Difference between revisions of "Shaul's Sin in Gilgal/2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
m |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<approaches> | <approaches> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<category>Reliance on Self | <category>Reliance on Self | ||
<p>In not waiting for Shemuel, Shaul demonstrated that he doubted Hashem's powers to save the nation and preferred to rely on his own strength and strategies.</p> | <p>In not waiting for Shemuel, Shaul demonstrated that he doubted Hashem's powers to save the nation and preferred to rely on his own strength and strategies.</p> | ||
− | <point><b>Why make Shaul wait?</b> Hashem wanted to ensure that the people recognized that it was Hashem's hand which lay behind their military victories, and not the power of man.  As such, Shemuel made | + | <point><b>Why make Shaul wait?</b> Hashem wanted to ensure that the people recognized that it was Hashem's hand which lay behind their military victories, and not the power of man.  As such, Shemuel made a strategically illogical demand, telling Shaul to wait rather than seize the opportunity to defeat the Philistines while they were still unorganized.  Hashem intentionally had Shaul tarry until his army dispersed and he was left with but 600 men, so that no one could possibly think to take credit for the victory but rather all would recognize Hashem's aid.</point> |
<point><b>Severity of sin</b> – Demonstrating that war is not won by human might was especially important after the establishment of the monarchy, when the people were likely to attribute all success to their king and not Hashem.  Shaul's disobedience proved all of Shemuel's fears in appointing a king valid; soon the people would come to rely on him in place of the true King, Hashem.</point> | <point><b>Severity of sin</b> – Demonstrating that war is not won by human might was especially important after the establishment of the monarchy, when the people were likely to attribute all success to their king and not Hashem.  Shaul's disobedience proved all of Shemuel's fears in appointing a king valid; soon the people would come to rely on him in place of the true King, Hashem.</point> | ||
<point><b>Contrast to Yonatan</b> – Yonatan's behavior stands in contrast to that of his father and highlights Shaul's failure. As opposed to Shaul who is unwilling to fight with his meager army,<fn>Though Shaul was quick to bring the sacrifice, once he realized that he had only 600 soldiers left, he stays in place rather than fighting the enemy.</fn> Yonatan goes to attack the Philistines with just his arms bearer.  Unlike Shaul, Yonatan recognizes that numbers in battle are not nearly as important as Hashem's backing, as he says  "כִּי אֵין לַיהֹוָה מַעְצוֹר לְהוֹשִׁיעַ בְּרַב אוֹ בִמְעָט."</point> | <point><b>Contrast to Yonatan</b> – Yonatan's behavior stands in contrast to that of his father and highlights Shaul's failure. As opposed to Shaul who is unwilling to fight with his meager army,<fn>Though Shaul was quick to bring the sacrifice, once he realized that he had only 600 soldiers left, he stays in place rather than fighting the enemy.</fn> Yonatan goes to attack the Philistines with just his arms bearer.  Unlike Shaul, Yonatan recognizes that numbers in battle are not nearly as important as Hashem's backing, as he says  "כִּי אֵין לַיהֹוָה מַעְצוֹר לְהוֹשִׁיעַ בְּרַב אוֹ בִמְעָט."</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Parallels to Gidon</b> – The description of the battle here contains many parallels to the story of Gidon's battle against Midyan.<fn>See M. Garsiel, "ספר שמואל א' עיון ספרותי במערכי השוואה, באנאלוגיות ובמקבילות", (Ramat Gan, 1983): 89-99, who lists and analyzes the many content and linguistic parallels between the stories | + | <point><b>Parallels to Gidon</b> – The description of the battle here contains many parallels to the story of Gidon's battle against Midyan.<fn>See M. Garsiel, "ספר שמואל א' עיון ספרותי במערכי השוואה, באנאלוגיות ובמקבילות", (Ramat Gan, 1983): 89-99, who lists and analyzes the many content and linguistic parallels between the stories. He demonstrates how Shaul might have started out like Gidon in the beginning of his reign, but later it is Yonatan who parallels Gidon, while Shaul stands in stark contrast. </fn>  In both stories, the vastness of the enemy is likened to the sand by the sea, while the Israelite fighting force consists of only a few hundred soldiers.  This is a reality imposed by Hashem, "פֶּן יִתְפָּאֵר עָלַי יִשְׂרָאֵל לֵאמֹר יָדִי הוֹשִׁיעָה לִּי".  While Shaul is afraid to attack with so few soldiers, Gidon gathers his men telling them that they can win with Hashem's help: "קוּמוּ כִּי נָתַן י"י בְּיֶדְכֶם אֶת מַחֲנֵה מִדְיָן"</point> |
