Tanakh and the Ancient Near East Index – Parashat Noach/0

Tanakh & the Ancient Near East Index – Parashat Noach

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Flood Narratives

• The flood story has several parallels in Ancient Near Eastern literature.  See The Mabbul and Mesopotamian Myths, which explores both the narrative similarities as well as the theological differences underlying the various narratives. The comparison highlights the unique values and belief systems of the Children of Israel, distinguishing them from their polytheistic neighbors.
• While pagans blurred the line between man and god, viewing gods as having physical needs, fearing the very flood they set forth, and on the flipside, elevating man to the status of god, Tanakh presents Hashem as omnipotent,  in control of nature, above the physical and totally distinct from man.
• Similarly, while the pagan gods emerge as arbitrary and fickle, God acts only out of justice, bringing the Flood as punishment.
• See Flood Narratives in the Bible and the Ancient Near East, by Avi-Gil Chaitovksy, for an exploration of parallels and contrasts between the different accounts. 
• For discussion of the relationship between the Biblical and Mesopotamian Flood traditions, with an emphasis on the disparities, see: U. Cassuto, A Commentary on the Book of Genesis and N.M. Sarna, Understanding Genesis, (New York, 1970): 37–59.
• For translations of the Mesopotamian accounts, see Epic of Gilgamesh, Epic of Atrahasis and the Epic of Ziusudra.

Tower of Bavel in its Ancient Near Eastern Context

• Olam Hamikra provides images of ancient ziggurats, which may give context for understanding the significance of the tower of Bavel. 
• See Noach: And Man’s Loftiness Will Be Bowed by R. Elchanan Samet for an exploration of how knowledge of Mesopotamian ziggurats interacts with traditional commentary on the intentions of the builders of the tower.  
• See The Mock Building Account of Genesis 11:1-9: Polemic Against Mesopotamian Royal Ideology by Dr. Andrew Giorgetti, which argues that the Biblical account of Migdal Bavel intentionally subverts the messages and motifs of Mesopotamian legends about royal building.
• U. Cassuto, A Commentary on the Book of Genesis reads the story as an anti-Babylonian polemic, suggesting that Tanakh is mocking pagan hubris in seeing their man-made Temples as being the height of civilization.¹ See also Deconstructing Migdal Bavel which further notes that, as such, the story serves to introduce the Avraham narratives. Avraham, in contrast to the surrounding pagans, looks not make a name for himself, but cries out in the name of God. He builds atars to God and preaches monotheism, rather than building towers to idolatry. 

¹ See also N.M. Sarna, Understanding Genesis, (New York, 1970): 63–77.