Difference between revisions of "The Decalogue: Direct From Hashem or Via Moshe/2/en"
m |
m |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<h2>Overview</h2> | <h2>Overview</h2> | ||
<p>The Torah's contrasting portraits of Hashem's revelation to the nation lead commentators to varying understandings of what the nation grasped directly from Hashem and what they understood only via Moshe. On one end of the spectrum, Rambam and R. D"Z Hoffmann focus on the verses which present Moshe as an intermediary, asserting that the people heard only the voice of Hashem, but could not distinguish His words. Moshe, thus, acted as a mediator or translator for all ten.</p> | <p>The Torah's contrasting portraits of Hashem's revelation to the nation lead commentators to varying understandings of what the nation grasped directly from Hashem and what they understood only via Moshe. On one end of the spectrum, Rambam and R. D"Z Hoffmann focus on the verses which present Moshe as an intermediary, asserting that the people heard only the voice of Hashem, but could not distinguish His words. Moshe, thus, acted as a mediator or translator for all ten.</p> | ||
− | <p>On the other end of the spectrum, many commentators look at the depiction of the episode as a "face to face" encounter. They, thus, maintain that the nation understood all ten | + | <p>On the other end of the spectrum, many commentators look at the depiction of the episode as a "face to face" encounter. They, thus, maintain that the nation understood all ten utterances directly from Hashem. While Ibn Ezra and others assume that Hashem conversed directly with the people, R. Saadia, in contrast, suggests that the nation only overheard Hashem's conversation with Moshe.</p> |
<p>A middle ground is charted by Rashi, Ramban, and others, who attempt to harmonize the various verses by positing that there was a split in the commandments. The nation understood only the first two from Hashem, but needed Moshe to explain the final eight.</p></div> | <p>A middle ground is charted by Rashi, Ramban, and others, who attempt to harmonize the various verses by positing that there was a split in the commandments. The nation understood only the first two from Hashem, but needed Moshe to explain the final eight.</p></div> | ||
<approaches> | <approaches> | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
</mekorot> | </mekorot> | ||
<point><b>Moshe's role</b> – Since the nation was not on a high enough prophetic level to understand Hashem, Hashem spoke only to Moshe, who then relayed Hashem's messages to the people.</point> | <point><b>Moshe's role</b> – Since the nation was not on a high enough prophetic level to understand Hashem, Hashem spoke only to Moshe, who then relayed Hashem's messages to the people.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>"פָּנִים בְּפָנִים"</b> – This phrase is difficult for this position, since according to these exegetes, there was no "face to face" encounter, as the people were only listening in as Hashem spoke to Moshe and were not even able to understand His words.<fn><multilink><a href="AbarbanelShemot19" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot19" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:23</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink> notes this difficulty.</fn>  This approach might attempt to explain that the words "פָּנִים בְּפָנִים" refer to a vivid sensory experience of apprehending the Divine while awake, rather than in a dream.<fn>Cf. Seforno Devarim 5:4.</fn></point> | + | <point><b>"פָּנִים בְּפָנִים"</b> – This phrase is difficult for this position, since according to these exegetes, there was no "face to face" encounter, as the people were only listening in as Hashem spoke to Moshe and they were not even able to understand His words.<fn><multilink><a href="AbarbanelShemot19" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot19" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:23</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink> notes this difficulty (cf. Ibn Kaspi Devarim 5:4-5).  The phrase "פָּנִים בְּפָנִים" appears nowhere else in Tanakh, while the similar expression "פָּנִים אֶל פָּנִים" appears regarding Hashem's communication with Moshe (Shemot 33:11, Devarim 34:10) and Yaakov and Gidon's encounters with angels (Bereshit 32:31, Shofetim 6:22).</fn>  This approach might attempt to explain that the words "פָּנִים בְּפָנִים" refer to a vivid sensory experience of apprehending the Divine while awake, rather than in a dream.<fn>Cf. Seforno Devarim 5:4.</fn></point> |
