Difference between revisions of "The Suffering Servant in Yeshayahu 53/2/en"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 21: Line 21:
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li><b>Mistaken assumption</b> – According to most of these commentators the words "חֳלָיֵנוּ הוּא נָשָׂא" (and similar phrases) represent the perspective of the other nations, but are not a description of fact.<fn>This works well with verses 4-7, which can easily be read as the words of the foreign nations.&#160; However, the singular formulation "כִּי נִגְזַר מֵאֶרֶץ חַיִּים מִפֶּשַׁע <b>עַמִּי</b>" in verse 8 is somewhat difficult, leading R"Y Kara, Radak and others to explain that these are the words of "every individual nation". More difficult is verse 11, "בְּדַעְתּוֹ יַצְדִּיק צַדִּיק עַבְדִּי לָרַבִּים וַעֲוֺנֹתָם הוּא יִסְבֹּל" as these appears to be the words of Hashem Himself. Radak suggests that Hashem is saying that in the future, Israel's righteousness will act as a panacea for others sins since it will bring world peace. [In other words, the verse speaks of vicarious reward, not vicarious suffering.]</fn> Israel really suffered for her own sins.&#160; However, when the nations finally recognized their earlier wickedness (and Israel's righteousness), and tried to reconcile it with their earlier peace and prosperity (and Israel's afflictions), they erroneously concluded that Israel's anguish must have been vicarious punishment for their own sins.</li>
 
<li><b>Mistaken assumption</b> – According to most of these commentators the words "חֳלָיֵנוּ הוּא נָשָׂא" (and similar phrases) represent the perspective of the other nations, but are not a description of fact.<fn>This works well with verses 4-7, which can easily be read as the words of the foreign nations.&#160; However, the singular formulation "כִּי נִגְזַר מֵאֶרֶץ חַיִּים מִפֶּשַׁע <b>עַמִּי</b>" in verse 8 is somewhat difficult, leading R"Y Kara, Radak and others to explain that these are the words of "every individual nation". More difficult is verse 11, "בְּדַעְתּוֹ יַצְדִּיק צַדִּיק עַבְדִּי לָרַבִּים וַעֲוֺנֹתָם הוּא יִסְבֹּל" as these appears to be the words of Hashem Himself. Radak suggests that Hashem is saying that in the future, Israel's righteousness will act as a panacea for others sins since it will bring world peace. [In other words, the verse speaks of vicarious reward, not vicarious suffering.]</fn> Israel really suffered for her own sins.&#160; However, when the nations finally recognized their earlier wickedness (and Israel's righteousness), and tried to reconcile it with their earlier peace and prosperity (and Israel's afflictions), they erroneously concluded that Israel's anguish must have been vicarious punishment for their own sins.</li>
<li>Ibn Ezra, in contrast, understands that these words constitute an admission by the nations that they inflicted suffering on Israel.&#160; They refer to Israel's afflictions as "<b>our</b> sickness" only because they were the ones who caused them.</li>
+
<li><b>Admission of guilt</b> – Ibn Ezra agrees that the verse does not refer to vicarious punishment, and suggests, instead, that the words constitute an admission of guilt by the enemy nations. They confess to having inflicted suffering on Israel, referring to&#160; Israel's afflictions as "<b>our</b> sickness" only because they were the ones who caused them. Similarly, when they say that Israel is "מְדֻכָּא מֵעֲוֺנֹתֵינוּ", they are saying that it was their sins, i.e. their oppression, which crushed Israel.<fn>This reading, however, is difficult to apply to phrases such as "וּבַחֲבֻרָתוֹ נִרְפָּא לָנוּ" which assumes that they were somehow healed by the suffering of Israel.</fn></li>
<li>Shadal cites in the name of Eidut LeYisrael that Yeshayahu is talking to his generation saying how they are enjoying peace, while the future generation will suffer for all of their sins.</li>
+
<li>Vicarious punishment – In contrast to the other sources, the Kuzari appears to take the verses at face value and to assume that sometimes the righteous do suffer for the sins of others, even on the national level. All of humanity is one body, and Israel is its heart.&#160; It both provided vitality to the rest of the body and finds itself under constant pressure and distress form the surrounding limbs, who meanwhile sit at rest.</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
<point><b>Vicarious punishment?</b> The Kuzari parallels Israel to a limb.&#160; One limb might hurt for the whole body, just like Israel suffered for the rest of the nations.&#160; Hoil Moshe writes that Israel was afflicted in order to keep monotheism around, and that the traits they gained in exile will help them succeed in the future.</point>
+
<point><b>Vicarious punishment?</b> These sources differ in thier general approach to vicarious punishemnt:</point>
 
<point><b>Other occurrences</b> – Though this position could theoretically identify all the chapters as referring to Israel, not all commentators do,<fn>Rashi asserts that the servant in Chapter 42 is Israel, but the servant in Chapter 49 is the prophet Yeshayahu himself. R. Yosef Kara asserts that the servant in Chapter 42 is Koresh, and the servant in Chapter 49:1-2 is Yeshayahu like Rashi, but in verse 3 which mentions Israel explicitly the identity of the servant switches to the nation.<br/>However, see Shadal and Hoil Moshe who read them all about Israel.</fn> as certain verses in each of the chapters are difficult for such a position:<br/>
 
