Difference between revisions of "Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Vayakhel/0/he"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div> | <div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div> | ||
<category>Change of Plans | <category>Change of Plans | ||
| − | <p>Was sacrificial worship in the Tabernacle always part of Hashem's plans?</p><ul> | + | <p>Was sacrificial worship in the Tabernacle always part of Hashem's plans?</p> |
| − | <li><multilink><a href="SefornoMaamarKavvanotHaTorah6-13" data-aht="source"> | + | <ul> |
| − | <li><multilink><a href="AbarbanelYirmeyahu7" data-aht="source"> | + | <li><multilink><a href="SefornoMaamarKavvanotHaTorah6-13" data-aht="source">ספורנו</a><a href="SefornoMaamarKavvanotHaTorah6-13" data-aht="source">מאמר כוונות התורה ו':י"ג</a><a href="R. Ovadyah Seforno" data-aht="parshan">אודות ר' עובדיה ספורנו</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="HoilMosheShemot20-20" data-aht="source">הואיל משה</a><a href="HoilMosheShemot20-20" data-aht="source">שמות כ':כ'</a><a href="R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi (Hoil Moshe)" data-aht="parshan">אודות ר' משה יצחק אשכנזי</a></multilink> suggest that though Hashem had always wanted a sacrificial service, he had not wanted to limit it to any individual group or place, preferring to be worshiped via private altars rather than in a centralized Tabernacle.  Only after the Sin of the Golden Calf did He decide that the nation was not capable of such worship and instead needed limitations and safeguards. </li> |
| − | </ul><p>Is it possible that Hashem changed His mind, or that a Torah commandment was relevant only for a particular era?<fn>Can you think of other cases in which an intervening event might have led to a change in Hashem's original plan? See Rashbam on <a href="The Decalogue: Direct From Hashem or Via Moshe" data-aht="page"> | + | <li><multilink><a href="AbarbanelYirmeyahu7" data-aht="source">אברבנאל</a><a href="AbarbanelYirmeyahu7" data-aht="source">ירמיהו ז'</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">אודות ר' יצחק אברבנאל</a></multilink>, in contrast, suggests that Hashem's original plan included a Tabernacle as a vehicle through which the nation would feel Hashem's presence, but not sacrifices. After the Sin of the Golden Calf, however, Hashem added a sacrificial component to facilitate the atonement process.</li> |
| + | </ul> | ||
| + | <p>Is it possible that Hashem changed His mind, or that a Torah commandment was relevant only for a particular era?<fn>Can you think of other cases in which an intervening event might have led to a change in Hashem's original plan? See Rashbam on <a href="The Decalogue: Direct From Hashem or Via Moshe" data-aht="page">עשרת הדברים: ישירות מהקב"ה או דרך משה?</a>. What other commandments might be understood to pertain to just one era? For two examples, see Hoil Moshe on<a href=""עַיִן תַּחַת עַיִן" – An Eye for an Eye" data-aht="page">"עין תחת עין"</a> and Rambam on <a href="Purpose of the Sacrifices" data-aht="page">מטרת הקרבנות</a>.</fn>  What textual difficulties might such a suggestion resolve?<fn>The Hoil Moshe uses his explanation to account for the discrepancy in the laws regarding the altar in <a href="Shemot20-20-22" data-aht="source">שמות כ'</a> and <a href="Shemot27-1-8" data-aht="source">שמות כ"ז</a>.</fn> What theological difficulties does it raise?  See <a href="Altars of Earth, Stone, and Wood" data-aht="page">מזבחות אדמה, אבן, ועץ</a> and <a href="Purpose of the Mishkan" data-aht="page">מטרת המשכן</a>.</p> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
<category>Does Hashem Need a House? | <category>Does Hashem Need a House? | ||
<p>As God has no need for shelter, light, bread, or meat, why did He command the Children of Israel to construct the Tabernacle and its accompanying vessels? See Purpose of the Mishkan.</p><ul> | <p>As God has no need for shelter, light, bread, or meat, why did He command the Children of Israel to construct the Tabernacle and its accompanying vessels? See Purpose of the Mishkan.</p><ul> | ||
| − | <li>According to <multilink><a href="RambanShemot25Introduction" data-aht="source"> | + | <li>According to <multilink><a href="RambanShemot25Introduction" data-aht="source">רמב"ן</a><a href="RambanShemot25Introduction" data-aht="source">שמות כ"ה הקדמה</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">אודות ר' משה בן נחמן</a></multilink>, the Mishkan served to house Hashem's presence and facilitated the continuation of the Divine revelation which began at Mt. Sinai. Does this imply that God can be contained in a physical structure? What does it suggest about the concept of "sacred space"; are certain locations holier than others? Finally, how would having Hashem literally in one's midst affect one's relationship with Him?</li> |
| − | <li><multilink><a href="ShadalShemot25-1" data-aht="source"> | + | <li><multilink><a href="ShadalShemot25-1" data-aht="source">שד"ל</a><a href="ShadalShemot25-1" data-aht="source">שמות כ"ה:א'</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">אודות ר' שמואל דוד לוצאטו</a></multilink> suggests that the Tabernacle enhanced man's relationship with not only Hashem but also with his fellow man. By providing a centralized location for all to gather in their worship of Hashem, the Mishkan served to unify the nation. What are other benefits of centralization? What are some of the downsides?</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
