Difference between revisions of "The Decalogue: Direct From Hashem or Via Moshe/2/en"
m |
m |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<point><b>"קוֹל דְּבָרִים אַתֶּם שֹׁמְעִים"</b> – <p>R. D"Z Hoffmann brings support for the idea that the nation did not comprehend Hashem's words from the repeated emphasis on having heard His voice rather than His words. See <a href="Devarim4-10" data-aht="source">Devarim 4:12</a>, <a href="Devarim4-33" data-aht="source">4:33-36</a>, and <a href="Devarim5-19-28" data-aht="source">5:19-22</a>.<fn>R. D"Z Hoffmann would explain the other verses which suggest that Hashem actually spoke to the nation (and did not just give forth a voice) to refer to the fact that Hashem did in fact address them, even if they did not comprehend what He said.</fn></p></point> | <point><b>"קוֹל דְּבָרִים אַתֶּם שֹׁמְעִים"</b> – <p>R. D"Z Hoffmann brings support for the idea that the nation did not comprehend Hashem's words from the repeated emphasis on having heard His voice rather than His words. See <a href="Devarim4-10" data-aht="source">Devarim 4:12</a>, <a href="Devarim4-33" data-aht="source">4:33-36</a>, and <a href="Devarim5-19-28" data-aht="source">5:19-22</a>.<fn>R. D"Z Hoffmann would explain the other verses which suggest that Hashem actually spoke to the nation (and did not just give forth a voice) to refer to the fact that Hashem did in fact address them, even if they did not comprehend what He said.</fn></p></point> | ||
<point><b>"מֹשֶׁה יְדַבֵּר וְהָאֱלֹהִים יַעֲנֶנּוּ בְקוֹל"</b> – According to R. Hoffmann, this verse refers to Moshe's dialogue with Hashem in <a href="Shemot19-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:19-25</a> and not to the Decalogue.  Only when relaying the warnings is there a conversation where Hashem sometimes respond to Moshe.  During the revelation itself, Moshe repeated Hashem's words to the people, but Hashem's words were not a response to Moshe and would not be aptly described as "יַעֲנֶנּוּ בְקוֹל‏‎".<fn>Though R. D"Z Hoffmann agrees with ramabam above that Moshe played a mediating role, due to textual reasons, he prefers not to bring this verse as evidence.</fn></point> | <point><b>"מֹשֶׁה יְדַבֵּר וְהָאֱלֹהִים יַעֲנֶנּוּ בְקוֹל"</b> – According to R. Hoffmann, this verse refers to Moshe's dialogue with Hashem in <a href="Shemot19-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:19-25</a> and not to the Decalogue.  Only when relaying the warnings is there a conversation where Hashem sometimes respond to Moshe.  During the revelation itself, Moshe repeated Hashem's words to the people, but Hashem's words were not a response to Moshe and would not be aptly described as "יַעֲנֶנּוּ בְקוֹל‏‎".<fn>Though R. D"Z Hoffmann agrees with ramabam above that Moshe played a mediating role, due to textual reasons, he prefers not to bring this verse as evidence.</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"וַיֵּרֶד מֹשֶׁה אֶל הָעָם וַיֹּאמֶר אֲלֵהֶם"</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann asserts that this verse refers to transmitting Hashem's warnings to the nation, not the Decalogue..</point> | + | <point><b>"וַיֵּרֶד מֹשֶׁה אֶל הָעָם וַיֹּאמֶר אֲלֵהֶם"</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann asserts that this verse refers to transmitting Hashem's warnings to the nation, and not to the Decalogue..</point> |
− | <point><b>"וַיְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֵת כָּל הַדְּבָרִים"</b> – According to R. D"Z Hoffmann, Hashem did | + | <point><b>"וַיְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֵת כָּל הַדְּבָרִים"</b> – According to R. D"Z Hoffmann, Hashem did communicate the entire Decalogue to the nation.  They simply needed a go-between to understand what He said.</point> |
− | <point><b>Singular form</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann would likely attribute no significance to the | + | <point><b>Singular form</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann would likely attribute no significance to the singular rather than plural formulation, as there are many instances in Torah where Hashem addresses the nation and refers to them as a singular unit.<fn>See, for instance, all the commandments in Vayikra 19:13-19.</fn> Thus, this is not sufficient evidence that Hashem directed His words at Moshe alone.</point> |
− | <point><b>The nation's fear – "דַּבֵּר אַתָּה עִמָּנוּ וְנִשְׁמָעָה"</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann assumes that this event occurred after the giving of the | + | <point><b>The nation's fear – "דַּבֵּר אַתָּה עִמָּנוּ וְנִשְׁמָעָה"</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann assumes that this event occurred after the giving of the Ten Commandments and suggests that had the nation not feared, Hashem would have relayed the rest of the commandments to them as well.  He even raises the possibility that the original plan was that the after the Decalogue, the nation would approach and perhaps even ascend the mountain to partake in the establishing of the covenant over the commandments.</point> |
<point><b>Switch from 1st to 3rd person</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann agrees with Ibn Ezra's view that the first person to third person switch is insignificant, as "משפט אנשי לשון הקודש לדבר ככה".</point> | <point><b>Switch from 1st to 3rd person</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann agrees with Ibn Ezra's view that the first person to third person switch is insignificant, as "משפט אנשי לשון הקודש לדבר ככה".</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Purpose of Sinaitic revelation</b> – As Hashem could have created a scenario | + | <point><b>Purpose of Sinaitic revelation</b> – As Hashem could have created a scenario in which all the people could understand Him despite their distance, R. D"Z Hoffmann's approach is only logical if one posits that Hashem intentionally positioned Moshe closer, requiring him to act as translator, while still addressing His words to all. This pushed the people to recognize Moshe's stature as prophet, but simultaneously connected them to Hashem and promoted their belief in Him.</point> |
− | <point><b>Prophecy for the Masses</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann suggests that the people were at a lower level of sanctity, requiring a greater distance and thus lower prophetic | + | <point><b>Prophecy for the Masses</b> – R. D"Z Hoffmann suggests that the people were at a lower level of sanctity, requiring a greater distance and thus lower prophetic capabilities.</point> |
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
