Warning Bells – "וְנִשְׁמַע קוֹלוֹ... וְלֹא יָמוּת"/2

Warning Bells – "וְנִשְׁמַע קוֹלוֹ... וְלֹא יָמוּת"

Exegetical Approaches

THIS TOPIC IS STILL BEING DEVELOPED AND UPDATED

Overview

Commentators disagree on what actions will serve to prevent death from occurring in the sanctuary. Vayikra Rabbah and Rashi view the final words of the verse ("וְלֹא יָמוּת") as related to the wearing of all of the priestly garments, the absence of any one of which would have fatal consequences. Rashbam, in contrast, understands the words to refer specifically to the ringing bells of the high priest's robe which would alert the ordinary priests to evacuate the Tabernacle while the purification rite was being performed. Finally, Ralbag also explains that the words relate to the bells, but he posits that the bells served to remind the high priest to mentally prepare for his year round service.

Wearing Full Attire

The high priest will not die if he wears all of the required vestments for serving in the Tabernacle, and the bells of the robe play no special role as far as this.

Sources: Vayikra Rabbah20:921:8 (Margulies)21:8 (Vilna)About Vayikra Rabbah, RashiShemot 28:35Shemot 28:43Yoma 44b s.v. "ניאשתיק"About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki

Context of "וְלֹא יָמוּת" – Rashi reads the words "וְלֹא יָמוּת" as referring to the high priest wearing all of the garments described in the entire chapter. He thus separates these words from the rest of the verse and their immediate context of the robe and the sounding of its bells.

Parallel verses – Vayikra Rabbah and Rashi view our verse as parallel to Shemot 28:43 which similarly describes a punishment of death for lack of proper attire.

Who might die? According to this interpretation, it is the high priest himself who might die if he is in violation of the priestly dress code.

Why is only the high priest commanded? According to Vayikra Rabbah and Rashi, the admonition against serving with improper attire applies equally to the high priest and to ordinary priests. Thus, there are two verses: 28:35 which refers specifically to the high priest as it comes in the context of the special vestments of the high priest, and 28:43 which relates to all priests as it follows the instructions regarding the basic priestly garments.

"הַקֹּדֶשׁ" – As this term appears in the first part of the verse speaking of the robe and its bells, it refers to the outer chamber in which the high priest would wear the golden garments. The prohibition of being dressed inappropriately, though, applies in all parts of the Tabernacle including the Holy of Holies, and even in the courtyard.

Function of the bells – Vayikra Rabbah views the ringing of the bells as part of appropriate manners to knock before entering the Tabernacle. The lack of such etiquette, though, might not warrant the death penalty. Rashi adds that when the high priest would enter the Holy of Holies and would not be wearing the robe with its bells, a special metallic attachment to the censer would instead serve to make the ringing entry sound.

Evacuation of the Sanctuary

The bells of the high priest's robe served to warn the ordinary priests to leave the sanctuary prior to the high priest's entry. The priests' exit protected them from potential death.

Sources: RashbamShemot 28:35About R. Shemuel b. Meir,¹

Who might die? – Rashbam asserts that the concern is lest an ordinary priest die due to his presence in the sanctuary while the high priest is atoning for the nation.²

Parallel verses – According to this approach, the verse in Shemot is integrally related to the command of Vayikra 16:17, "וְכָל אָדָם לֹא יִהְיֶה בְּאֹהֶל מוֹעֵד בְּבֹאוֹ לְכַפֵּר בַּקֹּדֶשׁ".

"הַקֹּדֶשׁ" – "הַקֹּדֶשׁ" refers to the Holy of Holies, which the high priest entered on the Day of Atonement.

