Difference between revisions of "Avraham's Aliyah/2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic is currently in progress
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>"אֲנִי ה' אֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵאתִיךָ מֵאוּר כַּשְׂדִּים"</b> – Ibn Ezra points to this verse in the Covenant of the Pieces as evidence that Hashem commanded Avraham to leave while still in Ur Kasdim.<fn>One might point to the similar verse in <a href="Nechemyah9-7" data-aht="source">Nechemyah</a> as well.</fn></point> | <point><b>"אֲנִי ה' אֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵאתִיךָ מֵאוּר כַּשְׂדִּים"</b> – Ibn Ezra points to this verse in the Covenant of the Pieces as evidence that Hashem commanded Avraham to leave while still in Ur Kasdim.<fn>One might point to the similar verse in <a href="Nechemyah9-7" data-aht="source">Nechemyah</a> as well.</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>430 vs. 400</b> – This position is motivated to set Avraham's departure from Ur Kasdim at 70 specifically in order to solve the discrepancy in the account of the length of the Egyptian exile in <a href="Bereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:13 </a>(400 years) and <a href="Shemot12-40-41" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40-41</a> (430 years).  These sources maintain that the 430 year period is dated from Avraham's personal exile, while the 400 years is dated from the birth of YItzchak.  If so, Avraham was 70 when he left.</point> | + | <point><b>430 vs. 400</b> – This position is motivated to set Avraham's departure from Ur Kasdim at 70 specifically in order to solve the discrepancy in the account of the length of the Egyptian exile in <a href="Bereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:13 </a>(400 years) and <a href="Shemot12-40-41" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40-41</a> (430 years).  These sources maintain that the 430 year period is dated from Avraham's personal exile, while the 400 years is dated from the birth of YItzchak.  If so, Avraham was 70 when he left.  For elaboratioon, see <a href="Duration of the Egyptian Exile" data-aht="page">Duration of the Egyptian Exile</a>.</point> |
− | <point><b>Why date the move from the departure from Charan?</b> | + | <point><b>Why date the move from the departure from Charan?</b> According to this approach, it is not clear why the Torah deems it important to tell the reader that Avraham left Charan at 75, if Charan had just been a transition point and the main departure took place at 70.</point> |
</category> | </category> | ||
<category name="Left at 75">Left Charan at 75 | <category name="Left at 75">Left Charan at 75 | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
<li>The story could also support Shadal's suggestion that the word means family, especially since in the servant's retelling he says that Avraham told him "אֶל בֵּית אָבִי תֵּלֵךְ וְאֶל מִשְׁפַּחְתִּי".</li> | <li>The story could also support Shadal's suggestion that the word means family, especially since in the servant's retelling he says that Avraham told him "אֶל בֵּית אָבִי תֵּלֵךְ וְאֶל מִשְׁפַּחְתִּי".</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Ur Kasdim and עֵבֶר הַנָּהָר?</b> Ramban points to the verses in Yehoshua that claim that Avraham was from "עֵבֶר הַנָּהָר" as proof that he must have been born in Charan (which is in Aram Naharayim) and not Ur Kasdim (Babylonia). Both Abarbanel and Shadal, though, assume that Ur Kasdim itself was not in Babylonia but in the region of Aram Naharayim as well.<fn>Both suggest that it was named after the Chaldeans for some unknown reason, with Abarbanel raising the possibility that maybe it got its name after being conquered by them.  To support his position, Shadal points out that had Ur Kasdim really been in Babylonia, Avraham would not have needed to travel via Charan to reach Canaan.   One might question, though, if crossing the desert instead was really a viable option.</fn></point> | + | <point><b>Ur Kasdim and עֵבֶר הַנָּהָר?</b> Ramban points to the verses in <a href="Yehoshua24-2-3" data-aht="source">Yehoshua 24</a> that claim that Avraham was from "עֵבֶר הַנָּהָר" as proof that he must have been born in Charan (which is in Aram Naharayim) and not Ur Kasdim (Babylonia). Both Abarbanel and Shadal, though, assume that Ur Kasdim itself was not in Babylonia but in the region of Aram Naharayim as well.<fn>Both suggest that it was named after the Chaldeans for some unknown reason, with Abarbanel raising the possibility that maybe it got its name after being conquered by them.  To support his position, Shadal points out that had Ur Kasdim really been in Babylonia, Avraham would not have needed to travel via Charan to reach Canaan.   One might question, though, if crossing the desert instead was really a viable option.</fn></point> |
