Difference between revisions of "Prophetic Actions Without Explicit Divine Sanction/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 17: Line 17:
 
<li><a href="Bemidbar32-20-31" data-aht="source">Moshe and the petition of the 2/12 tribes</a>&#160;– These sources would likely view the tribes' words "אֵת אֲשֶׁר דִּבֶּר י"י אֶל עֲבָדֶיךָ כֵּן נַעֲשֶׂה" as proof that Moshe did not independently decide that they could settle the eastern bank.</li>
 
<li><a href="Bemidbar32-20-31" data-aht="source">Moshe and the petition of the 2/12 tribes</a>&#160;– These sources would likely view the tribes' words "אֵת אֲשֶׁר דִּבֶּר י"י אֶל עֲבָדֶיךָ כֵּן נַעֲשֶׂה" as proof that Moshe did not independently decide that they could settle the eastern bank.</li>
 
<li><a href="Yehoshua10-12-13" data-aht="source">Yehoshua and the sun</a> – These sources would likely explain that Yehoshua was not decreeing that the sun stand still, but rather praying to Hashem for aid, hoping that He would acquiesce to make a miracle.&#160; Thus, the verse states, "אָז יְדַבֵּר יְהוֹשֻׁעַ לַי"י " emphasizing that Yehosua's word were addressed to Hashem, and were not a public declaration.</li>
 
<li><a href="Yehoshua10-12-13" data-aht="source">Yehoshua and the sun</a> – These sources would likely explain that Yehoshua was not decreeing that the sun stand still, but rather praying to Hashem for aid, hoping that He would acquiesce to make a miracle.&#160; Thus, the verse states, "אָז יְדַבֵּר יְהוֹשֻׁעַ לַי"י " emphasizing that Yehosua's word were addressed to Hashem, and were not a public declaration.</li>
<li><a href="ShemuelI12-16-18" data-aht="source">Shemuel bringing rain</a>&#160;– This approach would likely explain that, despite the text's silence, Shemuel had been told beforehand to bring rain as a sign for the people. However, it is difficult to understand why he then needed to pray that the rain come.&#160; The position could answer that Shemuel wanted to ensure that the people recognized that the rain was indeed coming from Hashem.</li>
+
<li><a href="ShemuelI12-16-18" data-aht="source">Shemuel bringing rain</a>&#160;– This approach would likely explain that, despite the text's silence, Shemuel had been told beforehand to bring rain as a sign for the people. However, it is difficult to understand why he then needed to pray that the rain come.&#160; The position could answer that Shemuel wanted to ensure that the people recognized that the rain was indeed coming from Hashem and not coincidental.</li>
 
<li>Natan and the Beit HaMikdash</li>
 
<li>Natan and the Beit HaMikdash</li>
<li><a href="MelakhimI17-1" data-aht="source">Eliyahu on Mt. Carmel</a> – This position<fn>See Yerushalmi Ta'anit, Yerushalmi Megillah, Vayikra Rabbah and Radak.</fn> points to Eliyahu's statement on Mt. Carmel that&#160; "הַיּוֹם יִוָּדַע כִּי אַתָּה אֱלֹהִים בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל וַאֲנִי עַבְדֶּךָ [וּבִדְבָרְךָ] (ובדבריך) עָשִׂיתִי אֵת כׇּל הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה" as proof that Eliyahu's actions were all done at Hashem's behest.&#160; As above, though, if so, it is not clear why he then needs to pray that Hashem answer him, unless he simply wants to ensure that the people do not think that the rain is simply a coincidence.&#160;</li>
+
<li><a href="MelakhimI17-1" data-aht="source">Eliyahu's declaration of drought</a>&#160;and the <a href="MelakhimI17-1" data-aht="source">Altar on Mt. Carmel</a> – This position<fn>See Yerushalmi Ta'anit, Yerushalmi Megillah, Vayikra Rabbah and Radak.</fn> points to Eliyahu's statement on Mt. Carmel that&#160; "הַיּוֹם יִוָּדַע כִּי... אֲנִי עַבְדֶּךָ [וּבִדְבָרְךָ] (ובדבריך) עָשִׂיתִי אֵת כׇּל הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה" as proof that Eliyahu's actions were all done at Hashem's behest.<fn>See Radak who questions, as above, that if so, it is not clear why Eliyahu then needs to pray that Hashem answer him.&#160; Radak answers that Eliyahu wanted to ensure that the people did not think that the fire was some magical trick.</fn>&#160; It is ambiguous, though, if the words "כׇּל הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה" refer just to the events on Mt. Carmel, or also to the initial declaration of drought. These sources would likely say that even if it refers only to the former, one can learn from here to the rest of Eliyahu's miracles, that they too were done by the word of God. &#160;</li>
<li><b>Eliyahu's other miracles</b><fn>See <a href="MelakhimI17-1" data-aht="source">Melakhim I 17:1</a>, <a href="MelakhimII1-9-15" data-aht="source">Melakhim II 1:9-15</a></fn>&#160;– It is ambiguous if Eliyahu's words "וּבִדְבָרְךָ עָשִׂיתִי אֵת <b>כׇּל הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה</b>" refer just to the events on Mt. Carmel, or also to his initial declaration of drought.&#160; These sources would likely say that even if it refers only to the former, one can learn from here to the rest of Eliyahu's miracles, that they too were done by the word of God.</li>
+
<li><a href="MelakhimI17-10-22" data-aht="source">Eliyahu and the pitcher of flour</a>&#160;– The text itself states that this miracle occurred by the word of Hashem: "כִּדְבַר י"י אֲשֶׁר דִּבֶּר בְּיַד אֵלִיָּהוּ".</li>
 +
<li><b>Eliyahu's other miracles</b><fn>See <a href="MelakhimI17-1" data-aht="source">Melakhim I 17:1</a>,&#160;<a href="MelakhimI17-10-22" data-aht="source">Melakhim I 17:10-22</a>, and <a href="MelakhimII1-9-15" data-aht="source">Melakhim II 1:9-15</a>.</fn>&#160;– </li>
 
