Difference between revisions of "The Roundabout Route and The Road Not Traveled/1/en"
m |
m |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<q xml:lang="en"></q> | <q xml:lang="en"></q> | ||
</multilang> | </multilang> | ||
| − | <p>The verses delineate both the path which was rejected (the Philistine | + | <p>The verses delineate both the path which was rejected (the Philistine Route), and the path chosen instead (the Desert Route), but the preference is surprising. The Philistine Route is clearly the shorter, more direct path to Israel, so why is it rejected in favor of the longer, roundabout road?</p> |
<p>The text explains that Hashem was concerned that faced with war, the nation might decide to return to Egypt. With whom, though, does God fear that the nation will battle? Moreover, how does the alternative route solve the problem? After all, just a few days into their journey the nation is attacked by the pursuing Egyptian army and just a few weeks later they are again attacked by the Amalekites! Should not Hashem have been concerned that this path too would lead the nation to return to Egypt? Was the Desert Route merely the lesser of two evils, or did it have some intrinsic benefits of its own?</p> | <p>The text explains that Hashem was concerned that faced with war, the nation might decide to return to Egypt. With whom, though, does God fear that the nation will battle? Moreover, how does the alternative route solve the problem? After all, just a few days into their journey the nation is attacked by the pursuing Egyptian army and just a few weeks later they are again attacked by the Amalekites! Should not Hashem have been concerned that this path too would lead the nation to return to Egypt? Was the Desert Route merely the lesser of two evils, or did it have some intrinsic benefits of its own?</p> | ||
Version as of 21:27, 12 January 2015
The Roundabout Route and The Road Not Traveled
Introduction
Two Routes
Parashat Beshalach opens by describing the route taken by the Children of Israel upon leaving Egypt:
(יז) וַיְהִי בְּשַׁלַּח פַּרְעֹה אֶת הָעָם וְלֹא נָחָם אֱלֹהִים דֶּרֶךְ אֶרֶץ פְּלִשְׁתִּים כִּי קָרוֹב הוּא כִּי אָמַר אֱלֹהִים פֶּן יִנָּחֵם הָעָם בִּרְאֹתָם מִלְחָמָה וְשָׁבוּ מִצְרָיְמָה. (יח) וַיַּסֵּב אֱלֹהִים אֶת הָעָם דֶּרֶךְ הַמִּדְבָּר יַם סוּף וַחֲמֻשִׁים עָלוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם.
The verses delineate both the path which was rejected (the Philistine Route), and the path chosen instead (the Desert Route), but the preference is surprising. The Philistine Route is clearly the shorter, more direct path to Israel, so why is it rejected in favor of the longer, roundabout road?
The text explains that Hashem was concerned that faced with war, the nation might decide to return to Egypt. With whom, though, does God fear that the nation will battle? Moreover, how does the alternative route solve the problem? After all, just a few days into their journey the nation is attacked by the pursuing Egyptian army and just a few weeks later they are again attacked by the Amalekites! Should not Hashem have been concerned that this path too would lead the nation to return to Egypt? Was the Desert Route merely the lesser of two evils, or did it have some intrinsic benefits of its own?
What About Mt. Sinai?
The verses suggest, that had Hashem's concerns been nonexistent, the nation would have traveled directly to Israel via the Philistine Route. This, though, is somewhat surprising considering the fact that God had already told Moshe that upon leaving Egypt we were to worship Him in the desert, on Mt. Sinai.1 Throughout his negotiations with Paroh, Moshe similarly requested leave for a three day desert holiday to serve Hashem. If so, why was the Philistine Route even considered? Did we not have no choice but to travel the Desert Route?
Additional Questions
The verses raise several other smaller textual questions as well:
- The double "כִּי" – The word "כִּי" can sustain a number of meanings in Tanakh, including not just because but also when, if or that. Which of these meanings do the two occurrences of the word take in our verse? Is the verse giving two reasons for the rejected route or just one?
- "כִּי קָרוֹב הוּא" – To what is the path close? To Egypt or Canaan?
- "וַחֲמֻשִׁים עָלוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" – Why does the text emphasize that the nation left armed? Is this relevant to the choice of route?