<point><b>"אֲנִי ה' אֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵאתִיךָ מֵאוּר כַּשְׂדִּים"</b> – This verse is difficult for this position as it suggests that Hashem spoke to Avraham when still in Ur Kasdim.  Shadal explains that it simply means that behind the scenes, Hashem pulled the strings leading to Avraham's departure.<fn>Abarbanel does not address the question explicitly but seems to explain the events in the same manner.</fn>  Ramban, in contrast, explains that "הוֹצֵאתִיךָ" refers to saving and freeing Avraham from prison or the furnace of Ur Kasdim, not to taking him out of the country.</point> | <point><b>"אֲנִי ה' אֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵאתִיךָ מֵאוּר כַּשְׂדִּים"</b> – This verse is difficult for this position as it suggests that Hashem spoke to Avraham when still in Ur Kasdim.  Shadal explains that it simply means that behind the scenes, Hashem pulled the strings leading to Avraham's departure.<fn>Abarbanel does not address the question explicitly but seems to explain the events in the same manner.</fn>  Ramban, in contrast, explains that "הוֹצֵאתִיךָ" refers to saving and freeing Avraham from prison or the furnace of Ur Kasdim, not to taking him out of the country.</point> | ||
<point><b>Time spent in Charan</b> – According to this approach, it is unclear how long Avraham spent in Charan.  R"Y Behor Shor assumes that he was there for five years,<fn>This allows him to resolve the discrepancy regarding the duration of the exile, by suggesting that the 430 years began with Avraham's departure from his homeland at 70, while the 400 years began with Yitzchak's birth. Cf. the sources in the first approach above.</fn> while Jubilees maintains that he spent a  full 14 years there.</point> | <point><b>Time spent in Charan</b> – According to this approach, it is unclear how long Avraham spent in Charan.  R"Y Behor Shor assumes that he was there for five years,<fn>This allows him to resolve the discrepancy regarding the duration of the exile, by suggesting that the 430 years began with Avraham's departure from his homeland at 70, while the 400 years began with Yitzchak's birth. Cf. the sources in the first approach above.</fn> while Jubilees maintains that he spent a  full 14 years there.</point> | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
<p>At the age of 70, Avraham moved to Israel for the Covenant of the Pieces.  He then returned to Charan temporarily, but moved back to Canaan at the age of 75.</p> | <p>At the age of 70, Avraham moved to Israel for the Covenant of the Pieces.  He then returned to Charan temporarily, but moved back to Canaan at the age of 75.</p> | ||
<mekorot><multilink><a href="SederOlamRabbah1" data-aht="source">Seder Olam Rabbah</a><a href="SederOlamRabbah1" data-aht="source">1</a><a href="SederOlamRabbah3" data-aht="source">3</a><a href="Seder Olam Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Seder Olam Rabbah</a></multilink><fn>Though many other sources follow Seder Olam Rabbah's lead in suggesting that the covenant took place when Avraham was 70, they do not all say explicitly that it took place in Israel, in which case they would not maintain that there were multiple moves. For elaboration regarding the dating of the covenant, see <a href="Relationship Between the Sections of Bereshit 15" data-aht="page">Relationship Between the Sections of Bereshit 15 </a>and <a href="Duration of the Egyptian Exile" data-aht="page">Duration of the Egyptian Exile</a>.