<multilink><a href="RasagShemot19-9" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><a href="RasagShemot19-9" data-aht="source">Commentary Shemot 19:9-21, 20:1</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink>,<fn>R. Saadia Gaon's comments are cut off in the middle of his discussion of the issue so it is difficult to totally reconstruct is position.</fn> <multilink><a href="RAvrahamShemot20-1" data-aht="source">R. Maimon</a><a href="RAvrahamShemot20-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:1</a><a href="R. Avraham Maimonides" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham Maimonides</a></multilink> | <multilink><a href="RasagShemot19-9" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><a href="RasagShemot19-9" data-aht="source">Commentary Shemot 19:9-21, 20:1</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink>,<fn>R. Saadia Gaon's comments are cut off in the middle of his discussion of the issue so it is difficult to totally reconstruct is position.</fn> <multilink><a href="RAvrahamShemot20-1" data-aht="source">R. Maimon</a><a href="RAvrahamShemot20-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:1</a><a href="R. Avraham Maimonides" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham Maimonides</a></multilink> | ||
</mekorot> | </mekorot> | ||
− | <point><b>Moshe's role</b> – R. Saadia and R. Maimon do not suggest that Moshe played an intermediary role in the sense of explaining or relaying commandments in Hashem's stead, but do assert that the positioning (having the nation listening in to Hashem and Moshe's conversation) set him up as "go-between" of sorts and highlighted his elevated status. R. Saadia also adds that after each of Hashem's statements, Moshe repeated it to the people.<fn>Thus, the nation heard each commandment in the Decalogue twice, once from Hashem and once from Moshe.  We do not have the end of R. Saadia's comments, which are cut off right before he is to explain what he thinks is the purpose of such doubling.</fn></point> | + | <point><b>Moshe's role</b> – R. Saadia and R. Maimon do not suggest that Moshe played an intermediary role in the sense of explaining or relaying commandments in Hashem's stead, but do assert that the positioning (having the nation listening in to Hashem and Moshe's conversation) set him up as a "go-between" of sorts and highlighted his elevated status. R. Saadia also adds that after each of Hashem's statements, Moshe repeated it to the people.<fn>Thus, the nation heard each commandment in the Decalogue twice, once from Hashem and once from Moshe.  We do not have the end of R. Saadia's comments, which are cut off right before he is to explain what he thinks is the purpose of such doubling.</fn></point> |
− | <point><b>"פָּנִים בְּפָנִים"</b> – This phrase is somewhat difficult for this approach, since one would not normally refer to overheard speech as a face to face encounter. | + | <point><b>"פָּנִים בְּפָנִים"</b> – This phrase is somewhat difficult for this approach, since one would not normally refer to overheard speech as a "face to face" encounter. These commentators might suggest that Moshe is simply saying that, despite the positioning, the nation understood Hashem's words clearly, as if the statements were said to them face to face.</point> |
− | <point><b>"אָנֹכִי עֹמֵד בֵּין ה' וּבֵינֵיכֶם"</b> – R. Saadia and R. Maimon suggest that the phrase refers to Moshe's role during revelation itself.  According to R. Saadia, Moshe literally stood between the nation and Hashem to repeat to them Hashem's words.<fn>According to R. Maimon, Moshe did not say anything, so the phrase "לְהַגִּיד לָכֶם אֶת דְּבַר ה'" is difficult. He might say that it was as if Moshe was speaking because it was his position in between the nation and Hashem that enabled them to hear Hashem's speech.</fn></point> | + | <point><b>"אָנֹכִי עֹמֵד בֵּין ה' וּבֵינֵיכֶם"</b> – R. Saadia and R. Maimon suggest that the phrase refers to Moshe's role during revelation itself.  According to R. Saadia, Moshe literally stood between the nation and Hashem in order to repeat to them Hashem's words.<fn>According to R. Maimon, Moshe did not say anything, so the phrase "לְהַגִּיד לָכֶם אֶת דְּבַר ה'" is difficult. He might say that it was as if Moshe was speaking because it was his position in between the nation and Hashem that enabled them to hear Hashem's speech.</fn></point> |
− | <point><b>"בַּעֲבוּר יִשְׁמַע הָעָם בְּדַבְּרִי עִמָּךְ"</b> – According to R. Saadia and R. Maimon the verse is understood according to its simple meaning. Hashem did in fact direct his speech to Moshe and was only overheard by the rest of the people. Such a method had the benefit of instilling belief in Moshe.</point> | + | <point><b>"בַּעֲבוּר יִשְׁמַע הָעָם בְּדַבְּרִי עִמָּךְ"</b> – According to R. Saadia and R. Maimon, the verse is understood according to its simple meaning. Hashem did, in fact, direct his speech to Moshe and was only overheard by the rest of the people. Such a method had the extra benefit of instilling belief in Moshe.</point> |
<point><b>"וַיְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֵת כָּל הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה"</b> – R. Maimon suggests that there is no stated audience in this sentence since the audience was all who were present: Moshe, Aharon and the nation as a whole.  Hashem spoke to all (despite directing his words at Moshe).  This position might also point to the word "כָּל" as evidence that <b>all</b> ten were said by Hashem.<fn>See Ibn Ezra below.</fn></point> | <point><b>"וַיְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֵת כָּל הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה"</b> – R. Maimon suggests that there is no stated audience in this sentence since the audience was all who were present: Moshe, Aharon and the nation as a whole.  Hashem spoke to all (despite directing his words at Moshe).  This position might also point to the word "כָּל" as evidence that <b>all</b> ten were said by Hashem.<fn>See Ibn Ezra below.</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"מֹשֶׁה יְדַבֵּר וְהָאֱלֹהִים יַעֲנֶנּוּ בְקוֹל"</b> – R. Saadia connects this verse to the above "בַּעֲבוּר יִשְׁמַע הָעָם בְּדַבְּרִי עִמָּךְ", suggesting that he thinks that it, too, refers to Hashem's speech during the Decalogue.<fn>Ibn Ezra and Shadal understand that R.Saadia thinks that both verses refer to the period before the giving of the Decalogue, when Hashem issues to Moshe the various warnings.  R. Saadia's comments to verse 9, though, clearly suggest that he assumes that the verse refers to the Decalogue itself.</fn>  He asserts that | + | <point><b>"מֹשֶׁה יְדַבֵּר וְהָאֱלֹהִים יַעֲנֶנּוּ בְקוֹל"</b> – R. Saadia connects this verse to the above "בַּעֲבוּר יִשְׁמַע הָעָם בְּדַבְּרִי עִמָּךְ", suggesting that he thinks that it, too, refers to Hashem's speech during the Decalogue.<fn>Ibn Ezra and Shadal understand that R.Saadia thinks that both verses refer to the period before the giving of the Decalogue, when Hashem issues to Moshe the various warnings.  R. Saadia's comments to verse 9, though, clearly suggest that he assumes that the verse refers to the Decalogue itself.</fn>  He asserts that the verse comes to inform the reader that, to be heard over the loud blast of the shofar, both Moshe and Hashem needed to speak at a high volume.<fn>According to him, both Moshe and Hashem were speaking since Moshe repeated each of Hashem's statements to the nation.   Since Moshe spoke second, though, one might have expected the verse to be written in the opposite order "ה' ידבר ומשה יעננו בקול".  As written, it sounds as if Moshe spoke first.</fn> R. Maimon who does not assert that Moshe spoke at all during the Decalogue might suggest that this refers to Moshe and Hashem's earlier conversation in verses 20-25.</point> |
