Difference between revisions of "Chronology of Bemidbar 1 – 10/2"
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<point><b>Dedication of the altar</b> – As the princes brought their sacrifices only after the vessels were anointed, the dedication of the altar could first take place only in the second month. As such, with the exception of the first verse, all the events of Chapter 7 really occurred in the second month, after the censuses of Chapters 1-4.</point> | <point><b>Dedication of the altar</b> – As the princes brought their sacrifices only after the vessels were anointed, the dedication of the altar could first take place only in the second month. As such, with the exception of the first verse, all the events of Chapter 7 really occurred in the second month, after the censuses of Chapters 1-4.</point> | ||
<point><b>Relationship between מילואים and חנוכת המזבח</b> – According to Abarbanel, the two events did not overlap at all, as one took place in the first month and the other in the second month.  The princes' sacrifices are known as "the dedication of the altar", not because the altar had not been used earlier, but rather because the princes were the first to bring sacrifices upon it as individual Israelites.</point> | <point><b>Relationship between מילואים and חנוכת המזבח</b> – According to Abarbanel, the two events did not overlap at all, as one took place in the first month and the other in the second month.  The princes' sacrifices are known as "the dedication of the altar", not because the altar had not been used earlier, but rather because the princes were the first to bring sacrifices upon it as individual Israelites.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>"הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים"</b> – Abarbanel points to the description of the princes as "those who officiated in the counting" to support his position.  In his opinion, the verse can describe the princes in this manner only because | + | <point><b>"הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים"</b> – Abarbanel points to the description of the princes as "those who officiated in the counting" to support his position.  In his opinion, the verse can describe the princes in this manner only because the dedication of the altar took place after the census.</point> |
<point><b>Gifts to Levites</b> – The fact that the princes give the Levites wagons to aid them in their duties further suggests that the events of Chapter 7 occurred only after the Levites were appointed and assigned specific roles.</point> | <point><b>Gifts to Levites</b> – The fact that the princes give the Levites wagons to aid them in their duties further suggests that the events of Chapter 7 occurred only after the Levites were appointed and assigned specific roles.</point> | ||
<point><b>"וַיַּקְרִיבוּ הַנְּשִׂאִים... בְּיוֹם הִמָּשַׁח אֹתוֹ"</b> – This verse is difficult for Abarbanel as it suggests that the anointment took only one day and that the princes brought their sacrifices on that very day.  Abarbanel thus asserts that the word "day" can refer also to an extended period of time.<fn>As support he points to the usage of the word in <a href="Yechezkel20-5" data-aht="source">Yechezkel 20:5</a> and  <a href="Yechezkel38-18" data-aht="source">Yechezkel 38:18</a> where it seems to mean a time period rather than a literal day.</fn></point> | <point><b>"וַיַּקְרִיבוּ הַנְּשִׂאִים... בְּיוֹם הִמָּשַׁח אֹתוֹ"</b> – This verse is difficult for Abarbanel as it suggests that the anointment took only one day and that the princes brought their sacrifices on that very day.  Abarbanel thus asserts that the word "day" can refer also to an extended period of time.<fn>As support he points to the usage of the word in <a href="Yechezkel20-5" data-aht="source">Yechezkel 20:5</a> and  <a href="Yechezkel38-18" data-aht="source">Yechezkel 38:18</a> where it seems to mean a time period rather than a literal day.</fn></point> | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<mekorot>An approach based on <multilink><a href="UCassutoShemot38-25" data-aht="source">U. Cassuto</a><a href="UCassutoShemot38-25" data-aht="source">Shemot 38:25</a><a href="Prof. Umberto Cassuto" data-aht="parshan">About Prof. Umberto Cassuto</a></multilink><fn>The approach presented here is a possible extension of Cassuto's understanding (in his commentary on Sefer Shemot) of the chronology of the census.  Cassuto did not write a commentary to Bemidbar and thus did not explicitly relate to the chronology issue in Sefer Bemidbar.</fn></mekorot> | <mekorot>An approach based on <multilink><a href="UCassutoShemot38-25" data-aht="source">U. Cassuto</a><a href="UCassutoShemot38-25" data-aht="source">Shemot 38:25</a><a href="Prof. Umberto Cassuto" data-aht="parshan">About Prof. Umberto Cassuto</a></multilink><fn>The approach presented here is a possible extension of Cassuto's understanding (in his commentary on Sefer Shemot) of the chronology of the census.  Cassuto did not write a commentary to Bemidbar and thus did not explicitly relate to the chronology issue in Sefer Bemidbar.</fn></mekorot> | ||
<point><b>Bemidbar 1 –The Census</b> – Cassuto proposes that the censuses of <a href="Shemot30-11-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 30 </a>and Bemidbar 1 were both part of a single extended process.<fn>He uses this to explain how the final tallies (See <a href="Shemot38-25-28" data-aht="source">Shemot 38:26</a> and <a href="Bemidbar1-46" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 1:46</a>) were identical.  See <a href="Censuses in the Wilderness" data-aht="page">Censuses in the Wilderness</a> for elaboration.</fn>  At the time of the construction of the Tabernacle, the people gave their half-shekels, names and other information, but it was only in the second month of the following year that the data was analyzed and all of the necessary calculations were made.<fn>Cassuto points to documentation of other censuses in the Ancient Near East and to David's census described in <a href="ShemuelII24-8" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 24:8</a> as evidence that such counts were a long drawn out process that could take many months.