</fn></mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="SederOlamRabbah1" data-aht="source">Seder Olam Rabbah</a><a href="SederOlamRabbah1" data-aht="source">1</a><a href="SederOlamRabbah3" data-aht="source">3</a><a href="Seder Olam Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Seder Olam Rabbah</a></multilink><fn>Though many other sources follow Seder Olam Rabbah's lead in suggesting that the covenant took place when Avraham was 70, they do not all say explicitly that it took place in Israel, in which case they would not maintain that there were multiple moves. For elaboration regarding the dating of the covenant, see <a href="Relationship Between the Sections of Bereshit 15" data-aht="page">Relationship Between the Sections of Bereshit 15 </a>and <a href="Duration of the Egyptian Exile" data-aht="page">Duration of the Egyptian Exile</a>.</fn></mekorot> | ||
− | <point><b>Motivation for this position</b> – The motivation for this approach is the contradiction regarding the duration of the exile in <a href="Bereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15 </a>(400 years) and <a href="Shemot12-40-41" data-aht="source">Shemot 12</a> (430 years). Seder Olam Rabbah resolves the problem by maintaining that the 400 years started from the birth of Yitzchak, while the 430 count began thirty years earlier, at the Covenant of the Pieces, when Avraham was 70.<fn>Since Avraham was 100 when Yitzchak was born, the Covenant must have occurred when he was 70.</fn>  From Hashem's words, "אֲנִי ה' אֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵאתִיךָ... לָתֶת לְךָ אֶת הָאָרֶץ <b>הַזֹּאת</b> " Seder Olam concludes that the Covenant took place in Israel, leading to the idea that Avraham must have | + | <point><b>Motivation for this position</b> – The motivation for this approach is the contradiction regarding the duration of the exile in <a href="Bereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15 </a>(400 years) and <a href="Shemot12-40-41" data-aht="source">Shemot 12</a> (430 years). Seder Olam Rabbah resolves the problem by maintaining that the 400 years started from the birth of Yitzchak, while the 430 count began thirty years earlier, at the Covenant of the Pieces, when Avraham was 70.<fn>Since Avraham was 100 when Yitzchak was born, the Covenant must have occurred when he was 70.</fn>  From Hashem's words, "אֲנִי ה' אֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵאתִיךָ... לָתֶת לְךָ אֶת הָאָרֶץ <b>הַזֹּאת</b> " Seder Olam concludes that the Covenant took place in Israel, leading to the idea that Avraham must have made aliyah and tehn left, only to return again.</point> |
<point><b>Why leave Israel?</b> <a href="RalbagBereshitBeurHaMilot15-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a> questions how it is possible that Avraham, once in Israel, could have left the promised land without good reason.  <a href="RanBereshit12-5" data-aht="source">Ran </a> responds that Avraham had originally left immediately upon Hashem's command, without time to organize his possessions.  He only returned later to Charan to pack up his belongings and arrange the permanent move.<fn>This assumes that Avraham was living in Charan before the Covenant.  See point below for elaboration.</fn></point> | <point><b>Why leave Israel?</b> <a href="RalbagBereshitBeurHaMilot15-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a> questions how it is possible that Avraham, once in Israel, could have left the promised land without good reason.  <a href="RanBereshit12-5" data-aht="source">Ran </a> responds that Avraham had originally left immediately upon Hashem's command, without time to organize his possessions.  He only returned later to Charan to pack up his belongings and arrange the permanent move.<fn>This assumes that Avraham was living in Charan before the Covenant.  See point below for elaboration.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Double language of leaving</b> – <a href="RanBereshit12-5" data-aht="source">Ran </a>suggests that this approach helps explain the doubling in the text regarding Avraham's departure. Bereshit 12:4 says, "ויֵּלֶךְ אַבְרָם כַּאֲשֶׁר דִּבֶּר אֵלָיו י"י וַיֵּלֶךְ אִתּוֹ לוֹט ", and then verse 5 repeats, "וַיִּקַּח אַבְרָם אֶת שָׂרַי אִשְׁתּוֹ וְאֶת לוֹט... וַיֵּצְאוּ לָלֶכֶת". Ran posits that the first "וַיֵּלֶךְ" refers to Avraham's leaving at the age of 70, while the second speaks of his second aliyah, at the age of 75, when he took not just Lot, but his whole family and possessions.