Difference between revisions of "The Roundabout Route and The Road Not Traveled/1/en"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
>Title modification script
m (Title modification script moved page The Roundabout Route and The Road Not Traveled/1 to The Roundabout Route and The Road Not Traveled/1/en without leaving a redirect: Converting page titles)
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<page type="Introduction">
 
<page type="Introduction">
 
<h1>The Roundabout Route and The Road Not Traveled</h1>
 
<h1>The Roundabout Route and The Road Not Traveled</h1>
<div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div><p style="text-align:center"><a class="word-after" title="DOC" href="/Media/2Shemot/13/The Roundabout Route and The Road Not Traveled/Hebrew Study Guide.doc">Hebrew Study Guide</a>&#160;<a class="pdf" title="PDF" href="/Media/2Shemot/13/The Roundabout Route and The Road Not Traveled/Hebrew Study Guide.pdf">PDF</a></p>
+
<p style="text-align:center" class="top-buttons"><a class="pdf" title="PDF" href="/Media/2Shemot/13/The Roundabout Route and The Road Not Traveled/Hebrew Study Guide.pdf">PDF</a>&#160;<a class="word-before" title="DOC" href="/Media/2Shemot/13/The Roundabout Route and The Road Not Traveled/Hebrew Study Guide.doc">Hebrew Study Guide</a>&#160;</p>
<h2 name="">Two Routes</h2>
+
<h2 name="Yam Suf Only an Afterthought?">Was the Miracle of Yam Suf Only an Afterthought?</h2>
<p>Parashat Beshalach opens by describing the route taken by the Children of Israel upon leaving Egypt:&#160; </p>
+
<p>Parashat Beshalach opens at the end of Chapter 13 by describing the path upon which Hashem led the Children of Israel when they left Egypt:&#160;</p>
 
<multilang style="overflow: auto;">
 
<multilang style="overflow: auto;">
<q xml:lang="he" dir="rtl">(יז) וַיְהִי בְּשַׁלַּח פַּרְעֹה אֶת הָעָם וְלֹא נָחָם אֱלֹהִים דֶּרֶךְ אֶרֶץ פְּלִשְׁתִּים כִּי קָרוֹב הוּא כִּי אָמַר אֱלֹהִים פֶּן יִנָּחֵם הָעָם בִּרְאֹתָם מִלְחָמָה וְשָׁבוּ מִצְרָיְמָה. (יח) וַיַּסֵּב אֱלֹהִים אֶת הָעָם דֶּרֶךְ הַמִּדְבָּר יַם סוּף וַחֲמֻשִׁים עָלוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם.</q>
+
<q xml:lang="he" dir="rtl">(יז) וַיְהִי בְּשַׁלַּח פַּרְעֹה אֶת הָעָם וְלֹא נָחָם אֱ-לֹהִים דֶּרֶךְ אֶרֶץ פְּלִשְׁתִּים כִּי קָרוֹב הוּא כִּי אָמַר אֱ-לֹהִים פֶּן יִנָּחֵם הָעָם בִּרְאֹתָם מִלְחָמָה וְשָׁבוּ מִצְרָיְמָה. (יח) וַיַּסֵּב אֱ-לֹהִים אֶת הָעָם דֶּרֶךְ הַמִּדְבָּר יַם סוּף וַחֲמֻשִׁים עָלוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם.</q>
<q xml:lang="en"></q>
+
<q xml:lang="en">(17) And when Paroh released the people, God did not lead them by way of the land of the Philistines, for it was close, for God said, "The people may have a change of heart when they see war, and return to Egypt." (18) So God led the people roundabout, by way of the wilderness to Yam Suf, and the children of Israel went up armed out of the land of Egypt.</q>
 