</fn>  As this part of the census provides important background for Sefer Bemidbar it is recorded here.</point> | <point><b>Bemidbar 1 –The Census</b> – Cassuto proposes that the censuses of <a href="Shemot30-11-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 30 </a>and Bemidbar 1 were both part of a single extended process.<fn>He uses this to explain how the final tallies (See <a href="Shemot38-25-28" data-aht="source">Shemot 38:26</a> and <a href="Bemidbar1-46" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 1:46</a>) were identical.  See <a href="Censuses in the Wilderness" data-aht="page">Censuses in the Wilderness</a> for elaboration.</fn>  At the time of the construction of the Tabernacle, the people gave their half-shekels, names and other information, but it was only in the second month of the following year that the data was analyzed and all of the necessary calculations were made.<fn>Cassuto points to documentation of other censuses in the Ancient Near East and to David's census described in <a href="ShemuelII24-8" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 24:8</a> as evidence that such counts were a long drawn out process that could take many months.</fn>  As this part of the census provides important background for Sefer Bemidbar it is recorded here.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Bemidbar 3 – Appointment of the Levites</b> – According to this position, the appointment of the Levites and their census also | + | <point><b>Bemidbar 3 – Appointment of the Levites</b> – According to this position, the appointment of the Levites and their census also began during the first year. </point> |
− | <point><b>Descendants of Aharon</b> – According to this | + | <point><b>Descendants of Aharon</b> – According to this position it is logical why <a href="Bemidbar3-1-16" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 3:1 </a>first recounts the lineage of Aharon "on the day that Hashem spoke to Moshe BaHar Sinai", mentioning all four sons, and then qualifies that Nadav and Avihu died. When the census began they had been alive, but after their deaths the text needed to update the list to match the reality of the second year.</point> |
− | <point><b>Bemidbar 7 – Dedication of the Altar</b> – According to this approach, the dedication of the Altar took place in the first month of the second year, after the Tabernacle was erected, as per the simple reading of Bemidbar 7:1.  It is not clear how it related to the | + | <point><b>Bemidbar 7 – Dedication of the Altar</b> – According to this approach, the dedication of the Altar took place in the first month of the second year, after the Tabernacle was erected, as per the simple reading of Bemidbar 7:1.  It is not clear how it related to the seven days of the consecration of the Mishkan and whether the two ceremonies overlapped or one followed the other.</point> |
<point><b>"הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים"</b> – According to this approach, the princes might have already played a role in the first part of the census which occurred prior to the dedication, and as such, can be described here as "הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים".  Bemidbar 1:4-5, however, implies that the leaders were first chosen during the second stage of the census.  This position might reply that this appointment is just a reaffirmation of the status already conferred in the first year.  Cf. the <multilink><a href="NetzivBemidbar7-1" data-aht="source">Netziv</a><a href="NetzivBemidbar1-4" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 1:4</a><a href="NetzivBemidbar7-1" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 7:1</a><a href="R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin (Netziv)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin</a></multilink> who suggests that during the Tabernacle's construction the princes had originally held positions by choice of the people,<fn>He points to Shemot 35:27 which already speaks of the princes and the gifts they brought to the Mishkan.</fn> and in Bemidbar 1 this choice gets Divine sanction.</point> | <point><b>"הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים"</b> – According to this approach, the princes might have already played a role in the first part of the census which occurred prior to the dedication, and as such, can be described here as "הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים".  Bemidbar 1:4-5, however, implies that the leaders were first chosen during the second stage of the census.  This position might reply that this appointment is just a reaffirmation of the status already conferred in the first year.  Cf. the <multilink><a href="NetzivBemidbar7-1" data-aht="source">Netziv</a><a href="NetzivBemidbar1-4" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 1:4</a><a href="NetzivBemidbar7-1" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 7:1</a><a href="R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin (Netziv)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin</a></multilink> who suggests that during the Tabernacle's construction the princes had originally held positions by choice of the people,<fn>He points to Shemot 35:27 which already speaks of the princes and the gifts they brought to the Mishkan.</fn> and in Bemidbar 1 this choice gets Divine sanction.</point> | ||
<point><b>Gifts to Levites</b> – If the Levites had already been appointed in the first year, it is understandable how the princes gave them gifts related to their tasks.</point> | <point><b>Gifts to Levites</b> – If the Levites had already been appointed in the first year, it is understandable how the princes gave them gifts related to their tasks.</point> |
Version as of 11:07, 2 June 2016
Chronology of Bemidbar 1 – 10
Exegetical Approaches
In Chronological Order
Despite first impressions, Bemidbar 1-10 maintains a basic chronological order. This approach subdivides regarding which chapters are not as they seem:
Chapters 7-9 Occurred Later
Though Bemidbar 7 and 9 make passing references to the first month, their main focus is on events which took place in the second month. Thus, the entire unit of Bemidbar 1-10 recounts events of the second month, and there is no achronology.