<point><b>Other manifestations of self-reliance</b> – Later in <a href="ShemuelI14-18-20" data-aht="source">Chapter 14</a>, Shaul commits the same mistake, acting on his own rather than being guided by Hashem.  After Yonatan's attack, Shaul originally intends to seek Hashem's advice, but when he sees the confusion in the Philistine camp he tells the priest, "withdraw your hand," preferring to take advantage of the enemies' weakness and attack immediately than wait for Hashem's word.<fn>In both stories Shaul's original intentions are positive.  He does wait for seven days in Gilgal, and here he does originally call the priest.  However, in both cases, as soon as events on the ground affect his perception of potential victory/defeat, he loses patience and acts on his own.</fn>  Once again, Shaul portrays ignorance of the fact that "לֹא בְכֹחַ יִגְבַּר אִישׁ".</point> | <point><b>Other manifestations of self-reliance</b> – Later in <a href="ShemuelI14-18-20" data-aht="source">Chapter 14</a>, Shaul commits the same mistake, acting on his own rather than being guided by Hashem.  After Yonatan's attack, Shaul originally intends to seek Hashem's advice, but when he sees the confusion in the Philistine camp he tells the priest, "withdraw your hand," preferring to take advantage of the enemies' weakness and attack immediately than wait for Hashem's word.<fn>In both stories Shaul's original intentions are positive.  He does wait for seven days in Gilgal, and here he does originally call the priest.  However, in both cases, as soon as events on the ground affect his perception of potential victory/defeat, he loses patience and acts on his own.</fn>  Once again, Shaul portrays ignorance of the fact that "לֹא בְכֹחַ יִגְבַּר אִישׁ".</point> | ||
<point><b>Comparison to Shaul's sin in the battle against Amalek</b></point> | <point><b>Comparison to Shaul's sin in the battle against Amalek</b></point> | ||
Line 23: | Line 19: | ||
<li>Philistines</li> | <li>Philistines</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
+ | </category> | ||
+ | <category>Usurping Shemuel's Role | ||
+ | <p>Shaul actions constituted a rebellion against the prophet, Shemuel.</p> | ||
+ | <point><b>Parallels to the Sin of the Golden Calf</b></point> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
</approaches> | </approaches> | ||
</page> | </page> | ||
</aht-xml> | </aht-xml> |
Version as of 00:56, 26 October 2016
Shaul's Sin in Gilgal
Exegetical Approaches
Reliance on Self
In not waiting for Shemuel, Shaul demonstrated that he doubted Hashem's powers to save the nation and preferred to rely on his own strength and strategies.
Why make Shaul wait? Hashem wanted to ensure that the people recognized that it was Hashem's hand which lay behind their military victories, and not the power of man. As such, Shemuel made a strategically illogical demand, telling Shaul to wait rather than seize the opportunity to defeat the Philistines while they were still unorganized. Hashem intentionally had Shaul tarry until his army dispersed and he was left with but 600 men, so that no one could possibly think to take credit for the victory but rather all would recognize Hashem's aid.
Severity of sin – Demonstrating that war is not won by human might was especially important after the establishment of the monarchy, when the people were likely to attribute all success to their king and not Hashem. Shaul's disobedience proved all of Shemuel's fears in appointing a king valid; soon the people would come to rely on him in place of the true King, Hashem.
Contrast to Yonatan – Yonatan's behavior stands in contrast to that of his father and highlights Shaul's failure. As opposed to Shaul who is unwilling to fight with his meager army,1 Yonatan goes to attack the Philistines with just his arms bearer. Unlike Shaul, Yonatan recognizes that numbers in battle are not nearly as important as Hashem's backing, as he says "כִּי אֵין לַיהֹוָה מַעְצוֹר לְהוֹשִׁיעַ בְּרַב אוֹ בִמְעָט."
Parallels to Gidon – The description of the battle here contains many parallels to the story of Gidon's battle against Midyan.2 In both stories, the vastness of the enemy is likened to the sand by the sea, while the Israelite fighting force consists of only a few hundred soldiers. This is a reality imposed by Hashem, "פֶּן יִתְפָּאֵר עָלַי יִשְׂרָאֵל לֵאמֹר יָדִי הוֹשִׁיעָה לִּי". While Shaul is afraid to attack with so few soldiers, Gidon gathers his men telling them that they can win with Hashem's help: "קוּמוּ כִּי נָתַן י"י בְּיֶדְכֶם אֶת מַחֲנֵה מִדְיָן"
Other manifestations of self-reliance – Later in Chapter 14, Shaul commits the same mistake, acting on his own rather than being guided by Hashem. After Yonatan's attack, Shaul originally intends to seek Hashem's advice, but when he sees the confusion in the Philistine camp he tells the priest, "withdraw your hand," preferring to take advantage of the enemies' weakness and attack immediately than wait for Hashem's word.3 Once again, Shaul portrays ignorance of the fact that "לֹא בְכֹחַ יִגְבַּר אִישׁ".
Comparison to Shaul's sin in the battle against Amalek
David versus Shaul
- Golyat
- Philistines
Usurping Shemuel's Role
Shaul actions constituted a rebellion against the prophet, Shemuel.
Parallels to the Sin of the Golden Calf