<point><b>The nation's fear – "דַּבֵּר אַתָּה עִמָּנוּ וְנִשְׁמָעָה"</b> – According to this approach, this scene is found in its chronological place and only occurred after Hashem finished relaying the entire Decalogue.</point> | <point><b>The nation's fear – "דַּבֵּר אַתָּה עִמָּנוּ וְנִשְׁמָעָה"</b> – According to this approach, this scene is found in its chronological place and only occurred after Hashem finished relaying the entire Decalogue.</point> | ||
<point><b>Switch from 1st to 3rd person</b> – This position would agree with Ibn Ezra below that the switch is an example of legitimate, normal, variation in Tanakh and carries no extra significance.</point> | <point><b>Switch from 1st to 3rd person</b> – This position would agree with Ibn Ezra below that the switch is an example of legitimate, normal, variation in Tanakh and carries no extra significance.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Purpose of Sinaitic revelation</b> – This approach understands that the episode had a | + | <point><b>Purpose of Sinaitic revelation</b> – This approach understands that the episode had a dual objective, to instill faith in Moshe as Hashem's messenger, and to inculcate belief in Hashem Himself.  The former was accomplished by having Hashem direct his words at Moshe, elevating Him above the nation, while the latter was fulfilled when the people heard Hashem speak.</point> |
− | <point><b>Prophecy for the masses</b> – This approach assumes that all can | + | <point><b>Prophecy for the masses</b> – This approach assumes that all can prophesy if Hashem so desires, even without extensive preparation. R. Maimon, though, does qualify that each person understood Hashem's words differently, according to their own abilities and level.</point> |
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
<opinion name="">Heard Words Directly | <opinion name="">Heard Words Directly | ||
− | <p>Hashem spoke directly to the people themselves, and they, not Moshe, were his target audience.</p> | + | <p>Hashem spoke directly to the people themselves, and they, not Moshe, were his target audience for the entire Decalogue.</p> |
<mekorot> | <mekorot> | ||
<multilink><a href="Josephus3-5-4" data-aht="source">Josephus</a><a href="Josephus3-5-4" data-aht="source">Antiquities 3:5:4 (89-90)</a><a href="Josephus" data-aht="parshan">About Josephus</a></multilink>, the Sages in <multilink><a href="SHSRabbah1-2" data-aht="source">Shir HaShirim Rabbah</a><a href="SHSRabbah1-2" data-aht="source">1:2</a><a href="Shir HaShirim Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shir HaShirim Rabbah</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="PesiktaRabbati22" data-aht="source">Pesikta Rabbati</a><a href="PesiktaRabbati22" data-aht="source">22</a><a href="Pesikta Rabbati" data-aht="parshan">About Pesikta Rabbati</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="TanchumaBuberYitro17" data-aht="source">Tanchuma (Buber)</a><a href="TanchumaBuberYitro17" data-aht="source">Yitro 17</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About Tanchuma (Buber)</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="Kuzari1-87" data-aht="source">R. Yehuda HaLevi</a><a href="Kuzari1-87" data-aht="source">1:87</a><a href="R. Yehuda HaLevi" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yehuda HaLevi</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashbamShemot19-19" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamShemot19-19" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:19</a><a href="RashbamShemot20-15" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:15</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotLong20-1" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotLong20-1" data-aht="source">Shemot Long Commentary 20:1</a><a href="IbnEzraDevarim5-5" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:5</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RalbagShemot19-8" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagShemot19-8" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:8-9</a><a href="RalbagShemot20-15" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:15</a><a href="RalbagDevarim5-5" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:5</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="AbarbanelShemot20" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot19Q13" data-aht="source">Shemot 19-20, Questions 13-14</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot19-9" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:9</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot19-19" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:19</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot19-20-22" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:20-22</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot19" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:23</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot20" data-aht="source">Shemot 20</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="ShadalShemot20-1" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalShemot19-9" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:9</a><a href="ShadalShemot19-19" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:19</a><a href="ShadalShemot19-24" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:24</a><a href="ShadalShemot20-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink> | <multilink><a href="Josephus3-5-4" data-aht="source">Josephus</a><a href="Josephus3-5-4" data-aht="source">Antiquities 3:5:4 (89-90)</a><a href="Josephus" data-aht="parshan">About Josephus</a></multilink>, the Sages in <multilink><a href="SHSRabbah1-2" data-aht="source">Shir HaShirim Rabbah</a><a href="SHSRabbah1-2" data-aht="source">1:2</a><a href="Shir HaShirim Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shir HaShirim Rabbah</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="PesiktaRabbati22" data-aht="source">Pesikta