</multilang>
 
</multilang>
<p>The verses delineate both the path which was rejected (the Philistine Route), and the path selected instead (the Desert Route), but the choice is surprising. The Philistine Route is clearly the shorter, more direct path to Israel, so why is it eschewed in favor of the longer, roundabout road?</p>
+
<p>The beginning of the first verse (v. 17) notes the rejected Philistine Route, while the first half of the second verse (v. 18) delineates the selected Wilderness Route heading toward Yam Suf.&#160; Sandwiched in between is an enigmatic explanation of God's decision, namely the concern that the Israelites, upon encountering an enemy, would cower and flee back to Egypt.</p>
<p>The Torah explains that Hashem was concerned that faced with war, the nation might decide to return to Egypt. With whom, though, does God fear that the nation will battle? Moreover, how does the path taken solve the problem? After all, just a few days into their journey the nation is attacked by the pursuing Egyptian army, and just a few weeks later they are again attacked by the Amalekites!&#160; Should not Hashem have been concerned that this path, too, would lead the nation to return to Egypt? Was the Desert Route merely the lesser of two evils, or did it have some intrinsic benefits of its own?</p>
+
<p>From these verses it might appear that avoiding battle was the primary reason that the God led the Children of Israel via the Wilderness Route toward Yam Suf, and that if not for this factor, He would have opted for the Philistine Route.&#160; But was not the real reason for heading toward Yam Suf so that the Egyptians would give chase, drown in the sea, and enable the Israelites along with the rest of the world to behold the Almighty's awesome majesty?<fn>See Shemot 14:31, 15:14-16, and Yehoshua 2:10-11, and see the questions formulated by the <multilink><a href="AkeidatYitzchak39Question1" data-aht="source">Akeidat Yitzchak</a><a href="AkeidatYitzchak39Question1" data-aht="source">39 Question 1</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Arama (Akeidat Yitzchak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Arama</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="AbarbanelShemot13Questions1-3" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelShemot13Questions1-3" data-aht="source">Shemot 13 Questions 1-3</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink>.</fn>&#160; And do not the opening verses of <a href="Shemot14-1-8" data-aht="source">Shemot 14</a> detail how Hashem choreographed the Israelites' movements in order to entice Paroh into chasing after them?<fn>For discussion of the theological issues involved in the possible suspension of Paroh's free will, see <a href="Hardened Hearts" data-aht="page">Hardened Hearts</a>.</fn>&#160; If so, why do our verses focus on the fear of war, making it seem like one of the greatest miracles of all time was merely an afterthought?</p>
  
<h2 name="">What About Mt. Sinai?</h2>
+
<h2>What About Mt. Sinai?</h2>
<p>The verses suggest that, were it not for Hashem's concerns, the nation would have traveled to Israel directly via the Philistine Route. This, though, is somewhat surprising, considering the fact that God had already told Moshe that upon leaving Egypt the nation was to worship Him in the desert, on Mt. Sinai.<fn>See <a href="Shemot3-11-12" data-aht="source">Shemot 3:11-12</a>.</fn> Throughout his negotiations with Paroh, Moshe similarly requested leave for a three day desert holiday to serve Hashem. If so, why was the Philistine Route even considered? Were they not supposed to take the Desert Route from the very beginning?</p>
+
<p>The Torah's emphasis on the mundane concern of the nation's potential cowardice overshadows not only the Splitting of the Sea, but also the need to take the Wilderness Route so as to experience the revelation and giving of the Decalogue at Sinai. Had not Hashem already told Moshe that upon leaving Egypt the nation was to worship Him in the wilderness, at Mt. Sinai,<fn>See <a href="Shemot3-11-12" data-aht="source">Shemot 3:11-12</a>.</fn> and had not Moshe, throughout his negotiations with Paroh, repeatedly requested leave for a three day holiday to serve Hashem in the wilderness?&#160; Was this all just a sham?<fn>See <a href="A Three Day Journey" data-aht="page">A Three Day Journey</a> for discussion of this issue.</fn>&#160; If not, how could taking the Philistine Route have been regarded as any sort of option?<fn>Cf. the formulation of <multilink><a href="RYSReggioShemot13-17" data-aht="source">R. Y"S Reggio</a><a href="RYSReggioShemot13-17" data-aht="source">Shemot 13:17</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Shemuel Reggio (Yashar)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Shemuel Reggio</a></multilink>.</fn></p>
  