− | <point><b>"אָנֹכִי עֹמֵד בֵּין ה' וּבֵינֵיכֶם"</b> – This verse is understood, as per its | + | <point><b>"אָנֹכִי עֹמֵד בֵּין ה' וּבֵינֵיכֶם"</b> – This verse is understood, as per the simple reading of its context, to refer to Moshe's mediating role during the giving of the Decalogue itself.</point> |
− | <point><b>"בַּעֲבוּר יִשְׁמַע הָעָם בְּדַבְּרִי עִמָּךְ"</b> – This position finds support from this verse, as it makes no mention of Hashem intending to speak to the nation, only of them listening as Hashem speaks to Moshe.</point> | + | <point><b>"בַּעֲבוּר יִשְׁמַע הָעָם בְּדַבְּרִי עִמָּךְ"</b> – This position finds support from this verse, as it makes no mention of Hashem intending to speak directly to the nation itself, but rather only of them listening as Hashem speaks to Moshe.</point> |
− | <point><b>"קוֹל דְּבָרִים אַתֶּם שֹׁמְעִים"</b> – To support their position, these commentators point to the many verses in the description of the event in Devarim which consistently refer to the voice that the nation heard, rather than | + | <point><b>"קוֹל דְּבָרִים אַתֶּם שֹׁמְעִים"</b> – To support their position, these commentators point to the many verses in the description of the event in Devarim which consistently refer to the voice that the nation heard, rather than any words. See <a href="Devarim4-10" data-aht="source">Devarim 4:12</a>, <a href="Devarim4-33" data-aht="source">4:33-36</a>, and <a href="Devarim5-19-28" data-aht="source">5:19-22</a>.<fn>These include: "<b>קוֹל</b> דְּבָרִים אַתֶּם שֹׁמְעִים", "הֲשָׁמַע עָם <b>קוֹל</b> אֱלֹהִים", "מִן הַשָּׁמַיִם הִשְׁמִיעֲךָ אֶת <b>קֹלוֹ</b>", "כְּשׇׁמְעֲכֶם אֶת <b>הַקּוֹל</b>", "וְאֶת <b>קֹלוֹ</b> שָׁמַעְנוּ". It should be noted, though, that Shadal points to other parts of many of these same verses to prove that Hashem spoke directly to the nation. Thus, for instance, despite the fact that the nation speaks of hearing Hashem's voice, Hashem himself prefaces His remarks by saying, "וְאַשְׁמִעֵם אֶת <b>דְּבָרָי</b>", I will have them listen to my<b> words</b>.</fn></point> |
<point><b>"מֹשֶׁה יְדַבֵּר וְהָאֱלֹהִים יַעֲנֶנּוּ בְקוֹל"</b> – Rambam suggests that these words refer to the role Moshe played during the Decalogue, when he relayed to the nation every statement of Hashem exactly as he heard it.<fn>According to this, though, one might have expected the verse to read "ה' ידבר ומשה יעננו בקול" since Hashem speaks first and only then does Moshe transmit.</fn></point> | <point><b>"מֹשֶׁה יְדַבֵּר וְהָאֱלֹהִים יַעֲנֶנּוּ בְקוֹל"</b> – Rambam suggests that these words refer to the role Moshe played during the Decalogue, when he relayed to the nation every statement of Hashem exactly as he heard it.<fn>According to this, though, one might have expected the verse to read "ה' ידבר ומשה יעננו בקול" since Hashem speaks first and only then does Moshe transmit.</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"וַיֵּרֶד מֹשֶׁה אֶל הָעָם וַיֹּאמֶר אֲלֵהֶם"</b> – According to this approach, this verse refers to Moshe's relaying of the | + | <point><b>"וַיֵּרֶד מֹשֶׁה אֶל הָעָם וַיֹּאמֶר אֲלֵהֶם"</b> – According to this approach, this verse refers to Moshe's relaying of the Decalogue which begins a mere one verse later.<fn>The single intervening verse, "וַיְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֵת כָּל הַדְּבָרִים", interrupts the mention of the speaker from the quote, because the text needs to tell the reader that both Hashem and Moshe spoke these words (Hashem to Moshe and then Moshe to the nation).</fn></point> |
<point><b>"וַיְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֵת כָּל הַדְּבָרִים"</b> – Rambam assumes that Moshe is the unstated audience of this verse, and it is to him that Hashem addressed all of His words.</point> | <point><b>"וַיְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֵת כָּל הַדְּבָרִים"</b> – Rambam assumes that Moshe is the unstated audience of this verse, and it is to him that Hashem addressed all of His words.</point> | ||
<point><b>Singular form</b> – Rambam explains that since Hashem was speaking just to Moshe, He used the singular ("לְךָ", "עָשִׂיתָ", "תִּגְנֹב" etc.), rather than the plural which might have been expected if the speech was aimed at all of the Israelites.</point> | <point><b>Singular form</b> – Rambam explains that since Hashem was speaking just to Moshe, He used the singular ("לְךָ", "עָשִׂיתָ", "תִּגְנֹב" etc.), rather than the plural which might have been expected if the speech was aimed at all of the Israelites.</point> | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
