Sinning with Quail/2

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sinning with Quail

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Gluttony

The Israelites' gluttony warrants an intense punishment from Hashem

Eating "בחנם" –  Ramban asserts that Egyptian taskmasters would have the Israelites catch fish for them in the Nile and would allow the slaves to take fish once in a while. R. Yosef Bekhor Shor argues that when the Nile would overflow, fish would remain on the soil and be left ownerless for anyone to take. For these commentators, חנם literally means "free of charge."
Fish or Meat?
Request of Shemot 16

Theological Issues

Burden of Commandments

Desire for food and meat are actually masks for a want of freedom from restrictive commandments.

Eating בחנם – These commentators reason that בחנם truly means "free from commandments1." In Egypt, before the giving of the Torah, the Israelites were not bound by any eating restrictions and could indulge in any food they pleased.
Fish or Meat? Shmuel (Yoma 75b) asserts that דגים is actually a reference to illicit sexual relations, which were not yet prohibited to the Israelites in Egypt2. Longing for "fish" is another expression of ridding of restrictive commandments.
Request of Shemot 16 – Rashi argues that the request for meat in Shemot was also a negative, gluttonous request3. Nonetheless, such a request was not as severe as the one in Bemidbar 11.

Testing Hashem's Abilities

Complaints about food and meat challenge Hashem's ability to provide food for the hungry nation

Request of Shemot 16

Educational Expectations

Lack of Appreciation

While the request itself was not problematic, Hashem punished the Israelites for their lack of appreciation for their freedom from Egypt.

Request of Shemot 16

Educational Development

The Israelites' request portrayed the nation's failure of inculcating the the essential messages of th Manna and revelation at Sinai.

Request of Shemot 16