Difference between revisions of "Battle of the Kings – Purpose of the Story/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 4: Line 4:
 
<h1>Battle of the Kings – Purpose of the Story</h1>
 
<h1>Battle of the Kings – Purpose of the Story</h1>
  
 +
<div class="overview">
 +
<h2>Overview</h2>
 +
<p>In trying to understand the purpose of including the episode of the battle of kings in Tanakh, some commentators analyze its contribution to the surrounding Avram narratives while others look to its relevance to the larger history of Israel. &#160;Thus, Radak and others suggest that the story serves to fill in the portrait of Avram, pointing to his various qualities that emerge from the story, from military prowess to selflessness. U. Cassuto, similarly connects the story to the other Avram narratives, seeing in Avram's conquest the beginning of the realization of the Divine promises to Avram.&#160; In contrast, Ramban suggests that the story's significance relates to its foreshadowing future attacks on the nation and Israel's ultimate victory later in history.&#160; Finally, R. Hirsch asserts that it comes to underscore the vulnerability of the land of Israel from the time of Avram until modern times.</p></div>
 
<approaches>
 
<approaches>
 
<category name="">Avraham's Exceptional Qualities
 
<category name="">Avraham's Exceptional Qualities

Version as of 02:06, 31 October 2014

Battle of the Kings – Purpose of the Story

Exegetical Approaches

Overview

In trying to understand the purpose of including the episode of the battle of kings in Tanakh, some commentators analyze its contribution to the surrounding Avram narratives while others look to its relevance to the larger history of Israel.  Thus, Radak and others suggest that the story serves to fill in the portrait of Avram, pointing to his various qualities that emerge from the story, from military prowess to selflessness. U. Cassuto, similarly connects the story to the other Avram narratives, seeing in Avram's conquest the beginning of the realization of the Divine promises to Avram.  In contrast, Ramban suggests that the story's significance relates to its foreshadowing future attacks on the nation and Israel's ultimate victory later in history.  Finally, R. Hirsch asserts that it comes to underscore the vulnerability of the land of Israel from the time of Avram until modern times.

Avraham's Exceptional Qualities

The story highlights how Avraham was unique not only in his monotheistic beliefs but also in his other attributes. The Torah's inclusion of the episode helps the reader better appreciate Avraham's greatness and presents his behavior as a model to emulate.

What qualities? These commentators differ regarding which specific characteristics of Avraham the chapter highlights:
  • Military Might – According to R. Bachya and Abarbanel, Avraham's victory over the kings revealed both his bravery and his capabilities as a military strategist and warrior.1
  • Loyalty – Alternatively, Radak, Ralbag, Abarbanel, and R. D"Z Hoffmann assert that the story teaches the importance of enduring loyalty to one's family.  Avraham was willing to risk his own life in order to rescue his nephew, even though Lot had taken up company with evil people.
  • Selflessness – Ralbag, Abarbanel, and R. D"Z Hoffmann point to Avraham's refusal to benefit from the spoils of battle as evidence of both his generosity and recognition that all belongs to Hashem. Avraham's conduct stands out, particularly in light of the norms of the Ancient Near East in which the victor took the spoils of battle.2
Biblical parallels – Throughout their commentaries, both Radak and Ralbag consistently point to the lessons the reader is meant to learn from the conduct of Biblical heroes.  Thus, for instance, both note Avraham's desire to preserve peace in the home ("שלום בית") in Bereshit 17 and his hospitality in Bereshit 18.
Extraneous details – This position does not account for why the Torah needed to go in to elaborate detail regarding the Refaim, Zuzim, and other nations conquered by the four kings.

Sign for the Future

Avraham's triumph over the four kings foreshadows Israel's future prevailing over the four major kingdoms: Babylonia, Persia, Greece, and Rome. The import of the episode, thus, lies in its impact on the future of the Israelite nation rather than its contribution to the portrait of Avraham.

מעשה אבות סימן לבנים – Abarbanel points out that this view is consistent with the concept that "כל מה שאירע לאבות סימן לבנים"; the Patriarchs' actions determine the future fate of their descendants.
Biblical parallels – Ramban understands many of the other stories of the Patriarchs as similarly creating blueprints for future history.4 Thus, for example, he asserts that Avraham's descent to Egypt paved the way for the future enslavement of the nation in Egypt and that Yaakov's skirmish with the "איש" represented the future struggles of Israel and their ultimate salvation from their enemies.5
Extraneous details – This approach might explain that the Torah details the various nations who had been previously conquered by the kings in order to symbolize the vast strength and empires of the four future kingdoms.

Fulfillment of Hashem's Promise

Avraham's victory over the kings constituted a preliminary conquest of Canaan and its neighboring lands and was the beginning of the actualization of Hashem's promises to Avraham. The story is not out of place at all, but rather is integrally connected to the Divine covenants and assurances of the surrounding chapters.

"To your seed I will give this land" – The two variations within this approach focus on two different groups of Avraham's descendants and the disparate lands which they inherited:
  • The Children of Israel – R. Hirsch and Cassuto claim that since the four kings had conquered the entire region, when Avraham vanquished them and chased them all the way to Damascus,6 he effectively gained control over the entire land of Canaan.  This action thus staked out the Israelites' future claims to the land.
  • Ammon, Moav, and Seir – The Ma'asei Hashem and Cassuto note that Avraham gained rights also to the lands east of the Jordan which were to go to his other descendants and relatives, the progeny of Lot and Esav.  In conquering the four kings, Avraham inherited all that they had previously conquered, including the lands of the Refaim, Zuzim, Eimim, and Hori.  Thus, the story provides the background for how Avraham's family (other than Yaakov's descendants) became sovereign over the entire region.
Biblical parallels – In Devarim 2, when warning the nation that they are not to inherit the lands of Seir, Ammon, or Moav, Moshe mentions all the nations (Refaim, Zuzim etc.) who had previously settled in these lands,7 but were then kicked out.  Devarim thus alludes to Bereshit 14 so as to explain that Avraham's descendants came to possess these lands through Avraham's conquest.
Extraneous details – Particularly according to the variation of the Ma'asei Hashem and Cassuto, the details of the kings' prior campaigns are important for establishing proof of ownership of the region.

Vulnerability of Israel

The episode serves to highlight the precarious placement of Israel amongst the nations.

Center of the world – Israel lies at the crossroads of Asia, Africa and Europe, and the two main cultures of the Ancient Near East, Egypt and Mesopotamia.  As such, it is fated to eternally be caught in the middle of the major battles of its neighbors.
Dependence on Hashem – According to R. Hirsch, Israel was chosen precisely because of this very vulnerability, in order to teach that its security is dependent solely on Hashem. This message of recognition of and reliance on Hashem is one of the key lessons that Avraham introduced to the world.
Biblical parallels – The concept that Israel's natural insecurity is what makes it unique is explicit in Devarim 11 and other Biblical passages as well.  The Torah contrasts Egypt's self sufficiency due to the Nile with Israel's dependence on rain, and thus, Hashem.8