Chapters 1-4 Conclude an Earlier Process
Though the census in Bemidbar 1 mentions the second month, the initial chapters of Bemidbar are actually the summary of an extended process which began already in the first year and stretched until the second month of the second year.
Not in Chronological Order
The events of Bemidbar 1-10 are not recorded in the order in which they occurred. This approach subdivides regarding which events were moved and why.
Later Events Told Earlier
The early chapters of Sefer Bemidbar speak of events that occurred only later, because they are not part of the book's core. They serve, instead, as either an introduction to Sefer Bemidbar or as appendix to the Books of Shemot and Vayikra.
- Appendix – According to R"Y Bekhor Shor and Ramban, Bemidbar 9 really opens the book, while the first eight chapters only come to finish topics (להשלים את הענין) discussed in the Books of Shemot and Vayikra.7 As such, there is no attempt to arrange these chapters chronologically and some of the events discussed there happened after events spoken of only later in Bemidbar.
- Introduction – Alternatively, the core of Bemidbar really begins with Chapter 7, "the day that Moshe finished erecting the Tabernacle" and proceeds chronologically from there. The census and set up of the camp in the second month are recorded earlier (in Chapters 1-4) only because they comprise a necessary introduction to the book.8 According to this, Chapters 5-6 might be viewed as a legal appendix to this unit,9 as in other places where a narrative section ends with a legal passage.
- According to Ramban, within the appendix, thematic order takes precedence over chronology. The book opens with the censuses and set up of the camp around the Mishkan (perhaps because the book focuses on the nation's travels), and then discusses laws which relate to this.10 Only after all the legal material is covered does the Torah return to narrative to speak of the prince's offerings and the Levites' purification.
- According to the alternative opinion, it is only one set of chapters that is out of order, those dealing with the censuses and camp, and within these there is no achronology.
- Levites chosen earlier – The Levites were actually chosen beforehand, but they were only officially counted in the second month, as this was right before the nation's travels, when they were to begin their jobs as porters. See Selection of the Priests and Levites for a full discussion of when they might have first been chosen.
- Gifts given later – Alternatively, Bemidbar 7:5-7 is out of place. Though the princes' gifts and sacrifices were brought to the Mishkan in the first month, the wagons and cattle were only given to the Levites after their appointment in the second month.11 The verses are only recorded here to finish the story of the princes' offerings.
- First month – According to the position that the core of Sefer Bemidbar begins in Chapter 7 and proceeds chronologically, the purification of the Levites took place in the first month. This assumes that not only were the Levites chosen before the census12 but that they were purified as well. Presumably this was done so that they would be prepared for their tasks as soon as they needed to travel.
- Second month – Ramban is ambiguous, but seems to imply in contrast, that the purification took place in the second month, soon after the Levites' official census and appointments.13
Earlier Events Told Later
Certain events are told out of order, after they really occurred, in order to present the nation in the best possible light.
- Avoid denigration – Rashi only addresses the achronological placement of Chapter 9. He suggests that Hashem did not want to open the book with the story of the nation's observance of the Pesach in the first month since it was shameful that this was the only Pesach they observed throughout their 40 years in the wilderness. This, however, is difficult since the book could have begun with Chapter 7 (the description of the princes' sacrifices in the first month) which would have both maintained chronological order and also opened the book with a positive action. Moreover, it is hard to say that speaking of the Pesach is denigrating, as in the first year the nation had not done anything wrong.
- Give praise – Seforno suggests that though the description of the nation's travels in Chapter 10 really flows straight from Chapters 1-6,15 Chapters 7-9 are inserted in the middle as an introduction to Chapter 10 to explain why the nation merited to enter the land immediately without war.16 The events described in these chapters (the dedication of the altar, purification of the Levites, Pesach sacrifice, and willingness to follow Hashem in the Wilderness) were all praiseworthy deeds which merited them entry into the land..
- First month – Seforno claims that this occurred in the first month.17 This preserves the internal chronology within the larger unit of Chapters 7-9, but must posit that the Levites were both chosen and purified before they were officially counted to replace the firstborns. 18
- Second month –Seforno could have alternatively suggested that the purification occurred in the second month after the census and the Levites' official appointment. This would assume that the internal order of the interloping unit of Chapters 7-9 is not based on chronology but the relative importance of each of the events discussed.19 It has the advantage of being able to date the purification to after (or alongside) the Levites' appointment in the second month.