Difference between revisions of "Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Vayera/0/en"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
<category>Criticizing our Avot | <category>Criticizing our Avot | ||
| − | <p>To what extent should we view our ancestors as perfect role models worthy of emulation, reinterpreting any stories that cast shadows on their reputations, and when is it ok to criticize their actions and recognize that they, too, had human flaws?  Use the story of | + | <p>To what extent should we view our ancestors as perfect role models worthy of emulation, reinterpreting any stories that cast shadows on their reputations, and when is it ok to criticize their actions and recognize that they, too, had human flaws?  Use the story of the <a href="Banishment of Hagar and Yishmael" data-aht="page">Banishment of Hagar and Yishmael</a> as a test case to explore the question.</p> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
| − | <li>What crime could possibly justify the banishment of one's son? </li> | + | <li>What crime could possibly justify the banishment of one's son?  </li> |
| − | <li>Is it possible that the righteous Sarah would be ready to expel Yishmael for innocuous laughter? On the other hand, is it | + | <li>How should Yishmael's "צחוק" be understood?  Is it possible that the righteous Sarah would be ready to expel Yishmael for innocuous laughter? On the other hand, is it conceivable that a son raised by Avraham could have committed crimes so dire that such a punishment was warranted?  </li> |
| − | <li> | + | <li>Somewhat surprisingly, in our story, Hashem comes out on the side of Sarah, suggesting that the reader swallow their criticism and re-evaluate each of the characters and their actions. See, however, R. Avraham Saba, who nonetheless maintains that Sarah was at fault.</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
Version as of 07:17, 14 November 2016
Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Vayera
Did the Avot Keep the Mitzvot?
This issue had been debated throughout the ages. On one hand, the Avot and Imahot lived centuries before the Torah was given and many of its laws would be meaningless to them. On the other hand, it seems paradoxical to conceive of the founders of a religion not observing even its most basic commandments.
- What other factors might lead one to suggest that the Avot did in fact observe at least some of the commandments?
- What evidence might you bring from Torah to support each position?
- With which side of the debate do you agree; why? See Avot and Mitzvot – Was Avraham the First Jew?
Criticizing our Avot
To what extent should we view our ancestors as perfect role models worthy of emulation, reinterpreting any stories that cast shadows on their reputations, and when is it ok to criticize their actions and recognize that they, too, had human flaws? Use the story of the Banishment of Hagar and Yishmael as a test case to explore the question.
- What crime could possibly justify the banishment of one's son?
- How should Yishmael's "צחוק" be understood? Is it possible that the righteous Sarah would be ready to expel Yishmael for innocuous laughter? On the other hand, is it conceivable that a son raised by Avraham could have committed crimes so dire that such a punishment was warranted?
- Somewhat surprisingly, in our story, Hashem comes out on the side of Sarah, suggesting that the reader swallow their criticism and re-evaluate each of the characters and their actions. See, however, R. Avraham Saba, who nonetheless maintains that Sarah was at fault.
Like Father, Like Son?
Often readers picture Avraham as an active trailblazer, and Yitzchak as but a passive shadow, whose main contribution is being a link in the chain. Is this an accurate depiction?
- What do you think are the strengths and weaknesses of each character?
- What are the main points of similarity and difference between the two?
- Perhaps surprisingly, the stories of father and son are actually quite similar, and exploring the parallels helps a reader appreciate both the overlap between and the uniqueness of each leader. See Avraham and Yitzchak for more.