Rabbati</a><a href="PesiktaRabbati22" data-aht="source">22</a><a href="Pesikta Rabbati" data-aht="parshan">About Pesikta Rabbati</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="TanchumaBuberYitro17" data-aht="source">Tanchuma (Buber)</a><a href="TanchumaBuberYitro17" data-aht="source">Yitro 17</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About Tanchuma (Buber)</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="Kuzari1-87" data-aht="source">R. Yehuda HaLevi</a><a href="Kuzari1-87" data-aht="source">1:87</a><a href="R. Yehuda HaLevi" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yehuda HaLevi</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashbamShemot19-19" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamShemot19-19" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:19</a><a href="RashbamShemot20-15" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:15</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotLong20-1" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotLong20-1" data-aht="source">Shemot Long Commentary 20:1</a><a href="IbnEzraDevarim5-5" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:5</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RalbagShemot19-8" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagShemot19-8" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:8-9</a><a href="RalbagShemot20-15" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:15</a><a href="RalbagDevarim5-5" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:5</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="AbarbanelShemot20" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot19Q13" data-aht="source">Shemot 19-20, Questions 13-14</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot19-9" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:9</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot19-19" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:19</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot19-20-22" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:20-22</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot19" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:23</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot20" data-aht="source">Shemot 20</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="ShadalShemot20-1" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalShemot19-9" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:9</a><a href="ShadalShemot19-19" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:19</a><a href="ShadalShemot19-24" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:24</a><a href="ShadalShemot20-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink> | ||
</mekorot> | </mekorot> | ||
− | <point><b>Moshe's role</b> – According to these sources, Moshe did not play any significant role during Revelation. He, like the rest of the nation, simply listened to Hashem.  According to Abarbanel and Shadal, even physically Moshe was positioned | + | <point><b>Moshe's role</b> – According to these sources, Moshe did not play any significant role during the Revelation. He, like the rest of the nation, simply listened to Hashem.  According to Abarbanel and Shadal, even physically, Moshe was positioned amidst the people and was not higher up on the mountain.<fn>This follows the approach laid forth in <a href="ShemotRabbah28-3" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a>.</fn></point> |
<point><b>"פָּנִים בְּפָנִים"</b> – These commentators understand the phrase "פָּנִים בְּפָנִים" to refer to a direct, unmediated encounter.  R. Levi in the Tanchuma describes the experience as one in which each member of the nation felt as if Hashem was speaking to him personally.</point> | <point><b>"פָּנִים בְּפָנִים"</b> – These commentators understand the phrase "פָּנִים בְּפָנִים" to refer to a direct, unmediated encounter.  R. Levi in the Tanchuma describes the experience as one in which each member of the nation felt as if Hashem was speaking to him personally.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>"אָנֹכִי עֹמֵד בֵּין ה' וּבֵינֵיכֶם"</b> – According to most of these commentators, these words refer to the mediating role that Moshe assumed after receiving the Decalogue, when giving over the rest of the commandments.<fn>Ibn Ezra and Abarbanel say this explicitly.  According to them, the phrase "בָּעֵת הַהִוא" (at that time) does not refer to the immediate period spoken of in the verse (the giving of the Decalogue) but rather some point afterwards forward.  See בָּעֵת הַהִוא for a discussion of the term's usage in Tanakh.<br/>The Sages and Ralbag are more ambiguous.  They don't say explicitly that the words refer to the giving over of the other commandments, only that Moshe is referring to the conversation in which the people confess their fear and request that Moshe speak with them rather than Hashem.</fn> Alternatively, this position could posit, as does <a href="RambanDevarim5-5" data-aht="source">Ramban</a>,<fn>See the first approach that he brings in his comments to Devarim 5:5.</fn> that  this refers to Moshe's role before the Decalogue when he acted as a go-between to relay all of Hashem's instructions to the nation.</point> | + | <point><b>"אָנֹכִי עֹמֵד בֵּין ה' וּבֵינֵיכֶם"</b> – According to most of these commentators, these words refer to the mediating role that Moshe assumed after receiving the Decalogue, when giving over the rest of the commandments.<fn>Ibn Ezra and Abarbanel say this explicitly.  According to them, the phrase "בָּעֵת הַהִוא" (at that time) does not refer to the immediate period spoken of in the verse (the giving of the Decalogue) but rather some point afterwards forward.  See בָּעֵת הַהִוא for a discussion of the term's usage in Tanakh.<br/>The Sages and Ralbag are more ambiguous.  They don't say explicitly that the words refer to the giving over of the other commandments, only that Moshe is referring to the conversation in which the people confess their fear and request that Moshe speak with them rather than Hashem.</fn> Alternatively, this position could posit, as does <a href="RambanDevarim5-5" data-aht="source">Ramban</a>,<fn>See the first approach that he brings in his comments to Devarim 5:5.</fn> that  this refers to Moshe's role before the Decalogue when he acted as a go-between to relay all of Hashem's instructions to prepare the nation.</point> |