<point><b>"וַיְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֵת כָּל הַדְּבָרִים"</b> – According to R. D"Z Hoffmann, Hashem did communicate the entire Decalogue to the nation.  They simply needed a go-between to understand what He said.</point> | <point><b>"וַיְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֵת כָּל הַדְּבָרִים"</b> – According to R. D"Z Hoffmann, Hashem did communicate the entire Decalogue to the nation.  They simply needed a go-between to understand what He said.</point> | ||
<point><b>Singular form</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann would likely attribute no significance to the singular rather than plural formulation, as there are many instances in Torah where Hashem addresses the nation and refers to them as a singular unit.<fn>See, for instance, all the commandments in Vayikra 19:13-19.</fn> Thus, this is not sufficient evidence that Hashem directed His words at Moshe alone.</point> | <point><b>Singular form</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann would likely attribute no significance to the singular rather than plural formulation, as there are many instances in Torah where Hashem addresses the nation and refers to them as a singular unit.<fn>See, for instance, all the commandments in Vayikra 19:13-19.</fn> Thus, this is not sufficient evidence that Hashem directed His words at Moshe alone.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>The nation's fear – "דַּבֵּר אַתָּה עִמָּנוּ וְנִשְׁמָעָה"</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann assumes that this event occurred after the giving of the | + | <point><b>The nation's fear – "דַּבֵּר אַתָּה עִמָּנוּ וְנִשְׁמָעָה"</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann assumes that this event occurred after the giving of the Decalogue and suggests that had the nation not feared, Hashem would have relayed the rest of the commandments to them as well.  He even raises the possibility that the original plan was that the after the Decalogue, the nation would approach and perhaps even ascend the mountain to partake in the establishing of the covenant over the commandments.</point> |
<point><b>Switch from 1st to 3rd person</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann agrees with Ibn Ezra's view that the first person to third person switch is insignificant, as "משפט אנשי לשון הקודש לדבר ככה".</point> | <point><b>Switch from 1st to 3rd person</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann agrees with Ibn Ezra's view that the first person to third person switch is insignificant, as "משפט אנשי לשון הקודש לדבר ככה".</point> | ||
<point><b>Purpose of Sinaitic revelation</b> – As Hashem could have created a scenario in which all the people could understand Him despite their distance, R. D"Z Hoffmann's approach is only logical if one posits that Hashem intentionally positioned Moshe closer, requiring him to act as translator, while still addressing His words to all. This pushed the people to recognize Moshe's stature as prophet, but simultaneously connected them to Hashem and promoted their belief in Him.</point> | <point><b>Purpose of Sinaitic revelation</b> – As Hashem could have created a scenario in which all the people could understand Him despite their distance, R. D"Z Hoffmann's approach is only logical if one posits that Hashem intentionally positioned Moshe closer, requiring him to act as translator, while still addressing His words to all. This pushed the people to recognize Moshe's stature as prophet, but simultaneously connected them to Hashem and promoted their belief in Him.</point> | ||
Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
</mekorot> | </mekorot> | ||
<point><b>Moshe's role</b> – Moshe acted as an intermediary for the last eight commandments, relaying them to the nation in Hashem's stead.</point> | <point><b>Moshe's role</b> – Moshe acted as an intermediary for the last eight commandments, relaying them to the nation in Hashem's stead.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Why the split?</b> According to these sources, the original plan was for Hashem to say | + | <point><b>Why the split?</b> According to these sources, the original plan was for Hashem to say the entire Decalogue directly to the nation.  After Hashem relayed the second commandment, though, the nation became frightened and requested that Moshe mediate.</point> |
<point><b>"פָּנִים בְּפָנִים"</b> – This phrase describes the first part of the encounter, when the nation heard and understood the first two commandments directly from Hashem.</point> | <point><b>"פָּנִים בְּפָנִים"</b> – This phrase describes the first part of the encounter, when the nation heard and understood the first two commandments directly from Hashem.</point> | ||
