Difference between revisions of "Appointing Moshe's Assistants/1"
(Original Author: Yonatan Novetsky, Rabbi Hillel Novetsky) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<page type="Introduction"> | <page type="Introduction"> | ||
| − | <h1>Appointing Moshe's Assistants in<br/> | + | <h1>Appointing Moshe's Assistants in<br/> Shemot 18, Bemidbar 11, and Devarim 1</h1> |
| − | Shemot 18, Bemidbar 11, and Devarim 1</h1> | + | <div style="text-align:center;font-weight:bold" class="header"><a href="Table" data-aht="subpage" class="btn" style="color:#832525">Open Comparison Table</a></div> |
| − | + | <h2>Three Accounts</h2> | |
| − | + | <p>Three different chapters in the Torah (Shemot 18, Bemidbar 11, and Devarim 1) describe how Moshe was overwhelmed by the needs of the Children of Israel, and needed to appoint assistants to share in the burden. The <a href="Table" data-aht="subpage">accompanying table</a> shows that the stories of Shemot 18 and Bemidbar 11 differ significantly from each other,<fn>They differ about whether the initiative came from Moshe or not and regarding the responsibilities of the appointees.</fn> while Moshe's retelling in his farewell address in Devarim 1 appears to fuse elements from both of the earlier accounts.<fn>In Devarim 1, the initiative is Moshe's like in Bemidbar, but the appointments are judicial like in Shemot. All three accounts share different forms of the root נשא and discuss Moshe's inability to carry the burden of the nation.</fn> What is the relationship between these three stories?</p> | |
| − | + | <p>Perhaps the simplest option is to assume that Shemot 18 and Bemidbar 11 recount two different events; otherwise, why would the Torah confuse the reader by telling the same story twice. However, this approach must grapple with why Moshe is overwhelmed by the burden of the nation again in Bemidbar 11, if a solution had already been proposed and implemented in Shemot 18. Additionally, Devarim 1's combination of the two earlier stories may indicate that they are connected to each other. This leads some exegetes to explore the possibility that all three accounts overlap and provide different perspectives on the same or simultaneous events.</p> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | <h2> | ||
| − | <p>Three different chapters in the Torah (Shemot 18, Bemidbar 11, and Devarim 1) | ||
| − | |||
| − | <p>Perhaps the simplest option is to assume that Shemot 18 and Bemidbar 11 recount two different events; otherwise, why would the Torah confuse the reader by telling the same story twice. | ||
</page> | </page> | ||
</aht-xml> | </aht-xml> | ||
Latest revision as of 01:30, 27 November 2016
Appointing Moshe's Assistants in
Shemot 18, Bemidbar 11, and Devarim 1
Introduction
Three Accounts
Three different chapters in the Torah (Shemot 18, Bemidbar 11, and Devarim 1) describe how Moshe was overwhelmed by the needs of the Children of Israel, and needed to appoint assistants to share in the burden. The accompanying table shows that the stories of Shemot 18 and Bemidbar 11 differ significantly from each other,1 while Moshe's retelling in his farewell address in Devarim 1 appears to fuse elements from both of the earlier accounts.2 What is the relationship between these three stories?
Perhaps the simplest option is to assume that Shemot 18 and Bemidbar 11 recount two different events; otherwise, why would the Torah confuse the reader by telling the same story twice. However, this approach must grapple with why Moshe is overwhelmed by the burden of the nation again in Bemidbar 11, if a solution had already been proposed and implemented in Shemot 18. Additionally, Devarim 1's combination of the two earlier stories may indicate that they are connected to each other. This leads some exegetes to explore the possibility that all three accounts overlap and provide different perspectives on the same or simultaneous events.
