Difference between revisions of "Two Accounts of Creation: Bereshit 1–2/2/he"
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<page type="Approaches"> | <page type="Approaches"> | ||
<h1>שני סיפורי הבריאה: בראשית א'–ב'</h1> | <h1>שני סיפורי הבריאה: בראשית א'–ב'</h1> | ||
− | |||
<div class="overview"> | <div class="overview"> | ||
<h2>סקירה</h2> | <h2>סקירה</h2> | ||
Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
<category>Literary Device | <category>Literary Device | ||
<p>The repetition of the Creation story is a literary technique, in which the Torah first presents a general overview of the world's creation and then returns to provide greater detail about its most significant individual components.</p> | <p>The repetition of the Creation story is a literary technique, in which the Torah first presents a general overview of the world's creation and then returns to provide greater detail about its most significant individual components.</p> | ||
− | <mekorot><multilink><a href="MishnatREliezer1" data-aht="source"> | + | <mekorot><multilink><a href="MishnatREliezer1" data-aht="source">משנת רבי אליעזר</a><a href="MishnatREliezer1" data-aht="source">א׳</a><a href="Mishnat R. Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">אודות משנת רבי אליעזר</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit2-5" data-aht="source">רש"י</a><a href="RashiBereshit2-5" data-aht="source">בראשית ב׳:ה׳</a><a href="RashiBereshit2-8" data-aht="source">בראשית ב׳:ח׳</a><a href="RashiBereshit2-19" data-aht="source">בראשית ב׳:י״ט</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">אודות ר' שלמה יצחקי</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit1-27" data-aht="source">ר׳ יוסף בכור שור</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorBereshit1-27" data-aht="source">בראשית א׳:כ״ז</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">אודות ר' יוסף בכור שור</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashbamBereshit1-27" data-aht="source">רשב״ם</a><a href="RashbamBereshit1-27" data-aht="source">בראשית א׳:כ״ז</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">אודות ר' שמואל בן מאיר</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RadakBereshit2-4-5" data-aht="source">רד״ק</a><a href="RadakBereshit2-4-5" data-aht="source">בראשית ב׳:ד׳-ה׳</a><a href="RadakBereshit2-19" data-aht="source">בראשית ב׳:י״ט</a><a href="R. David Kimchi (Radak)" data-aht="parshan">אודות ר' דוד קמחי</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="UCassutoBereshit2-4" data-aht="source">מ״ד קאסוטו</a><a href="UCassutoBereshit2-4" data-aht="source">בראשית ב׳:ד׳</a><a href="Prof. Umberto Cassuto" data-aht="parshan">אודות פרופ' משה דוד קאסוטו</a></multilink></mekorot> |
<point><b>Structural unit</b> – This position views Chapters 1–2 as one unit.  Chapter 1 provides an overview of Creation, while Chapter 2 presents the details, with a specific focus on the creation of man.</point> | <point><b>Structural unit</b> – This position views Chapters 1–2 as one unit.  Chapter 1 provides an overview of Creation, while Chapter 2 presents the details, with a specific focus on the creation of man.</point> | ||
<point><b>Creation of man and woman – together or separate?</b> Chapter 1 describes the end result of mankind's creation, that both male and female were created.  The specifics of how that transpired are expressed only in Chapter 2, where the reader learns that this was a staged process, with man being created prior to his mate, and woman being formed only later from one of his ribs.</point> | <point><b>Creation of man and woman – together or separate?</b> Chapter 1 describes the end result of mankind's creation, that both male and female were created.  The specifics of how that transpired are expressed only in Chapter 2, where the reader learns that this was a staged process, with man being created prior to his mate, and woman being formed only later from one of his ribs.</point> | ||
Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Second stage</b> – Rashi, following R. Assi in <multilink><a href="BavliChulin60b" data-aht="source"> | + | <li><b>Second stage</b> – Rashi, following R. Assi in <multilink><a href="BavliChulin60b" data-aht="source">בבלי חולין</a><a href="BavliChulin60b" data-aht="source">חולין ס׳:</a><a href="Bavli Chulin" data-aht="parshan">About Bavli Chulin</a></multilink>, harmonizes the two accounts by suggesting that vegetation appeared on the earth on Day Three, but did not grow until after man's creation on Day Six.<fn>He points out that in <a href="Bereshit2-4-25" data-aht="source">verse 5</a>, the word "טֶרֶם" does not mean "before" (in which case the verse would seem to be saying, "before the grass grew, God created man"), but rather "not yet". This explanation works well for the phrase "וְכׇל עֵשֶׂב הַשָּׂדֶה טֶרֶם יִצְמָח" which, according to Rashi, now means that the grass had not yet grown.  However, the phrase "וְכֹל שִׂיחַ הַשָּׂדֶה טֶרֶם יִהְיֶה בָאָרֶץ" suggests that the vegetation did not yet exist at all.</fn></li> |
<li><b>New creation</b> – Cassuto suggests, in contrast, that most vegetation was created before man, as described in Chapter 1.  Bereshit 2:5 is speaking only about very specific plants ("שִׂיחַ הַשָּׂדֶה" and "עֵשֶׂב הַשָּׂדֶה") which were created afterwards.  These terms refer to wheat and barley which were necessary only after man sinned and could no longer benefit from the Garden of Eden.  As Chapter 2 leads into the story of the sin, this fact is mentioned only here.<fn>Cf. Radak who also suggests that the verse is saying that only vegetation that required human efforts was not yet created. He further emphasizes that the verse is simply coming to explain how it was possible for vegetation to grow at all before man was created to work the land, and points out that certain greenery could sprout because God created a vapor to water them.</fn></li> | <li><b>New creation</b> – Cassuto suggests, in contrast, that most vegetation was created before man, as described in Chapter 1.  Bereshit 2:5 is speaking only about very specific plants ("שִׂיחַ הַשָּׂדֶה" and "עֵשֶׂב הַשָּׂדֶה") which were created afterwards.  These terms refer to wheat and barley which were necessary only after man sinned and could no longer benefit from the Garden of Eden.  As Chapter 2 leads into the story of the sin, this fact is mentioned only here.<fn>Cf. Radak who also suggests that the verse is saying that only vegetation that required human efforts was not yet created. He further emphasizes that the verse is simply coming to explain how it was possible for vegetation to grow at all before man was created to work the land, and points out that certain greenery could sprout because God created a vapor to water them.</fn></li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 36: | Line 35: | ||
<point><b>Commands to man: to conquer or to guard?</b> Chapter 2 which focuses on man's life once he moves into the Garden of Eden includes the specific instructions related to the Garden.  Such directives have no place in the general account of Chapter 1 which instead includes the timeless command to multiply and subdue the earth.</point> | <point><b>Commands to man: to conquer or to guard?</b> Chapter 2 which focuses on man's life once he moves into the Garden of Eden includes the specific instructions related to the Garden.  Such directives have no place in the general account of Chapter 1 which instead includes the timeless command to multiply and subdue the earth.</point> | ||
<point><b>Names of Hashem</b><ul> | <point><b>Names of Hashem</b><ul> | ||
− | <li>Radak, following <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah13-13" data-aht="source"> | + | <li>Radak, following <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah13-13" data-aht="source">בראשית רבה</a><a href="BereshitRabbah13-13" data-aht="source">י״ג:א׳, ג׳</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">אודות בראשית רבה</a></multilink>, suggests that throughout Chapter 1, when Creation was not yet complete, Hashem's full name is not used.  Only in Chapter 2, when the entire world already exists, does the Torah use His full name.<fn>Radak also points to Ibn Ezra who explains similarly, that only by the epitome of Creation, the formation of man and his soul, is the full name of Hashem used.  He also points out that since Hashem created via His angels, the creations in Chapter 1 are attributed to them, using the noun "אֱלֹהִים" (which can refer to Hashem's messengers).</fn></li> |