<h2 name="">Additional Questions</h2>
+
<h2>Additional Questions</h2>
<p>The verses raise several other smaller textual questions as well:</p>
+
<p>Leaving aside the external considerations of the paramount importance of the miracles of Yam Suf and Mt. Sinai, the above verses themselves contain multiple ambiguities and raise numerous questions:</p>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li><b>The double "כִּי"</b> – The word "כִּי" can sustain a number of meanings in Tanakh, including not just "because" but also "when", "if", or "that". Which of these meanings do the two occurrences of the word take in our verse? Is the verse giving two reasons for the rejected route or just one?</li>
+
<li><b>"בְּשַׁלַּח פַּרְעֹה אֶת הָעָם"</b> – Did Paroh send the Israelites off on only a temporary three day journey, or was he expelling them permanently?</li>
<li><b>"כִּי קָרוֹב הוּא"</b> – To what is the path close? To Egypt or Canaan? Why is the proximity so problematic?</li>
+
<li><b>"דֶּרֶךְ אֶרֶץ פְּלִשְׁתִּים"</b> – Where exactly is the "Philistine Route" and why was it thus designated?&#160; Did not the Philistines arrive on the shores of Israel only in the 12th century BCE, much after the Exodus?<fn>Philistines appear already in Bereshit in the Avraham and Yitzchak narratives.&#160; However, these Philistines live in the Negev region and are an entirely distinct people from the coastal Philistines described in the books of Yehoshua and Shofetim.</fn></li>
<li><b>"וַחֲמֻשִׁים עָלוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל"</b> – What does the word "וַחֲמֻשִׁים" mean? Why does the text emphasize that the nation left armed or equipped?&#160; Is this relevant to the choice of route?</li>
+
<li><b>"כִּי קָרוֹב הוּא"</b> – To what is the Philistine Road close?&#160; To Canaan, Egypt, or Yam Suf?&#160; Is the proximity being presented as a reason to take this path or to eschew it?<fn>In other words:&#160; Is "כִּי קָרוֹב הוּא" providing an explanation for "וְלֹא נָחָם אֱ-לֹהִים", or is it only giving the reason why Hashem might have led them that way (were it not for the additional factor of "פֶּן יִנָּחֵם הָעָם בִּרְאֹתָם מִלְחָמָה")?</fn></li>
 +
<li><b>The double "כִּי"</b> – What is the relationship between the two clauses of "כִּי קָרוֹב הוּא" and "כִּי אָמַר אֱ-לֹהִים פֶּן יִנָּחֵם הָעָם"?&#160; Does the word "כִּי" have the same meaning in both occurrences?<fn>The word "כִּי" can sustain multiple meanings in Tanakh, including, not just "because", but also "when", "if", or "that".</fn>&#160; Is the verse giving two reasons for the rejected route or just one?</li>
 +
<li><b>"בִּרְאֹתָם מִלְחָמָה"</b> – Which potential battle is the cause of the concern (the Canaanites, Philistines, or Egyptians)?&#160; Was not Hashem planning on miraculously vanquishing all of the enemies awaiting the Israelites in Canaan?<fn>See Shemot 23:27-28:&#160; "וְשָׁלַחְתִּי אֶת הַצִּרְעָה לְפָנֶיךָ וְגֵרְשָׁה אֶת הַחִוִּי אֶת הַכְּנַעֲנִי וְאֶת הַחִתִּי מִלְּפָנֶיךָ".</fn>&#160; Furthermore, how did changing their route solve the problem?&#160; Was it not more terrifying for the nascent Israelite nation, just a few days into their journey, to be pursued by the mighty Egyptian army?&#160; Would this not be an even greater motivation for them to raise a white flag and resubmit to Egyptian slavery?<fn>See Shemot 14:10-12 where the Israelites verbalize this very sentiment.&#160; Similarly, taking the Wilderness Route neither avoids further battles (Amalek attacks only a short time thereafter) nor forestalls the desire of the Children of Israel to return to Egypt (they express their longing for Egypt throughout the years in the wilderness).</fn></li>
 +
<li><b>"וַחֲמֻשִׁים עָלוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל"</b> – What does the word "וַחֲמֻשִׁים" mean?&#160; Why does the text emphasize this detail and how might it be relevant to the choice of route?</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 +
<p>All of the above questions have led exegetes over the generations to explore alternative interpretations of our verses.&#160; To study them, please continue to <a href="2" data-aht="subpage">Approaches</a>.</p>
  
 
</page>
 
</page>
 
</aht-xml>
 
</aht-xml>

Latest revision as of 08:01, 30 July 2019

The Roundabout Route and The Road Not Traveled

Introduction

PDF Hebrew Study Guide 

Was the Miracle of Yam Suf Only an Afterthought?

