Difference between revisions of "Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Shofetim/0/en"
m |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<category>Calling for Peace | <category>Calling for Peace | ||
| − | <p>Many are uncomfortable with the directive to annihilate the Seven Nations of Canaan.  Was there really no possibility for peaceful co-existence? Commentators actually debate the issue, with Rashi maintaining that it was prohibited to call for peace and war was inevitable, and Radak claiming that the nation was, in fact,obligated to offer terms of peace before waging war.</p> | + | <p>Many are uncomfortable with the directive to annihilate the Seven Nations of Canaan.  Was there really no possibility for peaceful co-existence? Commentators actually debate the issue, with Rashi maintaining that it was prohibited to call for peace and war was inevitable, and Radak claiming that the nation was, in fact, obligated to offer terms of peace before waging war.</p> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>How would each side of the debate read the verses of Devarim 20?  What other verses could support each position? How does the story of the Gibonites' deceit in Sefer Yehoshua shed light on the issue?</li> | <li>How would each side of the debate read the verses of Devarim 20?  What other verses could support each position? How does the story of the Gibonites' deceit in Sefer Yehoshua shed light on the issue?</li> | ||
Version as of 12:20, 16 August 2017
Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Shofetim
Calling for Peace
Many are uncomfortable with the directive to annihilate the Seven Nations of Canaan. Was there really no possibility for peaceful co-existence? Commentators actually debate the issue, with Rashi maintaining that it was prohibited to call for peace and war was inevitable, and Radak claiming that the nation was, in fact, obligated to offer terms of peace before waging war.
- How would each side of the debate read the verses of Devarim 20? What other verses could support each position? How does the story of the Gibonites' deceit in Sefer Yehoshua shed light on the issue?
- According to Rashi, the reason for the decree of obliteration is religious in nature, lest the nations sway Israel towards idolatry. Sometimes a zero-tolerance policy is necessary. Do you agree? In what circumstances are compromises not an option?
- According to Radak, what would have happened had the nations actually surrendered to Israel? How would the land have sustained both populations? How do you think Israelite history might have differed? For more, see Calling for Peace in the Conquest of Canaan.
Determining Truth
We sometimes look back to the Biblical period and wonder how a nation who lived in a prophetic age and merited to hear the Divine word could still mess up so badly. If you had access to Hashem's will, and had prophets to tell you for certain what was right and wrong, would not being a good person be that much easier? Why did the people so often not heed the prophetic word?
It is possible that part of the problem was determining who was a true or false prophet to begin with.
