Purpose of the Beheaded Heifer Ritual/2
Purpose of the Beheaded Heifer Ritual
Exegetical Approaches
Utilitarian: Discover the Killer
The ritual and its various components are all meant to aid in finding the unknown murderer.
- Natural – The majority of these commentators suggest that the publicity generated by the ritual will motivate people to search for the killer and gather information that will aid in the investigation.
- Miracle – Both Targum Yerushalmi (Yonatan) and R. Bachya maintain that the ritual will miraculously lead to the murderer, either as a trail of worms leads from the heifer to the culprit, or as the heifer himself walks to the house of the murderer.
- Closest city – The rite is performed by elders of the closest city since the murderer was most likely from there and it will be those townspeople who might know something of the murder.
- Calf – A cow was chosen to be killed since it is a large animal, attracting more attention and, hence, more publicity (Sefer HaChinukh).
- Beheading – The cow is killed specifically via beheading as this is a particularly gruesome death which will shock the people, generating more discussion of the killing.
- נַחַל אֵיתָן אֲשֶׁר לֹא יֵעָבֵד בּוֹ וְלֹא יִזָּרֵעַ – R.Bachya brings an opinion that "נַחַל אֵיתָן" refers to rich, fatty land, while Rambam asserts that it refers to a river with raging waters, perhaps also assuming that the nearby land would be good for growing crops. Both understand "אֲשֶׁר לֹא יֵעָבֵד בּוֹ" to mean that the land shall not be sown in the future. As such, the directive serves as an incentive to the owner of the land to find the killer, lest he lose the ability to work his otherwise productive land.
- Killing the calf – Abarbanel suggests that the killing of the calf is symbolic of the potential punishment to be meted out to the people in wake of the unsolved murder; their cattle too will die. Fear of punishment will motivate the people to search for the culprit.
- These commentators might suggest that this is nonetheless a secondary goal of the rite. Even if the leaders cannot be held responsible for the murder, they might be responsible for not bringing the murderer to justice. When the elders request "אַל תִּתֵּן דָּם נָקִי בְּקֶרֶב עַמְּךָ יִשְׂרָאֵל" they might be praying that Hashem help them find the killer, and it is that act (and not the rite itself) which will absolve them of responsibility.
- See Minchat Yehuda who goes further to suggests that actually the elders are not requesting atonement at all, proposing that the word "כפר" here means "reveal", with the elders requesting help from Hashem in finding the murderer. As evidence of such usage, he points to Yeshayahu 28:18, "וְכֻפַּר בְּרִיתְכֶם אֶת מָוֶת", but it is questionable if that is the meaning of the verse.3
Repentance and Atonement
The ritual is one of atonement, meant either to cleanse the land from the blood of the innocent, or to atone for the people / leaders who might be partially responsible for the death..
For the Land
Acts of murder defile the land, which can only be cleansed though the blood of the killer. When the killer is unknown and cannot be brought to justice, the ritual is necessary to cleanse the land.
- Substitute for murderer - This approach might suggest that the rite is meant to substitute
- Sacrifice
- The goal of
For the Nation/Leaders
The rite atones for the nation's shared responsibility in the death.
Mishna Sotah, Yerushalmi Sotah, Bavli Sotah Rashi, Ramban, Ralbag, R. David Zvi Hoffmann Tzror Hamor
- Ralbag suggests that the elders' declaration of innocence is really an apology, since even though they did not actively spill blood, they are nonetheless responsible as they should have taught the nation better, ensuring that all were following the Torah's values, and thereby prevented such a horrendous deed.
- Alternatively the leaders declare that they did not inadvertently contribute to the murder by either not accompanying the victim and thereby leaving him unprotected or
Communal Responsibility / Value of Life
The ritual is meant to shock the people to ensure they never remain complacent in face of loss of life, but rather feel a level of communal responsibility for their fellow.