<category>Of Tables, Bread, and Covenants | <category>Of Tables, Bread, and Covenants | ||
| − | <p>We often look for symbolic meaning in rituals or religious objects. What symbolism might lie behind the ark, table, candelabrum, and incense altar?</p><ul> | + | <p>We often look for symbolic meaning in rituals or religious objects. What symbolism might lie behind the ark, table, candelabrum, and incense altar?</p> |
| − | <li><multilink><a href="AbarbanelShemot25" data-aht="source"> | + | <ul> |
| − | </ul><p>What role does eating play in religious life? How many rites or commandments mandate partaking of food?</p><ul> | + | <li><multilink><a href="AbarbanelShemot25" data-aht="source">אברבנאל</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot25" data-aht="source">שמות כ"ה</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">אודות ר' יצחק אברבנאל</a></multilink> proposes that the ark symbolizes the Torah, while the other vessels represent the physical (table), intellectual (menorah) and spiritual (incense altar) rewards granted to those who observe the Torah's commandments. Do you find his suggestion compelling? Why or why not? See <a href="Purpose of the Shulchan and Lechem HaPanim" data-aht="page">מטרת השולחן ולחם הפנים</a></li> |
| − | <li>In the time of Tanakh, meals were often connected to signing covenantal agreements,<fn>See <a href="ANE:Treaties in Tanakh and the Ancient Near East" data-aht="page"> | + | </ul> |
| + | <p>What role does eating play in religious life? How many rites or commandments mandate partaking of food?</p> | ||
| + | <ul> | ||
| + | <li>In the time of Tanakh, meals were often connected to signing covenantal agreements,<fn>See <a href="ANE:Treaties in Tanakh and the Ancient Near East" data-aht="page">בריתות בתנ"ך ובמזרח הקדמון</a>.</fn> serving the same function as a handshake might today. In light of this, R. Hovav Yechieli<fn>See R. Hovav Yechieli, <a href="http://herzogpress.herzog.ac.il/gilayon.asp?gilh=%D7%9E%D7%93&ktav=1&gil=44">"תערך לפני שלחן – השולחן ולחם הפנים"</a>, Megadim 44 (5766): 33-49.</fn> suggests that the Lechem HaPanim constituted a covenant sealing meal which continuously renewed the Covenant of Sinai.  What textual or conceptual support can you bring for this reading? See <a href="Purpose of the Shulchan and Lechem HaPanim" data-aht="page">מטרת השולחן ולחם הפנים</a>.</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
Version as of 07:02, 16 August 2019
נושאים לשולחן שבת – פרשת ויקהל
Change of Plans
Was sacrificial worship in the Tabernacle always part of Hashem's plans?
- ספורנו and הואיל משה suggest that though Hashem had always wanted a sacrificial service, he had not wanted to limit it to any individual group or place, preferring to be worshiped via private altars rather than in a centralized Tabernacle. Only after the Sin of the Golden Calf did He decide that the nation was not capable of such worship and instead needed limitations and safeguards.
- אברבנאל, in contrast, suggests that Hashem's original plan included a Tabernacle as a vehicle through which the nation would feel Hashem's presence, but not sacrifices. After the Sin of the Golden Calf, however, Hashem added a sacrificial component to facilitate the atonement process.
Is it possible that Hashem changed His mind, or that a Torah commandment was relevant only for a particular era?1 What textual difficulties might such a suggestion resolve?2 What theological difficulties does it raise? See מזבחות אדמה, אבן, ועץ and מטרת המשכן.
Does Hashem Need a House?
As God has no need for shelter, light, bread, or meat, why did He command the Children of Israel to construct the Tabernacle and its accompanying vessels? See Purpose of the Mishkan.
- According to רמב"ן, the Mishkan served to house Hashem's presence and facilitated the continuation of the Divine revelation which began at Mt. Sinai. Does this imply that God can be contained in a physical structure? What does it suggest about the concept of "sacred space"; are certain locations holier than others? Finally, how would having Hashem literally in one's midst affect one's relationship with Him?
- שד"ל suggests that the Tabernacle enhanced man's relationship with not only Hashem but also with his fellow man. By providing a centralized location for all to gather in their worship of Hashem, the Mishkan served to unify the nation. What are other benefits of centralization? What are some of the downsides?
Of Tables, Bread, and Covenants
We often look for symbolic meaning in rituals or religious objects. What symbolism might lie behind the ark, table, candelabrum, and incense altar?
- אברבנאל proposes that the ark symbolizes the Torah, while the other vessels represent the physical (table), intellectual (menorah) and spiritual (incense altar) rewards granted to those who observe the Torah's commandments. Do you find his suggestion compelling? Why or why not? See מטרת השולחן ולחם הפנים
What role does eating play in religious life? How many rites or commandments mandate partaking of food?
- In the time of Tanakh, meals were often connected to signing covenantal agreements,3 serving the same function as a handshake might today. In light of this, R. Hovav Yechieli4 suggests that the Lechem HaPanim constituted a covenant sealing meal which continuously renewed the Covenant of Sinai. What textual or conceptual support can you bring for this reading? See מטרת השולחן ולחם הפנים.
More...
For more, see: Parashat Vayakhel Topics.
