View source for Shaul's Sin in the Battle with Amalek/1/en

<aht-xml>

<page type="Introduction">
<h1>Shaul's Sin in the Battle with Amalek</h1>
<h2>Sheep and Kings</h2>
<p><a href="ShemuelI15" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 15</a>&#160;describes Shaul's battle against Amalek and his subsequent loss of the kingship.&#160; After the battle, Hashem tells Shemuel:</p>
<multilang style="overflow: auto;">
<q xml:lang="he" dir="rtl">נִחַמְתִּי כִּי הִמְלַכְתִּי אֶת שָׁאוּל לְמֶלֶךְ כִּי שָׁב מֵאַחֲרַי וְאֶת דְּבָרַי לֹא הֵקִים...</q>
<q xml:lang="en">'It repenteth Me that I have set up Saul to be king; for he is turned back from following Me, and hath not performed My commandments.'</q>
</multilang>
<p>However, Hashem does not specify which of Shaul's actions caused Him to regret the appointment. Hashem's words follow a description of Shaul's having mercy on Agag and the choice livestock of the Amalekites, suggesting that this was the problem.<fn>In Shemuel's rebukes, too, he focuses on taking from the booty, asking: "וּמֶה קוֹל הַצֹּאן הַזֶּה בְּאׇזְנָי" in<a href="ShemuelI15" data-aht="source"> verse 14</a> and chastising Shaul: "וְלָמָּה לֹא שָׁמַעְתָּ בְּקוֹל י"י וַתַּעַט אֶל הַשָּׁלָל" in <a href="ShemuelI15" data-aht="source">verse 19</a>.</fn> Yet, neither of these actions seem so terrible that they should merit such a severe punishment. Shaul's claimed motive in saving the animals was positive (he planned to sacrifice them to Hashem),<fn>One might argue that this was simply an excuse after the fact rather than his original intention.</fn> and taking only a single captive might appear to be a minor transgression.&#160; In addition, if necessary, it would be fairly easy to rectify both of these mistakes!<fn>Shaul could have simply killed Agag (as Shemuel subsequently did) and the livestock.</fn>&#160; Finally, Shaul himself seems unaware that these actions were problematic, and even cites them when declaring that he has fulfilled Hashem's directive:</p>
<multilang style="overflow: auto;">
<q xml:lang="he" dir="rtl">(כ) וַיֹּאמֶר שָׁאוּל אֶל שְׁמוּאֵל אֲשֶׁר שָׁמַעְתִּי בְּקוֹל י"י וָאֵלֵךְ בַּדֶּרֶךְ אֲשֶׁר שְׁלָחַנִי י"י וָאָבִיא אֶת אֲגַג מֶלֶךְ עֲמָלֵק וְאֶת עֲמָלֵק הֶחֱרַמְתִּי. (כא) וַיִּקַּח הָעָם מֵהַשָּׁלָל צֹאן וּבָקָר רֵאשִׁית הַחֵרֶם לִזְבֹּחַ לַי"י אֱלֹהֶיךָ בַּגִּלְגָּל.</q>
<q xml:lang="en">(20) And Saul said unto Samuel: 'Yea, I have hearkened to the voice of the Lord, and have gone the way which the Lord sent me, and have brought Agag the king of Amalek, and have utterly destroyed the Amalekites. (21) But the people took of the spoil, sheep and oxen, the chief of the devoted things, to sacrifice unto the Lord thy God in Gilgal.'</q>
</multilang>
<p>Where, then, did Shaul err so badly that it cost him his kingship?</p>

<h2>Comparison to David</h2>
<p>As David is anointed immediately following this chapter, we naturally compare the two leaders, wondering where Shaul failed and David succeeded.</p>
<ul>
<li><b>Dealings with Amalek</b> – Did David rectify any of Shaul's mistakes from the battle?&#160; In David's war against Amalek (<a href="ShemuelI30-1-20" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 30</a>), he too takes sheep and cattle as booty, and allows four hundred Amalekites to escape.&#160; Is this any better than Shaul?&#160; Why, then, is Shaul chastised for his actions, but not David?</li>
<li><b>Sin and punishment</b> – When David sins with Batsheva and has Uriah killed, he does not lose his kingship.&#160; Were Shaul's deeds here really more blameworthy than those of David?</li>
<li><b>Character</b> – How do David and Shaul's characters compare? Does Shaul manifest any character flaws in our chapter that David does not share?</li>
</ul>

<h2>Additional Questions</h2>
<ul>
<li><b>"וְהִנֵּה מַצִּיב לוֹ יָד"</b> – After the battle, we are told that Shaul has set up a monument.&#160; Was this memorial meant to honor himself on his great victory, or was it meant for Hashem's glory? How does its establishment relate to Shaul's problematic fulfillment of Hashem's command?</li>
<li><b>"כִּי חַטַּאת קֶסֶם מֶרִי וְאָוֶן וּתְרָפִים הַפְצַר"</b> – In rebuking Shaul, Shemuel compares his actions to idolatry and magical offerings. What does he mean by this analogy?&#160; What light might it shed on the nature of Shaul's sin?</li>
<li><b>"וְאֶת עֲמָלֵק הֶחֱרַמְתִּי"</b> –&#160;<a href="ShemuelI30-1-20" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 30</a> tells how, not long after the events of our chapter, the Amalekites attacked David's camp in Ziklag. However, if Shaul had killed all of the Amalekites, how did hundreds remain to fight against David?</li>
<li><b>Double loss</b> – In <a href="ShemuelI13-8-14" data-aht="source">Chapter 13</a>, after Shaul fails to wait for Shemuel to sacrifice in Gilgal, the prophet rebukes him, telling him that his disobedience has cost him his kingship, "וְעַתָּה מַמְלַכְתְּךָ לֹא תָקוּם".&#160; If Shaul had already lost the monarchy, what new punishment was given here? How do the two crimes relate to each other? Did Shaul commit the same error a second time, or was each sin distinct?<fn>For further discussion of this issue, see <a href="Losing the Kingship Twice" data-aht="page">Losing the Kingship Twice</a> and <a href="Shaul's Sin in Gilgal" data-aht="page">Shaul's Sin in Gilgal</a>.</fn>&#160;</li>
</ul>

</page>
</aht-xml>