</point> | <point><b>Double language of leaving</b> – <a href="RanBereshit12-5" data-aht="source">Ran </a>suggests that this approach helps explain the doubling in the text regarding Avraham's departure. Bereshit 12:4 says, "ויֵּלֶךְ אַבְרָם כַּאֲשֶׁר דִּבֶּר אֵלָיו י"י וַיֵּלֶךְ אִתּוֹ לוֹט ", and then verse 5 repeats, "וַיִּקַּח אַבְרָם אֶת שָׂרַי אִשְׁתּוֹ וְאֶת לוֹט... וַיֵּצְאוּ לָלֶכֶת". Ran posits that the first "וַיֵּלֶךְ" refers to Avraham's leaving at the age of 70, while the second speaks of his second aliyah, at the age of 75, when he took not just Lot, but his whole family and possessions.</point> | ||
<point><b>Why achronological?</b> This position would need to explain why the Torah does not set the Covenant in its chronological place. <a href="RashbamMsOxford2718" data-aht="source">Rashbam </a> suggests that the Torah wanted to juxtapose the promise of land with the promise of progeny mentioned in the first part of Chapter 15.</point> | <point><b>Why achronological?</b> This position would need to explain why the Torah does not set the Covenant in its chronological place. <a href="RashbamMsOxford2718" data-aht="source">Rashbam </a> suggests that the Torah wanted to juxtapose the promise of land with the promise of progeny mentioned in the first part of Chapter 15.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>When did Avraham go from Ur Kasdim to Charan?</b> Seder Olam Rabbah does not address the question, but would | + | <point><b>When did Avraham go from Ur Kasdim to Charan?</b> Seder Olam Rabbah does not address the question, but would apparently suggest that Avraham's family had moved at some point prior to the Covenant.  This would explain why, after the Covenant, Avraham returns to Charan and not to his hometown of Ur Kasdim.  Moreover, Chapter 11 suggests that Avraham went from Ur Kasdim (not Canaan) to Charan, and that he went together with his father and family, and not alone.<fn>See <a href="RalbagBereshitBeurHaMilot15-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag </a> who questions Seder Olam Rabbah on this point, assuming that the  end of Chapter 11 must have happened only after the Covenant, but one need not make that assumption.</fn></point> |
− | <point><b>Why move to Charan?</b> This position | + | <point><b>Why move to Charan?</b><ul> |
+ | <li>This position might suggest that Hashem had told Avraham to leave to Israel for the Covenant while still in Ur Kasdim. He and his family headed there via Charan (the natural route one would take for such a journey). While his family settled in Charan, Avraham continued on to Israel.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Alternatively, the move was unconnected to any directives of Hashem.  Perhaps, Terach and Avraham were fleeing persecution, as Ramban suggests, or they were motivated by personal reasons, like Abarbanel posits.  Though they originally set out for Israel, they were sidetracked in Charan.  </li> | ||
+ | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>The Command of "לֶךְ לְךָ"</b><ul> | <point><b>The Command of "לֶךְ לְךָ"</b><ul> | ||
− | <li><b>At 75</b> – This position | + | <li><b>At 75</b> – This position could maintain that the command is in its chronological place, and was given to Avraham at 75, after he had returned to Charan from Israel.<fn>If, though, the Ran is correct that Avraham only returned to pack, the command would seem superfluous, as Avraham was in the act of moving regardless.</fn></li> |
− | <li><b>At 70</b> – Alternatively, the command was given when Avraham was 70, and referred to his leaving for the Covenant. | + | <li><b>At 70</b> – Alternatively, the command was given when Avraham was 70, and referred to his leaving for the Covenant.  If it was given when Avraham was still in Ur Kasdim, one would have to say that this verse, too, is achronological.  If, though, one posits that Avraham's move to Charan was years earlier, and unrelated to the command, one need not posit any achronology.  Either way, though, it is strange why the text should later highlight Avraham's final departure at 75, if this was simply a continuation of the original one.</li> |
