Difference between revisions of "Two Accounts of Creation: Bereshit 1–2/2/en"
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<point><b>Commands to man: to conquer or to guard?</b> Chapter 2 which focuses on man's life once he moves into the Garden of Eden includes the specific instructions related to the Garden.  Such directives have no place in the general account of Chapter 1 which instead includes the timeless command to multiply and subdue the earth.</point> | <point><b>Commands to man: to conquer or to guard?</b> Chapter 2 which focuses on man's life once he moves into the Garden of Eden includes the specific instructions related to the Garden.  Such directives have no place in the general account of Chapter 1 which instead includes the timeless command to multiply and subdue the earth.</point> | ||
<point><b>Names of Hashem</b><ul> | <point><b>Names of Hashem</b><ul> | ||
− | <li>Radak, following <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah13-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah13-13" data-aht="source">13:1,3</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>, suggests that throughout Chapter 1, when Creation was not yet complete, Hashem's full name is not used.  Only in Chapter 2, when the entire world already exists, does the Torah use His full name.<fn>Radak also points to Ibn Ezra who explains similarly, that only by the epitome of Creation, the formation of man and his soul, is the full name of Hashem used.  He also points out that since Hashem created via His angels, the creations in Chapter 1 are attributed to them, using the noun " | + | <li>Radak, following <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah13-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah13-13" data-aht="source">13:1,3</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>, suggests that throughout Chapter 1, when Creation was not yet complete, Hashem's full name is not used.  Only in Chapter 2, when the entire world already exists, does the Torah use His full name.<fn>Radak also points to Ibn Ezra who explains similarly, that only by the epitome of Creation, the formation of man and his soul, is the full name of Hashem used.  He also points out that since Hashem created via His angels, the creations in Chapter 1 are attributed to them, using the noun "אֱ-לֹהִים" (which can refer to Hashem's messengers).</fn></li> |
<li>Cassuto asserts that the name Elohim is a general term used to refer to God, while Hashem is His proper name.  Thus, in the general description of the material world, the more distant term, "Elohim", is used.  However, in the detailed description of His personal interaction with Adam, the proper name "Hashem" is used.<fn>Cassuto suggests that Chapter 2 does not suffice with "Hashem" but combines the terms "Hashem-Elohim" to teach the reader that the two are one and the same.</fn></li> | <li>Cassuto asserts that the name Elohim is a general term used to refer to God, while Hashem is His proper name.  Thus, in the general description of the material world, the more distant term, "Elohim", is used.  However, in the detailed description of His personal interaction with Adam, the proper name "Hashem" is used.<fn>Cassuto suggests that Chapter 2 does not suffice with "Hashem" but combines the terms "Hashem-Elohim" to teach the reader that the two are one and the same.</fn></li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
<point><b>Order of creation</b> – Since the two chapters describe totally different events, there is no reason for the order of creation to be the same in both.<fn>The vegetation, man, water, etc. of Chapter 2 are distinct from those of Chapter 1, and were all created much later.</fn></point> | <point><b>Order of creation</b> – Since the two chapters describe totally different events, there is no reason for the order of creation to be the same in both.<fn>The vegetation, man, water, etc. of Chapter 2 are distinct from those of Chapter 1, and were all created much later.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Names of Hashem</b> – R. Nissani suggests that the name Elohim connotes a universal God, and is thus used when discussing the creation of the world at large.  The name Hashem, on the other hand, reflects God's personal providence, and is thus added when describing the creation of an individual race whom God cares for in particular and with whom He converses.</point> | <point><b>Names of Hashem</b> – R. Nissani suggests that the name Elohim connotes a universal God, and is thus used when discussing the creation of the world at large.  The name Hashem, on the other hand, reflects God's personal providence, and is thus added when describing the creation of an individual race whom God cares for in particular and with whom He converses.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>"צֶלֶם | + | <point><b>"צֶלֶם אֱ-לֹהִים" versus "נִשְׁמַת חַיִּים"</b> – The Hoil Moshe asserts that although both pre-Adamites and post-Adamites were created "in the image of God", with the ability to rule over others, only Adamites merited that Hashem breathed into them a living soul, making them much wiser and closer to Hashem.</point> |