<point><b>"אָנֹכִי עֹמֵד בֵּין ה' וּבֵינֵיכֶם"</b> – This clause refers to the second part of the experience when Moshe served as an intermediary to deliver the final eight commandments.</point> | <point><b>"אָנֹכִי עֹמֵד בֵּין ה' וּבֵינֵיכֶם"</b> – This clause refers to the second part of the experience when Moshe served as an intermediary to deliver the final eight commandments.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>The nation's fear – "דַּבֵּר אַתָּה עִמָּנוּ וְנִשְׁמָעָה"</b> – According to these sources, this episode took place in the middle of the Decalogue, between the second and third commandments.  It is only written out of order so as not to interrupt the flow of the storyline and to keep the Decalogue in one continuous list.  R. Yosef Bekhor Shor adds that had it not been for their fear, the nation might have heard all the commandments in this manner.  Alternatively, Hashem had never planned on relaying more than | + | <point><b>The nation's fear – "דַּבֵּר אַתָּה עִמָּנוּ וְנִשְׁמָעָה"</b> – According to these sources, this episode took place in the middle of the Decalogue, between the second and third commandments.  It is only written out of order so as not to interrupt the flow of the storyline and to keep the Decalogue in one continuous list.  R. Yosef Bekhor Shor adds that had it not been for their fear, the nation might have heard all the commandments in this manner.  Alternatively, Hashem had never planned on relaying more than these commandments regardless of the nation's fears.<fn>It should be noted that in this aspect, this position is much more similar to the approach above that has the nation hear all ten commandments, than to Ramban below.  In contrast to Ramban, both these positions assume that at some point Hashem's original plan changed due to the nation's fear, disagreeing only regarding at which point it was that the fear hit the nation (after commandment 2 or 10).  In choosing the specific scenario, one position is motivated by the switch in speaker and the other by the placement of the scene depicting the fear.</fn></point> |
<point><b>"כִּי יְרֵאתֶם מִפְּנֵי הָאֵשׁ וְלֹא עֲלִיתֶם בָּהָר"</b> – This verse seems to imply that, were it not for their fears, the people could have ascended the mountain.  This poses a difficulty for this approach which maintains that the people expressed their fears midway through the Decalogue, as at that point it was prohibited from ascending the mountain regardless of whether they were afraid.  Thus, this approach might need to explain, as Ibn Ezra above, that Moshe is saying that despite the fact that they did not ascend the mountain, they were still in fear.<fn>R"Y Bekhor Shor, in contrast, posits that Moshe is referring to a future ascent of the mountain, to hear the rest of the commandments.</fn></point> | <point><b>"כִּי יְרֵאתֶם מִפְּנֵי הָאֵשׁ וְלֹא עֲלִיתֶם בָּהָר"</b> – This verse seems to imply that, were it not for their fears, the people could have ascended the mountain.  This poses a difficulty for this approach which maintains that the people expressed their fears midway through the Decalogue, as at that point it was prohibited from ascending the mountain regardless of whether they were afraid.  Thus, this approach might need to explain, as Ibn Ezra above, that Moshe is saying that despite the fact that they did not ascend the mountain, they were still in fear.<fn>R"Y Bekhor Shor, in contrast, posits that Moshe is referring to a future ascent of the mountain, to hear the rest of the commandments.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Switch from 1st to 3rd person</b> – R. Yosef Kara adduces support for this approach from the fact that the Decalogue switches from first person to third person immediately after the second commandment.  If this is when Moshe began to speak, the third person references to Hashem make sense.</point> | <point><b>Switch from 1st to 3rd person</b> – R. Yosef Kara adduces support for this approach from the fact that the Decalogue switches from first person to third person immediately after the second commandment.  If this is when Moshe began to speak, the third person references to Hashem make sense.</point> |
Version as of 08:19, 6 June 2019
The Decalogue: Direct From Hashem or Via Moshe?
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
The Torah's contrasting portraits of Hashem's revelation to the nation lead commentators to varying understandings of what the nation grasped directly from Hashem and what they understood only via Moshe. On one end of the spectrum, Rambam and R. D"Z Hoffmann focus on the verses which present Moshe as an intermediary, asserting that the people heard only the voice of Hashem, but could not distinguish His words. Moshe, thus, acted as a mediator or translator for all ten.