+ | </ul></point> | ||
+ | <point><b>"מֵאַרְצְךָ וּמִמּוֹלַדְתְּךָ וּמִבֵּית אָבִיךָ"</b><ul> | ||
+ | <li>If one assumes that the command was given in Charan, this position might explain that "מולדת" means family rather than birthplace (as Avraham was not in his birthplace but rather in Charan when given the command). </li> | ||
+ | <li>If, though, the command was given in Ur Kasdim, the verse is not problematic.</li> | ||
+ | </ul></point> | ||
+ | <point><b>"אֲנִי ה' אֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵאתִיךָ מֵאוּר כַּשְׂדִּים"</b><ul> | ||
+ | <li>This might support the option that Hashem told Avraham to leave for the Covenant while he was still in Ur Kasdim.</li> | ||
+ | <li>If though, one assumes that Hashem said these words only in Charan, this approach would have to explain, like Shadal, that Hashem was referring to His overall plan which took Avraham from Ur Kasdim, via Charan, to Israel.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<point><b>Variations of this approach</b> – There are several variations of this approach, most of which are textually difficult to sustain:<br/> | <point><b>Variations of this approach</b> – There are several variations of this approach, most of which are textually difficult to sustain:<br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> |
Version as of 23:55, 18 June 2015
Avraham's Aliyah
Exegetical Approaches
Left Ur Kasdim at 70
Hashem commanded Avraham to leave Ur Kasdim when he was 70. He emigrated, stayed in Charan for five years, and then made the final move to Canaan.
Why did Avraham's family leave Ur Kasdim? According to these sources, the family left due to Hashem's command ("לֶךְ לְךָ") to Avraham.2 Avraham, rather than Terach, prompted the family's uprooting.
"וַיִּקַּח תֶּרַח אֶת אַבְרָם..." – R. Saadia and Radak suggest that despite it being Avraham's decision to leave, the verse nonetheless attributes the move to Terach since he was the patriarch of the family.3
"לָלֶכֶת אַרְצָה כְּנַעַן" – These commentators disagree in how they explain why Avraham went towards Canaan if Hashem had not told him where he was headed.
- On Hashem's command – According to Ibn Ezra, even though it is not explicit in the text, Hashem did in fact tell Avraham upfront that he should travel to Canaan.4 The family left with the intent of arriving there, and Avraham only procrastinated in Charan since the land was pleasing to his father.
- Natural next stop – Radak disagrees, suggesting that though Avraham was unaware of the final destination, he headed towards Canaan since that was the first country outside the borders of Aram.5
" וַיֹּאמֶר ה' אֶל אַבְרָם לֶךְ לְךָ" – Though all these sources agree that Hashem's command to Avraham was given while he was still in Ur Kasdim, and not, as the verses might suggest, in Charan, they differ in how they read the verse:
- According to Ibn Ezra the statement is simply but one example of many verses which are not found in their chronological place.
- R. Saadia agrees that the story is not told chronologically but asserts that Tanakh simply reversed the cause and effect. He suggests that the verse is connected to the previous passage and should read as if written, "And Terach took... [because] Hashem said to Avraham, go".
- Radak, in contrast, maintains that the word "וַיֹּאמֶר" should be understood as "He had already said".
Why is the story achronological? R. Saadia asserts that since leaving Ur Kasdim is connected to the death of Terach in Charan, the Torah wanted to first discuss the matters relating to Terach before moving into the material relevant only to Avraham.
"מֵאַרְצְךָ וּמִמּוֹלַדְתְּךָ" – These sources understand the word "מולדת" to mean birthplace, and see in this verse proof that Hashem must have spoken to Avraham in Ur Kasdim,6 for if Avraham had been in Charan, he would not be leaving his place of birth.
"וּמִבֵּית אָבִיךָ" – The phrase "מִבֵּית אָבִיךָ" is somewhat difficult in light of the fact that Avraham did not leave his immediate family behind him. Ibn Ezra explains that Hashem knew that Terach was to stay in Charan. Alternatively, one might suggest that the term refers literally to the house Avraham grew up in, or perhaps to the rest of the family that did not join.