<li>Cassuto asserts that the name Elohim is a general term used to refer to God, while Hashem is His proper name.  Thus, in the general description of the material world, the more distant term, "Elohim", is used.  However, in the detailed description of His personal interaction with Adam, the proper name "Hashem" is used.<fn>Cassuto suggests that Chapter 2 does not suffice with "Hashem" but combines the terms "Hashem-Elohim" to teach the reader that the two are one and the same.</fn></li> | <li>Cassuto asserts that the name Elohim is a general term used to refer to God, while Hashem is His proper name.  Thus, in the general description of the material world, the more distant term, "Elohim", is used.  However, in the detailed description of His personal interaction with Adam, the proper name "Hashem" is used.<fn>Cassuto suggests that Chapter 2 does not suffice with "Hashem" but combines the terms "Hashem-Elohim" to teach the reader that the two are one and the same.</fn></li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
Line 66: | Line 65: | ||
<category>Completely Distinct Events | <category>Completely Distinct Events | ||
<p>While Chapter 1 describes the earlier creation of the whole world and the entire human race, Chapter 2 speaks of a subsequent and wholly separate creation of the Garden of Eden and the individual Adam.</p> | <p>While Chapter 1 describes the earlier creation of the whole world and the entire human race, Chapter 2 speaks of a subsequent and wholly separate creation of the Garden of Eden and the individual Adam.</p> | ||
− | <mekorot><multilink><a href="HoilMosheBereshit1-26" data-aht="source"> | + | <mekorot><multilink><a href="HoilMosheBereshit1-26" data-aht="source">הואיל משה</a><a href="HoilMosheBereshit1-26" data-aht="source">בראשית א׳:כ״ו</a><a href="R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi (Hoil Moshe)" data-aht="parshan">אודות ר' משה יצחק אשכנזי</a></multilink>,<fn>The Hoil Moshe does not develop the idea as a solution to the problem of the two Creation accounts.  His starting point is instead an attempt to reconcile the scientific opinions regarding the age of the world with the Torah's account.  In so doing, he posits that a more primitive human species (אדם הקדמון - Preadamiti) was created thousands of years before Adam and Chavvah were formed.</fn> R"D Nissani<fn>See his article "בראשית א-ב: הסיפור הכפול על הבריאה"  in כפשוטו: ביאורים וחידושים לסוגיות התורה, (Modi'in, 2014): 3-14.</fn></mekorot> |
<point><b>Structural unit</b> – This approach views Chapters 1 and 2 as two distinct units, describing different events.  Chapter 2 is connected to the chapters which follow it rather than to Chapter 1.</point> | <point><b>Structural unit</b> – This approach views Chapters 1 and 2 as two distinct units, describing different events.  Chapter 2 is connected to the chapters which follow it rather than to Chapter 1.</point> | ||
<point><b>Why two creations?</b><ul> | <point><b>Why two creations?</b><ul> |
Version as of 05:17, 3 July 2019
שני סיפורי הבריאה: בראשית א'–ב'
גישות פרשניות
סקירה
Commentators attempt to understand both the need for and the discrepancies between the two accounts of Creation. The majority of sources view the issue from a literary perspective, claiming that Chapter 1 presents an overview of Creation, while Chapter 2 provides the details, focusing on the formation of man. Others, such as R. Y"D Soloveitchik and R"M Breuer, are more philosophical in their approach. They claim that the two accounts complement each other, each relaying a different aspect of man and the world. Since man himself, and the world at large, have contradictory yet coexisting facets, so does the narrative.
A final approach is suggested by Hoil Moshe and elaborated upon by R"D Nissani. They suggest that the two chapters do not describe the same event at all, and as such, have no need to conform to each other. While Chapter 1 describes the initial creation of the world and the entire human race, Chapter 2 depicts the much later creation of the individual named Adam. This solution is used to explain other troubling issues in Bereshit as well, including the age of the world and the longevity of early humans.