<point><b>Other occurrences</b> – Though this position could theoretically identify all the chapters as referring to Israel, not all commentators do,<fn>Rashi asserts that the servant in Chapter 42 is Israel, but the servant in Chapter 49 is the prophet Yeshayahu himself. R. Yosef Kara asserts that the servant in Chapter 42 is Koresh, and the servant in Chapter 49:1-2 is Yeshayahu like Rashi, but in verse 3 which mentions Israel explicitly the identity of the servant switches to the nation.<br/>However, see Shadal and Hoil Moshe who read them all about Israel.</fn> as certain verses in each of the chapters are difficult for such a position:<br/>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>

Version as of 03:37, 17 September 2018

The Suffering Servant in Yeshayahu 53

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

The Nation of Israel

Identity of the servant
  • According to this approach, the servant is the nation of Israel, or at least the righteous among them.2  This reading matches the larger context, as both the preceding and following prophecies speak of Israel.3  In addition, throughout Yeshayahu, the term "עַבְדִּי" often refers to the nation. See, for instance, "‎וְאַתָּה יִשְׂרָאֵל עַבְדִּי" ‎(41:8), "אַל תִּירָא עַבְדִּי יַעֲקֹב" ‎(44:2), and "עַבְדִּי אָתָּה יִשְׂרָאֵל" ‎(49:3)4 
  • R"E Ashkenazi offers a variation of this approach, suggesting that the chapter speaks specifically of Iyyov, but that his life was meant to serve as a symbol of the life of the nation as a whole.5
"נִבְזֶה וַחֲדַל אִישִׁים" – When was the servant degraded? The various descriptions of humiliation and anguish refer to the nation's experience in exile,6 where they suffered extensively at the hands of their oppressors, both physically7 and emotionally.8 While most of the sources assume that the prophet is speaking of the present exile, Ibn Kaspi9 maintains that he speaks of the Assyrian and Babylonian exiles.10
"הִנֵּה יַשְׂכִּיל עַבְדִּי" – When will the servant be exalted?
  • Messianic times – Most of these sources and suggests that this and the other verses which speak of the servant's improved status11 refer to the End of Days.12 It then that Israel will take vengeance on her enemies ("כֵּן יַזֶּה גּוֹיִם רַבִּים") and that the foreign nations will recognize both the errors of their own beliefs and actions ("כֻּלָּנוּ כַּצֹּאן תָּעִינוּ") and the righteousness of Israel.13 An advantage of this reading is that these motifs are common in the prophecies of this section of Yeshayahu with many speaking of foreign recognition of both Israel and Hashem in the End of Days.
  • Second Temple Period – Ibn Kaspi, in contrast, asserts that the verses refer to the Second Temple Period when the nation returned to Israel.
"חֳלָיֵנוּ הוּא נָשָׂא" – These sources offer a  variety of approaches to the question of how Israel can suffer for other nations:
  • Mistaken assumption – According to most of these commentators the words "חֳלָיֵנוּ הוּא נָשָׂא" (and similar phrases) represent the perspective of the other nations, but are not a description of fact.14 Israel really suffered for her own sins.  However, when the nations finally recognized their earlier wickedness (and Israel's righteousness), and tried to reconcile it with their earlier peace and prosperity (and Israel's afflictions), they erroneously concluded that Israel's anguish must have been vicarious punishment for their own sins.
  • Admission of guilt – Ibn Ezra agrees that the verse does not refer to vicarious punishment, and suggests, instead, that the words constitute an admission of guilt by the enemy nations. They confess to having inflicted suffering on Israel, referring to  Israel's afflictions as "our sickness" only because they were the ones who caused them. Similarly, when they say that Israel is "מְדֻכָּא מֵעֲוֺנֹתֵינוּ", they are saying that it was their sins, i.e. their oppression, which crushed Israel.15
  • Vicarious punishment – In contrast to the other sources, the Kuzari appears to take the verses at face value and to assume that sometimes the righteous do suffer for the sins of others, even on the national level. All of humanity is one body, and Israel is its heart.  It both provided vitality to the rest of the body and finds itself under constant pressure and distress form the surrounding limbs, who meanwhile sit at rest.
Vicarious punishment? These sources differ in thier general approach to vicarious punishemnt:
Other occurrences – Though this position could theoretically identify all the chapters as referring to Israel, not all commentators do,16 as certain verses in each of the chapters are difficult for such a position:
  • Chapter 42
  • Chapter 49:  At first glance the image of a servant who is being called by Hashem from birth ("מִבֶּטֶן קְרָאָנִי‎") would seem to refer to the appointment of a prophet.  Hoil Moshe counters this by suggesting that it speaks of the early formation of the nation.  Similarly, "וַיָּשֶׂם פִּי כְּחֶרֶב חַדָּה‎" seem to be a hint to the prophet's mouth which is uttering words of rebuke, though R. Eliezer of Beaugency rereads it that Israel will be strong against its enemies.  In addition, Shadal points out that the presence of the phrase "וַיֹּאמֶר לִי עַבְדִּי אָתָּה יִשְׂרָאֵל‎" suggests that the prophecy as a whole refers to the Children of Israel.
"כַּאֲשֶׁר שָׁמְמוּ עָלֶיךָ רַבִּים" – Rashi asserts the onlookers are the other nations.  He understands the verse metaphorically, just as they were surprised when they saw how denigrated Israel was in exile, they will be even further surprised now when they see the success of the people.  In contrast, Ibn Ezra maintains that the nations are surprised at the literal look of Israel.17
"כִּי נִגְזַר מֵאֶרֶץ חַיִּים" – Rashi says this is the exile, where the nation was cut off from the land of Israel.
"וַיִּתֵּן אֶת רְשָׁעִים קִבְרוֹ" – According to Rashi, these words describe all the times that people from the nation were willing to die at the hands of wicked people rather than transgress a commandment.
"וּכְמַסְתֵּר פָּנִים מִמֶּנּוּ" – These sources disagree regarding who is the subject of these words.
  • Israel – Rashi asserts that the foreign nations speak of how the nation would always hide their faces in shame to cover up the blemishes from being harassed.
  • Hashem – R. Yosef Kara suggests the other nations assume that Hashem is the one who hid His face from the people, and that is how they got to the low level they were at.
  • Foreign nations – Ibn Ezra assumes the nations are referring to their own actions towards Israel, turning their back and refusing to help them.18