Avraham's servant – "אֶל אַרְצִי וְאֶל מוֹלַדְתִּי תֵּלֵךְ" – This understanding must explain how when Avraham tells his servant to go "אֶל אַרְצִי וְאֶל מוֹלַדְתִּי", the servant heads to the city of Nachor, or Charan, rather than Ur Kasdim. Ibn Ezra suggests that only the word "מוֹלַדְתִּי" referred to Ur Kasdim, while the the word "אַרְצִי" referred to Charan,7 where Avraham had lived for some years.8
Ur Kasdim or ?עֵבֶר הַנָּהָר – Ramban questions this approach from Yehoshua 24 which presents Avraham as coming from "עֵבֶר הַנָּהָר" which he assumes refers to the area of Aram Naharayim (Charan)9 rather than Ur Kasdim, which he places in Babylonia (home of the Chaldeans).
- It is not clear, though, where exactly Ur Kasdim is. Radak, in fact, appears to believe that both Charan and Ur Kasdim are cities in the same general region of Aram.10 If so, there is no contradiction in saying that Avraham came from both Ur Kasdim and .עֵבֶר הַנָּהָר
- Moreover, it is not clear that עֵבֶר הַנָּהָר is limited to the area of Aram. If the river spoken of is the Euphrates, it could perhaps refer to any region along the river, to the east or west, in the northern or southern sections.
"אֲנִי ה' אֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵאתִיךָ מֵאוּר כַּשְׂדִּים" – Ibn Ezra points to this verse in the Covenant of the Pieces as evidence that Hashem commanded Avraham to leave while still in Ur Kasdim.11
430 vs. 400 – This position is motivated to set Avraham's departure from Ur Kasdim at 70 specifically in order to solve the discrepancy in the account of the length of the Egyptian exile in Bereshit 15:13 (400 years) and Shemot 12:40-41 (430 years). These sources maintain that the 430 year period is dated from Avraham's personal exile, while the 400 years is dated from the birth of YItzchak. If so, Avraham was 70 when he left. For elaboratioon, see Duration of the Egyptian Exile.
Why date the move from the departure from Charan? According to this approach, it is not clear why the Torah deems it important to tell the reader that Avraham left Charan at 75, if Charan had just been a transition point and the main departure took place at 70.
Left Charan at 75
Hashem first commanded Avraham to go to Israel after he was already living in Charan. He headed towards the promised land at the age of 75.
Why did Avraham's family leave Ur Kasdim for Canaan? This position offers various possibilities:
- According to Ramban, due to Avraham's monotheistic beliefs, he was in danger of persecution in Ur Kasdim.12 Thus, Terach decided to take the family to Canaan, a long distance from the Chaldeans.13
- Abarbanel asserts that Terach thought that the atmosphere of Ur Kasdim was detrimental to his family, leading him to bear only three children, his son to die early, and Avraham and Sarah to be barren. He hoped that a change of place and the good air of the mountainous Canaan would be beneficial to his household.14
- Chizkuni maintains that the family, being of Semitic origins, headed to Canaan since that land was given to them as an inheritance.15
"וַיִּקַּח תֶּרַח אֶת אַבְרָם..." – The verse attributes the move to Terach since he initiated it.
" וַיֹּאמֶר ה' אֶל אַבְרָם לֶךְ לְךָ" – According to this position, this sentence is found in its chronological place and Hashem only commanded Avraham to emigrate once he had already moved to Charan.
- According to Jubilees, though Avraham had already rejected idols when in Ur Kasdim, it was only after his arrival in Charan that he recognized Hashem. It was after this recognition that Hashem told him to move to Canaan.
- Abarbanel suggests that Hashem waited until Avraham was already in Charan thinking that the move would be easier for him from there, since he had already been uprooted from his homeland and much of his family.