Parashat Beshalach opens at the end of Chapter 13 by describing the path upon which Hashem led the Children of Israel when they left Egypt: 

EN/HEע/E

(יז) וַיְהִי בְּשַׁלַּח פַּרְעֹה אֶת הָעָם וְלֹא נָחָם אֱ-לֹהִים דֶּרֶךְ אֶרֶץ פְּלִשְׁתִּים כִּי קָרוֹב הוּא כִּי אָמַר אֱ-לֹהִים פֶּן יִנָּחֵם הָעָם בִּרְאֹתָם מִלְחָמָה וְשָׁבוּ מִצְרָיְמָה. (יח) וַיַּסֵּב אֱ-לֹהִים אֶת הָעָם דֶּרֶךְ הַמִּדְבָּר יַם סוּף וַחֲמֻשִׁים עָלוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם.

(17) And when Paroh released the people, God did not lead them by way of the land of the Philistines, for it was close, for God said, "The people may have a change of heart when they see war, and return to Egypt." (18) So God led the people roundabout, by way of the wilderness to Yam Suf, and the children of Israel went up armed out of the land of Egypt.

The beginning of the first verse (v. 17) notes the rejected Philistine Route, while the first half of the second verse (v. 18) delineates the selected Wilderness Route heading toward Yam Suf.  Sandwiched in between is an enigmatic explanation of God's decision, namely the concern that the Israelites, upon encountering an enemy, would cower and flee back to Egypt.

From these verses it might appear that avoiding battle was the primary reason that the God led the Children of Israel via the Wilderness Route toward Yam Suf, and that if not for this factor, He would have opted for the Philistine Route.  But was not the real reason for heading toward Yam Suf so that the Egyptians would give chase, drown in the sea, and enable the Israelites along with the rest of the world to behold the Almighty's awesome majesty?1  And do not the opening verses of Shemot 14 detail how Hashem choreographed the Israelites' movements in order to entice Paroh into chasing after them?2  If so, why do our verses focus on the fear of war, making it seem like one of the greatest miracles of all time was merely an afterthought?

What About Mt. Sinai?

The Torah's emphasis on the mundane concern of the nation's potential cowardice overshadows not only the Splitting of the Sea, but also the need to take the Wilderness Route so as to experience the revelation and giving of the Decalogue at Sinai. Had not Hashem already told Moshe that upon leaving Egypt the nation was to worship Him in the wilderness, at Mt. Sinai,3 and had not Moshe, throughout his negotiations with Paroh, repeatedly requested leave for a three day holiday to serve Hashem in the wilderness?  Was this all just a sham?4  If not, how could taking the Philistine Route have been regarded as any sort of option?5

Additional Questions

Leaving aside the external considerations of the paramount importance of the miracles of Yam Suf and Mt. Sinai, the above verses themselves contain multiple ambiguities and raise numerous questions:

  • "בְּשַׁלַּח פַּרְעֹה אֶת הָעָם" – Did Paroh send the Israelites off on only a temporary three day journey, or was he expelling them permanently?
  • "דֶּרֶךְ אֶרֶץ פְּלִשְׁתִּים" – Where exactly is the "Philistine Route" and why was it thus designated?  Did not the Philistines arrive on the shores of Israel only in the 12th century BCE, much after the Exodus?6
  • "כִּי קָרוֹב הוּא" – To what is the Philistine Road close?  To Canaan, Egypt, or Yam Suf?  Is the proximity being presented as a reason to take this path or to eschew it?7
  • The double "כִּי" – What is the relationship between the two clauses of "כִּי קָרוֹב הוּא" and "כִּי אָמַר אֱ-לֹהִים פֶּן יִנָּחֵם הָעָם"?  Does the word "כִּי" have the same meaning in both occurrences?8  Is the verse giving two reasons for the rejected route or just one?
  • "בִּרְאֹתָם מִלְחָמָה" – Which potential battle is the cause of the concern (the Canaanites, Philistines, or Egyptians)?  Was not Hashem planning on miraculously vanquishing all of the enemies awaiting the Israelites in Canaan?9  Furthermore, how did changing their route solve the problem?  Was it not more terrifying for the nascent Israelite nation, just a few days into their journey, to be pursued by the mighty Egyptian army?  Would this not be an even greater motivation for them to raise a white flag and resubmit to Egyptian slavery?10
  • "וַחֲמֻשִׁים עָלוּ בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" – What does the word "וַחֲמֻשִׁים" mean?  Why does the text emphasize this detail and how might it be relevant to the choice of route?

All of the above questions have led exegetes over the generations to explore alternative interpretations of our verses.  To study them, please continue to Approaches.