<p>After recounting the arrival of Yaakov's family in Egypt, the Torah describes at length Yosef's economic policies during the years of famine.  The depiction is surprising, for it is not readily apparent what purpose this story holds for the reader.  Why does the Torah, usually so careful and often sparse in its language, find it necessary to expound about Egyptian economics?  In the words of Abarbanel:</p>
<p>After recounting the arrival of Yaakov's family in Egypt, the Torah describes at length Yosef's economic policies during the years of famine.  The depiction is surprising, for it is not readily apparent what purpose this story holds for the reader.  Why does the Torah, usually so careful and often sparse in its language, find it necessary to expound about Egyptian economics?  Or, in the words of the <multilink><a href="AkeidatYitzchakBereshitGate31" data-aht="source">Akeidat Yitzchak</a><a href="AkeidatYitzchakBereshitGate31" data-aht="source">Bereshit Gate 31</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Arama (Akeidat Yitzchak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Arama</a></multilink>:<fn>This question, like a significant portion of the entire commentary of the Akeidat Yitzchak, is found almost verbatim in Abarbanel.  For more on this, see <a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a>.</fn></p>
<multilang style="overflow: auto;">
<multilang style="overflow: auto;">
−
<q xml:lang="he" dir="rtl" style="margin-bottom:0;">ולמה נזכר בתורה כל הספור הזה המיוחד למצרים וחק החומש והעברת העם בערים וחק הכהנים כי זה יאות בספרי דברי הימים למצרים לא בתורת האל?!</q>
+
<q xml:lang="he" dir="rtl" style="margin-bottom:0;">למה הוזכר בכאן כל זה הענין מחק החמישית והעברת העם לערים וחק הכהנים מאת פרעה?  כי כל זה יאות ליכתב בספרי נימוסי מצרים לא בתורה האלהית!</q>
−
<q xml:lang="en" style="margin-bottom:0;">And why does the Torah mention this whole story, which is unique to Egypt, and the law of the fifth, and the transferring of the people to cities, and the law of the priests, for this is fitting for Egyptian Chronicles but not for the Divine Torah?!<br/><br/></q>
+
<q xml:lang="en" style="margin-bottom:0;">Why is the entire story of the law of the fifth and the transferring of the people to the cities, and the law of the priests mentioned here?  For this is fitting to be written in the Egyptian records, but not for the Divine Torah!<br/><br/></q>
</multilang>
</multilang>
−
<h2 name="">Economic wisdom or extortion?<br/></h2>
+
<h2>Economic Wisdom or Extortion?<br/></h2>
−
At first glance, Yosef's economic measures seem somewhat severe.  Although the Egyptians had given a fifth of their grain to be stored during the years of plenty, when famine strikes they find themselves forced to give up all their money and cattle and even offer themselves as slaves<fn>The Torah is somewhat ambiguous regarding whether Yosef took them up on the offer.  Immediately afterwards the Torah states that Yosef bought their land without mention of enslavement, yet in verse 23, Yosef says, "הֵן קָנִיתִי אֶתְכֶם הַיּוֹם וְאֶת אַדְמַתְכֶם לְפַרְעֹה", suggesting that he bought the people as well as the land.</fn> in order to buy food.  Yosef takes all their land and a fifth of any future produce for Paroh and then implements a policy of population displacement.  What was the purpose of these actions?  Were such draconian measures really needed to ensure proper distribution of the food, or was Yosef being unnecessarily harsh?
+
At first glance, Yosef's economic measures seem somewhat severe.  Although the Egyptians had given a fifth of their grain to be stored during the years of plenty, when famine strikes they find themselves forced to give up all their money and cattle and even offer themselves as slaves<fn>The Torah is somewhat ambiguous regarding whether Yosef took them up on the offer.  Immediately afterwards the Torah states that Yosef bought their land without mention of enslavement.  Yet, in <a href="Bereshit47-11-27" data-aht="source">verse 23</a>, Yosef says: "הֵן קָנִיתִי אֶתְכֶם הַיּוֹם וְאֶת אַדְמַתְכֶם לְפַרְעֹה", suggesting that he bought the people as well as the land.</fn> in order to buy food.  Yosef takes all their land and a fifth of any future produce for Paroh and then implements a policy of population displacement.  What was the purpose of these actions?  Were such draconian measures really needed to ensure proper distribution of the food, or was Yosef being unnecessarily harsh?