Literary Device
The repetition of the Creation story is a literary technique, in which the Torah first presents a general overview of the world's creation and then returns to provide greater detail about its most significant individual components.
- Man: first or last? Since the entire purpose of retelling the Creation story in Chapter 2 is to move into a discussion of Adam and the particulars that relate to him alone, this account veers from the actual order and begins by recounting man's creation.
- Vegetation: before or after man? Both Rashi and Cassuto assert that Chapter 2 speaks of a new event but differ in how they relate it to the plants of Chapter 1:
- Second stage – Rashi, following R. Assi in בבלי חולין, harmonizes the two accounts by suggesting that vegetation appeared on the earth on Day Three, but did not grow until after man's creation on Day Six.1
- New creation – Cassuto suggests, in contrast, that most vegetation was created before man, as described in Chapter 1. Bereshit 2:5 is speaking only about very specific plants ("שִׂיחַ הַשָּׂדֶה" and "עֵשֶׂב הַשָּׂדֶה") which were created afterwards. These terms refer to wheat and barley which were necessary only after man sinned and could no longer benefit from the Garden of Eden. As Chapter 2 leads into the story of the sin, this fact is mentioned only here.2
- Animals: before or after man?
- Old event – Rashi and Radak explain that the word "וַיִּצֶר" in 2:19 refers back to the previous formation of animals, completed already in Chapter 1. The fact is repeated simply to introduce Adam's naming of the animals.
- New event – Cassuto argues that "וַיִּצֶר" is not a past perfect form and thus must refer to a new creation. Though many animals had already been created, Hashem now formed specific ones to introduce to Adam in the Garden.
- Radak, following בראשית רבה, suggests that throughout Chapter 1, when Creation was not yet complete, Hashem's full name is not used. Only in Chapter 2, when the entire world already exists, does the Torah use His full name.3
- Cassuto asserts that the name Elohim is a general term used to refer to God, while Hashem is His proper name. Thus, in the general description of the material world, the more distant term, "Elohim", is used. However, in the detailed description of His personal interaction with Adam, the proper name "Hashem" is used.4
Two Facets of Creation
The two chapters describe different aspects of the same event of Creation. Since man and the world at large have contradictory, but nonetheless, coexisting facets, each aspect of the world is spoken of separately. This approach has been developed in two similar, but distinct, ways by R. Y"D Soloveitchik and R"M Breuer:5
Creative Man vs. Man of Faith
Chapter 1 focuses on man in his majestic and creative capacity and his search for dignity through control over his environment, while Chapter 2 describes the submissive man of faith and his search for redemption. As each prototype approaches his surroundings differently, the descriptions of each creation differ.
Natural World vs. Revelatory World
Chapter 1 presents the world as run by nature, where Hashem is hidden and His attribute of justice is at the fore. Chapter 2, in contrast, presents a world in which Hashem is revealed and His mercy dominates.
Completely Distinct Events
While Chapter 1 describes the earlier creation of the whole world and the entire human race, Chapter 2 speaks of a subsequent and wholly separate creation of the Garden of Eden and the individual Adam.
- The Hoil Moshe appears to suggest that the pre-Adamites of Chapter 1 are a lesser form of the human species later fathered by Adam. He does not explain why Hashem did not simply start by creating a more perfect creature.
- According to R. Nissani, Adam was uniquely created and placed in the Garden of Eden since he was to father a special race, distinct from the rest of mankind which had been previously created.
- "כָל מֹצְאִי יַהַרְגֵנִי" – Kayin's lament after his punishment for killing Hevel that "all who will find me will kill me" only makes sense on the backdrop of other existing humans.
- Progeny – If there were no other people in the world besides Adam, Chavvah, and their children, whom did Kayin marry and how did he bear children?15
- "וַיְהִי בֹּנֶה עִיר" – After Kayin bears his son, Chanokh, the verse states that he built a city. A city connotes an area inhabited by many, not just Kayin's immediate family.