− | <point><b>"וַיְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֵת כָּל הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה"</b> – Ibn Ezra supports the idea that Hashem communicated all the commandments directly from the text's usage of the words "‎‏<b>כָּל</b> הַדְּבָרִים"‎.<fn>He argues against the position below which posits that only two commandments were transmitted directly by Hashem by pointing out that the word "all" assumes that there was no differentiation between the manner in which the commandments were relayed; all were from Hashem directly.  Shadal adds proofs from <a href="Devarim4-10" data-aht="source">Devarim 4:12-13</a>, <a href="Devarim4-33" data-aht="source">4:36</a> and <a href="Devarim5-19-28" data-aht="source">5:19-21</a> all of which emphasize how Hashem spoke to the nation ("וַיְדַבֵּר ה' אֲלֵיכֶם", "וּדְבָרָיו שָׁמַעְתָּ", "רָאִינוּ כִּי יְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֶת הָאָדָם וָחָי").</fn> Shadal adds proofs from <a href="Devarim4-10" data-aht="source">Devarim 4:12-13</a>, <a href="Devarim4-33" data-aht="source">4:36</a> and <a href="Devarim5-19-28" data-aht="source">5:19-21</a>, all of which emphasize how Hashem spoke (and did not | + | <point><b>"וַיְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֵת כָּל הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה"</b> – Ibn Ezra supports the idea that Hashem communicated all the commandments directly from the text's usage of the words "‎‏<b>כָּל</b> הַדְּבָרִים"‎.<fn>He argues against the position below which posits that only two commandments were transmitted directly by Hashem by pointing out that the word "all" assumes that there was no differentiation between the manner in which the commandments were relayed; all were from Hashem directly.  Shadal adds proofs from <a href="Devarim4-10" data-aht="source">Devarim 4:12-13</a>, <a href="Devarim4-33" data-aht="source">4:36</a> and <a href="Devarim5-19-28" data-aht="source">5:19-21</a> all of which emphasize how Hashem spoke to the nation ("וַיְדַבֵּר ה' אֲלֵיכֶם", "וּדְבָרָיו שָׁמַעְתָּ", "רָאִינוּ כִּי יְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֶת הָאָדָם וָחָי").</fn> Shadal adds proofs from <a href="Devarim4-10" data-aht="source">Devarim 4:12-13</a>, <a href="Devarim4-33" data-aht="source">4:36</a> and <a href="Devarim5-19-28" data-aht="source">5:19-21</a>, all of which emphasize how Hashem spoke (and did not produce merely the sound of a voice) to the nation.<fn>See the phrases: "וַיְדַבֵּר ה' אֲלֵיכֶם", "וּדְבָרָיו שָׁמַעְתָּ", "רָאִינוּ כִּי יְדַבֵּר אֱלֹהִים אֶת הָאָדָם וָחָי".</fn></point> |
<point><b>"בַּעֲבוּר יִשְׁמַע הָעָם בְּדַבְּרִי עִמָּךְ"</b><ul> | <point><b>"בַּעֲבוּר יִשְׁמַע הָעָם בְּדַבְּרִי עִמָּךְ"</b><ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Spoke to all</b> – According to Ibn Ezra, this verse does not insinuate that Hashem was to speak to Moshe alone, but only that when Hashem did speak to him (along with everyone else), his prophetic stature would be verified. The nation had doubted Moshe's prophecy, believing that if Hashem speaks to a person he cannot live afterwards.  Thus, Hashem tells Moshe that when the nation sees Him speaking to Moshe during the giving of the Decalogue, they will finally recognize that | + | <li><b>Spoke to all</b> – According to Ibn Ezra, this verse does not insinuate that Hashem was to speak to Moshe alone, but only that when Hashem did speak to him (along with everyone else), his prophetic stature would be verified. The nation had doubted Moshe's prophecy, believing that if Hashem speaks to a person, he cannot live afterwards.  Thus, Hashem tells Moshe that when the nation sees Him speaking to Moshe during the giving of the Decalogue, they will finally recognize that their preconception was false.</li> |
− | + | <li><b>Change of plan</b> - According to Ralbag and Abarbanel, Hashem originally told Moshe that he would speak to him alone and the nation would overhear, leading them to believe in Moshe's prophecy.  Moshe then clarified to Hashem that the nation preferred to not have a mediator, but rather desired a direct face to face encounter. As a result, Hashem acquiesced and changed the original plan.<fn>The two commentators differ in the details of this theory.  Both are trying to solve the problem of the double "וַיַּגֵּד מֹשֶׁה אֶת דִּבְרֵי הָעָם אֶל ה" and to understand what "words of the people" Moshe is relaying each time.  According to Ralbag, when the people told Moshe that "כֹּל אֲשֶׁר דִּבֶּר ה' נַעֲשֶׂה" he understood that they wanted a sign that would prove that it was Hashem who had spoken to  Moshe all along, for then they were sure to adhere to his words.  Hashem, thus, suggested that they overhear Him speak to Moshe in the cloud.  Only then did Moshe realize that he had been mistaken and the nation had really requested to hear Hashem directly (thinking that if they hear Him, then they would surely do His commandments).  This is consistent with Ralbag's general view of Moshe as fallible, especially with regards to his interactions with people. <br/>According to Abarbanel, in contrast, Moshe understood this all along.  When he first relayed the people's words to Hashem, though, he simply told Hashem that the people said they want to listen to Hashem's voice and if so, they will keep His covenant.  Hashem, thus responded that He will reveal Himself to Moshe with a physical voice (rather than giving him a mental prophecy) so that the nation can overhear.  Only then did Moshe clarify that the people really wanted to hear Hashem directly.</fn></li> | |
− | |||
− | <li><b>Change of plan</b> - According to Ralbag and Abarbanel, originally | ||
<li><b>Before the Decalogue</b> – Shadal asserts that this refers to the nation hearing Hashem's conversation with Moshe <i>before</i> the Decalogue.</li> | <li><b>Before the Decalogue</b> – Shadal asserts that this refers to the nation hearing Hashem's conversation with Moshe <i>before</i> the Decalogue.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
Line 85: | Line 83: | ||
<point><b>"כִּי יְרֵאתֶם מִפְּנֵי הָאֵשׁ וְלֹא עֲלִיתֶם בָּהָר"</b><ul> | <point><b>"כִּי יְרֵאתֶם מִפְּנֵי הָאֵשׁ וְלֹא עֲלִיתֶם בָּהָר"</b><ul> | ||
<li>According to Ibn Ezra, Moshe is saying that the nation feared from the fire, despite the fact that they did not go up the mountain. </li> | <li>According to Ibn Ezra, Moshe is saying that the nation feared from the fire, despite the fact that they did not go up the mountain. </li> | ||
