Difference between revisions of "Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Mishpatim/0/en"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<category>Law and Order | <category>Law and Order | ||
| − | <p>Should the main purpose of a judicial code be to lay forth principles of right and wrong or to preserve law and order? What do the legal sections of the Torah aim to do?</p><ul> | + | <p>Should the main purpose of a judicial code be to lay forth principles of right and wrong or to preserve law and order? What do the legal sections of the Torah aim to do?</p> |
| + | <ul> | ||
<li>Scan the laws laid forth in Parashat Mishpatim (and other legal sections of Torah). What types of laws are included?  How are these formulated (are they conditional or absolute statements?)  What punishments are included?  What does this suggest about the purpose of our Code of Law?</li> | <li>Scan the laws laid forth in Parashat Mishpatim (and other legal sections of Torah). What types of laws are included?  How are these formulated (are they conditional or absolute statements?)  What punishments are included?  What does this suggest about the purpose of our Code of Law?</li> | ||
<li>How do other Ancient Near Eastern law codes compare?  What can the differences teach about the underlying values of each culture and their conceptions of justice?  See <a href="The Torah and Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes" data-aht="page">The Torah and Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes</a>.</li> | <li>How do other Ancient Near Eastern law codes compare?  What can the differences teach about the underlying values of each culture and their conceptions of justice?  See <a href="The Torah and Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes" data-aht="page">The Torah and Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes</a>.</li> | ||
<li>Would you refer to the Torah as a whole as a law code? Why or why not?</li> | <li>Would you refer to the Torah as a whole as a law code? Why or why not?</li> | ||
| + | </ul> | ||
| + | </category> | ||
| + | <category>Bystander | ||
| + | <p>Shemot 21 speaks of a case in which a pregnant woman is injured in a brawl leading to either a miscarriage or the premature birth of her baby.</p> | ||
| + | <ul> | ||
| + | <li>Is a fetus considered its own independent entity, equal in status to any human being? Or, is it considered to be only a part of its mother's body ("עובר ירך אמו"), leading to lesser culpability if aborted?</li> | ||
| + | <li>If a person intends to kill one individual but mistakenly kills another, how should the action be viewed?  Is this a capital crime, as there was intent involved, or is it accidental manslaughter as the victim was not actively targeted? What does the case of the pregnant bystander teach about the law?</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
Version as of 13:58, 14 February 2017
Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Mishpatim
Law and Order
Should the main purpose of a judicial code be to lay forth principles of right and wrong or to preserve law and order? What do the legal sections of the Torah aim to do?
- Scan the laws laid forth in Parashat Mishpatim (and other legal sections of Torah). What types of laws are included? How are these formulated (are they conditional or absolute statements?) What punishments are included? What does this suggest about the purpose of our Code of Law?
- How do other Ancient Near Eastern law codes compare? What can the differences teach about the underlying values of each culture and their conceptions of justice? See The Torah and Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes.
- Would you refer to the Torah as a whole as a law code? Why or why not?
Bystander
Shemot 21 speaks of a case in which a pregnant woman is injured in a brawl leading to either a miscarriage or the premature birth of her baby.
- Is a fetus considered its own independent entity, equal in status to any human being? Or, is it considered to be only a part of its mother's body ("עובר ירך אמו"), leading to lesser culpability if aborted?
- If a person intends to kill one individual but mistakenly kills another, how should the action be viewed? Is this a capital crime, as there was intent involved, or is it accidental manslaughter as the victim was not actively targeted? What does the case of the pregnant bystander teach about the law?