<point><b>Creation of man and woman – together or separate?</b> In Chapter 1, when the human species as a whole is created, both male and female are created simultaneously since the procreation necessary to produce a species requires a male and female.  When Hashem forms the individual, Adam, though, there was no special reason to create Chavvah simultaneously.</point> | <point><b>Creation of man and woman – together or separate?</b> In Chapter 1, when the human species as a whole is created, both male and female are created simultaneously since the procreation necessary to produce a species requires a male and female.  When Hashem forms the individual, Adam, though, there was no special reason to create Chavvah simultaneously.</point> | ||
<point><b>"זָכָר וּנְקֵבָה" versus איש ואשה</b> – The Hoil Moshe suggests that the lesser pre-Adamites might have engaged in sexual relations only out of animalistic desire and thus they are referred to only as male and female.  Adam, in contrast, looked for a spiritual partner in Chavvah.</point> | <point><b>"זָכָר וּנְקֵבָה" versus איש ואשה</b> – The Hoil Moshe suggests that the lesser pre-Adamites might have engaged in sexual relations only out of animalistic desire and thus they are referred to only as male and female.  Adam, in contrast, looked for a spiritual partner in Chavvah.</point> | ||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>"לְמִינוֹ"</b> – With regard to the creation of all other forms of life (vegetation, fish, birds, and animals), the verses explicitly state that Hashem created each according to its species ("לְמִינוֹ").  By man, though, this term is absent, and this is somewhat difficult for this position which claims that mankind, too, was created as an entire species and not just as a single individual.</point> | <point><b>"לְמִינוֹ"</b> – With regard to the creation of all other forms of life (vegetation, fish, birds, and animals), the verses explicitly state that Hashem created each according to its species ("לְמִינוֹ").  By man, though, this term is absent, and this is somewhat difficult for this position which claims that mankind, too, was created as an entire species and not just as a single individual.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>זֶה סֵפֶר תּוֹלְדֹת אָדָם</b> – The opening two verses of Chapter 5, which preface the genealogy of Adam (and presumably thus speak of Adam of Chapter 2) are also difficult for R. Nissani, since the language in Chapter 5 parallels the terminology used regarding the creation of the human species in Chapter 1<fn>It uses the verb "ברא" rather than "יצר", speaks of formation "in the likeness of God" similar to Bereshit 1's "בְּצֶלֶם | + | <point><b>זֶה סֵפֶר תּוֹלְדֹת אָדָם</b> – The opening two verses of Chapter 5, which preface the genealogy of Adam (and presumably thus speak of Adam of Chapter 2) are also difficult for R. Nissani, since the language in Chapter 5 parallels the terminology used regarding the creation of the human species in Chapter 1<fn>It uses the verb "ברא" rather than "יצר", speaks of formation "in the likeness of God" similar to Bereshit 1's "בְּצֶלֶם אֱ-לֹהִים בָּרָא אֹתוֹ", and echoes verbatim that "זָכָר וּנְקֵבָה בְּרָאָם".</fn> rather than that of Chapter 2.  R. Nissani thus suggests that these two opening verses serve as a summary of the entire Creation account in Chapters 1-4, rather than an introduction to Chapter 5 itself.</point> |
<point><b>Age of the world</b> – Both the Hoil Moshe and R. Nissani posit that the creation of Adam in the Garden might have occurred thousands of years after the original creation of humans.  This allows for harmonization with scientific data according to which the world and human life is much older than dating in Torah would seem to imply.<fn>This is the starting point for the Hoil Moshe's comments. He assumes that each day of Creation was an era and could have lasted thousands of years. The Pre-Adamites were created in Day/Era 6 while the Adamites were created on Day/Era 7.</fn></point> | <point><b>Age of the world</b> – Both the Hoil Moshe and R. Nissani posit that the creation of Adam in the Garden might have occurred thousands of years after the original creation of humans.  