−
<h2 name="">Repetitions and Extraneous details</h2>
+
<h2>Repeated and Seemingly Extraneous Details</h2>
<p>The episode includes several details which are repeated more than once, making the reader question their import:</p>
<p>The episode includes several details which are repeated more than once, making the reader question their import:</p>
<ul>
<ul>
−
<li><b>Fate of Canaan</b> – When describing the impoverishment of the Egyptians, there is a three-fold mention<fn>See <a href="Bereshit47-11-27" data-aht="source">Bereshit 47:13,14,15</a>.</fn> that in Canaan too, money was scarce.  Why does the Torah highlight this fact?  What does it reveal about the overall economic situation of Canaan and the devastation caused there by the famine?</li>
+
<li><b>Fate of Canaan</b> – When describing the impoverishment of the Egyptians, there is a three-fold mention<fn>See <a href="Bereshit47-11-27" data-aht="source">Bereshit 47:13,14,15</a>.</fn> that, in Canaan too, money was scarce.  Why does the Torah highlight this fact?  What does it reveal about the overall economic situation of Canaan and the devastation caused there by the famine?</li>
−
<li><b>Yosef's family</b> – Yosef's economic policies are framed by details of Yosef's family settling and proliferating in Goshen.  The literary sandwiching suggests that the Torah is trying to connect the two issues.   What, though, is the point of the connection?</li>
+
<li><b>Yosef's family</b> – Yosef's economic policies are framed by details of Yosef's family settling and proliferating in Goshen.  The literary sandwiching suggests that the Torah is trying to connect the two issues.  What, though, is the point of the connection?</li>
<li><b>Priestly exemption</b> – The priestly exemption from selling their land to Paroh is mentioned twice in this short unit; why is this necessary?  What is the reader supposed to learn from this fact?</li>
<li><b>Priestly exemption</b> – The priestly exemption from selling their land to Paroh is mentioned twice in this short unit; why is this necessary?  What is the reader supposed to learn from this fact?</li>
After recounting the arrival of Yaakov's family in Egypt, the Torah describes at length Yosef's economic policies during the years of famine. The depiction is surprising, for it is not readily apparent what purpose this story holds for the reader. Why does the Torah, usually so careful and often sparse in its language, find it necessary to expound about Egyptian economics? Or, in the words of the Akeidat YitzchakBereshit Gate 31About R. Yitzchak Arama:1
EN/HEע/E
למה הוזכר בכאן כל זה הענין מחק החמישית והעברת העם לערים וחק הכהנים מאת פרעה? כי כל זה יאות ליכתב בספרי נימוסי מצרים לא בתורה האלהית!
Why is the entire story of the law of the fifth and the transferring of the people to the cities, and the law of the priests mentioned here? For this is fitting to be written in the Egyptian records, but not for the Divine Torah!
Economic Wisdom or Extortion?
At first glance, Yosef's economic measures seem somewhat severe. Although the Egyptians had given a fifth of their grain to be stored during the years of plenty, when famine strikes they find themselves forced to give up all their money and cattle and even offer themselves as slaves2 in order to buy food. Yosef takes all their land and a fifth of any future produce for Paroh and then implements a policy of population displacement. What was the purpose of these actions? Were such draconian measures really needed to ensure proper distribution of the food, or was Yosef being unnecessarily harsh?
Repeated and Seemingly Extraneous Details
The episode includes several details which are repeated more than once, making the reader question their import:
Fate of Canaan – When describing the impoverishment of the Egyptians, there is a three-fold mention3 that, in Canaan too, money was scarce. Why does the Torah highlight this fact? What does it reveal about the overall economic situation of Canaan and the devastation caused there by the famine?
Yosef's family – Yosef's economic policies are framed by details of Yosef's family settling and proliferating in Goshen. The literary sandwiching suggests that the Torah is trying to connect the two issues. What, though, is the point of the connection?
Priestly exemption – The priestly exemption from selling their land to Paroh is mentioned twice in this short unit; why is this necessary? What is the reader supposed to learn from this fact?