Leader of Israel

King

Who is the servant?
  • Ibn Chiquitilla explains the servant to be Chizkiyahu.  However, Ibn Balaam notes that we don't know anything about Chizkiyahu suffering, and that the description of "לֹא תֹאַר לוֹ וְלֹא הָדָר" does not match him.19
  • Abarbanel reads the chapter as referring to Yoshiyahu, one of the few historical figures of the period who suffered without sinning himself.  Yoshiyahu did not suffer throughout his life rather only in his early death when he was killed in battle with Paroh Necho.
"הִנֵּה יַשְׂכִּיל עַבְדִּי" – When? In contrast to other commentators who assert that "יַשְׂכִּיל" is referring to future prosperity that will come upon the servant, Abarbanel understands it to refer to the success and perfection of Yoshiyahu in the beginning of his reign before he suffered.  He understands "יַשְׂכִּיל" in the meaning of understanding, that Yoshiyahu learned to walk in Hashem's path and worshiped Him with all his heart.
"מִשְׁחַת מֵאִישׁ מַרְאֵהוּ" – The descriptions of the person being despicable are referring to Paroh Necho who fought against Yoshiyahu.  The prophet is speaking in the name of the nation who are surprised how such a righteous man was killed by such a shamed enemy.  This reading is a little surprising that the verses suddenly switch their subject from Yoshiyahu to Paroh Necho.
"חֳלָיֵנוּ הוּא נָשָׂא" – Vicarious punishment?
"נִבְזֶה וַחֲדַל אִישִׁים" – When?
"כִּי נִגְזַר מֵאֶרֶץ חַיִּים"
"וַיִּתֵּן אֶת רְשָׁעִים קִבְרוֹ"
Context of prophecy

Prophet

"חֳלָיֵנוּ הוּא נָשָׂא" – Vicarious punishment? R. Eliezer of Beaugency explains that the prophet was sick thinking about the tragedies that were to come on the nation.
"נִבְזֶה וַחֲדַל אִישִׁים" – When? Yirmeyahu fits the description of a degraded servant of Hashem, as we have accounts of officers trying to kill and torture him.
"הִנֵּה יַשְׂכִּיל עַבְדִּי" – When?
"כִּי נִגְזַר מֵאֶרֶץ חַיִּים"
"וַיִּתֵּן אֶת רְשָׁעִים קִבְרוֹ"
"עַבְדִּי" – R. Saadia suggests that the servant can include all of the prophets who rebuked the nation and were disrespected while filling their role, or refer to a specific prophet.  R. Eliezer of Beaugency explains the chapter according to the first option, however, R. Saadia himself explains it about Yirmeyahu since he is the only prophet that matches all the descriptions of the servant in Yeshayahu.20
Context of the Prophecy – Ibn Ezra notes that there is no relationship between the surrounding chapters of comfort and Yirmeyahu's suffering.

Mashiach

"חֳלָיֵנוּ הוּא נָשָׂא" – Vicarious punishment?
"נִבְזֶה וַחֲדַל אִישִׁים" – When? Ramban explains that the Mashiach is upset about the sins of Israel which delayed his coming.  Ramban also describes that when the Mashiach first appears, he will be poor and riding on a horse, and all the people will mock and curse him.
"הִנֵּה יַשְׂכִּיל עַבְדִּי" – When?
"כִּי נִגְזַר מֵאֶרֶץ חַיִּים"
"וַיִּתֵּן אֶת רְשָׁעִים קִבְרוֹ"
"עַבְדִּי" – According to this approach the servant is the Mashiach.  The main motivation is that this prophecy comes in the midst of prophecies of comfort, which many say are talking about the days of the Mashiach.