Difference between revisions of "Shimshon and Shemuel/0"
m |
m |
||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Degree of similarity</b> – All of the above phrases have a very high level of linguistic similarity.</li> | <li><b>Degree of similarity</b> – All of the above phrases have a very high level of linguistic similarity.</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Distinctive phrases</b> – Both of the phrases "וּמוֹרָה לֹא יַעֲלֶה עַל רֹאשׁוֹ"‎‏‎<fn>The terminology used by the laws of the nazirite is slightly different: "תַּעַר לֹא יַעֲבֹר עַל רֹאשׁוֹ".</fn> and "וַיִּגְדַּל הַנַּעַר"‎<fn>The plural form of the phrase, "וַיִּגְדְּלוּ הַנְּעָרִים " appears by Yaakov and Esav in Bereshit 25, but is missing the context of growing up with Hashem.</fn> appear | + | <li><b>Distinctive phrases</b> – Both of the phrases "וּמוֹרָה לֹא יַעֲלֶה עַל רֹאשׁוֹ"‎‏‎<fn>The terminology used by the laws of the nazirite is slightly different: "תַּעַר לֹא יַעֲבֹר עַל רֹאשׁוֹ".</fn> and "וַיִּגְדַּל הַנַּעַר"‎<fn>The plural form of the phrase, "וַיִּגְדְּלוּ הַנְּעָרִים " appears by Yaakov and Esav in Bereshit 25, but is missing the context of growing up with Hashem.</fn> appear in these two stories only. The exact opening "וַיְהִי אִישׁ אֶחָד מִ... וּשְׁמוֹ" is also unique to these narratives but similar phrasing introduces the stories of the Idol of Mikhah, Shaul, Esther, and Iyyov as well.<fn>Each include the component of a man being in or from a certain place and then named.  All, thus, include forms of the words איש היה מ/ב... ושמו. In addition, in both the stories of Shaul and Esther, like here, the person being introduced is  the father/guardian of the hero or heroine.</fn></li> |
<li><b>Content parallels</b> – Though other stories of barren woman share components with each of these events,<fn>Thus one might compare Elkanah's having two wives, one who has children and one who cannot, with Yaakov's marriage to the fertile Leah and barren Rachel.  Similalry, the angel's announcement to Manoach might be compared to the similalr announcement to Avraham and Sarah.</fn> most of the specific parallels mentioned above do not appear in those stories.</li> | <li><b>Content parallels</b> – Though other stories of barren woman share components with each of these events,<fn>Thus one might compare Elkanah's having two wives, one who has children and one who cannot, with Yaakov's marriage to the fertile Leah and barren Rachel.  Similalry, the angel's announcement to Manoach might be compared to the similalr announcement to Avraham and Sarah.</fn> most of the specific parallels mentioned above do not appear in those stories.</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
<li>Though Shimshon at times prays for assistance, this is to save or avenge himself rather than the nation. In contrast, Shemuel prays on behalf of the people, to ensure that they (not he) will be saved.</li> | <li>Though Shimshon at times prays for assistance, this is to save or avenge himself rather than the nation. In contrast, Shemuel prays on behalf of the people, to ensure that they (not he) will be saved.</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
− | <li><b><span style="color: #008000;">Hashem</span></b> – Shemuel achieves full prophetic status ("נֶאֱמָן שְׁמוּאֵל לְנָבִיא לַה'‏") while Shimshon appears to attain only that "the spirit of God beat within him".  When his head is | + | <li><b><span style="color: #008000;">Hashem</span></b> – Shemuel achieves full prophetic status ("נֶאֱמָן שְׁמוּאֵל לְנָבִיא לַה'‏") while Shimshon appears to attain only that "the spirit of God beat within him".  When his head is shaved, Hashem is no longer with him at all.</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> |
Version as of 03:53, 29 May 2015
Shimshon and Shemuel
Introduction
The Shimshon and Shemuel narratives each open with a scene in which the leader's birth and future destiny is promised. The two birth stories contain a significant number of plot similarities, buttressed by some linguistic allusions. The similarities, though, mainly serve to highlight the many contrasts between the narratives and the difference in character between the protagonists.