"מֵאַרְצְךָ וּמִמּוֹלַדְתְּךָ" – This position must explain how leaving Charan constituted leaving Avraham's "מולדת".16 These sources differ in their understanding of the word, and, thus, also in how they resolve the problem:
- Birthplace – According to both R"Y Bekhor Shor and Ramban "מולדת" is a place of birth. R. Yosef Bekhor Shor asserts that, even though Avraham had already physically left his home, Hashem told him to also mentally sever ties and to have no intentions of returning there. Ramban, in contrast, assumes that Charan, rather than Ur Kasdim, was Avraham's birthplace.17 At some point, Terach had uprooted his family to live in Ur Kasdim, but that was not where Avraham was born.
- Family – Shadal,18 in contrast, claims that the word means family, obviating the issue of Charan not being Avraham's place of birth. As evidence of this usage, Shadal points to Bereshit 43:7, Esther 2:10, and Esther 8:6.
"מִבֵּית אָבִיךָ" – As Avraham was leaving his family behind in Charan, this term is easily understood.
Avraham's servant – "אֶל אַרְצִי וְאֶל מוֹלַדְתִּי תֵּלֵךְ"
- Ramban points to this story as proof that Avraham's birthplace was Charan since the servant, after being told to go "אֶל אַרְצִי וְאֶל מוֹלַדְתִּי", went to Charan.
- The story could also support Shadal's suggestion that the word means family, especially since in the servant's retelling he says that Avraham told him "אֶל בֵּית אָבִי תֵּלֵךְ וְאֶל מִשְׁפַּחְתִּי".
Ur Kasdim and עֵבֶר הַנָּהָר? Ramban points to the verses in Yehoshua 24 that claim that Avraham was from "עֵבֶר הַנָּהָר" as proof that he must have been born in Charan (which is in Aram Naharayim) and not Ur Kasdim (Babylonia). Both Abarbanel and Shadal, though, assume that Ur Kasdim itself was not in Babylonia but in the region of Aram Naharayim as well.19
"אֲנִי ה' אֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵאתִיךָ מֵאוּר כַּשְׂדִּים" – This verse is difficult for this position as it suggests that Hashem spoke to Avraham when still in Ur Kasdim. Shadal explains that it simply means that behind the scenes, Hashem pulled the strings leading to Avraham's departure.20 Ramban, in contrast, explains that "הוֹצֵאתִיךָ" refers to saving and freeing Avraham from prison or the furnace of Ur Kasdim, not to taking him out of the country.
Time spent in Charan – According to this approach, it is unclear how long Avraham spent in Charan. R"Y Behor Shor assumes that he was there for five years,21 while Jubilees maintains that he spent a full 14 years there.
Moved Multiple Times
At the age of 70, Avraham moved to Israel for the Covenant of the Pieces. He then returned to Charan temporarily, but moved back to Canaan at the age of 75.
Motivation for this position – The motivation for this approach is the contradiction regarding the duration of the exile in Bereshit 15 (400 years) and Shemot 12 (430 years). Seder Olam Rabbah resolves the problem by maintaining that the 400 years started from the birth of Yitzchak, while the 430 count began thirty years earlier, at the Covenant of the Pieces, when Avraham was 70.23 From Hashem's words, "אֲנִי ה' אֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵאתִיךָ... לָתֶת לְךָ אֶת הָאָרֶץ הַזֹּאת " Seder Olam concludes that the Covenant took place in Israel, leading to the idea that Avraham must have made aliyah and tehn left, only to return again.
Why leave Israel? Ralbag questions how it is possible that Avraham, once in Israel, could have left the promised land without good reason. Ran responds that Avraham had originally left immediately upon Hashem's command, without time to organize his possessions. He only returned later to Charan to pack up his belongings and arrange the permanent move.24
Double language of leaving – Ran suggests that this approach helps explain the doubling in the text regarding Avraham's departure. Bereshit 12:4 says, "ויֵּלֶךְ אַבְרָם כַּאֲשֶׁר דִּבֶּר אֵלָיו י"י וַיֵּלֶךְ אִתּוֹ לוֹט ", and then verse 5 repeats, "וַיִּקַּח אַבְרָם אֶת שָׂרַי אִשְׁתּוֹ וְאֶת לוֹט... וַיֵּצְאוּ לָלֶכֶת". Ran posits that the first "וַיֵּלֶךְ" refers to Avraham's leaving at the age of 70, while the second speaks of his second aliyah, at the age of 75, when he took not just Lot, but his whole family and possessions.