This allows for harmonization with scientific data according to which the world and human life is much older than dating in Torah would seem to imply.<fn>This is the starting point for the Hoil Moshe's comments. He assumes that each day of Creation was an era and could have lasted thousands of years. The Pre-Adamites were created in Day/Era 6 while the Adamites were created on Day/Era 7.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Permission to eat meat</b> – To explain the differing commands regarding eating meat in Chapters 1 and 9 of Bereshit, the Hoil Moshe suggests that the Pre-Adamites were commanded to eat only vegetation, while Adam and Chavvah's descendants were permitted to also eat meat.  For other opinions regarding this issue, see <a href="Permission to Eat Meat" data-aht="page">Permission to Eat Meat</a>.</point> | <point><b>Permission to eat meat</b> – To explain the differing commands regarding eating meat in Chapters 1 and 9 of Bereshit, the Hoil Moshe suggests that the Pre-Adamites were commanded to eat only vegetation, while Adam and Chavvah's descendants were permitted to also eat meat.  For other opinions regarding this issue, see <a href="Permission to Eat Meat" data-aht="page">Permission to Eat Meat</a>.</point> | ||
<point><b>Longevity</b> – R. Nissani suggests that the long life spans of the people listed in the generations from Adam to Noach likely refer only to Adam's descendants and are not representative of the rest of the people living in the world at the time.  Having originated in the Garden of Eden, and perhaps having tasted from the Tree of Life, they merited long life.  Over the generations, though, Adam's descendants mingled with and married other humans and eventually life spans were lowered for all.</point> | <point><b>Longevity</b> – R. Nissani suggests that the long life spans of the people listed in the generations from Adam to Noach likely refer only to Adam's descendants and are not representative of the rest of the people living in the world at the time.  Having originated in the Garden of Eden, and perhaps having tasted from the Tree of Life, they merited long life.  Over the generations, though, Adam's descendants mingled with and married other humans and eventually life spans were lowered for all.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>בְּנֵי | + | <point><b>בְּנֵי הָאֱ-לֹהִים and בְּנוֹת הָאָדָם</b> – R. Nissani posits that the "בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים" of Bereshit 6 are the descendants of Adam who had lived in the Garden and eaten of the Tree of Knowledge.  They took advantage of their special status and knowledge to capture the daughters of the rest of mankind to whom they had taken a liking.<fn>According to R. Nissani, though, one might have thought that the terms should be reversed.  The emphasis on being made in the image of God (and hence perhaps the term, "בְּנֵי הָאֱ-לֹהִים") is in reference to the creation of all of mankind.  Similarly, according to R. Nissani, the phrase "בְּנוֹת הָאָדָם" which emphasizes a connection to Adam specifically would better describe the daughters of the individual Adam.</fn>  See <a href="בני הא־להים and בנות האדם" data-aht="page">בני הא־להים and בנות האדם </a>for other understandings of this enigmatic passage.</point> |
</category> | </category> | ||
</approaches> | </approaches> | ||
</page> | </page> | ||
</aht-xml> | </aht-xml> |
Version as of 12:34, 24 July 2019
Two Accounts of Creation: Bereshit 1–2
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
Commentators attempt to understand both the need for and the discrepancies between the two accounts of Creation. The majority of sources view the issue from a literary perspective, claiming that Chapter 1 presents an overview of Creation, while Chapter 2 provides the details, focusing on the formation of man. Others, such as R. Y"D Soloveitchik and R"M Breuer, are more philosophical in their approach. They claim that the two accounts complement each other, each relaying a different aspect of man and the world. Since man himself, and the world at large, have contradictory yet coexisting facets, so does the narrative.
A final approach is suggested by Hoil Moshe and elaborated upon by R"D Nissani. They suggest that the two chapters do not describe the same event at all, and as such, have no need to conform to each other. While Chapter 1 describes the initial creation of the world and the entire human race, Chapter 2 depicts the much later creation of the individual named Adam. This solution is used to explain other troubling issues in Bereshit as well, including the age of the world and the longevity of early humans.
