two censuses are identical.  How is this possible?  Were there no deaths or births in the intervening months? 

Is the Torah Chronological?

When recording any story, an author must balance the competing demands of chronological and thematic order.  The Torah is no exception, and though chronological order appears to be its default setting, at times this is sacrificed to achieve other objectives.

  • In the early chapters of Sefer Bemidbar, explicit dates appear to make explicit that the narrative is not recounted in chronological order.  Why might this have been the preferred method of relaying the laws and stories of this section?  Is there any other way of reading the chapters? See Chronology of Bemidbar 1 – 10 for details.
  • When passages are undated, what textual clues might nonetheless exist which would provide evidence for an achronological order?
  • Regarding each of the following stories, some commentators have suggested that the text is not chronological.  See Avraham's Aliyah for a discussion of when and how many times Avraham moved to Israel,  Chronology – Shemot 18 regarding Yitro's arrival and Matan Torah, The Births and Relative Ages of Yaakov's Children and its implications for understanding the Slaughter of Shekhem, and Chronology of Shemuel I 16 – 17 regarding David's killing of Golyat and rise to power in Shaul's court.  Are the achronology proposals persuasive?  What are the larger ramifications of these suggestions?