Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Ki Tisa/0/en
Shabbat Table Topics – Parashat Ki Tisa
Sins of the Parents
Why, at times, are the righteous punished while sinners prosper? The verse "פֹּקֵד עֲוֹן אָבוֹת עַל בָּנִים" appears to suggest that, at least in certain circumstances, Hashem Himself allows innocent children to be punished while their sinful parents go free.
- How does this manifest Divine justice? Is there any other way of understanding the verse?
- When, if ever, is collective punishment justified? Can the same reasoning apply to vicarious punishment (when one is punished in place of another)? Does the fact that the verse speaks of inter-familial punishment make a difference?
- For extensive discussion of the issue, see Are Children Punished for Parents' Sins?
In Defense of Aharon
How could the nation, and especially Aharon, blunder with the Sin of the Golden Calf so soon after revelation? Is it possible that Aharon could have really been involved in an idolatrous rite? If so, how could he have been rewarded with the priesthood so soon afterwards?
- Set up a debate at your Shabbat table, with some defending and others prosecuting Aharon for his actions.
- Did the nation sin by believing in foreign gods, or, as the Kuzari suggests, did they simply err in making a graven image, even though it was meant to represent God Himself? R"Y Bekhor Shor raises a third possibility that people were simply looking for an alternative guide to replace the lost Moshe, and that there was no sin against God at all. Which of these do you find most convincing and best supported by the text? How would each position explain Aharon's actions?
Identical Tallies
Parashat Ki Tisa opens with a command to count the nation via half shekels. Somewhat surprisingly, the head count provided by this census is identical to the tally reached during the census in Bemidbar 1, which occurred a few months later.
- How can this be? Were there no deaths or births in the interim? Moreover, considering that only a few months separated the two events, why were two censuses necessary at all?
- Cassuto uses knowledge of Ancient Near Eastern censuses to suggest that the two events were were both part of a single extended process which started with the building of the Tabernacle. R"Y Bekhor Shor agrees that there was but one census, but suggests that it occurred only in the beginning of the second year in Bemidbar 1. He claims that the half shekels of Parashat Ki Tisa played no role in counting the nation and were solely for the building of the Mishkan. What are the advantages and disadvantages to each approach?
- See Censuses in the Wilderness and Half Shekels – For Census or Tabernacle?
Polemics and Parshanut
Commentators' positions on Biblical issues are influenced by numerous factors including their reading of the text, theological or philosophical concerns, autobiographical connections, and polemics with other sects or religions.
- Does the fact that an approach is polemically motivated make it less valid or intellectually honest than one which is influenced by the text alone?
- See R"Y Bekhor Shor on the Sin of the Golden Calf where he explicitly argues with the "heretics" who mock Israel for failing and sinning with the Calf and note how his position might come to counter such claims. See also R. Saadia Gaon on Half Shekels – For Census or Tabernacle? whose position that there is an annual obligation to bring half shekels to support the Mikdash might be reaction to Karaitic claims to the contrary.
