Difference between revisions of "Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Mishpatim/0/en"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 14: Line 14:
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
<category>Bystander
 
<category>Bystander
<p>Shemot 21 speaks of a case in which a pregnant woman is injured in a brawl leading to either a miscarriage or the premature birth of her baby.</p>
+
<p>Shemot 21 speaks of a case in which a pregnant woman is injured in a brawl leading to either a miscarriage or the premature birth of her baby.&#160; The verses abound in ambiguities, making the exact law unclear.&#160; Scan the verses inside and discuss the following issues, using <a href="Injury to Bystanders and the Meaning of &quot;יהיה אסון&quot;" data-aht="page">Injury to Bystanders and the Meaning of "יהיה אסון" </a>as a guide:</p>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>Is a fetus considered its own independent entity, equal in status to any human being? Or, is it considered to be only a part of its mother's body ("עובר ירך אמו"), leading to lesser culpability if aborted?</li>
+
<li>What can this case teach about how the Torah views the status of a fetus? Is it considered its own independent entity, no different than any human being? Or, is it considered to be only a part of its mother's body ("עובר ירך אמו"), leading to lesser culpability if aborted?&#160; What textual issues affect your answer?</li>
 
<li>If a person intends to kill one individual but mistakenly kills another, how should the action be viewed?&#160; Is this a capital crime, as there was intent involved, or is it accidental manslaughter as the victim was not actively targeted? What does the case of the pregnant bystander teach about the law?</li>
 
<li>If a person intends to kill one individual but mistakenly kills another, how should the action be viewed?&#160; Is this a capital crime, as there was intent involved, or is it accidental manslaughter as the victim was not actively targeted? What does the case of the pregnant bystander teach about the law?</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>

Version as of 23:31, 14 February 2017

Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Mishpatim

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Law and Order

Should the main purpose of a judicial code be to lay forth principles of right and wrong or to preserve law and order? What do the legal sections of the Torah aim to do?

  • Scan the laws laid forth in Parashat Mishpatim (and other legal sections of Torah). What types of laws are included?  How are these formulated (are they conditional or absolute statements?)  What punishments are included?  What does this suggest about the purpose of our Code of Law?
  • How do other Ancient Near Eastern law codes compare?  What can the differences teach about the underlying values of each culture and their conceptions of justice?  See The Torah and Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes.
  • Would you refer to the Torah as a whole as a law code? Why or why not?

Bystander

Shemot 21 speaks of a case in which a pregnant woman is injured in a brawl leading to either a miscarriage or the premature birth of her baby.  The verses abound in ambiguities, making the exact law unclear.  Scan the verses inside and discuss the following issues, using Injury to Bystanders and the Meaning of "יהיה אסון" as a guide:

  • What can this case teach about how the Torah views the status of a fetus? Is it considered its own independent entity, no different than any human being? Or, is it considered to be only a part of its mother's body ("עובר ירך אמו"), leading to lesser culpability if aborted?  What textual issues affect your answer?
  • If a person intends to kill one individual but mistakenly kills another, how should the action be viewed?  Is this a capital crime, as there was intent involved, or is it accidental manslaughter as the victim was not actively targeted? What does the case of the pregnant bystander teach about the law?