Why achronological? This position would need to explain why the Torah does not set the Covenant in its chronological place. Rashbam suggests that the Torah wanted to juxtapose the promise of land with the promise of progeny mentioned in the first part of Chapter 15.
When did Avraham go from Ur Kasdim to Charan? Seder Olam Rabbah does not address the question, but would apparently suggest that Avraham's family had moved at some point prior to the Covenant. This would explain why, after the Covenant, Avraham returns to Charan and not to his hometown of Ur Kasdim. Moreover, Chapter 11 suggests that Avraham went from Ur Kasdim (not Canaan) to Charan, and that he went together with his father and family, and not alone.25
Why move to Charan?
- This position might suggest that Hashem had told Avraham to leave to Israel for the Covenant while still in Ur Kasdim. He and his family headed there via Charan (the natural route one would take for such a journey). While his family settled in Charan, Avraham continued on to Israel.
- Alternatively, the move was unconnected to any directives of Hashem. Perhaps, Terach and Avraham were fleeing persecution, as Ramban suggests, or they were motivated by personal reasons, like Abarbanel posits. Though they originally set out for Israel, they were sidetracked in Charan.
The Command of "לֶךְ לְךָ"
- At 75 – This position could maintain that the command is in its chronological place, and was given to Avraham at 75, after he had returned to Charan from Israel.26
- At 70 – Alternatively, the command was given when Avraham was 70, and referred to his leaving for the Covenant. If it was given when Avraham was still in Ur Kasdim, one would have to say that this verse, too, is achronological. If, though, one posits that Avraham's move to Charan was years earlier, and unrelated to the command, one need not posit any achronology. Either way, though, it is strange why the text should later highlight Avraham's final departure at 75, if this was simply a continuation of the original one.
"מֵאַרְצְךָ וּמִמּוֹלַדְתְּךָ וּמִבֵּית אָבִיךָ"
- If one assumes that the command was given in Charan, this position might explain that "מולדת" means family rather than birthplace (as Avraham was not in his birthplace but rather in Charan when given the command).
- If, though, the command was given in Ur Kasdim, the verse is not problematic.
"אֲנִי ה' אֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵאתִיךָ מֵאוּר כַּשְׂדִּים"
- This might support the option that Hashem told Avraham to leave for the Covenant while he was still in Ur Kasdim.
- If though, one assumes that Hashem said these words only in Charan, this approach would have to explain, like Shadal, that Hashem was referring to His overall plan which took Avraham from Ur Kasdim, via Charan, to Israel.
Variations of this approach – There are several variations of this approach, most of which are textually difficult to sustain:
- Bavli Avodah Zarah posits that Avraham was 52 when he left for Israel, taking with him "אֶת הַנֶּפֶשׁ אֲשֶׁר עָשׂוּ בְחָרָן". Tosafot there suggests that he stayed in Canaan through the Covenant at 70, and then returned to Charan for five years before once again moving to Israel.27
- Tanchuma dates the Covenant of the Pieces to Avraham's 48th year.28 It does not explicitly state that it took place in Israel, but assuming that it did, this position, too, would assert that Avraham made multiple trips. The advantage of this approach is that if Avraham returned to Ur Kasdim soon after the prophecy, it would mean that he was out of Israel for over 25 before Hashem's command of "לֶךְ לְךָ". If so, it is clear why the second departure would require its own command and be highlighted in the verses.
- R. Yechiel of Paris suggests that Avraham actually moved back and forth three times, at 70 for the Covenant, 74 for the war of the five kings,29 and 75 for good. This, though, requires one to rearrange the chronology of the entire unit, making the position somewhat difficult.30