<li>Elisha's miracles –&#160;</li>
 
<li>Elisha's miracles –&#160;</li>
 
<li>–</li>
 
<li>–</li>

Version as of 03:06, 17 July 2017

Prophetic Actions Without Explicit Divine Sanction

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

All Divinely Commanded

The miracles and deeds performed by a prophet are done via Divine command.  Despite Hashem's instructions not being explicitly mentioned, it can be assumed that they were communicated to Moshe.

Prophetic autonomy – According to this approach, prophets do not have the power to change nature on their own, and any miracle that a prophet performs is done only at Hashem's command.3 It is possible to go even further and suggest that prophets do not even have the autonomy to act or to make any significant decisions except with Divine guidance.4
Biblical cases – This position attempts to explain away all cases where a prophet seems to be acting on his own:
  • Incense test – Many of these sources5 understand Moshe's falling on his face after Korach's initial complaint as a sign of prophetic communication.  At this juncture,  Hashem told him how to proceed during the rebellion and directed him to propose the incense test.  Rashbam claims that Moshe's later words "בְּזֹאת תֵּדְעוּן כִּי י"י שְׁלָחַנִי לַעֲשׂוֹת אֵת כׇּל הַמַּעֲשִׂים הָאֵלֶּה" refer to his hope that the nation will recognize that the test was devised by Hashem, and not himself.6
  • Earth opening – Ramban maintains that in Hashem's words, "הֵעָלוּ מִסָּבִיב לְמִשְׁכַּן קֹרַח דָּתָן וַאֲבִירָם" He hinted that the earth was to swallow the leaders, so here, too, Moshe was not declaring a miracle on his own.7
  • Moshe and the petition of the 2/12 tribes – These sources would likely view the tribes' words "אֵת אֲשֶׁר דִּבֶּר י"י אֶל עֲבָדֶיךָ כֵּן נַעֲשֶׂה" as proof that Moshe did not independently decide that they could settle the eastern bank.
  • Yehoshua and the sun – These sources would likely explain that Yehoshua was not decreeing that the sun stand still, but rather praying to Hashem for aid, hoping that He would acquiesce to make a miracle.  Thus, the verse states, "אָז יְדַבֵּר יְהוֹשֻׁעַ לַי"י " emphasizing that Yehosua's word were addressed to Hashem, and were not a public declaration.
  • Shemuel bringing rain – This approach would likely explain that, despite the text's silence, Shemuel had been told beforehand to bring rain as a sign for the people. However, it is difficult to understand why he then needed to pray that the rain come.  The position could answer that Shemuel wanted to ensure that the people recognized that the rain was indeed coming from Hashem and not coincidental.
  • Natan and the Beit HaMikdash
  • Eliyahu's declaration of drought and the Altar on Mt. Carmel – This position8 points to Eliyahu's statement on Mt. Carmel that  "הַיּוֹם יִוָּדַע כִּי... אֲנִי עַבְדֶּךָ [וּבִדְבָרְךָ] (ובדבריך) עָשִׂיתִי אֵת כׇּל הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה" as proof that Eliyahu's actions were all done at Hashem's behest.9  It is ambiguous, though, if the words "כׇּל הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה" refer just to the events on Mt. Carmel, or also to the initial declaration of drought. These sources would likely say that even if it refers only to the former, one can learn from here to the rest of Eliyahu's miracles, that they too were done by the word of God.  
  • Eliyahu and the pitcher of flour – The text itself states that this miracle occurred by the word of Hashem: "כִּדְבַר י"י אֲשֶׁר דִּבֶּר בְּיַד אֵלִיָּהוּ".
  • Eliyahu's other miracles10 –
  • Elisha's miracles – 
Why is Hashem's command not explicitly stated?
"מֵקִים דְּבַר עַבְדּוֹ"
Prophetic fallibility
Speaking/ Acting in Hashem's name
Moshe versus other prophets
Evaluation of Prophetic ability

Prophet's Own Initiative

A prophet is granted the ability by Hashem to act and perform wonders on his own initiative.

Prophetic Prayer

When a prophet declares that a miracle that was not Divinely commanded is to happen, he is in effect praying that Hashem will fulfill his words and risks the possibility that Hashem will not accede to his request.

Uniqueness of Moshe