− | <li>This position could | + | <li>This position could also maintain that the original plan (had the nation not been overcome by fear) was to ascend the mountain after the giving of the Decalogue and to hear the rest of the 613 commandments from perhaps an even closer vantage point and at a higher spiritual level.<fn>See R. D" Z Hoffmann above, who heads in this direction.   He understands the phrase, "בִּמְשֹׁךְ הַיֹּבֵל הֵמָּה יַעֲלוּ בָהָר" to mean that originally there was to be some call from the shofar to assemble the people to ascend the mountain. Such a blast is not mentioned because in the end the nation was too fearful and preferred not to hear any more from Hashem. Cf. R. Leibtag and R. Grossman who also explain the phrase "בִּמְשֹׁךְ הַיֹּבֵל " not as a sign to indicate that Hashem's presence has left, but as a call for the nation to ascend the mountain in order to hear Hashem.  They suggest , though, that the original plan was to ascend the mountain so as to hear the Decalogue itself.</fn></li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>"מֹשֶׁה יְדַבֵּר וְהָאֱלֹהִים יַעֲנֶנּוּ בְקוֹל"</b><ul> | <point><b>"מֹשֶׁה יְדַבֵּר וְהָאֱלֹהִים יַעֲנֶנּוּ בְקוֹל"</b><ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Before the Decalogue</b> – According to Ibn Ezra, Abarbanel and Shadal,<fn>Rashbam is not explicit but seems to agree.</fn> this refers to the conversation between Moshe and Hashem before the giving of the Decalogue and, as such, provides no information regarding how Hashem delivered the commandments.<fn>Ibn Ezra asserts that the verse is simply saying that Moshe did not fear from the thunder and continued to listen as Hashem spoke to him loudly over nature. Abarbanel, in contrast, assumes that the verse is relaying that this conversation between Hashem and Moshe was not a mental one, but said in a physical voice, so that it could be heard by the nation as well.</fn></li> | + | <li><b>Before the Decalogue</b> – According to Ibn Ezra, Abarbanel, and Shadal,<fn>Rashbam is not explicit but seems to agree.</fn> this refers to the conversation between Moshe and Hashem before the giving of the Decalogue and, as such, provides no information regarding how Hashem delivered the commandments.<fn>Ibn Ezra asserts that the verse is simply saying that Moshe did not fear from the thunder and continued to listen as Hashem spoke to him loudly over nature. Abarbanel, in contrast, assumes that the verse is relaying that this conversation between Hashem and Moshe was not a mental one, but said in a physical voice, so that it could be heard by the nation as well.</fn></li> |
<li><b>Before and during</b> – Ralbag maintains that the verse refers to Hashem's words both before and during the Decalogue.<fn>Abarbanel claims that Ralbag assumes the verse refers only to the Decalogue but in Ralbag's comments to verses 20-21 he says explicitly that all the warnings of those verses were given to Moshe and heard by the nation "בקול".</fn>  The mention of Moshe speaking refers only to the earlier conversation, but the fact that Hashem spoke "בְקוֹל" can refer to both.<fn>He assumes that the verse is coming to teach that Hashem conversed with Moshe prophetically, but simultaneously transmitted the message to the nation out loud (via a concrete voice rather than a mental prophecy).</fn></li> | <li><b>Before and during</b> – Ralbag maintains that the verse refers to Hashem's words both before and during the Decalogue.<fn>Abarbanel claims that Ralbag assumes the verse refers only to the Decalogue but in Ralbag's comments to verses 20-21 he says explicitly that all the warnings of those verses were given to Moshe and heard by the nation "בקול".</fn>  The mention of Moshe speaking refers only to the earlier conversation, but the fact that Hashem spoke "בְקוֹל" can refer to both.<fn>He assumes that the verse is coming to teach that Hashem conversed with Moshe prophetically, but simultaneously transmitted the message to the nation out loud (via a concrete voice rather than a mental prophecy).</fn></li> | ||
<li><b>During</b> <b>the Decalogue</b> – <a href="MekhiltaBachodesh4" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer</a> suggests that that the verse refers to the Decalogue but is simply saying that before Hashem spoke to the nation, He waited for Moshe to tell Him that they were ready.<fn>Thus, when Moshe spoke and gave the "go-ahead", Hashem replied with the ten commandments.</fn></li> | <li><b>During</b> <b>the Decalogue</b> – <a href="MekhiltaBachodesh4" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer</a> suggests that that the verse refers to the Decalogue but is simply saying that before Hashem spoke to the nation, He waited for Moshe to tell Him that they were ready.<fn>Thus, when Moshe spoke and gave the "go-ahead", Hashem replied with the ten commandments.</fn></li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Switch from 1st to 3rd person</b> – Ibn Ezra argues that it is a normal for the text to switch between first and third person; in other places too, such as Shemot 23:18-19, Hashem alternates between speaking of Himself in first and third persons.<fn>See also Abarbanel who brings a whole list of verses as further proofs.</fn> Ibn Eza also explains the specific location of the switch,  pointing out that after the nation accepted Hashem as their | + | <point><b>Switch from 1st to 3rd person</b> – Ibn Ezra argues that it is a normal for the text to switch between first and third person; in other places too, such as Shemot 23:18-19, Hashem alternates between speaking of Himself in first and third persons.<fn>See also Abarbanel who brings a whole list of verses as further proofs.</fn> Ibn Eza also explains the specific location of the switch,  pointing out that after the nation accepted Hashem as their God in the first two commandments, He could then refer to Himself as the Israelites' God in third person.</point> |
<point><b>Purpose of Sinaitic revelation</b><ul> | <point><b>Purpose of Sinaitic revelation</b><ul> | ||
<li>This position highlights the goal of teaching the nation to believe in Hashem.  As Moshe says in Sefer Devarim, after hearing Hashem directly, "אַתָּה הָרְאֵתָ לָדַעַת כִּי ה' הוּא הָאֱלֹהִים"‎.<fn>Shemot 19:9 seems to contradict this, explicitly stating that the goal was to establish faith in Moshe.  Ibn Ezra agrees that this, too, was accomplished when the nation learned that speaking to God does not automatically result in death, and that it was thus possible that Moshe had all along been speaking to Hashem. Ralbag and Abarbanel, in contrast, suggest that instilling faith in Moshe was only  part of an original plan (where Hashem thought He would speak to Moshe and not directly to the nation) but that plan was then rejected.  See above bullet for elaboration.</fn> </li> | <li>This position highlights the goal of teaching the nation to believe in Hashem.  As Moshe says in Sefer Devarim, after hearing Hashem directly, "אַתָּה הָרְאֵתָ לָדַעַת כִּי ה' הוּא הָאֱלֹהִים"‎.<fn>Shemot 19:9 seems to contradict this, explicitly stating that the goal was to establish faith in Moshe.  Ibn Ezra agrees that this, too, was accomplished when the nation learned that speaking to God does not automatically result in death, and that it was thus possible that Moshe had all along been speaking to Hashem. Ralbag and Abarbanel, in contrast, suggest that instilling faith in Moshe was only  part of an original plan (where Hashem thought He would speak to Moshe and not directly to the nation) but that plan was then rejected.  See above bullet for elaboration.</fn> </li> | ||