On the other end of the spectrum, many commentators look at the depiction of the episode as a "face to face" encounter. They, thus, maintain that the nation understood all ten utterances directly from Hashem. While Ibn Ezra and others assume that Hashem conversed directly with the people, R. Saadia, in contrast, suggests that the nation only overheard Hashem's conversation with Moshe.
A middle ground is charted by Rashi, Ramban, and others, who attempt to harmonize the various verses by positing that there was a split in the commandments. The nation understood only the first two from Hashem, but needed Moshe to explain the final eight.
Understood None
The nation heard only the voice of Hashem, but understood none of His words, and Moshe's mediation between the people and Hashem was thus needed throughout the entire Decalogue. Commentators disagree whether the voice was directed at the nation or if they merely overheard the sounds of the Divine conversation with Moshe.
Overheard Voice
The people listened as Hashem communicated the Decalogue to Moshe, but they only heard the Divine voice and could not decipher His words.
Heard Voice Directly
Hashem spoke to the people directly, but due to their distance, they could make out only a voice and not distinct words.
Understood All Ten
The nation understood the entire Decalogue from Hashem. This position subdivides regarding whether Hashem's words were aimed at the people or Moshe.
Overheard Words
Hashem's spoke to Moshe only, but He intended that the nation would listen in on this conversation.
Heard Words Directly
Hashem spoke directly to the people themselves, and they, not Moshe, were His target audience for the entire Decalogue.
- Spoke to all – According to Ibn Ezra, this verse does not insinuate that Hashem was to speak to Moshe alone, but only that when Hashem did speak to him (along with everyone else), his prophetic stature would be verified. The nation had doubted Moshe's prophecy, believing that if Hashem speaks to a person, he cannot live afterwards. Thus, Hashem tells Moshe that when the nation sees Him speaking to Moshe during the giving of the Decalogue, they will finally recognize that their preconception was false.
- Change of plan - According to Ralbag and Abarbanel, Hashem originally told Moshe that He would speak to him alone and the nation would overhear, leading them to believe in Moshe's prophecy. Moshe then clarified to Hashem that the nation preferred to not have a mediator, but rather desired a direct face to face encounter. As a result, Hashem acquiesced and changed the original plan.24
- Before the Decalogue – Shadal asserts that this refers to the nation hearing Hashem's conversation with Moshe before the Decalogue.
- According to Ibn Ezra, Moshe is saying that the nation feared from the fire, despite the fact that they did not go up the mountain.
- This position could also maintain that the original plan (had the nation not been overcome by fear) was to ascend the mountain after the giving of the Decalogue and to hear the rest of the 613 commandments from perhaps an even closer vantage point and at a higher spiritual level.26
- Before the Decalogue – According to Ibn Ezra, Abarbanel, and Shadal,27 this refers to the conversation between Moshe and Hashem before the giving of the Decalogue and, as such, provides no information regarding how Hashem delivered the commandments.28
- Before and during – Ralbag maintains that the verse refers to Hashem's words both before and during the Decalogue.29 The mention of Moshe speaking refers only to the earlier conversation, but the fact that Hashem spoke "בְקוֹל" can refer to both.30
- During the Decalogue – R. Eliezer suggests that that the verse refers to the Decalogue but is simply saying that before Hashem spoke to the nation, He waited for Moshe to tell Him that they were ready.31
- This position highlights the goal of teaching the nation to believe in Hashem. As Moshe says in Sefer Devarim, after hearing Hashem directly, "אַתָּה הָרְאֵתָ לָדַעַת כִּי ה' הוּא הָאֱלֹהִים".33
- According to Shadal, there may have been a dual purpose of instilling belief in both Moshe and Hashem. By hearing Hashem speak to Moshe before the actual revelation, the nation recognized his prophetic stature, and by hearing Hashem on their own during revelation, they came to believe in God.
Understood Only Two
The nation understood only two commandments directly from Hashem. The commentators disagree as to how the nation received the other eight:
Eight From Moshe
Due to the nation's fear, Hashem stopped speaking to them and instead spoke only to Moshe, who then relayed the final eight commandments to the nation.
Voice but No Words
Hashem communicated also the other eight commandments to the nation, but in these they discerned only His voice and needed Moshe to serve as an interpreter.