Content Parallels
Both stories revolve around a barren woman who is promised a child who then grows up to be a leader of the nation. There are many more specific parallels, which are summarized in the following table:
Mrs. Manoach and Channah |
|
Shimshon and Shemuel |
|
Male Figures |
|
Literary Allusions
There are a handful of linguistic parallels as well:
בשורת הולדת שמשון (שופטים יג) | בשורת הולדת שמואל (ספר שמואל א' א-ב) |
(יג:ב) וַיְהִי אִישׁ אֶחָד מִצָּרְעָה מִמִּשְׁפַּחַת הַדָּנִי וּשְׁמוֹ מָנוֹחַ | (א:א) וַיְהִי אִישׁ אֶחָד מִן הָרָמָתַיִם צוֹפִים מֵהַר אֶפְרָיִם וּשְׁמוֹ אֶלְקָנָה |
(יג:ה) וּמוֹרָה לֹא יַעֲלֶה עַל רֹאשׁוֹ כִּי נְזִיר אֱלֹהִים יִהְיֶה הַנַּעַר מִן הַבָּטֶן | (א:יא) וּנְתַתִּיו לַה' כָּל יְמֵי חַיָּיו וּמוֹרָה לֹא יַעֲלֶה עַל רֹאשׁוֹ |
(יג:כד) וַיִּגְדַּל הַנַּעַר וַיְבָרְכֵהוּ ה' | (ב:כא) וַיִּגְדַּל הַנַּעַר שְׁמוּאֵל עִם ה' |
Analysis
- Degree of similarity – All of the above phrases have a very high level of linguistic similarity.
- Distinctive phrases – Both of the phrases "וּמוֹרָה לֹא יַעֲלֶה עַל רֹאשׁוֹ"2 and "וַיִּגְדַּל הַנַּעַר"3 appear in these two stories only. The exact opening "וַיְהִי אִישׁ אֶחָד מִ... וּשְׁמוֹ" is also unique to these narratives but similar phrasing introduces the stories of the Idol of Mikhah, Shaul, Esther, and Iyyov as well.4
- Content parallels – Though other stories of barren woman share components with each of these events,5 most of the specific parallels mentioned above do not appear in those stories.
Contrasts
Despite the many similarities, there are several important points of contrast between the narratives. These are summarized in the chart below:
Mrs. Manoach and Channah |
|
Shimshon and Shemuel |
|
Implications
The comparison of Shimshon and Shemuel serves to highlight how Shimshon does not appear to fully accomplish his mission, while Shemuel surpasses him in every respect:
- Partial leadership and partial salvation – Shimshon only "begins" to fight the Philistines ("וְהוּא יָחֵל לְהוֹשִׁיעַ אֶת יִשְׂרָאֵל"), and never fully leads the people, acting on his own and not in concert with with the nation. Radak explains that these two points are connected. Due to the nation's low spiritual level, they merited only partial salvation.6 Thus, it was Shimshon's job to periodically smite the Philistines, but not to totally vanquish them. Since incomplete conquest naturally leads to retaliation, Shimshon needed to act alone so that the Philistine vengeance would be aimed only at him and not the people as a whole. Thus, Shimshon "abandoned" his people to marry and live amongst the Philistines, recognizing that his isolation ensured their safety.
- Shemuel finishes the job – The numerous parallels between the leaders and their births suggest that Shemuel is a corrective to Shimshon. Whereas Shimshon strived to only physically save the nation, Shemuel looked to improve their spiritual state. As such, they could merit full, and not just partial, salvation.
- The mothers – The difference between the leaders might be reflected in their parents as well. While Mrs. Manoach did not actively seek to improve her situation, Channah turned to Hashem, and on her own offered her son to serve Him. Channah succeeded in bequeathing to Shemuel the notion that success hinges on turning to and serving Hashem, thereby allowing him to steer the nation in a new direction.