Literary Device
The repetition of the Creation story is a literary technique, in which the Torah first presents a general overview of the world's creation and then returns to provide greater detail about its most significant individual components.
- Man: first or last? Since the entire purpose of retelling the Creation story in Chapter 2 is to move into a discussion of Adam and the particulars that relate to him alone, this account veers from the actual order and begins by recounting man's creation.
- Vegetation: before or after man? Both Rashi and Cassuto assert that Chapter 2 speaks of a new event but differ in how they relate it to the plants of Chapter 1:
- Second stage – Rashi, following R. Assi in Bavli Chulin, harmonizes the two accounts by suggesting that vegetation appeared on the earth on Day Three, but did not grow until after man's creation on Day Six.1
- New creation – Cassuto suggests, in contrast, that most vegetation was created before man, as described in Chapter 1. Bereshit 2:5 is speaking only about very specific plants ("שִׂיחַ הַשָּׂדֶה" and "עֵשֶׂב הַשָּׂדֶה") which were created afterwards. These terms refer to wheat and barley which were necessary only after man sinned and could no longer benefit from the Garden of Eden. As Chapter 2 leads into the story of the sin, this fact is mentioned only here.2
- Animals: before or after man?
- Old event – Rashi and Radak explain that the word "וַיִּצֶר" in 2:19 refers back to the previous formation of animals, completed already in Chapter 1. The fact is repeated simply to introduce Adam's naming of the animals.
- New event – Cassuto argues that "וַיִּצֶר" is not a past perfect form and thus must refer to a new creation. Though many animals had already been created, Hashem now formed specific ones to introduce to Adam in the Garden.
- Radak, following Bereshit Rabbah, suggests that throughout Chapter 1, when Creation was not yet complete, Hashem's full name is not used. Only in Chapter 2, when the entire world already exists, does the Torah use His full name.3
- Cassuto asserts that the name Elohim is a general term used to refer to God, while Hashem is His proper name. Thus, in the general description of the material world, the more distant term, "Elohim", is used. However, in the detailed description of His personal interaction with Adam, the proper name "Hashem" is used.4
Two Facets of Creation
The two chapters describe different aspects of the same event of Creation. Since man and the world at large have contradictory, but nonetheless, coexisting facets, each aspect of the world is spoken of separately. This approach has been developed in two similar, but distinct, ways by R. Y"D Soloveitchik and R"M Breuer:5
Creative Man vs. Man of Faith
Chapter 1 focuses on man in his majestic and creative capacity and his search for dignity through control over his environment, while Chapter 2 describes the submissive man of faith and his search for redemption. As each prototype approaches his surroundings differently, the descriptions of each creation differ.
Natural World vs. Revelatory World
Chapter 1 presents the world as run by nature, where Hashem is hidden and His attribute of justice is at the fore. Chapter 2, in contrast, presents a world in which Hashem is revealed and His mercy dominates.
Completely Distinct Events
While Chapter 1 describes the earlier creation of the whole world and the entire human race, Chapter 2 speaks of a subsequent and wholly separate creation of the Garden of Eden and the individual Adam.
- The Hoil Moshe appears to suggest that the pre-Adamites of Chapter 1 are a lesser form of the human species later fathered by Adam. He does not explain why Hashem did not simply start by creating a more perfect creature.
- According to R. Nissani, Adam was uniquely created and placed in the Garden of Eden since he was to father a special race, distinct from the rest of mankind which had been previously created.
- "כָל מֹצְאִי יַהַרְגֵנִי" – Kayin's lament after his punishment for killing Hevel that "all who will find me will kill me" only makes sense on the backdrop of other existing humans.
- Progeny – If there were no other people in the world besides Adam, Chavvah, and their children, whom did Kayin marry and how did he bear children?15
- "וַיְהִי בֹּנֶה עִיר" – After Kayin bears his son, Chanokh, the verse states that he built a city. A city connotes an area inhabited by many, not just Kayin's immediate family.