− | <li>According to Shadal, there | + | <li>According to Shadal, there may have been a dual purpose of instilling belief in both Moshe and Hashem.  By hearing Hashem speak to Moshe before the actual revelation, the nation recognized his prophetic stature, and by hearing Hashem on their own during revelation, they came to believe in God.</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Prophecy for the Masses</b> – This approach assumes that anyone can prophesy, even without extended preparation.  Nonetheless, most of these commentators do limit the level of prophecy of the people. Thus, R. Yose b. R. Chanina in the Tanchuma says that each person grasped Hashem's word according to his own capabilities, while Ralbag and Abarbanel | + | <point><b>Prophecy for the Masses</b> – This approach assumes that anyone can prophesy, even without extended preparation.  Nonetheless, most of these commentators do limit the level of prophecy of the people. Thus, R. Yose b. R. Chanina in the Tanchuma says that each person grasped Hashem's word according to his own capabilities, while Ralbag and Abarbanel emphasize how the nation could only experience Revelation via their physical senses, hearing a concrete (rather than mental) voice.<fn>Ralbag points out that this was in contrast to Moshe who heard the Decalogue "prophetically", using his mental facilities.</fn></point> |
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
Line 103: | Line 101: | ||
<p>The nation understood only two commandments directly from Hashem. The commentators disagree as to how the nation received the other eight:</p> | <p>The nation understood only two commandments directly from Hashem. The commentators disagree as to how the nation received the other eight:</p> | ||
<opinion name="">Eight From Moshe | <opinion name="">Eight From Moshe | ||
+ | <p>Due to the nation's fear, Hashem stopped speaking to them and instead spoke only to Moshe, who then relayed the final eight commandments to the nation.</p> | ||
<mekorot> | <mekorot> | ||
R. Hamnuna in <multilink><a href="BavliMakkot23b" data-aht="source">Bavli Makkot</a><a href="BavliMakkot23b" data-aht="source">Makkot 23b-24a</a><a href="Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, R. Yishmael in <multilink><a href="BavliHorayot8a" data-aht="source">Bavli Horayot</a><a href="BavliHorayot8a" data-aht="source">Horayot 23b-24a</a><a href="Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, R. Yehoshua in <multilink><a href="SHSRabbah1-2" data-aht="source">Shir HaShirim Rabbah</a><a href="SHSRabbah1-2" data-aht="source">1:2</a><a href="Shir HaShirim Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shir HaShirim Rabbah</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="PsJShemot20-2" data-aht="source">Targum Pseudo-Jonathan</a><a href="PsJShemot20-2" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:2</a><a href="Targum Pseudo-Jonathan" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Pseudo-Jonathan</a></multilink>, R. Yehoshua b. Levi in <multilink><a href="PesiktaRabbati22" data-aht="source">Pesikta Rabbati</a><a href="PesiktaRabbati22" data-aht="source">22</a><a href="Pesikta Rabbati" data-aht="parshan">About Pesikta Rabbati</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashiShemot19-19" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiShemot19-19" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:19</a><a href="RashiShemot20-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:1</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYBSShemot20-1" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Kara</a><a href="RYBSShemot20-1" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor Shemot 20:1</a><a href="R. Yosef Kara" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Kara</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYBSDevarim5-4" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYBSDevarim5-4" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:4-5</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>,<fn>This is how he explains the encounter in his comments on Devarim 5. In Shemot, though, he first suggests that the nation heard all ten commandments from Hashem and only afterwards brings the opinion that there was a split in the middle.</fn> | R. Hamnuna in <multilink><a href="BavliMakkot23b" data-aht="source">Bavli Makkot</a><a href="BavliMakkot23b" data-aht="source">Makkot 23b-24a</a><a href="Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, R. Yishmael in <multilink><a href="BavliHorayot8a" data-aht="source">Bavli Horayot</a><a href="BavliHorayot8a" data-aht="source">Horayot 23b-24a</a><a href="Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, R. Yehoshua in <multilink><a href="SHSRabbah1-2" data-aht="source">Shir HaShirim Rabbah</a><a href="SHSRabbah1-2" data-aht="source">1:2</a><a href="Shir HaShirim Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shir HaShirim Rabbah</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="PsJShemot20-2" data-aht="source">Targum Pseudo-Jonathan</a><a href="PsJShemot20-2" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:2</a><a href="Targum Pseudo-Jonathan" data-aht="parshan">About Targum Pseudo-Jonathan</a></multilink>, R. Yehoshua b. Levi in <multilink><a href="PesiktaRabbati22" data-aht="source">Pesikta Rabbati</a><a href="PesiktaRabbati22" data-aht="source">22</a><a href="Pesikta Rabbati" data-aht="parshan">About Pesikta Rabbati</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashiShemot19-19" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiShemot19-19" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:19</a><a href="RashiShemot20-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:1</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYBSShemot20-1" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Kara</a><a href="RYBSShemot20-1" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor Shemot 20:1</a><a href="R. Yosef Kara" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Kara</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYBSDevarim5-4" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYBSDevarim5-4" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:4-5</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>,<fn>This is how he explains the encounter in his comments on Devarim 5. In Shemot, though, he first suggests that the nation heard all ten commandments from Hashem and only afterwards brings the opinion that there was a split in the middle.</fn> | ||
</mekorot> | </mekorot> | ||