Entering the inner sanctum with robes? – This position encounters considerable difficulty from the fact that the high priest did not enter the Holy of Holies on Yom HaKippurim while wearing his belled robe. Rashbam does not address the issue but one might suggest several solutions:

• Ibn EzraVayikra 16:4About R. Avraham ibn Ezra on Vayikra 16:4 learns from our verse that on the Day of Atonement the priest did actually wear the garments mentioned here (the robe, tunic, and breastplate) into the inner chamber.³
• Alternatively, one might suggest that there was a change in the law. Perhaps, initially the high priest was to be allowed into the Holy of Holies whenever he wanted, wearing his regular uniform. Only after the sin of Nadav and Avihu did Hashem limit entry to one day a year, and with specific garments.⁴ Our verses, then, would not be limited to Yom HaKippurim, but would refer to any time the high priest wanted to atone in the inner sanctuary.
⁵

Why is only the high priest commanded? – According to Rashbam, it is only logical that the high priest alone wear the bells as he is the one who needs to warn the other priests.

Proper Respect or Intentions

The ringing of the bells insured that the high priest approached his service in the Tabernacle with proper respect and purity of thought, and thus he would not perish.

Sources: R. ChananelYoma 52aAbout R. Chananel, R. Yosef Bekhor ShorShemot 28:35About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor, RambanShemot 28:35About R. Moshe Nachmanides, R. BachyaShemot 28:35About R. Bachya b. Asher RalbagShemot 28:35About R. Levi b. Gershon

Function of the bells

• A knock – According to most of these commentators, the bells were the high priest's way of knocking to request permission to enter.
• A warning – Ramban and R. Bachya additionally suggest that they served to alert the ministering angels who normally filled the Tabernacle to the arrival of the high priest. This would signal them to leave, ensuring that they did not harm the incoming priest.
• A reminder – For Ralbag, in contrast, the bells were a reminder to the high priest to properly channel his thoughts to the worship of Hashem.

Parallel verses – According to Ramban and R. Bachya, the verse in Shemot is connected to the command of Vayikra 16:17, "וְכָל אָדָם לֹא יִהְיֶה בְּאֹהֶל מוֹעֵד בְּבֹאוֹ לְכַפֵּר בַּקֹּדֶשׁ". They understand the phrase "וְכָל אָדָם" to include angels since they are described in Yehezkel 1:10 as having "פְּנֵי אָדָם".

Who might die? According to these commentators, it is the high priest himself who was in danger.

Why is only the high priest commanded?

• Status – Ramban suggests that the command is aimed just at the high priest due to his higher stature and greater service.⁶ Ralbag could similarly explain that the high priest was held to a higher standard due to the importance of his role.
• Ordinary priests absent – Alternatively, one might suggest, as does Seforno, that in the dessert, the ordinary priests were never allowed in the Tabernacle at all.⁷ As such, they obviously had no need for bells to announce their arrival or focus their thoughts since they never served inside the sanctuary.

"הַקֹּדֶשׁ" R. Chananel, Ramban and R. Bachya interpret this to refer to only the outer part of the sanctuary. They point out that on Yom HaKippurim, there was a special dispensation for the high priest to enter without "knocking", apparently because of the closer relationship to Hashem on this day.⁸

According to Ramban and R. Bachya, it is the high priest himself who is in mortal danger. The Tabernacle is normally filled with God's ministering angels who must evacuate before the high priest enters so that they do not harm him.

¹ This may also be how the Mishna interpreted the verse. See Mishna TamidTamid 6:3About the Mishna and Mishna KeilimKeilim 1:9About the Mishna.

² The fear, perhaps, is that these priests might accidentally see the Divine presence during the high priest's service.

³ According to him, Vayikra only mentions the white vestments since these others are assumed.

⁴ This might be supported by the position in Vayikra Rabbah20:9About Vayikra Rabbah that asserts that Nadav and Avihu's sin was entering unrobed.

⁵ This problem might lead to a slightly different read of the verses which might suggest that the ordinary priests were meant to evacuate not just when the high priest entered the Holy of Holies, but any time he was serving in the Tabernacle at all.

⁶ This is not really a sufficient explanation as to why the regular priests would not be in jeopardy if the ministering angels were not evacuated.

⁷ R. Meir Spiegelman, in his article, "" points out that throughout Torah, all the cultic services that take place in th Taberbnacle itself are assigned to aharon specifically. Thus it is Aharon who is commanded to bring the incense, the lighting o fthe candle

⁸ R. Bachya explains similarly regarding the fact that there was no need to evacuate the angels on this special day.