− | <point><b>Moshe's role</b> – Moshe acted as an intermediary for the last eight commandments, | + | <point><b>Moshe's role</b> – Moshe acted as an intermediary for the last eight commandments, relaying them to the nation in Hashem's stead.</point> |
<point><b>Why the split?</b> According to these sources, the original plan was for Hashem to say all ten commandments directly to the nation.  After Hashem relayed the second commandment, though, the nation became frightened and requested that Moshe mediate.</point> | <point><b>Why the split?</b> According to these sources, the original plan was for Hashem to say all ten commandments directly to the nation.  After Hashem relayed the second commandment, though, the nation became frightened and requested that Moshe mediate.</point> | ||
<point><b>"פָּנִים בְּפָנִים"</b> – This phrase describes the first part of the encounter, when the nation heard and understood the first two commandments directly from Hashem.</point> | <point><b>"פָּנִים בְּפָנִים"</b> – This phrase describes the first part of the encounter, when the nation heard and understood the first two commandments directly from Hashem.</point> | ||
Line 121: | Line 120: | ||
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
<opinion name="">Voice but No Words | <opinion name="">Voice but No Words | ||
+ | <p>Hashem communicated also the other eight commandments to the nation, but in these they discerned only His voice and needed Moshe to explain them.</p> | ||
<mekorot> | <mekorot> | ||
<multilink><a href="RambanShemot20-6" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanShemot19-9" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:9</a><a href="RambanShemot20-6" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:6</a><a href="RambanShemot20-14" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:14</a><a href="RambanDevarim5-5" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:5</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> | <multilink><a href="RambanShemot20-6" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanShemot19-9" data-aht="source">Shemot 19:9</a><a href="RambanShemot20-6" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:6</a><a href="RambanShemot20-14" data-aht="source">Shemot 20:14</a><a href="RambanDevarim5-5" data-aht="source">Devarim 5:5</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink> |
Version as of 04:33, 22 May 2015
The Decalogue: Direct From Hashem or Via Moshe?
Exegetical Approaches
Understood None
The nation heard only the voice of Hashem, but understood none of His words, thus requiring Moshe's mediation between the people and Hashem throughout the entire Decalogue. Commentators disagree whether the sound was directed at the nation or they merely overheard the sounds of the Divine conversation with Moshe.
Overheard Voice
The people listened as Hashem communicated the Decalogue to Moshe, but they only heard the Divine voice and could not decipher His words.
Heard Voice Directly
Hashem spoke to the people directly, but due to their distance, they could make out only a voice and not distinct words.
R. D"Z Hoffmann brings support for the idea that the nation did not comprehend Hashem's words from the repeated emphasis on having heard His voice rather than His words. See Devarim 4:12, 4:33-36, and 5:19-22.9
Understood All Ten
The nation understood the entire Decalogue from Hashem. This position subdivides regarding whether Hashem's words were aimed at the people or Moshe.
Overheard Words
Hashem's spoke to Moshe only, but He intended that the nation would listen in on this conversation.
Heard Words Directly
Hashem spoke directly to the people themselves, and they, not Moshe, were his target audience for the entire Decalogue.
- Spoke to all – According to Ibn Ezra, this verse does not insinuate that Hashem was to speak to Moshe alone, but only that when Hashem did speak to him (along with everyone else), his prophetic stature would be verified. The nation had doubted Moshe's prophecy, believing that if Hashem speaks to a person, he cannot live afterwards. Thus, Hashem tells Moshe that when the nation sees Him speaking to Moshe during the giving of the Decalogue, they will finally recognize that their preconception was false.
- Change of plan - According to Ralbag and Abarbanel, Hashem originally told Moshe that he would speak to him alone and the nation would overhear, leading them to believe in Moshe's prophecy. Moshe then clarified to Hashem that the nation preferred to not have a mediator, but rather desired a direct face to face encounter. As a result, Hashem acquiesced and changed the original plan.23
- Before the Decalogue – Shadal asserts that this refers to the nation hearing Hashem's conversation with Moshe before the Decalogue.
- According to Ibn Ezra, Moshe is saying that the nation feared from the fire, despite the fact that they did not go up the mountain.
- This position could also maintain that the original plan (had the nation not been overcome by fear) was to ascend the mountain after the giving of the Decalogue and to hear the rest of the 613 commandments from perhaps an even closer vantage point and at a higher spiritual level.26
- Before the Decalogue – According to Ibn Ezra, Abarbanel, and Shadal,27 this refers to the conversation between Moshe and Hashem before the giving of the Decalogue and, as such, provides no information regarding how Hashem delivered the commandments.28
- Before and during – Ralbag maintains that the verse refers to Hashem's words both before and during the Decalogue.29 The mention of Moshe speaking refers only to the earlier conversation, but the fact that Hashem spoke "בְקוֹל" can refer to both.30
- During the Decalogue – R. Eliezer suggests that that the verse refers to the Decalogue but is simply saying that before Hashem spoke to the nation, He waited for Moshe to tell Him that they were ready.31
- This position highlights the goal of teaching the nation to believe in Hashem. As Moshe says in Sefer Devarim, after hearing Hashem directly, "אַתָּה הָרְאֵתָ לָדַעַת כִּי ה' הוּא הָאֱלֹהִים".33
- According to Shadal, there may have been a dual purpose of instilling belief in both Moshe and Hashem. By hearing Hashem speak to Moshe before the actual revelation, the nation recognized his prophetic stature, and by hearing Hashem on their own during revelation, they came to believe in God.
Understood Only Two
The nation understood only two commandments directly from Hashem. The commentators disagree as to how the nation received the other eight:
Eight From Moshe
Due to the nation's fear, Hashem stopped speaking to them and instead spoke only to Moshe, who then relayed the final eight commandments to the nation.
Voice but No Words
Hashem communicated also the other eight commandments to the nation, but in these they discerned only His voice and needed Moshe to explain them.